Here is a little of the History of Umar, the son of Al-Khattab, according to the Book of Universal History:

Common Era II 9: 4-9

4. After him was Umar, who led the great conquest against the Persians. Now Umar had captured many of the Persians in the battle of Nahavand. Among the captured ones was Piruz, a man who was a soldier.
5. Now Piruz had been made a slave by a man named Al-Mughira. In those days, Piruz began to become close to Umar, for his master sent him several messages to the court of Umar. Then a day came when the Shias who wanted Ali the son-in-law of Mohammed as the caliph approached Piruz and said, kill Umar for us and we shall offer you safety.
6. Now in those days, Umar had twenty-five Shias in his court without knowing. And he had trusted them to protect him.
7. A day came when Umar was praying in the mosque that Piruz stabbed him twice and began to run away. Then the people chased him, but Rahaman, one of the Shias in the mosque protected him and received three blows of daggers in his chest while Piruz escaped.
8. Now Umar had served as the caliph for ten years before he was killed by Piruz who was sent by the Shias.
9. After the death of Umar, Uthman became the caliph and yet again the Shias hated him...

OtemAtum:
Here is a little of the History of Umar, the son of Al-Khattab, according to the Book of Universal History:

Common Era II 9: 4-9

4. After him was Umar, who led the great conquest against the Persians. Now Umar had captured many of the Persians in the battle of Nahavand. Among the captured ones was Piruz, a man who was a soldier.
5. Now Piruz had been made a slave by a man named Al-Mughira. In those days, Piruz began to become close to Umar, for his master sent him several messages to the court of Umar. Then a day came when the Shias who wanted Ali the son-in-law of Mohammed as the caliph approached Piruz and said, kill Umar for us and we shall offer you safety.
6. Now in those days, Umar had twenty-five Shias in his court without knowing. And he had trusted them to protect him.
7. A day came when Umar was praying in the mosque that Piruz stabbed him twice and began to run away. Then the people chased him, but Rahaman, one of the Shias in the mosque protected him and received three blows of daggers in his chest while Piruz escaped.
8. Now Umar had served as the caliph for ten years before he was killed by Piruz who was sent by the Shias.
9. After the death of Umar, Uthman became the caliph and yet again the Shias hated him...

Kindly help us provide authentic evidences for points 4, 5 and 6. Those are astonighing claims.

Thanks

OtemAtum:
Here is a little of the History of Umar, the son of Al-Khattab, according to the Book of Universal History:

Common Era II 9: 4-9

4. After him was Umar, who led the great conquest against the Persians. Now Umar had captured many of the Persians in the battle of Nahavand. Among the captured ones was Piruz, a man who was a soldier.
5. Now Piruz had been made a slave by a man named Al-Mughira. In those days, Piruz began to become close to Umar, for his master sent him several messages to the court of Umar. Then a day came when the Shias who wanted Ali the son-in-law of Mohammed as the caliph approached Piruz and said, kill Umar for us and we shall offer you safety.
6. Now in those days, Umar had twenty-five Shias in his court without knowing. And he had trusted them to protect him.
7. A day came when Umar was praying in the mosque that Piruz stabbed him twice and began to run away. Then the people chased him, but Rahaman, one of the Shias in the mosque protected him and received three blows of daggers in his chest while Piruz escaped.
8. Now Umar had served as the caliph for ten years before he was killed by Piruz who was sent by the Shias.
9. After the death of Umar, Uthman became the caliph and yet again the Shias hated him...

Although I hate Shism this a complete fabrication

najib632:
Although I hate Shism this a complete fabrication

State your reason.

OtemAtum:
State your reason.

I don't have time to beat around the bush, educate yourself on Islamic history even if it's a little bit. Your ignorance is too apparent.

najib632:
I don't have time to beat around the bush, educate yourself on Islamic history even if it's a little bit. Your ignorance is too apparent.

Islamic History made available to your likes are corrupt and written for selfish reasons. The one I am dishing out to you is pure, coming from the Book of Universal History. It is neither a corrupted book nor a biased book. It is not compiled by either a Sunni or a Shiite.