Blindersoff:
[s]This is the same El Zakzaky many are attacking El Rufai for and whom Falana is defending.

It is clear that the FG knows much more than most do which is why they have refused to release El Zakzaky.

Buhari has remained defiant to the courts and has refused to release El Zakzaky and this picture justifies his reason not to[/s].

Fulani Herdsmen and Boko Haram are terrorists why are they allowed to walk free and if caught set free, are they not in the same category with El Zakzaky

Hmmmm

solmus:



its not a secret Iran backs most Shiite worldwide, just as Saudi backs sunis worldwide, Vatican backs all Catholics worldwide or American Backing Saudi and Isreal in the middle east.. the only question is when has a Shiite killed anyone anywhere to tag them terrorist


.

Iran have been a terror to Israel right from biblical times.
Iran is not hiding their hate for Zion and wiping them out of the surface of the earth. If that's not terror, then what is?

Blindersoff:
This is the same El Zakzaky many are attacking El Rufai for and whom Falana is defending.

It is clear that the FG knows much more than most do which is why they have refused to release El Zakzaky.

Buhari has remained defiant to the courts and has refused to release El Zakzaky and this picture justifies his reason not to.

So in other words he can decide to detain anybody he likes?
What happened to the rule of law and fundamental human rights?

Blackking98:
Lzaa Immhotep Gmbuhari SilasNwude . We need to hold special thanks giving service for our man sarrki. God has opened his eyes true true

It remains helinues and metaphysical insha Allah

Officialgarri:
Nigerian Shiite will lose the little sympathy they are getting from US

The US has never had open sympathy for any anti American movement which Shiite represents.

Expulsion of US and Elimination of Israel and a final nail to the deal of the century

I read zakzaky's Wikipedia and he's lost almost all his children in clashes and violent protests. It was stated there that his ultimate aim is to create an Islamic republic in Nigeria. I was thinking a while back that what has this guy done to the federal government to deserve such persecution considering he's a Muslim, little do I know that their aim is to disrupt the country through clandestine operations and to impose their religion on everyone else. The FG knows more than the people clamouring for his release.

ChaoHendrix:

So in other words he can decide to detain anybody he likes?
What happened to the rule of law and fundamental human rights?

Rule of law flies out of the window and fundamental human rights are limited when it comes to matter of National security.

Blindersoff:


A subpoena comes from the court and not from the house. This is why another name for a subpoena is a court summons.

It never came from the house. This was why they claimed executive privilege to counter the court summons.

in the US there is a house subpoena and court subpoena. you can't exercise executive privileges over Court subpoenas. the court is supreme.

you don't need a lecture on subpoenas, do you?

lincs25:
Falana lost his value! he doesn't know what he is up to now

When an ignorant fool talks. Falana is a lawyer and his job is to defend ANYBODY irrespective of your fragile emotions.

Sai zakzaky, sai babamu.

McPizzle:


Rule of law flies out of the window and fundamental human rights are limited when it comes to matter of National security.

rule of law is supreme every where in the world except Islamic countries, country under dictatorship and buhari Nigeria.

see as wickedness dey smell for dea face

2 of Amerikaz Most Wanted.

Daughters of terrorist

Lostz:

in the US there is a house subpoena and court subpoena. you can't exercise executive privileges over Court subpoenas. the court is supreme.

you don't need a lecture on subpoenas, do you?

You seem obtuse.

The house is the legislative arm and thus a part of the Judiciary. They never issue anything like a writ of summons aka a subpoena without the authorization of the court.

If the subpoena came just from the house then there was no need for him to invoke executive privilege. He would just have ignored.

Read up on subpoenas and stop letting me spoon feed you

McPizzle:


Rule of law flies out of the window and fundamental human rights are limited when it comes to matter of National security.

You are very correct

Lostz:
rule of law is supreme every where in the world except Islamic countries, country under dictatorship and buhari Nigeria.

I guess Trump followed rule of law when he killed Soleimani right? Why did he assassinate him and not arrest him and charge him to court since rule of law supercedes national security.

Blindersoff:
This is the same El Zakzaky many are attacking El Rufai for and whom Falana is defending.

It is clear that the FG knows much more than most do which is why they have refused to release El Zakzaky.

Buhari has remained defiant to the courts and has refused to release El Zakzaky and this picture justifies his reason not to.

Oga El Zakzaky is not in government custody

ChaoHendrix:

So in other words he can decide to detain anybody he likes?
What happened to the rule of law and fundamental human rights?

Tell that to Soleimani who was outrightly assassinated and not arrested and charged to court since you feel rule of law is above national security and his fundamental human rights should have been respected

Officialgarri:
Nigerian Shiite will lose the little sympathy they are getting from US

Some of you would just write what's not obtainable? US will never sympathise with Shiite or ISIs or their leading organisation, Al Qaeda.

solmus:



its not a secret Iran backs most Shiite worldwide, just as Saudi backs sunis worldwide, Vatican backs all Catholics worldwide or American Backing Saudi and Isreal in the middle east.. the only question is when has a Shiite killed anyone anywhere to tag them terrorist


.

Another question is what is shiite?

Blindersoff:


You seem obtuse.

The house is the legislative arm and thus a part of the Judiciary. They never issue anything like a writ of summons aka a subpoena without the authorization of the court.

If the subpoena came just from the house then there was no need for him to invoke executive privilege. He would just have ignored.

Read up on subpoenas and stop letting me spoon feed you

.

House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff said on September 13 that he had issued a subpoena to Acting
Director of National Intelligence Joseph Maguire , as Maguire had failed to release the whistleblower's complaint to the congressional intelligence committees, as was arguably required by the relevant statute. Schiff argued that the complaint might have been withheld from Congress "in an unlawful effort to protect the President and conceal from the Committee information related to his possible 'serious or flagrant' misconduct, abuse of power, or violation of law". [121][1


all subpoenas during Trump impeachment during Trump impeachment were issued by the house

the legislature is never part of the judiciary
the legislature in a presidential system is considered an independent and coequal branch of government along with both the judiciary and the executive.


Court subpoenas are supreme and the presidency cannot exercise executive privileges over them. when there is a disagreement between the executive and legislature, it is the judiciary that is supposed to give orders.

Blindersoff:

Frustrated soul go and fix your life

Lolz e pain am

Daughters of terrorist....
They supposed to be 3 in numbers! One of the daughter is missing, the one who's father sat at ASO ROCK.....
Conference with so much hate, if you want to convert the hate energy in their hearts into a progress or useful energy, believe me the strength of that progress energy can catapult u into planet MARS and back.
Lost tribe??

Blindersoff:


I guess Trump followed rule of law when he killed Soleimani right? Why did he assassinate him and not arrest him and charge him to court since rule of law supercedes national security.

there are no rule of law in combat. what they have is rule of engagement. the president role as a commander in chief is different from his role as head of the executive.

even the judiciary does not have the power to interfere in rule of engagement. only the legislature can checkmate the executive when it comes to combat

are you trying to tell me there is a war between Nigeria and shites?

these things are easy to understand.

Lostz:
.

House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff said on September 13 that he had issued a subpoena to Acting
Director of National Intelligence Joseph Maguire , as Maguire had failed to release the whistleblower's complaint to the congressional intelligence committees, as was arguably required by the relevant statute. Schiff argued that the complaint might have been withheld from Congress "in an unlawful effort to protect the President and conceal from the Committee information related to his possible 'serious or flagrant' misconduct, abuse of power, or violation of law". [121][1


all subpoenas during Trump impeachment during Trump impeachment were issued by the house

the legislature is never part of the judiciary
the legislature in a presidential system is considered an independent and coequal branch of government along with both the judiciary and the executive.


Court subpoenas are supreme and the presidency cannot exercise executive privileges over them. when there is a disagreement between the executive and legislature, it is the judiciary that is supposed to give orders.

You are really obtuse.

The moment the word SUBPOENA was used, it came from the court.

Only a court issues a subpoena

Blindersoff:


Tell that to Soleimani who was outrightly assassinated and not arrested and charged to court since you feel rule of law is above national security and his fundamental human rights should have been respected

there are no rule of law in combat. what they have is rule of engagement. the president role as a commander in chief is different from his role as head of the executive.
even the judiciary does not have the power to interfere in rule of engagement. only the legislature can checkmate the executive when it comes to combat

Lostz:
there are no rule of law in combat. what they have is rule of engagement. the president role as a commander in chief is different from his role as head of the executive.

even the judiciary does not have the power to interfere in rule of engagement. only the legislature can checkmate the executive when it comes to combat

are you trying to tell me there is a war between Nigeria and shites?

these things are easy to understand.

So you agree that national security supercedes rule of law.

Was there a war between USA and the Qud forces headed by Soleimani?

Was he and the Qud forces not allies to the USA in the fight against ISIS?

Even Trump and Pompeo till today have refused to show evidence they claimed they had against Soleimani that he was plotting attacks against the USA.

Perhaps you have special access to the evidence so you can use it to justify your post above. Can you show me?

immhotep:

It remains helinues and metphysical insha Allah