Welcome, Guest: Register On Nairaland / LOGIN! / Trending / Recent / NewStats: 3,205,033 members, 7,990,860 topics. Date: Friday, 01 November 2024 at 06:15 AM |
Nairaland Forum / Nairaland / General / Politics / . (619615 Views)
IGBO POLITICAL LEADERS N THEIR PAST MISADVENTURES RESULTING IN CURRENT NAT PROBL / Junaid Mohammed: Igbo Political Leaders Haven’t Learnt Any Lesson From Civil War / Buhari And Economic Advisory Council In Close Door Meeting (2) (3) (4)
(1) (2) (3) ... (631) (632) (633) (634) (635) (636) (637) ... (732) (Reply) (Go Down)
Re: . by ckenneths(m): 5:27am On Jan 17, 2020 |
Igboland amaka 6 Likes
|
Re: . by ckenneths(m): 5:30am On Jan 17, 2020 |
Obodo ndi ocha 3 Likes
|
Re: . by ckenneths(m): 5:31am On Jan 17, 2020 |
Obodo Chukwu goziri 4 Likes
|
Re: . by ckenneths(m): 5:32am On Jan 17, 2020 |
Anyi ga enwe mmeri 7 Likes
|
Re: . by ckenneths(m): 5:41am On Jan 17, 2020 |
...... 7 Likes
|
Re: . by ckenneths(m): 5:44am On Jan 17, 2020 |
Igbo be anyi na azu ka ahia 7 Likes
|
Re: . by pazienza(m): 1:47pm On Jan 17, 2020 |
Obi1kenobi: 1. You are wrong on this. It's actually the other way round. Their public stated interests/objectives are of no interests whatsoever to us, because they can easily backtrack on them along the road or even give them a different interpretations to what we currently think or assume them to mean, we have been here with Yorubas before. Of more importance to us is their hidden agenda and aim, which we might not know, but following Yoruba past antecedents, we can make a very good guess, or just sit on the fence and let things pan allowing time to expose what is hidden to the light. 2. Since you are asking. Let me tell you what my gut feeling about what Amotekun is all about. It is my personal conviction that Amotekun is only but a political bargaining chip by the Yoruba political elites with regards to the race for 2023 elections. Amotekun is not a brain child of Yoruba commoners,even though their commoners are currently pushing it. Amotekun is a craft of Yoruba political elites and intelligentia. They hope to use it to force the North to concede the presidency to them at maximal profit margin, or at the minimal profit margin, let them retain the VP slot and not be forced to give it up to the East who the North might feel needs to be appeased in 2023 with VP slot. If we naively join the Amotekun, then we would have made things easier for the Yorubas, as they would in their typical slimy style withdraw the proposal in the last minutes when the North must have conceded to their demands, leaving us with short end of the stick again. My stance is that we stay completely out of the Amotekun thing, no support and no resistance, let them make play themselves. And if in the end it turns out that Amotekun is not a political bargaining chip as I think (which I truly doubt i am wrong on my thoughts about this), nothing stops us from coming in at the last minute to be the tie Breaker between the Yorubas and their Arewa bedfellows, and in so doing, ensure we reap abundantly from their own losses. This is how we should approach things. Strictly cold and devoid of emotionalism. Thanks. 19 Likes 1 Share |
Re: . by horsepower102: 4:05pm On Jan 17, 2020 |
pazienza: |
Re: . by Obi1kenobi(m): 6:36pm On Jan 17, 2020 |
pazienza: So basically, the crux of your argument is that the inherent perfidy and duplicity of the Yoruba race is the reason we should steer clear of the debate over Amotekun? Well, given you know me and my "political correctness", as you've disparagingly put it in the past, that's just one irreconcilable dispute which we're obviously not going to bridge. Cos you're going to pretty extreme lengths here to insinuate we're walking into some kind of trap and you haven't quite articulated just how deep and consequential the trap is. I don't see how your narrative works with how you've presented it. I don't see how Amotekun is a political bargaining chip that will somehow arm-twist the North into doing the political bidding of Yorubas. On the contrary, it's a massive political risk which might alienate the North from Yorubas (to add to already building tensions after Buhari did poorer than expected in the SW). And whatever alienates the North is a good thing in my playbook - except you're suggesting we should be the ones to betray Yorubas by cozying up to the North if they fall out with Yorubas. But there is a lot of conjecturing and supposition here that makes discussing their intentions unworthy of any substantive debate if you have already made up your mind that scheming, treacherous Yorubas are always cooking up something to bamboozle and sell out everyone. Also, all successful political movements in Nigeria are brain-childs of the elite and intelligentsia. This is Nigeria, not Finland or Norway. The elites run the show and the rest of us are spectators. So I'm not sure why that has any peculiar relevance when it comes to Amotekun. I credit the Yoruba elites for adopting a measure that had grassroots support (or even Northerners that nearly 2 decades ago, successively challenged the Nigerian constitutional order when they adopted Sharia law, Hisbah boards etc) and wish our leaders were as proactive. That's our own failure in politics and nothing to make us any more suspicious of other groups. The most relevant argument now is: 1) As Biafran nationalists, what are your core beliefs? What are your principles? Do you promulgate and fight for those principles or "keep it close to your chest"? Even Nnamdi Kanu who you have defended severally against my criticism thinks "Amotekun" aligns with his aspirations for Ndigbo. Which given his Biafran nationalist cause, seems a rational course to take. Your own strategy is what I'm still trying to figure out. 2) You still didn't address a key question I asked about how you intend to achieve your Biafran nationalist goals. Except you intend to take it by force (which won't happen, or even come close to happening, or even be attempted), there will come a point where you need the support of other Nigerians in your goal for self-determination. This would require us to be able to cooperate on certain strategic issues with other groups who seek various levels of autonomy and self-determination. If you're getting so worked up because of ordinary vocal support of Amotekun, I'm still all ears to hear how you Biafran nationalists intend to achieve your dream. Cos at this stage, it's becoming as if no one actually cares about any practical implementation of yearnings, beyond discussing utopian dreams. What's the strategy going forward? 3 Likes |
Re: . by B2mario(m): 7:03pm On Jan 17, 2020 |
Chiwude:this is always my stand. We welcome all parties to igboland for the fact that the part bearer is development and progress orientated. This party sentiment should stop. I think at this point (stage) we should not be looking at party but personality. 2 Likes |
Re: . by B2mario(m): 7:05pm On Jan 17, 2020 |
XANDERBOY85:Kai, I laugh in my dialect. You are the shortsighted person here who does not want to brace up. |
Re: . by B2mario(m): 7:08pm On Jan 17, 2020 |
ckenneths:another true post from a rational man. Thanks to God that the destroyer is no longer the governor of our dear lovely Imo state. 1 Like |
Re: . by MXrap: 7:08pm On Jan 17, 2020 |
Your state- Abia is a dilapidated filthy shithole but you are not bothered. Since 1999 Abia is yet to have a governor but you not worried. Abia state is the worst state in Nigeria but you are still talking in public. I spit on you. Abia people are cursed to abandon their state. [s] B2mario:[/s] 1 Like 1 Share |
Re: . by MXrap: 7:13pm On Jan 17, 2020 |
[s] B2mario:[/s] Hahahaha Which one is your governor? So you have quietly switched state. I no blame you, even a mad man will not even accept to be an Abia indigene. Abia state has the worst human capital and that's why they elect the worst people as governors since 1999 till date. See the only thing your governor has achieved since he was elected- sharing kerosene while Aba is a disgusting dilapidated sewage shithole and Umuahia is a village. Ndi Abia tufia. See your governor supervising kerosene sharing.
|
Re: . by XANDERBOY85: 8:15pm On Jan 17, 2020 |
spyder880: Reminds me of Bright Chimezie! |
Re: . by pazienza(m): 8:39pm On Jan 17, 2020 |
Obi1kenobi
The Crux of the matter is that we don't know what Amotekun is all about other than what Yorubas are claiming that it is in public. If Yorubas wanted other regions support in pushing Amotekun, common sense dictates that they should have liased with other regions during the planning stage before coming public with this. But that hasn't happened. On the contrary, violence or confrontations with the Power that be in Abuja has always been a bargaining chip for power blocs in Southern Nigeria. The Yorubas rallied behind the Abiola fiasco to make claim to power in 1999, the South South wielded economic sabotage of Abuja petrodollars via pipeline vandalism and kidnapping of foreign oil workers to press home the need for them to be appeased by Abuja, which eventually led to VP for GEJ in 2007. Infact, many SE politicians were hoping to use IPOB as a bargaining chip as well in the heat of those moments, before it became obvious they were not in control of Nnamdi Kanu and IPOB and the game was up, leading to the proscription of IPOB by SE governors. Confrontation and not peace and dialogue, has always been a veritable tool of power grab in Nigeria Already the North understands the game Yorubas are playing and had given them a hint with recent message by Miyyeti Allah suggesting that Yorubas would have to drop Amotekun if they still want 2023 presidency. This is exactly what Yorubas want to hear, and I can only imagine them pushing the North harder in coming weeks. Also, all successful political movements in Nigeria are brain-childs of the elite and intelligentsia. This is Nigeria, not Finland or Norway. The elites run the show and the rest of us are spectators. So I'm not sure why that has any peculiar relevance when it comes to Amotekun. I credit the Yoruba elites for adopting a measure that had grassroots support (or even Northerners that nearly 2 decades ago, successively challenged the Nigerian constitutional order when they adopted Sharia law, Hisbah boards etc) and wish our leaders were as proactive. That's our own failure in politics and nothing to make us any more suspicious of other groups. I have no issues with Yoruba elites forming Amotekun or whatever. I don't even want to care. We have similar sorts of vigilantes in SE. Anambra in particular. If you live in Anambra, you will always see them. It is not a must for us to support Amotekun or whatsoever Yorubas are up to. It's their headache, not Ours. You attempt at trying to armtwist Ndiigbo into lending support to a Yoruba agenda is at best disrespectful. The most relevant argument now is: 1. As a Biafran it is my belief that in everything Ndiigbo do, Igbo interests must come first, and if protecting Igbo interests means another group going to hell, then so be it. I am not a fan of NK, ever since I noticed his organization are bereft of any direction or strategic thinking. His version of Biafra is the one that care less about Igbo interests but more about the interests of groups he hopes to co opt into his utopic multiethnic Biafra. I'm not surprised that NK endorsed and is campaigning for Amotekun. Igbo lives and interests I have since concluded mean nothing to him. I learnt he is offering thousands of Igbo youths to serve in Amotekun. I hope he offers his own brothers, cousins and kinsmen for such insanity and not precious Igbo youths. NK has never been or claimed to be an Igbo nationalist, I have nothing in common with him. 2. You should ask yourself, do Yorubas really want regional autonomy for everyone? If they do, how come Buhari whose anti regional stance on issues became a hero in Yoruba land, while GEJ who organized a National conference and if allowed to continue could have implemented many aspects of the resolutions reached on the conference that could have led to a certain degree of decentralisation of power was vilified by them . In liberal PDP and GEJ, we had an opportunity to slowly decentralize the FG powers, but the Yorubas would rather have a dictator who is anti decentralisation in power, if it means they get to share power with the dictator or get crumbs. They also had the opportunity to right whatever wrong they did in 2015, by voting in a more liberal Atiku. But for promise of VP and presidency post Buhari, they once again jumped on Buhari train. This isn't the first time either. In 1967 when Ojukwu was arguing for Confederation, it was Awolowo and Yoruba intelligentsia who rather than support that, decided to jump on Gowon boat. It was with Yoruba support that Gowon dissolved the regions , created the states , and centralized power in Nigeria, same thing Ironsi was killed for attempting. Yorubas chant regionalism always, yet at any given point in time they had the option to sacrifice selfish interests to get regionalism, they chose the selfish interests and left those on the other side to burn. I also wonder what regionalism means to Yorubas, considering the resistance Oduah met at the hands of Yorubas, when she and GEJ made Enugu international airport. It would appear to me that Yorubas want a sort of arrangement where Lagos will retain it's current air and sea monopoly on the country, while allowing them to fully control the revenue from the sea and air gateway of Nigeria, without having the FG control them or share the revenue from them with the rest of the country. They also want to have untamed control on who. Stays or leaves their region amongst other things. Strictly speaking, they want to eat their cake and still have it . My strategy to get Biafra? well, it includes alot of things I can't list here, but it clearly doesn't involve repeating Igbo mistakes of yesteryears. It involves building the Igbo political unity strong first and foremost , staying clear of things that are none of our business, things that only serve as distractions that dissipate our energy, without serving our own interests, which this Amotekun fully represents. 16 Likes 1 Share |
Re: . by Nobody: 8:52pm On Jan 17, 2020 |
Flesh and blood did not reveal this to you Pazienza. We've read this script before in 1964, 1987, 1993 and 1999. The Yoruba's are strategizing with Amotekun to lay claim to the presidency. While I'm not interested in how they go about it, I'm keen into warning all the IPOB/Apolitical Igbo dunces not to involve Ndigbo in Yoruba struggles. Nnamdi Kanu and his cursed herds of exuberant touts should beware else they get burnt in the melee. The Yoruba's know how to settle their case with the north by retreating at the right time. Ndigbo should stay on their line and play their politics rights. The SE Governors, our legislators and Ohaneze Ndigbo must start acting like charismatic leaders and work towards achieving their goal, irrespective of party and creed. The likes of IPOB and other infiltrators or future Nzeogwu in the SE must be exposed and neutralized before they destroy us a second time. A word is enough for the wise. Igbo interest must come first! 5 Likes 2 Shares |
Re: . by Ishilove: 9:05pm On Jan 17, 2020 |
IDENNAA:I am very disappointed. I was hoping the mods would make it at least 3 months so the culprits can learn decorum on a public forum. 1 Like 1 Share |
Re: . by pazienza(m): 9:16pm On Jan 17, 2020 |
Chiwude: At the bold. Very apt. 7 Likes 2 Shares |
Re: . by SLAP44: 10:18pm On Jan 17, 2020 |
Pazienza, obikenobi
|
Re: . by SLAP44: 10:34pm On Jan 17, 2020 |
pazienza: When you see northerners trying hard to blend in and use divide and rule tactics on the south, you will know. This is same group of monikers who will rather die than see any south south person have affiliation with Igbo people still trying to make sure that Igbo people will not side with Yorubas for Amotekun when you see that the whole south shares the same threat of life. You start to wonder. My take is that there are no permanent friends or foes. When the Yoruba decides to sing a tune that sounds exactly like what Nnamdi Kanu is singing, I as a Biafran will dance. Amotekun has come to stay, so that Operation Agunweohia can also stand. 2 Likes |
Re: . by SLAP44: 10:37pm On Jan 17, 2020 |
Chiwude: Words straight out of the mouth of the miyetti alla 2 Likes |
Re: . by ckenneths(m): 12:29pm On Jan 19, 2020 |
Today, Udi-Ozalla bypass, Enugu state Government project 1 Like
|
Re: . by ckenneths(m): 12:31pm On Jan 19, 2020 |
Enugu state government erosion control works 2 Likes
|
Re: . by ckenneths(m): 12:32pm On Jan 19, 2020 |
Ifeanyi Ugwuanyi is busy 1 Like
|
Re: . by ckenneths(m): 12:33pm On Jan 19, 2020 |
We must control the erosion 1 Like
|
Re: . by okeyglm: 12:53pm On Jan 19, 2020 |
this road was built by sulivan. very durable road. 1 Like |
Re: . by letusbepieces: 12:55pm On Jan 19, 2020 |
Ishilove: Are u from Bini or Idu, as an Ukwuani girl? |
Re: . by letusbepieces: 12:59pm On Jan 19, 2020 |
Ukwuani, Ikwere, Onitsha, Ika and Ogba should tell us whether it is bini or Idu. This will go along way to sanitize and sensitize their claims. |
Re: . by Nobody: 1:04pm On Jan 19, 2020 |
SLAP44: Please every state should set up their own security measures. Amotekun is purely Illegal. Anambra already has theirs , so no need for any Operation Agunweofia or whatever....You can formulate that in your state. Anyway Obiano has rejected such, no need typing further. That's how people will leave governance and be pursuing shadows and all sorts of unnecessary stuff. Develop your home grown solutions, that's the way the go. Agunweofia my foot. 1 Like 1 Share |
Re: . by Obi1kenobi(m): 3:10pm On Jan 19, 2020 |
pazienza: They don't have to liaise with other regions and alert the FG to their machinations. On the contrary, their rollout was genius and didn't give the FG much time to react. They've simply trusted that the popular will of Nigerians would back them. So all principled people have no reason not to back them. Your reason for saying we shouldn't back them is based on some political calculation whose ends are unclear. Your comparisons with Niger Delta militants is a poor one. The Niger Delta hosts our oil infrastructure and the economic sabotage by the militants crippled our economy and forced the FG to the negotiating table. That is massive leverage to have. Amotekun doesn't hold anybody hostage to anything. It doesn't affect the life of anybody in Kano or Sokoto or Borno. Those in the North upset by it are control freaks who see Nigeria as conquered territory and want their national security hegemony unchallenged. How this is supposed to improve Yoruba bargaining position in their quest for power is something you haven't made clear. Also, if such confrontation is supposed to improve one's bargaining power, then why have the activities of IPOB only succeeded in further alienating Igbos from political consideration? You say it is because the Igbo political elites weren't in control of IPOB, but Niger Delta politicians weren't in any greater control either of the Niger Delta militant groups. The failure of IPOB's agitations is simply because the SE has little leverage over the country. Other than being rude and insolent to the powers that be, nobody of consequence in any Nigerian seat of power outside the SE would be swayed by anything IPOB does, cos they have zero leverage. Also, contrary to your deep cynicism, I don't believe Yorubas are making all these sinister calculations you're claiming and I don't believe they'll be retreating from their position on Amotekun, except it is defeated in the courts. Either way, it would not make one bit of difference to Ndigbo if they do. It is still in our interest to support any measure from any group in the country (SW, SS, Middle Belt or wherever) because this helps our own agitations by: 1) Establishing legal/constitutional precedent that opens a path for us 2) Showing goodwill to other groups and hoping they'll reciprocate when we find ourselves in similar situations.
Nobody has done any such thing here. I have no problem with those who do not wish to support Yorubas. I was responding more to you who found it offensive that any Igbo would even consider supporting Yorubas.
1) And we keep going round and round with this: that your agitation doesn't exist in a vacuum and involves a struggle against external factors against whom you'll need allies. Other groups cannot "go to hell" because we need the help of other groups. I've asked you severally how you intend to accomplish your objectives of Biafran nationhood and you really haven't given any cogent response to that. I want to hear how you're going to do it by telling other groups to "go to hell". I have a long list of problems with Nnamdi Kanu, but his aspirations for an inclusive, diverse Biafra incorporating a few Igboid and non-Igbo groups is the least of them. It's not compulsory for a successful nation to be a homogeneous one. Very few nations on earth are homogeneous. On the contrary, I firmly believe a Biafra without either one or both of current Delta and Rivers States to open it up to the sea is one destined for serious economic pain. But that's an argument for another day. 2) Buhari and APC ran on a platform of "restructuring" in 2015 and made it more central to their campaign than GEJ who spent 6 years in power paying the occasional lip service to it and squandering money on a useless confab to keep up appearances rather than sponsoring serious constitutional reform. Yes, Buhari got in power and betrayed that agenda because Northerners are the only vocal opponents to restructuring in Nigeria. But the SW has never been any less committed to restructuring than the SE. The average Yoruba man on the street is no less committed to devolution of power from the center than an Igbo man. This may be betrayed by their elites in their quest for power, but it is no different from our own political elites. Whether SE, SW, SS or wherever, we're all betrayed by the selfish personal ambitions of our elite, so maybe don't portray it as a Yoruba thing. Tinubu's political machinery which was in opposition since '99 helped carry Buhari to power and they expect to reap the benefits when Buhari steps down by putting one of their own in power. This is their main political aspiration and everything else comes second. So let's stop this self-deception: our political elites would make the exact same calculation as Yorubas if the Presidency was open to them. We're not morally superior because we chose Atiku over Buhari, or GEJ over Buhari. I'm weary of political arguments that frame political disputes as some struggle of good vs evil where we're the ones with honest motives and our adversaries have nothing but deceptive motives. Your narrative about Awolowo, Ojukwu and co is the Igbo propagandist version. A Yoruba propagandist will tell you Awolowo was far more committed to regionalism than Zik and would tell you Ironsi's Decree 34 which repealed the country's federal structure for a unitary one set the foundation for the current state of Nigeria's unworkable governing structure. So once again, maybe don't lay too much emphasis on the actions of ambitious elites to demonize the motives of an entire tribe with one-sided narratives. Oh, and just curious: what resistance did Stella Oduah meet at the hands of Yorubas for Enugu airport (where she did a shabby job)? 4 Likes |
Re: . by SLAP44: 4:14pm On Jan 19, 2020 |
Osagyefo98:Amotekun, the sieve to separate who is fulani and who is igbo. You have been identified according to your words. |
(1) (2) (3) ... (631) (632) (633) (634) (635) (636) (637) ... (732) (Reply)
Yorubas Are The Most Industrious,Richest & Educated Tribe in Nigeria & Africa / Nairaland Says No To Secessionists / Yoruba Commonwealth and Politics
(Go Up)
Sections: politics (1) business autos (1) jobs (1) career education (1) romance computers phones travel sports fashion health religion celebs tv-movies music-radio literature webmasters programming techmarket Links: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) Nairaland - Copyright © 2005 - 2024 Oluwaseun Osewa. All rights reserved. See How To Advertise. 140 |