RayMcBlue:
- Once Upon a Time in... Hollywood

Acting was superb. Literally everyone, from the no name hippie actors to the all A listers. Fighting scenes were truly funny. I loved the OTT violence that got the hippie bunch in the end. Music was amazing, it was shot beauteously, it was colorful, full of life. Immersion was amazing, I'd watch the big 3 just living their lives for hours.

Having said that, I still can't deduce why Quentin made Bruce Lee look akin to a pompous ass douche and a loser. Quentin said in an interview that Bruce Lee was actually like that, that Bruce Lee actually said he could kill Ali, but in fact, Bruce said exactly the opposite, that he would be killed by Ali easily.

Some people said that scene was a dream sequence or Cliff's imagination, but it seemed more like Cliff reminiscing about something that genuinely transpired. That scene was such a bummer.

The film was incredibly meandering to me.It's duration was over 2hrs 30mins.The story could have been easily concluded in 1hr 30mins.Another issue is,if one doesnt know anything about the Manson murders and it's key players,it will be difficult to follow the story.I also believe that Bruce Lee "controversy" was created to make more people head to the cinema to watch the film.Many of the characters also led nowhere but I liked the films' music,costumes and sets.Quentin is a legend but this film has to rank as one of my least favorite from his stable.

hulk616:
Angel has fallen 0/10

Too much politics, too predictable and all USA's problems are caused by RUSSIA

For the first time you didn't talk about DC v marvel you actually made a lot of sense.
I agree with you and you should do this more often instead of that boring comic fight

Little (2019)
I enjoyed every minute of the movie, entertainment and comedy wrapped and served by feminism but actually based on bullying and its possible effects on kids.

In the Shadow of the Moon.

The peanut butter falcon - 7/10

Shia lebeouf was in this, I couldn't recognize him again. It's been a while since I saw him in any movie. While watching it ,American honey came to mind. And surprisingly, Shia lebeouf was in it. Both movies had the same vibe.

iamoyindamola:
For the first time you didn't talk about DC v marvel you actually made a lot of sense.
I agree with you and you should do this more often instead of that boring comic fight

thank you
But by the way I always make sense and comics are my main thing

Parasite 8.5/10
Probably my second best foreign film after Children of God. Well written. It was funny, really funny for more than half of the film but then I was tricked and shiiit became real after. It should easily win the Foreign Language award. Definitely in the top ten movies I have seen this year.

Ready or Not 7/10...... Crazy thriller I tell you...

Miggs:
The film was incredibly meandering to me.It's duration was over 2hrs 30mins.The story could have been easily concluded in 1hr 30mins.Another issue is,if one doesnt know anything about the Manson murders and it's key players,it will be difficult to follow the story.I also believe that Bruce Lee "controversy" was created to make more people head to the cinema to watch the film.Many of the characters also led nowhere but I liked the films' music,costumes and sets.Quentin is a legend but this film has to rank as one of my least favorite from his stable.

I completely agree. The music and costumes were on point but it was just loose.

Also my least favourite along with death proof.

Mark9854:
Little (2019)
I enjoyed every minute of the movie, entertainment and comedy wrapped and served by feminism but actually based on bullying and its possible effects on kids.

Yawns. Cliche to me.

Watched on fast forward.

armadeo:



Yawns. Cliche to me.

Watched on fast forward.

wow, I found it very interesting and it didn't seem cliché to me... unlike Netflix's POLAR and MARIA which were total rip-offs from the John Wick franchise.

cao:
In the Shadow of the Moon.

Wasted his life tracking down his own grand daughter, for some reason there was no butterfly effect on changing the past. Its a good movie, just a few loose ends as always with time travel.

armadeo:
Movies I am awaiting

1. The Irishman. This one makes me tremble with delight. Some of my all time favs + Scorsese. What more could I want. To be released on netflix in the 27th.

2. The call of the wild. I feel I will like this on a saturday morning

3. Cats. Ever since the greatest showman I've kept an eye out for possibly his musicals this might be one. The cast is stellar.

Will update later.

The CGI in cats looks creepy as f***. I can't imagine myself looking at it for over 90 minutes in the name of watching a movie.

I'm so happy that Charlie's Angels flopped.

Fvck fake feminism

Born2Freak:
I'm so happy that Charlie's Angels flopped.

Fvck fake feminism

Lol. What were they thinking.

I knew it would flop hard the minute I saw the trailer. I thought " ohhh no not again".

pryme:


Wasted his life tracking down his own grand daughter, for some reason there was no butterfly effect on changing the past. Its a good movie, just a few loose ends as always with time travel.

Yup. Time travel films, one must always be prepared for those paradoxes. I think Predestination was the only one that kinda made sense time-wise, since that whole thing was a casual loop.

Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind:

Genuinely sweet and arresting. I loved every bit of this movie.

Butterfly Effect-

This movie is really really...crazy.

5/10

Ishilove:
Butterfly Effect-

This movie is really really...crazy.

5/10

5
why not 0

Born2Freak:
I'm so happy that Charlie's Angels flopped.

Fvck fake feminism

Stay woke, niggah.

DannyKoice:


Stay woke, niggah.

I understand your criticism. However, you have to understand that there is woke and fake woke.

There are people who are woke just to sound cool. Hypocrites.

They should have made a good script first before using feminism to sell the movie. Let the movie's plot sell itself.

hulk616:
5
why not 0

Here in Zooland, we dont question her ratings. We dont try to reason with madness.

armadeo:


Lol. What were they thinking.

I knew it would flop hard the minute I saw the trailer. I thought " ohhh no not again".

Lazy producers. They thought that feminism sells movies. No. A good script, good plot and good casting sell a movie. Feminism should just be a by-product

Born2Freak:



I understand your criticism. However, you have to understand that there is woke and fake woke.

There are people who are woke just to sound cool. Hypocrites.

They should have made a good script first before using feminism to sell the movie. Let the movie's plot sell itself.

I was merely using your "woke(ness)" against you. You said you're a woke niggah, and yet, you were the first to shade Charlie's Angels on the account of it's female main cast. Wonder if you would have done the same if they were male? Double standards?

DannyKoice:


I was merely using your "woke(ness)" against you. You said you're a woke niggah, and yet, you were the first to shade Charlie's Angels on the account of it's female main cast. Wonder if you would have done the same if they were male? Double standards?

When did I support Charlie's Angels?

Charlie's angels - 3/10

It don't have the words to describe how horrible this movie is but don't spend you money to see it. You'll definitely regret it.

Born2Freak:



When did I support Charlie's Angels?

I never said you supported Charlie's...

My point is, as a "woke niggah", you shouldn't be slating Charlie's Angels for "fake feminism".

Charlie's Angel franchise wasn't a recent phenomenon, you know? The 2019 edition was but a 3rd installment of a reboot of the original Charlie's Angels films that started and ended before you were born. If the principal theme was feminism, then it ain't fake.

For the fact that you slated it for "fake feminism" when the feminism ain't fake, has clearly called your so-called "woke(ness)" into question.

hulk616:
5
why not 0

Any movie ever made that's not in MCU is always 0/10 where you are This your MCU fetish don pass borderline.

oyaskii:
Any movie ever made that's not in MCU is always 0/10 where you are This your MCU fetish don pass borderline.

wrong, i rate disney movies above 0

hulk616:
wrong, i rate disney movies above 0

Disney owns MCU so MCU is still the common denominator

DannyKoice:


I never said you supported Charlie's...

My point is, as a "woke niggah", you shouldn't be slating Charlie's Angels for "fake feminism".

Charlie's Angel franchise wasn't a recent phenomenon, you know? The 2019 edition was but a 3rd installment of a reboot of the original Charlie's Angels films that started and ended before you were born. If the principal theme was feminism, then it ain't fake.

For the fact that you slated it for "fake feminism" when the feminism ain't fake, has clearly called your so-called "woke(ness)" into question.

I know the history of Charlie's Angels. The original one was a classic.

However, this 2019 Charlie's Angels is nothing more than a cash grab on a once popular movie franchise.

A movie isnt feminist because of its cast. In fact, there is a whole feminist literature that criticizes capitalism. Using feminism as a marketing tool is wrong. Why not be fair to women for the reason of fairness and not for profit? Be good for goodness sake.

oyaskii:
Disney owns MCU so MCU is still the common denominator

non-MCU movies and i also rate bollywood movies above 0