Welcome, Guest: Register On Nairaland / LOGIN! / Trending / Recent / NewStats: 3,205,677 members, 7,993,371 topics. Date: Monday, 04 November 2024 at 11:12 AM |
Nairaland Forum / Nairaland / General / Politics / How Supreme Court Inflates Uzodimma’s Votes By 92,597 —YIAGA Explains (2045 Views)
Oil Companies Projected To Supply Dangote Refinery, Others 597,700 BPD Of Crude / Voters Now Protect Their Own Votes By Themselves, And No More The Party-Agents / How Supreme Court Ruling On Imo May Affect Ganduje (2) (3) (4)
How Supreme Court Inflates Uzodimma’s Votes By 92,597 —YIAGA Explains by 9jahotblog: 10:53am On Jan 16, 2020 |
The YIAGA Africa on Thursday said that the Supreme Court inflated the number of votes in its judgement on the March 9, 2019 governorship in Imo State by 92,597 votes. The nation’s apex court had on Tuesday declared Senator Hope Uzodinma of the All Progressives Congress (APC) as the winner of the election in the state after sacking Chief Emeka Ihedioha of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP). The court also ordered INEC to withdraw the CoR issued to Mr. Ihedioha, a former Deputy Speaker of the House of Representatives and issued same to Uzodimma, a former Chairman Senate committee on Aviation. Uzodimma had been sworn-in as the state governor. ADVERTISEMENT HOW OVER 5000 NIGERIA MEN HAVE PERMANENTLY OVERCOME TERRIBLE BEDROOM PERFORMANCE DUE TO THIS RECENT DISCOVERY BY MEDICAL CONSULTANTS However, reacting to the judgement, the Executive Director of YIAGA Africa, Mr. Samson Itodo, said that while the full judgement of the Supreme court on Imo is being awaited, the Returning Officer of the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) should not have made a declaration because the PDP candidate did not fulfill the constitutional requirements. According to him, that election was meant to be declared inconclusive but he went ahead to make a declaration. “The Supreme Court relied on results from over 300 polling units where @inecnigeria declined to certify results due to irregularities, non use of the smart card readers and violence. How come only two parties were on the results sheets from the over 366 polling units in an election with 70 candidates? “This is official results for the Imo governorship before the Supreme court judgement total no of polling units= 3,523; total no of accredited voters= 823,743; total no of valid votes= 714,355; total no of rejected votes= 25,130; and total votes cast= 739,485. “The difference between the total no of accredited voters and total votes cast is 84,258. This includes cancelled votes and those areas where smartcard readers were not used. Based on INEC’s results, the gap btw the PDP and APC candidate is 176,946 votes. From the Supreme Court’s judgment, its appears the APC candidate secured more than 176,969 votes from the 388 polling units to win the election. “Let us work with 176,969 pending the release of the Supreme Court results. 176,969 votes + 739, 485 (total votes cast) = 916,431 exceeding the total number of accredited voters in the election which stood at 823,834. Why the difference of 92,597 votes?” Itodo said in a chat with Daily Trust. He said that in Zamfara State the Supreme Court declared APC’s votes as wasted and ordered INEC to collate the valid votes and determine the winners where the thresholds were met and wonder why did the Supreme Court proceed to collate and declare a winner in Imo? He said, “Can the Supreme Court tell us the number of accredited voters, rejected and cancelled votes. Can the Supreme Court tell us the locations of the 388 PUs where results were not reflected so a comparison can be made with the original results declared by INEC?” He lamented that the judiciary is setting a bad precedent for the nation’s elections. https://www.dailytrust.com.ng/how-supreme-court-inflates-uzodimmas-votes-by-92597-yiaga-explains.html 2 Likes 1 Share |
Re: How Supreme Court Inflates Uzodimma’s Votes By 92,597 —YIAGA Explains by 9jahotblog: 10:55am On Jan 16, 2020 |
Our Supreme Court justices seriously need mathematicians and electronic calculators. 1 Like |
Re: How Supreme Court Inflates Uzodimma’s Votes By 92,597 —YIAGA Explains by Sirjamo: 11:03am On Jan 16, 2020 |
Samson Itodo and Cynthia Mbamalu of YIAGA Africa are PDP members masquerading as activists 4 Likes 1 Share |
Re: How Supreme Court Inflates Uzodimma’s Votes By 92,597 —YIAGA Explains by Nigerianization(m): 11:04am On Jan 16, 2020 |
It's magical Naija 1 Like |
Re: How Supreme Court Inflates Uzodimma’s Votes By 92,597 —YIAGA Explains by bigiyaro(m): 11:15am On Jan 16, 2020 |
Sirjamo:that is not the issue, your question should be weather their analysis is correct or not. 7 Likes 4 Shares |
Re: How Supreme Court Inflates Uzodimma’s Votes By 92,597 —YIAGA Explains by seunmsg(m): 11:46am On Jan 16, 2020 |
At least, YIAGA admitted that Ihedioha didn’t win the election in the first place. He was unlawfully returned elected by the compromised returning officer. If the right thing had been done at the right time, we won’t be here today trying to make sense out of the judgement of the Supreme Court. The desperation of some politicians to ensure Okorochas candidate is defeated led to the unlawful return of Ihedioha when a runoff should have been ordered. Uzodimma is now the beneficiary of the entire mess. Hopefully, lessons have been learnt and they will do things the right way next time. 1 Like |
Re: How Supreme Court Inflates Uzodimma’s Votes By 92,597 —YIAGA Explains by codedguy1(m): 12:51pm On Jan 16, 2020 |
The zoo living up to its reputation even with an anti corruption tzar at the helm. 1 Like |
Re: How Supreme Court Inflates Uzodimma’s Votes By 92,597 —YIAGA Explains by javaRookie: 12:53pm On Jan 16, 2020 |
I knew it |
Re: How Supreme Court Inflates Uzodimma’s Votes By 92,597 —YIAGA Explains by WATCHOVER(m): 1:14pm On Jan 16, 2020 |
seunmsg:No difference between you and Tanko 8 Likes 2 Shares |
Re: How Supreme Court Inflates Uzodimma’s Votes By 92,597 —YIAGA Explains by kahal29: 5:46pm On Jan 16, 2020 |
Accreditation is done at polling unit levels. Once election is cancelled in a polling unit, nothing is recorded from that polling unit during collation. Thus, when election results are cancelled, they usually don't form part of the accredited voters. Though some people have often argued against this practice because they believe that it is intentionally done to prevent a rerun. So looking at the Imo state case, the number of accredited voters will increase with the judgement. If these numbers now credited to Uzodinma was captured as invalid or cancelled votes, there would have been rerun because it's much more than the margin of victory between Ihedioha & Nwosu However assuming without conceding that those votes were actually inflated, Ihedioha unfortunately did not seek for the cancelation of those results due to over voting. Mind you the court is not a father Christmas. It only gives u what u ask for? Hope was given what he sought for in d mist of the evidences surrounding his prayers! The court is not a calculator of votes it only grants prayers based on EVIDENCES before it. 1 Like 1 Share |
Re: How Supreme Court Inflates Uzodimma’s Votes By 92,597 —YIAGA Explains by festacman(m): 5:51pm On Jan 16, 2020 |
We await details of Supreme Court ruling. |
Re: How Supreme Court Inflates Uzodimma’s Votes By 92,597 —YIAGA Explains by helinues: 6:01pm On Jan 16, 2020 |
Ihedioha himself bleeped up.. Why creating more enemies to the one on ground upon resuming office? He underrated those who might have struck a deal on his behalf regarding the supreme court judgements.. Mbaka over heard the plans and turned it to prophesy. We all sabi the miracle behind the disappearance of meat in the mouths |
Re: How Supreme Court Inflates Uzodimma’s Votes By 92,597 —YIAGA Explains by edoairways: 6:07pm On Jan 16, 2020 |
WATCHOVER: 1 Like |
Re: How Supreme Court Inflates Uzodimma’s Votes By 92,597 —YIAGA Explains by edoairways: 6:09pm On Jan 16, 2020 |
What can I say,even the holy book says the last shall become first but in Nigeria the 4th has become first |
Re: How Supreme Court Inflates Uzodimma’s Votes By 92,597 —YIAGA Explains by Xisnin(m): 6:11pm On Jan 16, 2020 |
kahal29:You ended up saying nothing. The court can be a doctor, a criminologist, a statistician, and a researcher whenever necessary. We don't expect the judges to understand basic arithmetics but in cases where they are deficient in knowledge, they require experts guidance and testimony. Unfortunately, the 2 Likes |
Re: How Supreme Court Inflates Uzodimma’s Votes By 92,597 —YIAGA Explains by Banmeallday: 6:12pm On Jan 16, 2020 |
When you have a certificate less Sharia head judge, what do you expect 1 Like |
Re: How Supreme Court Inflates Uzodimma’s Votes By 92,597 —YIAGA Explains by Olugbanko: 6:27pm On Jan 16, 2020 |
medicine after death! 1 Like 1 Share |
Re: How Supreme Court Inflates Uzodimma’s Votes By 92,597 —YIAGA Explains by Racoon(m): 6:30pm On Jan 16, 2020 |
The abracadabra of the Supreme Court will continue to hunt all the members that deliver this judgement. 1 Like |
Re: How Supreme Court Inflates Uzodimma’s Votes By 92,597 —YIAGA Explains by seunmsg(m): 6:33pm On Jan 16, 2020 |
kahal29: Thanks for this explanation. You have answered the question raised by YIAGA. 1 Like 1 Share |
Re: How Supreme Court Inflates Uzodimma’s Votes By 92,597 —YIAGA Explains by orunto27: 6:46pm On Jan 16, 2020 |
See me see "Supreme Confusion". Tanko means Tinubu |
Re: How Supreme Court Inflates Uzodimma’s Votes By 92,597 —YIAGA Explains by orunto27: 6:47pm On Jan 16, 2020 |
See me see "Supreme Confusion". Tanko means Tinubu. |
Re: How Supreme Court Inflates Uzodimma’s Votes By 92,597 —YIAGA Explains by Aufbauh(m): 7:17pm On Jan 16, 2020 |
This is what i refer to as advance wailing. YIAGA that wanted to discredit the 2019 election before we burst their bubble. They should have as well taken the job of the Supreme Court. Medicine after death though. 1 Like 1 Share |
Re: How Supreme Court Inflates Uzodimma’s Votes By 92,597 —YIAGA Explains by ivandragon: 7:54pm On Jan 16, 2020 |
Nothing about the judgement makes sense. By the so called supreme justices' dubious arithmetics, Hope had an average of 540 votes in each of the polling units where the additional votes were gotten from. An average polling unit ranges from 500 to 750... Imo has about 3,400+ polling units. So the supreme court is in essence saying that victory in a little over 9% of the total polling units was enough for hope to garner over 200,000+ votes to beat Iheadioha... Fine... But what about the number of votes iheadioha had in those 300+ polling units won by Hope? By the supreme court's decision, the margin of victory was less than 30,000 votes. Given that the total number of void votes according to INEC was about 26,000, it means Iheadioha needed only 4000 votes to force a rerun since the margin of victory would be less than total void votes... So, the supreme court is inferring that Iheadioha could not get an average of 15 votes across the 300+ polling units which Hope won? Or are they ignoring that on the premise of not having 2/3 spread? If that is the case, how would they know that Iheadioha does not have the 2/3 spread of his own votes in the disputed polling units awarded to Hope if ihedioha's own votes were not counted or taken into consideration? More questions than answers... |
Re: How Supreme Court Inflates Uzodimma’s Votes By 92,597 —YIAGA Explains by 9jahotblog: 9:28pm On Jan 16, 2020 |
ivandragon:you are very right oooo. |
(1) (Reply)
UK Parliament Accuses Buhari Of Paying Lip Service To Solutions Of Terrorism / $3.4 Billion From Imf Is Not A Loan & Why Pmb Is Always Ahead / Throwback: Gambari Asks Buhari To Implement 2014 National Conference Report
(Go Up)
Sections: politics (1) business autos (1) jobs (1) career education (1) romance computers phones travel sports fashion health religion celebs tv-movies music-radio literature webmasters programming techmarket Links: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) Nairaland - Copyright © 2005 - 2024 Oluwaseun Osewa. All rights reserved. See How To Advertise. 40 |