chinchonglee:
I knew their govt is smarter dan ours

Ay77:
I couldn't read that shit



Can someone narate this Novel for me?

fela4live:

You nko? You no be mumu? Were you aware of such agreement before this article? Kettle calling pot black.

ednut1:
u go school so. Our foreign exchange are held by the west . U think they won't seize it hahahaha wake up o.

GloShare:
Any agreement can be broken... that's why it's an agreement.

Or did the agreement permit killing Nigerians?

FG should seize about 2% of SA firms profits and put it in an escrow account to pay damages and compensations in case of such attacks. After every 5 years, the monies can be returned to the companies while a new batch of profits are held down.

GloShare:


I'm talking about modifying agreements to improve commitment.

See how we were quick to deploy police to shoprite, they should be committed to do same.

Wallade:
Did South African Government protect Nigerian investments in South Africa. The answer is obviously "No". I think the agreement has been violated already by the SA Government.

Nationalization of the assets of South Africa in Nigeria is a regretable but possible option. We must hold South Africa government responsible for their actions and inaction.

ednut1:
Yet mr mumu oshiomole and several ignorant folks were calling for nationalization. This is not 1981

Bellotelli:
In Article 5, titled “Compensation for Losses”, the conditions are even more instructive.
It states: “Investors of one party whose investments in the territory of the other party suffer losses owing to war or other armed conflict, revolution, a state of national emergency, revolt, insurrection or riot in the territory of the latter party shall be accorded by the latter party treatment, as regards restitution,
indemnification, compensation or other settlement, not less favourable than that which the latter party accords to its own investors or to investors of any third state.

From the above, all Nigerians affected in South Africa also deserve compensation. If South African govt refused to effect this, it also means that the Nigerian govt can also violate the agreement.

niaralandtopuser:

It could be argued South Africa broke that clause when they allowed Nigerian businesses to be looted. No one keep clause when there are disagreement like this. We can even pullout or suspend any agreement with South Africa

inoki247:
They should keep playing politics with everything d Federal Govt will soon come out to say Xenophobic are perpetrated by the Opposition to destabilize Nigeria....

obembet:
Op! So u expect me to read this long story abi? Make i no go church again before Nairalanders corrupt me finish

Wallade:
Did South African Government protect Nigerian investments in South Africa. The answer is obviously "No". I think the agreement has been violated already by the SA Government.

Nationalization of the assets of South Africa in Nigeria is a regretable but possible option. We must hold South Africa government responsible for their actions and inaction.

bennynaza:
But another problem is that if we nationalize MTN, in less than 2 years they will die like Nitel.
DStv will be worse than NTA
Shoprite will become Mammy market

ednut1:
has no correlation. The nigerian businesses here are mostly small ones by people with no papers self. So e no follow. A dangote would have agreement with SA not a chukwudi in soweto slums

ednut1:
unlike u i am aware u cannot just nationalize companies in 2019 without sanctions.

IamCharles123:

Their govt aren't any smarter, the contract says protection of each others business in both country, SA govt has failed to protect Nigeria businesses in their country so they have broken the contract already. Nigeria govt can go ahead n do anything but i know Nigeria govt is weak so am not expecting anything from them.