pussyeater:

"You said a wise man once said"
As the adage goes. Whatever a wise man says, you always hear it from the idiot's mouth. Go figure

SmartyPants:


In legal terms, admissible does not mean sufficient. While relevance is the test of availability, it says nothing about the weight to be attached to evidence nor it's particular probative value. I put it to you that proper examination of said Evidence Act will reveal that allegations of rape require a higher standard of corroboration, even though it is not stated in those terms.

Note the following:

1. You cannot secure a conviction on character evidence. In fact, you cannot even build a case upon character evidence. See s. 82 EA

2. The res gestae in this case lacks probative value because:
a. There is no way to ascertain the truth of what was discussed between the brother and Mt Fatoyinbo.
b. The brother will legally be considered a tainted witness whose testimony will itself require corroboration.

To illustrate, the frailties of your case, defense counsel could simply argue that the accusations against his client were blackmail on the part of Ms. Bukola who then misled her brother and Mr. Fatoyinbo had no choice but to settle.

How do you reply as the prosecution? Remember that you must adduce evidence to establish any facts on which you seek to rely upon. S 131 EA

SmartyPants:


In legal terms, admissible does not mean sufficient. While relevance is the test of availability, it says nothing about the weight to be attached to evidence nor it's particular probative value. I put it to you that proper examination of said Evidence Act will reveal that allegations of rape require a higher standard of corroboration, even though it is not stated in those terms.

Note the following:

1. You cannot secure a conviction on character evidence. In fact, you cannot even build a case upon character evidence. See s. 82 EA

2. The res gestae in this case lacks probative value because:
a. There is no way to ascertain the truth of what was discussed between the brother and Mt Fatoyinbo.
b. The brother will legally be considered a tainted witness whose testimony will itself require corroboration.

To illustrate, the frailties of your case, defense counsel could simply argue that the accusations against his client were blackmail on the part of Ms. Bukola who then misled her brother and Mr. Fatoyinbo had no choice but to settle.

How do you reply as the prosecution? Remember that you must adduce evidence to establish any facts on which you seek to rely upon. S 131 EA

chuose2:
BIODUN FATOYINBO IS A FREEMASON PASTOR

Four reasons to show that Biodun Fatoyinbo does not worship God.!

1] This is Biodun on the left and 2 Freemasons on the right, same sign (thanks to sender)

u are d real devil here
2] The god of Biodun Fatoyinbo is satan, thats why he can be seen here flashing the devils horns




3] Biodun Fatoyinbo is boldly flashing 666, the number of the devil just to show he worships satan


AND

www.nairaland.com/attachments/9731245_561954920170708214708jpeg91caaa6768cb90ea513cd78d394dd22d_jpegce62bb373976d74cdabd119ae3947489


4] The logo of COZA is a Pyramid, with light coming from the east, just like in Freemasonry.
Why will a church logo be a Pyramid?



ALL THE PASTORS COMING TO HIS AID ARE FREEMASONS TOO

laudate:

She gave details, timelines and vivid descriptions of how everything occurred. The pastor could not provide any concrete defence to refute her allegations. He only gave a watery set of excuses. And then stepped down from the pulpit.

Anyone who believes he has been falsely accused, would not be sitting down without making stringent efforts to clear his name. If I were in his shoes, and someone made such false claims against me, such a person would be behind bars in 24 hours.

Fatoyinbo does not have the guts to arrest Busola or sue her for defamation, because he knows she is right!

bigfrancis21:


While I don't support the actions of Biodun, the pastor, isn't there a statute of limitations in Nigeria as to how many years from an event occurrence one has to report the case? 20 years might seem such a very long time ago to prosecute. Even here in the US, the statute of limitations is often 3 years in many states and her complaint may not be entertained.

newsynews:
Singer Timi Dakolo's wife, Busola Dakolo has finally filed a complaint with the police following her rape allegation against COZA pastor, Biodun Fatoyinbo.

This has given the police the go ahead to investigate the allegation which she leveled against the pastor last Friday.

Busola Dakolo accused Biodun Fatoyinbo of raping her multiple times 20 years ago while she was still a member of his church.

She made the revelation in an interview with YNaija. See narration below.




https://www.purplefeel.com/2019/07/busola-dakolo-file-complaint-biodun-fatoyinbo.html?m=1

abbey621:


Can you name one logical/factual evidence that shows she's telling the truth? No sentiments, no emotional bias just straight up evidence. This will be the determining factor whether the case even makes it to court or not.

Funmmyastic:
Wow,gradually we are getting there.I will be very pleased if this is true.

chuose2:
BIODUN FATOYINBO IS A FREEMASON PASTOR

Four reasons to show that Biodun Fatoyinbo does not worship God.!

1] This is Biodun on the left and 2 Freemasons on the right, same sign (thanks to sender)


2] The god of Biodun Fatoyinbo is satan, thats why he can be seen here flashing the devils horns




3] Biodun Fatoyinbo is boldly flashing 666, the number of the devil just to show he worships satan


AND

www.nairaland.com/attachments/9731245_561954920170708214708jpeg91caaa6768cb90ea513cd78d394dd22d_jpegce62bb373976d74cdabd119ae3947489


4] The logo of COZA is a Pyramid, with light coming from the east, just like in Freemasonry.
Why will a church logo be a Pyramid?



ALL THE PASTORS COMING TO HIS AID ARE FREEMASONS TOO

kiyosaki1:


There is no rape apologists on nairaland , but people that use their brain .There is something in law called innocent till found guilty, that's if you understand .No one is supporting rape, but rather justice.
Nairaland forum is not the best way to handle rape case , and trying to shame the said pastor is either not the way . Things should be done properly , she should approach the relevant authorities to seek justice ,instead of social media if she really had the proof .

kiyosaki1:


There is no rape apologists on nairaland , but people that use their brain .There is something in law called innocent till found guilty, that's if you understand .No one is supporting rape, but rather justice.
Nairaland forum is not the best way to handle rape case , and trying to shame the said pastor is either not the way . Things should be done properly , she should approach the relevant authorities to seek justice ,instead of social media if she really had the proof .

bluebay:
Something the idiot would have done since last month... Rather than disgracing yourself and your husband... I so much pity for you of all these turned out to be a lie and you lost the case .

kiyosaki1:


There is no rape apologists on nairaland , but people that use their brain .There is something in law called innocent till found guilty, that's if you understand .No one is supporting rape, but rather justice.
Nairaland forum is not the best way to handle rape case , and trying to shame the said pastor is either not the way . Things should be done properly , she should approach the relevant authorities to seek justice ,instead of social media if she really had the proof .

pussyeater:

"You said a wise man once said"
As the adage goes. Whatever a wise man says, you always hear it from the idiot's mouth. Go figure

LordBuchi:

What if it turn out to be true and she win the case?

Freehuman:




Attached to this comment are screenshots of The Nigerian Evidence Act, 2011.

Under the English common law received into Nigeria by the Supreme Court ordinance of 1914 and Interpretations Act in section 45, Bukola Dakolo would have no case because of the common law doctrine of Res gestae which rendered Criminal cases useless if the evidence was not contemporaneous in time and place.

The law is dynamic and evolves to serve situations like this, thus the enactment of the Nigerian Evidence Act which renders the rules of common law void when it is inconsistent with the provisions of the Evidence Act.

Section 4 of the Evidence Act, 2011, attached below provides to the effect that evidence which occurred at a different time and place related to the fact in issue is relevant and therefore admissible in court.

Thus, the provisions of that section when read in Pari materia with sections 5-10 of the Evidence Act, makes circumstantial and character evidence admissible in court.

This is not an American Legal movie where videos (documentary evidence as defined by section 258 of the Evidence Act) and forensic evidence are required. According to the acclaimed victims story, her brother went to make trouble at the residence of the alleged predator when he became aware and there was settlement. That very act and testimony of witnesses of that act and the terms of settlement after the victim's brother's action, at about that period is enough if corroborated as circumstantial and character evidence to prove the case.

stanliwise:
stop fooling around boy. not everyone is a coward like you

frankyychiji:
lie or not she's loosing the case. So she plans on telling the court that she was under a spell and that's why she didn't struggle with him? Laughable.

Freehuman:




Attached to this comment are screenshots of The Nigerian Evidence Act, 2011.

Under the English common law received into Nigeria by the Supreme Court ordinance of 1914 and Interpretations Act in section 45, Bukola Dakolo would have no case because of the common law doctrine of Res gestae which rendered Criminal cases useless if the evidence was not contemporaneous in time and place.

The law is dynamic and evolves to serve situations like this, thus the enactment of the Nigerian Evidence Act which renders the rules of common law void when it is inconsistent with the provisions of the Evidence Act.

Section 4 of the Evidence Act, 2011, attached below provides to the effect that evidence which occurred at a different time and place related to the fact in issue is relevant and therefore admissible in court.

Thus, the provisions of that section when read in Pari materia with sections 5-10 of the Evidence Act, makes circumstantial and character evidence admissible in court.

This is not an American Legal movie where videos (documentary evidence as defined by section 258 of the Evidence Act) and forensic evidence are required. According to the acclaimed victims story, her brother went to make trouble at the residence of the alleged predator when he became aware and there was settlement. That very act and testimony of witnesses of that act and the terms of settlement after the victim's brother's action, at about that period is enough if corroborated as circumstantial and character evidence to prove the case.

Benekruku:
Long overdue!

Someone is going to jail.

Moneywirer:
Something she should have done since last month

bluebay:
Something the idiot would have done since last month... Rather than disgracing yourself and your husband... I so much pity for you of all these turned out to be a lie and you lost the case .