newinventions:
How can the supreme Court reverse it's own judgement. You are all mad. What on Earth is wrong with Nigerians.

How can a final court of Justice reverse it's own judgement.

God why did you drop me in this country.

Read this and stop making a fool of yourself:

Olorunfemi v Asho
This is yet another case in which the Supreme Court took the bold position to set aside its earlier decision. The Supreme Court set aside its judgment delivered in January 8, 1999 on the ground that, it failed to consider the respondents’ cross–appeal before allowing the appellant’s appeal.

Johnson v Lawanson
Coker J.S.C. delivering the court’s judgment held that “when the court is faced with the alternative of perpetuating what it is satisfied is an erroneous decision which was reached per incuriam and will, if followed, inflict hardship and injustice upon the generations in the future or of causing temporary disturbances of rights acquired under such a decision, I do not think we shall hesitate to declare the law as we find it.” The court then ordered that the appeal be re-heard de novo by another panel of Justices of the Supreme Court.

https://www.vanguardngr.com/2020/02/precedents-when-supreme-court-is-asked-to-reverse-itself/

michoim, gaskiyamagana, famology, gotnel, Schelube, colon, Afamed

Supreme court cannot sit on an appeal over it's own judgment.
These clowns that call themselves lawyers/SAN should know better. Heavy fines should be placed on Lawyers/SANS that files an appeal over a supreme court judgement.

Honestly this is becoming irritating and tiresome.
What is really the problem with our politicians? Don't they have any other thing to do?

And this not a partisan thing. APC and PDP should be ashamed of themselves.

Very soon they will be heading to ICJ in the Hague because of elections. Rubbish

9jahotblog:
Nice one from pdp observation.

Nice one how? Are u ok

Make Ihedioha go siddon jare, Hope is the choice of Imo people

post=86982493:
This party of thieves, looters and criminals will always be foolish.
They are not talking about the victory they had at the SC just few hours ago,
But see them coming up with another bs.
Bunch of annoying hypocrites.

Anyways,
The Supreme court has spoken, which should be final, as it is all over the world.

It all depends on who the indigenes of Bayelsa want and not what the Hypocrites that have never stepped their feet on Bayelsa state are shouting about.

For those of us that are not card carrying members of any political party, but only vote for good men and women that we believe can move their immediate environment forward (same reason all of us @[/b] voted for our darling Daddy in the presidential election and voted for another candidate in another party in our state of residence, no apologies to Sanwo-Olu!)

[b]It is sad that the days intellectuals (from opposing and different political affiliations) discuss politics on the political threads on Nairaland is gone and now it has gone to kids, hypocrites and dirty agberos that curse and abuse their mothers and fathers with no reasonable and sensible posts to contribute)

Lastly......

It is a always good and refreshing to see that we have a President who does not intervene in the rule of law.

Elections In Nigeria now,
There is no need to fear.
Why? Because the will of Nigerians will not be subverted. Never! A President once told us in this country that the coming polls would be do or die.
Not with President Buhari. Fair is fair. No foul play. Under his watch, his political party, the All Progressives Congress (APC) has lost gubernatorial elections in Bayelsa(now twice), Oyo State, Zamfara state and Anambra states.
At the last Council of States meeting, Gov Willie Obiano publicly registered his appreciation to President Buhari, for the level playing ground he made available during the election in his state. With do or die apostles, and a certain political party in power, such would never happen. Not with their garrison mentality. All states are territories that must be conquered, willy-nilly.

APC has won gubernatorial positions under Buhari in Kogi, Ondo and Edo states. The victories were fair and square. The party lost in Bayelsa (twice), Zamfara, Oyo, Anambra etc.
This President would never manipulate victory for anyone, not even his own party. And you ask us not to trust him?
We will, and no mistake.


God bless our darling Daddy President Muhammadu Buhari.
God bless Nigeria.


Lol
Just 3 mins ago sir!
All of us @[/b] love you too.....
Let's share the love around!
Stay blessed Chairman!


Because that is what you have programmed your mind to believe and have successfully brainwahsed your self in your [b]bs believe.
So in that case, you can't be helped.
We leave you to your believe, supporter of criminals and looters.
Live with your nightmare kid!


As simple as that.
END OF THREAD.

Oan,
One of us @[color=#006600][/color] just adopted these cute babies today from someone thinking about eating them!
(Pic for illustration)
Just imagine people eating such beautiful creatures.
Wetin Nigerians no go ever eat?!
They are just so adorable.

PDP is just making case for a lost battle so that when they finally get what they deserve, the gullible ones will see something to wail about.

CanadaOrBust:


Read this and stop making a fool of yourself:

https://www.vanguardngr.com/2020/02/precedents-when-supreme-court-is-asked-to-reverse-itself/

Guy we know there is a precedent in for reviewing supreme Court judgments, but it should be made based on very compellingly fact and evidence, not the rubbish total mockery our politicians are subjecting the country to.

It's more of a tit for tat that we're seeing now.

kerzhim:
PDP is just making case for a lost battle so that when they finally get what they deserve, the gullible ones will see something to wail about.

You are 100% right.
It is as simple as that!

post=86982493:
This party of thieves, looters and criminals will always be foolish.
They are not talking about the victory they had at the SC just few hours ago,
But see them coming up with another bs.
Bunch of annoying hypocrites.

Anyways,
The Supreme court has spoken, which should be final, as it is all over the world.

It all depends on who the indigenes of Bayelsa want and not what the Hypocrites that have never stepped their feet on Bayelsa state are shouting about.

For those of us that are not card carrying members of any political party, but only vote for good men and women that we believe can move their immediate environment forward (same reason all of us @[/b] voted for our darling Daddy in the presidential election and voted for another candidate in another party in our state of residence, no apologies to Sanwo-Olu!)

[b]It is sad that the days intellectuals (from opposing and different political affiliations) discuss politics on the political threads on Nairaland is gone and now it has gone to kids, hypocrites and dirty agberos that curse and abuse their mothers and fathers with no reasonable and sensible posts to contribute)

Lastly......

It is a always good and refreshing to see that we have a President who does not intervene in the rule of law.

Elections In Nigeria now,
There is no need to fear.
Why? Because the will of Nigerians will not be subverted. Never! A President once told us in this country that the coming polls would be do or die.
Not with President Buhari. Fair is fair. No foul play. Under his watch, his political party, the All Progressives Congress (APC) has lost gubernatorial elections in Bayelsa(now twice), Oyo State, Zamfara state and Anambra states.
At the last Council of States meeting, Gov Willie Obiano publicly registered his appreciation to President Buhari, for the level playing ground he made available during the election in his state. With do or die apostles, and a certain political party in power, such would never happen. Not with their garrison mentality. All states are territories that must be conquered, willy-nilly.

APC has won gubernatorial positions under Buhari in Kogi, Ondo and Edo states. The victories were fair and square. The party lost in Bayelsa (twice), Zamfara, Oyo, Anambra etc.
This President would never manipulate victory for anyone, not even his own party. And you ask us not to trust him?
We will, and no mistake.


God bless our darling Daddy President Muhammadu Buhari.
God bless Nigeria.


Lol
Just 3 mins ago sir!
All of us @[/b] love you too.....
Let's share the love around!
Stay blessed Chairman!


Because that is what you have programmed your mind to believe and have successfully brainwahsed your self in your [b]bs believe.
So in that case, you can't be helped.
We leave you to your believe, supporter of criminals and looters.
Live with your nightmare kid!


You are 100% right.
It is as simple as that!


As simple as that.
END OF THREAD.

Oan,
One of us @[color=#006600][/color] just adopted 6 of these cute babies today from someone thinking about eating them!
(Pic for illustration)
Just imagine people eating such beautiful creatures.
Wetin Nigerians no go ever eat?!
They are just so adorable.

u are an example of what Nigerian youth has become.

CanadaOrBust:


Read this and stop making a fool of yourself:

https://www.vanguardngr.com/2020/02/precedents-when-supreme-court-is-asked-to-reverse-itself/

michoim, gaskiyamagana, famology, gotnel, Schelube

Even if Supreme court made an error on their judgement they will never reverse their judgement. Guy it's not done anywhere in the world. Are you even normal. Why am I talking to this guy sef

NigeriaBam:
Failed Propaganda, the same Sledge hammer will be used on you.

---

Meanwhile, Are you looking for TRUSTED and RELIABLE Data Seller. Check My Profile or Signature MTN and 9mobile Data Is AVAILABLE At Lowest Price.
We're Doing This Business With Honesty, Sincerity, Transparency And God's Fearing.

who will patronise a zomby? Mixing business with zomby wk,that is a foolish move.

mrgoodd:
Many people think they re educated on this Forum, The truth is they re serious illiterate, Imagine one Okoro claiming a senior lawyer on nairaland yesterday saying Bayelsa is going back to the hand of APC, You see those women Judges at Supreme Court ehn , They know what they re doing, You can only manipulate your wife not sensible woman.

You are sounding more of an Illiterate

Do you know how judgement is reached amongst the supreme Court judges? No! You do not and why you composing gibberish.

Nwaoguta:
Story, ihedioha should wait till 2028 when hope might have concluded his 8 years of God given mandate, imolites want hope uzodimma, he is the solution to imo problems created by rochas.

mr man are you sure u are truly from oguta,we the Indigene of oguta aren’t this foolish...in Emeka we believe

post=86982493:
This party of thieves, looters and criminals will always be foolish.
They are not talking about the victory they had at the SC just few hours ago,
But see them coming up with another bs.
Bunch of annoying hypocrites.

Anyways,
The Supreme court has spoken, which should be final, as it is all over the world.

It all depends on who the indigenes of Bayelsa want and not what the Hypocrites that have never stepped their feet on Bayelsa state are shouting about.



Elections In Nigeria now,
There is no need to fear.
Why? Because the will of Nigerians will not be subverted. Never! A President once told us in this country that the coming polls would be do or die.* [/i]

The Donkey you have in power and praising now once told us "....the Dog and the baboon will soak in blood if elections didn't go his way..."

CanadaOrBust:


Read this and stop making a fool of yourself:

Olorunfemi v Asho
This is yet another case in which the Supreme Court took the bold position to set aside its earlier decision. The Supreme Court set aside its judgment delivered in January 8, 1999 on the ground that, it failed to consider the respondents’ cross–appeal before allowing the appellant’s appeal.

Johnson v Lawanson
Coker J.S.C. delivering the court’s judgment held that “when the court is faced with the alternative of perpetuating what it is satisfied is an erroneous decision which was reached per incuriam and will, if followed, inflict hardship and injustice upon the generations in the future or of causing temporary disturbances of rights acquired under such a decision, I do not think we shall hesitate to declare the law as we find it.” The court then ordered that the appeal be re-heard de novo by another panel of Justices of the Supreme Court.

https://www.vanguardngr.com/2020/02/precedents-when-supreme-court-is-asked-to-reverse-itself/

With the way election is conducted in this country you think Supreme Court will reverse any of their judgments. You think they don't know these politicians.

Keep dreaming.

PDP & it Wailers lack sense of humor. In today's judgment the Supreme court stated it categorically that they don't reverse judgment.
So PDP why the cry?

God pass them

newinventions:


Even if Supreme court made an error on their judgement they will never reverse their judgement. Guy it's not done anywhere in the world. Are you even normal. Why am I talking to this guy sef

Read this and stop making a fool of yourself, u & maishai01 :

Olorunfemi v Asho
This is yet another case in which the Supreme Court took the bold position to set aside its earlier decision. The Supreme Court set aside its judgment delivered in January 8, 1999 on the ground that, it failed to consider the respondents’ cross–appeal before allowing the appellant’s appeal.

Johnson v Lawanson
Coker J.S.C. delivering the court’s judgment held that “when the court is faced with the alternative of perpetuating what it is satisfied is an erroneous decision which was reached per incuriam and will, if followed, inflict hardship and injustice upon the generations in the future or of causing temporary disturbances of rights acquired under such a decision, I do not think we shall hesitate to declare the law as we find it.” The court then ordered that the appeal be re-heard de novo by another panel of Justices of the Supreme Court.

If PDP loose supreme Court judgment, they will reboot the INEC SERVER to reclaim their lost mandate.
PDP power!!

maishai01:


Guy we know there is a precedent in for reviewing supreme Court judgments, but it should be made based on very compellingly fact and evidence, not the rubbish total mockery our politicians are subjecting the country to.

It's more of a tit for tat that we're seeing now.

If the following is not compelling nothing in the world can be.

The following is from the actual summary of trial materials as presented in a major reputable newspaper.
Pay special attention to the bolded.
———————————————-

That Supreme Court Magic Judgment
This Day (Lagos) 17 FEBRUARY 2020

... According to summary of trial materials, no ward collation agent was called to show that at the collation center results were brought from the 388 polling units where the alleged exclusion took place...

The petitioner, rather called 28 polling unit agents who came to identify some of the results tendered by the petitioner from the bar. All the electoral documents were tendered from the bar and thus dumped on the court without anybody giving evidence correlating the contents of the result forms with the tabulation done by the petitioner himself.

Each of the 18 polling unit agents under cross-examination, manifested ignorance of the contents of the documents and never convinced anybody of being present in their claimed polling units...

Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) had in their reply to the petition disowned those result sheets and averred emphatically that NO RESULTS WERE GENERATED from those polling units as elections in those polling units were cancelled by presiding officers as a result of violence, over voting, snatching of electoral materials, etc. The Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) stated that any result from those polling units presented by any of the candidates, in this case, the petitioners, must be fake.

When confronted with the purported result sheets tendered by the petitioners, each of the witnesses admitted as follows:
i. The names and signatures of the Presiding Officers are not well found on those results.
ii. The names and signatures of other party agents did not appear on the result sheets, neither could they mention even one party agent of the other political parties in those booths.
iii. The result sheets do not contain the total number of ballot papers used and number of ballot papers unused or invalid. The scores of political parties are not clear on the face of the documents.

Based on the above, it appears the Supreme Court was desperately working to an answer in favour of the ruling party... and the only opening to do that was to accept the fictitious results of the 388 polling units willy-nilly. And instead of doing substantial justice on the matter, it ended up delivering one of judiciary's greatest infamies which even a kid learning arithmetic can see through. The judgment turned logic on its head, rewrote the basic universal laws of arithmetic and did grave and substantial injury to our democracy and the power of the people to choose who governs them. With this judicial precedent, the Supreme Court has inevitably rubber-stamped political rascality and the judgment could shape our democratic future.

The court has widened the opening which politicians exploit and manipulate to get into elective offices. All one needs to do is to stay somewhere, maybe in one's room, probably with one policeman or so, write one's own results, submit to INEC for counting and if it refuses, don't worry, bid your time till you get to the court. With supreme arrogance, the final court of appeal will recognise the results as legitimate, credible and authentic and pronto, you will be declared duly elected.

...Even more perplexing was the fact that in some of the polling units, voter turnout was more than the registered voters. How is this possible?
In Uzodinma's result sheets, there was no voided vote and only two parties, the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) and APC participated and were reflected in the election results of the 388 polling units. Yet, 70 political parties participated in that election and were all reflected in the INEC declared results of other polling units all over the state. ..,Does it mean that other parties such as All Progressives Grand Alliance (APGA), Action Alliance (AA), etc., did not participate in the election in those 388 polling units contrary to INEC's results in other areas of the state?
Why did the result sheets reflect only two parties when so many parties participated in the said election? Apparently, Senator Uzodinma concocted those results that fly in the face of the basic laws of arithmetic and common sense between the PDP and the APC after the fact that the PDP had won the election and he only scored his party a vote figure higher than the PDP vote. The corollary to that is that if it was any other party that was on the cusp of victory, Uzodinma's results would have been between just the APC and that party! Yet our almighty Supreme Court glossed over all these fundamental anomalies in Uzodinma's result sheets which had been rejected by even INEC... and accepted same as authentic.
A further assessment of the result sheets of the disputed 388 polling units showed that the said units are all in the Orlu Senatorial Zone where Uzodinma and the candidate of the Action Alliance Ugwumba Uche Nwosu come from. So even if the 388 polling units were concentrated mostly in Uzodinma's ancestral home, surely, Nwosu who emerged second in the March 9, 2019 election in Imo State and was backed by the incumbent governor at the time, Rochas Okorocha, his father in-law, must have amassed some votes from the units. But these votes were curiously missing, for the simple reason that they forged the results, and very badly at that.
Furthermore, Uzodinma of the APC scored an average of 98% of the total votes cast in the 388 units, whereas he scored an average of 13% in the remaining polling units in the state. How could this be? Why was it that it was only in these 388 units throughout the state that the voter turnout was either more than the registered voters or achieved 98 to 100 percent of the registered voters? Please note that emphasis is NOT on the number of accredited voters which is usually far less than the number of registered voters. Uzodinma's fake results validated by our Supreme Court defy reason. The pattern of the results from the disputed 388 polling units clearly shows the improbability of such an occurrence. And on the basis of the testimony of one policeman, and 28 discredited polling units' agents who gave contradictory statements at trial, the Supreme Court accepted the results.

In declaring Uzodinma governor of Imo State, the Supreme Court simply annulled a valid mandate freely given to an individual and transferred it to another person who came fourth in the election.

May God punish APC, PDP Members & INEC, they had succeeded reducing Nigeria to zero.

When i traveled to Canada in 2014 i was so proud to tell people that i came from Nigeria,
today if i even visit a country like Namibia can i bold enough to tell Namibian that I'm from Nigeria?
God knows i will be ashame of my self.

sapientia:
Who doesn't know Imo is the cause of all these.

Bayelsa was a valid case, even falana said the judgement was wrong just like he explained imo. So why is Pdp being so hypocritical. It’s annoying and dishonorable.

Only a fool would believe the Supreme Court would Reverse its decision . What sort of precedent do you want created.

I won't predict but d best thing for the supreme court is to do what is right as the last hope now...

Right what u did wrong and claim ur broken image now ooh

NigeriaBam:
Failed Propaganda, the same Sledge hammer will be used on you.

---

Meanwhile, Are you looking for TRUSTED and RELIABLE Data Seller. Check My Profile or Signature MTN and 9mobile Data Is AVAILABLE At Lowest Price.
We're Doing This Business With Honesty, Sincerity, Transparency And God's Fearing.

Pls I want to reason with you pls be Frank... No doubt Supreme Court is the final stop...but in a case that the SC fails to check figures and it makes the judgement imbalance , what else can be done , I know it not in the power of the SC to order for rerun, and Gov Hope was able to prove that his votes were truely canceled in more than 300 polling unit, but the SC didn't check the figures to see if it tallies with either numbers of people that collected PVCs in Those PUs, and even the accredited voters. Now that judgement has been passed , what is the implication in the future ?, Because a SC judge agreed to such mistake in the Case of Baba Tinubu that he discharged him out of errors from fraud cases, and the judgent stand to today. In the case of Imo, what is the future implication ?, Because o know for sure that the SC doesn't have the power to other for rerun and the proved canceled votes when granted and added it would exceed the total numbers of even total numbers of voters who collected voters card not to talk of the lesser number of accredited voters ?...pls explain this for me for future purpose , because any judge can make reference to this IMo case in the future to pass judgement...pls educate me more if what the SC did was the best ?

The Supreme Court verdict on Bayelsa today is enough to make it clear kola is wasting his time expecting same court to upturn its earlier verdict on imo guber judgements... It's clear 10m awarded to pdp will be paid by the party itself.. Supreme Court will also ask ikhedioha to pay hope 10m for bringing frivolous case and waste the valuable court hours. From today judgements in Bayelsa the only place for appeal after Supreme Court verdict on any issue is heaven ... Kola is not serious going by today's judgements and his nonsense press release

CanadaOrBust:


Read this and stop making a fool of yourself, u & maishai01 :

Olorunfemi v Asho
This is yet another case in which the Supreme Court took the bold position to set aside its earlier decision. The Supreme Court set aside its judgment delivered in January 8, 1999 on the ground that, it failed to consider the respondents’ cross–appeal before allowing the appellant’s appeal.

Johnson v Lawanson
Coker J.S.C. delivering the court’s judgment held that “when the court is faced with the alternative of perpetuating what it is satisfied is an erroneous decision which was reached per incuriam and will, if followed, inflict hardship and injustice upon the generations in the future or of causing temporary disturbances of rights acquired under such a decision, I do not think we shall hesitate to declare the law as we find it.” The court then ordered that the appeal be re-heard de novo by another panel of Justices of the Supreme Court.

Supreme Court will reverse the judgment in your dream.