I really don't know how they are doing it now but it has been a tradition for NNPC to reimburse tp for interview. I have someone working there presently and I asked him about this tp/Apl correlation n he said during his own time he was also paid #56 as tfare reimbursement.. We just need to keep praying and hoping.

onandoc:
[sub][/sub]


There's no way for me to know that, Its not like we left the interview room at the same time.. Regardless of same sheet, my name is in between theirs

Ok, thank you.

Mitocyan:
There are some people here. Their monicker makes it hard for me to take anything they say seriously even though they might be telling the truth. I didn't mention names.

What did you say that @Loveprick did to you?

Yes I was paid 40k for attending the 2011 interview in June 2012. I went to Abuja from Lagos. This time around, I have seen here that they paid Lagos people 20k. Does it not also make us wonder if something has changed?

Cybersecfreak:
I really don't know how they are doing it now but it has been a tradition for NNPC to reimburse tp for interview. I have someone working there presently and I asked him about this tp/Apl correlation n he said during his own time he was also paid #56 as tfare reimbursement.. We just need to keep praying and hoping.

Loveprick:
My colleague we did interview the same day and panel has been paid. We wrote our names on the same EH sheet, use the same bank and I even wrote my name before her. Please , what is misery behind this payment pattern?

There's definitely a trend. Regarding its relationship with APL, time would tell.
In summary, what I have learnt so far is that among the dates paid already, some were paid and others weren't. I'm leaning to each category being placed on an interest group... Whether APL interest group, Discipline interest group, Bank interest group etc.

I would have been more certain if July 5th experienced mass payments as I have a good sample size to establish a fact based hypothesis. The sample size includes me and several friends who had same panel interviews, sheet attendance, and performance descriptions(albeit cannot be used foundationally). Truly, if July 5th has been paid, I can personally come up with a good fact based explanation even though it might be totally wrong when everything unveils

Loveprick:
My colleague we did interview the same day and panel has been paid. We wrote our names on the same EH sheet, use the same bank and I even wrote my name before her. Please , what is misery behind this payment pattern?

Your colleague as in friend or work mate?
Same panel? Smiles possibly

But I don't believe u tho. How possibly is it that you guys were tracking each other throughout and after the interview? You mean you guys even wrote names same time while some minutes were taken by members of the panel before next invitee is called into the room?.... Lol. Maybe you traced the names of that colleague before writing urs or u waited for him/or her to know the paper he/she wrote on and ascertain the position.

You might be right anyways but I don't believe u. Thanks

stevie55:


What did you say that @Loveprick did to you?

Bro i swear i ignored the moniker, only for you to say loveprick i just burst laugh inside meeting...hahahahahahahahaha, loveprick, that name is funny..

Greetings ladies and gentlemen. Please there is no correlation between transportation fare and appointment letter.The recruitment process is quite stiff and competitive. While all controls are in place to curb the influence of godfathers and cabals, it is disheartening that some to a minimal extent undermined the process. While you people are busy complementing those applicants on this forum providing information, please note and be worried that you are being replaced with them…#Fact#1. A high performer (Name withheld) with a 2.1 and 9+ years’ experience in procurement & CIPS certificate from edo was replaced with c12112(Name withheld), a mechanical engineer with no single professional certificate for a procurement role. Those of you counting on God/Allah and your outstanding performance should be rest assured that the …….. is working hard to ensure merit. You are free to quote and bash me, but remember to pray for grace and tell yourself the truth and most importantly remember that as soon as you come online with your device I can access your complete details and location. Out!!!!!!

This guy just came to constitute a nuisance and retire his moniker after few minutes.

I hope it's not what I am thinking.

@C12112. I am your ardent follower and I take every of your source as the real sauce hook, line and sinker. Is this your alternative moniker? Please clear your name here.

onandoc:
First time posting on this thread, I've been following since when tp was disbursed to the first set of alartees, thereby seeing many theories. As a non alertee, the AB theory is something, I have welcomed and hoped to be true, which I'm sure is how other non-alertees must be feeling.

With regards sempumping's post. I interviewed July 9, We were 5 people slated to face the panel for 7am, we shud have been 6 but someone was absent. I made sure i got the contact details of everyone there, in summary, the first person that interviewed has been paid, the last person has been paid. They were both paid last week, I haven't been paid, someone else has also not been paid and we're in-between them on the list. So what is really happening?


Is there really no correlation between APL and TP? If there isn't, why go through this stress of paying everybody with this scattergun approach? because this method is actually more stressful and error prone than paying in an orderly manner.

@bolded
It's now "ishu ata yanyan"

Yam pepper scatter scatter.

stevie55:


That settles it. There's a correlation between TF and APL. What's the correlation? Only time will tell.

I don't think there is a correlation b/w TF & APL. I think while processing the payment, some people/names were mistakenly jumped . I am no more worried because my aim is the APL not the TF.

bobowaja:

Your colleague as in friend or work mate?
Same panel? Smiles possibly

But I don't believe u tho. How possibly is it that you guys were tracking each other throughout and after the interview? You mean you guys even wrote names same time while some minutes were taken by members of the panel before next invitee is called into the room?.... Lol. Maybe you traced the names of that colleague before writing urs or u waited for him/or her to know the paper he/she wrote on and ascertain the position.

You might be right anyways but I don't believe u. Thanks

It is very possible they wrote their names together on same sheet if their accreditation numbers, on the bracelet tags given, follow each other serially. Maybe they sat together at the accreditation block.

This is not to say this were the case, just stating the possibility, so please don't be quick to discredit his tale. Thanks.

simplynace:



Thanks for explaining further but I disagree with your claim of TFARE reimbursement not being a right. How about we rephrase it with respect to what policies are - a deliberate strategic statement of intent passed by the senior management or governing body of an organization. Hence, it is the duty of every personnel bound by that policy to comply just as it is expected of anyone who is given the duty to reimburse applicants to do so.

Do you know a breach in policy attract penalties...

This is more about the NNPC being accountable by judiciously carrying out one her duties.

Where are the auditors and internal control guys in the house?

My brother that they have internal policy to be complied with by their employees and enforced by internal control staff do not mean that policy cannot change. The internal policies are not for public consumption. No law court would sanction/penalize a company for breach of its own policy.. it's the exclusive preserve of their management to do so.

Their protest is not valid at all. It's not their right but a privilege to show they value prospective employees.

onandoc:
[sub][/sub]


There's no way for me to know that, Its not like we left the interview room at the same time.. Regardless of same sheet, my name is in between theirs

U ve said well.

O Ka re. Bee l'omo ko. O ti se re be

Runge:
My story also wants to look like that of @licensed2k. But I was not giving the chance to write down my account number. So, I am not expecting any TF and getting a APL is like a dream.

I was there crying sorrowfully. There I knew I was out of the race. I wish the rest best of luck.
I must tell you that the NNPC staff were professionals and heard my story with some form of empathy. But they don't deal with emotions or sentiment. I was just disqualified. ''Mo si n won lo si Abuja ni''. Mo gbadura ki n ma sin won waye''.

After I left the towers, I was almost depressed and cried for day. I put my hope in God for an exciting future.

I am ready to tell my story in full after the whole process has been concluded. (Just for posterity sake)

Is this not the Runge What sef?? !!

Cybersecfreak:
I really don't know how they are doing it now but it has been a tradition for NNPC to reimburse tp for interview. I have someone working there presently and I asked him about this tp/Apl correlation n he said during his own time he was also paid #56 as tfare reimbursement.. We just need to keep praying and hoping.

But the last set of recruitment was like 7 years ago, is it not possible that something has changed?

Okay, now that ppl are saying maybe its different sheet, will they pay some sheets for a particular day and ignore the other sheets? If so, why? Does that mean that others will not be paid or? This whole process is somehow

Loveprick:


I don't think there is a correlation b/w TF & APL. I think while processing the payment, some people/names were mistakenly jumped . I am no more worried because my aim is the APL not the TF.

If you think it was a mistake... what then makes you believe there won't be another mistake in the APL?

I don't think there has been any mistake so far? Whatever it is, we shall know in due cause.

mosgoon:
There's definitely a trend. Regarding its relationship with APL, time would tell.
In summary, what I have learnt so far is that among the dates paid already, some were paid and others weren't. I'm leaning to each category being placed on an interest group... Whether APL interest group, Discipline interest group, Bank interest group etc.

I would have been more certain if July 5th experienced mass payments as I have a good sample size to establish a fact based hypothesis. The sample size includes me and several friends who had same panel interviews, sheet attendance, and performance descriptions(albeit cannot be used foundationally). Truly, if July 5th has been paid, I can personally come up with a good fact based explanation even though it might be totally wrong when everything unveils

Facts are never wrong. Why go thru the stress of coming up with something that might be wrong in the end.. Some July 5th have been alerted and I'm sure different bank groups have been alerted, discipline based, i know ppl that interviewed with me that have been alerted... So those 3 are unlikely from my point of view

onandoc:



But the last set of recruitment was like 7 years ago, is it not possible that something has changed?

Okay, now that ppl are saying maybe its different sheet, will they pay some sheets for a particular day and ignore the other sheets? If so, why? Does that mean that others will not be paid or? This whole process is somehow

From his explaination, he said everyone was paid

If anybody from 8th July rescheduled for 11th has been paid .. signify make I drop my own hypothesis as e dey hottt

Loveprick:


I don't think there is a correlation b/w TF & APL. I think while processing the payment, some people/names were mistakenly jumped . I am no more worried because my aim is the APL not the TF.

So what you're saying now is that those that havent been paid, will not be paid because their name have been jumped. What a wawu

If payment has stopped trickling down, a necessary but insufficient condition for Tfare and APL to be related would be that there exists an arbitrary panel, P such that all the 6 candidates in P have been paid. Because (9000/6 =1500) is greater than 1300(speculated number to be recruited). I don't think anyone has suggested the existence of such a panel up till now.

To understand my point, look at it this way: if in all panels at least one person is not paid, and these are the ones that would be called. It would mean that 1/6 of the total candidate pool of 9000 which is 1500(greater than the speculated number(1300) of people to be recruited) will receive APL which is in opposition to wide spread speculation that 1300 or less candidates would be recruited.

Kevlala:


Whilst u guys probably interviewed serially, u probably won't have written ur names on the same sheet for account details. because the sheet was not for a specific department /course. So when the first person did and went to write his/her name, others from different panels would have written also before u finished ur interview. And I recall the sheet of paper wasn't a long one.

Just be calm and let things unfold. Dnt know how we can possibly change anything now, than to wait for the outcome backed by prayers. All things are possible.

abi u don catch am.

bobowaja:

Your colleague as in friend or work mate?
Same panel? Smiles possibly

But I don't believe u tho. How possibly is it that you guys were tracking each other throughout and after the interview? You mean you guys even wrote names same time while some minutes were taken by members of the panel before next invitee is called into the room?.... Lol. Maybe you traced the names of that colleague before writing urs or u waited for him/or her to know the paper he/she wrote on and ascertain the position.

You might be right anyways but I don't believe u. Thanks

I am not here to argue or prove any point. I was surprise to see her at the Tower because we have never discussed anything about NNPC recruitment . We applied the same role and my name was called before her name in the amphitheatre. After my interview I had to wait for her at the place we did accreditation so that we can go out and catch fun together in Abuja. Remember, I don't believe there is a correlation between APL and TF.

onandoc:



So what you're saying now is that those that havent been paid, will not be paid because their name have been jumped. What a wawu

I think he was trying to bring a halt to a kinda argument he might have suspected was coming up on the correlation between APL/TF.

merorisa:


It is very possible they wrote their names together on same sheet if their accreditation numbers, on the bracelet tags given, follow each other serially. Maybe they sat together at the accreditation block.

This is not to say this were the case, just stating the possibility, so please don't be quick to discredit his tale. Thanks.

The list where our names were written after verification of documents was totally different from the one containing account details. The person that wrote before and after me weren't even interviewed by my panel

Swargu:


Bro i swear i ignored the moniker, only for you to say loveprick i just burst laugh inside meeting...hahahahahahahahaha, loveprick, that name is funny..

That moniker says a lot - if and only if that name is anything to go by.
Whatever it means though. Haha

Cybersecfreak:
I really don't know how they are doing it now but it has been a tradition for NNPC to reimburse tp for interview. I have someone working there presently and I asked him about this tp/Apl correlation n he said during his own time he was also paid #56 as tfare reimbursement.. We just need to keep praying and hoping.

56k as against how much that people from his location received? And pls, at what point was he paid? B4 pr after medicals? Just checking something with u pls

mosgoon:
There's definitely a trend. Regarding its relationship with APL, time would tell.
In summary, what I have learnt so far is that among the dates paid already, some were paid and others weren't. I'm leaning to each category being placed on an interest group... Whether APL interest group, Discipline interest group, Bank interest group etc.

I would have been more certain if July 5th experienced mass payments as I have a good sample size to establish a fact based hypothesis. The sample size includes me and several friends who had same panel interviews, sheet attendance, and performance descriptions(albeit cannot be used foundationally). Truly, if July 5th has been paid, I can personally come up with a good fact based explanation even though it might be totally wrong when everything unveils

The depth of your analogy is impressive.
Well done Son!!!

Mitocyan:

To understand my point, look at it this way: if in all panels at least one person is not paid, and these are the ones that would be called. It would mean that 1/6 of the total candidate pool of 9000 which is 1500(greater than the speculated number(1300) of people to be recruited) will receive APL which is in opposition to wide spread speculation that 1300 or less candidates would be recruited.

Not everyone who was invited for the interview would come. Some will come but will not be allowed to proceed.

Mitocyan:
If payment has stopped trickling down, a necessary but insufficient condition for Tfare and APL to be related would be that there exists an arbitrary panel, P such that all the 6 candidates in P have been paid. Because 9000/1300 is greater than 6. I don't think anyone has suggested the existence of such a panel up till now.

To understand my point, look at it this way: if in all panels at least one person is not paid, and these are the ones that would be called. It would mean that 1/6 of the total candidate pool of 9000 which is 1500(greater than the speculated number(1300) of people to be recruited) will receive APL which is in opposition to wide spread speculation that 1300 or less candidates would be recruited.

We have more than six (6) interviewees for each panel. In my own panel, they called me and one other guy from the amphitheater, however, I was the only one around. When I got there, I met like 6 applicants already, with one presently inside making it eight ( 8 )interviewees at that moment, of which it could have been nine (9) if the other guy that was called along side me was there.

Enireqx20:


The list where our names were written after verification of documents was totally different from the one containing account details. The person that wrote before and after me weren't even interviewed by my panel

In my case it was the same sheet. I remember the lady asking me to note the sheet number somewhere so that after the interview I'll easily find the sheet and add my account details.

Enireqx20:


The list where our names were written after verification of documents was totally different from the one containing account details. The person that wrote before and after me weren't even interviewed by my panel

Yes, you are correct, but you can as well allow your friend to write before you on same sheet. Meaning, you were not compelled in any order to write your name.

A friend can wait after the interview, probably at the ground floor so they match to Block D together. There was no particular order to write but two or three friends can even share a pen to write on same sheet