TheiSchooler:


A regular child (whether in the city or village) that has a TV in front of him/her and is given a choice between cartoon and African magic will naturally prefer the former. It is inborn. It is natural.

Just pass and move on. It's convenient to use reverse psychology and say I'm proud when it is pride that is not allowing you to admit you had no argument in the first place. I'm proud cos I refuse to submit to an inferior argument from you? Then that must be a good pride. Let folks like you refute the points, even if you're a million uninformed people saying the same thing, I still won't accept just cos people like you join the bandwagon.

Give me a superior argument and I'll take it. Do you think I write my opinions and without research? Or do you think I'm a greenhorn?

I have researched this too hence I gave you exception. I even use myself as an example that I didn't watch cartoon when growing up it is even now that I began to fall in love with it. Why not provide empirical evidence instead of using observation? Having empirical fact resolves issues like this even though it might be criticized

TheiSchooler:


You made a weird, baseless assertion, and I should go ahead and verify it for you? Is the onus not on you that made the claim to provide supporting stats? You just say something on a whim and I should accept it as a fact? Please, keep moving...

The person that you said made the assertion obviously doesn't know what he's talking about. I'm very sure of it. I wish there could be a 'block' button, so I could avoid your distractions. Your arguments are incoherent and derailing. So, next time I see your moniker, I simply IGNORE. You can bank on that -- except there's a very compelling reason to reverse that decision.

You can continue with lies here that is your headache

asuustrike1:

That many journalist use that word " Nigerians are religious " doesn't mean it is the right usuage. This word can be interpreted by many to mean all Nigerians are religious hence we should be careful on the use of words. I did say that it is safer to use "many" because it passes a message across to many readers that there are exceptions.

My friend, it is correct. . Your knowledge of the language is limited. You don't need to go on and start adding "many" in every assertion, as none is 100% applicable. Even scientific facts have exceptions. When scientists, for example, says "exercise is healthy for you," you think they should have changed it to "exercise is healthy for many people"? Once something is a general occurrence, it's ok to say write an assertion without "many." You only use "many" when the exceptions are a significant number.

asuustrike1:

I have researched this too hence I gave you exception. I even use myself as an example that I didn't watch cartoon when growing up it is even now that I began to fall in love with it. Why not provide empirical evidence instead of using observation? Having empirical fact resolves issues like this even though it might be criticized

Your self example is a blatant lie. What else would you have said? You needed to save face, so I understand. Bring a verifiable stats. Your words are a mere opinions and hold no water.

TheiSchooler:


Your self example is a blatant lie. What else would you have said? You needed to save face, so I understand. Bring a verifiable stats. Your words are a mere opinions and hold no water.

My words are not opinion but they are verifiable .Anyway end it here because I don't have your time today. This forum rarely accept links to avoid ban

TheiSchooler:


Your self example is a blatant lie. What else would you have said? You needed to save face, so I understand. Bring a verifiable stats. Your words are a mere opinions and hold no water.

Let's have a private chat