maasoap:


Firstly, I'm not from the North, just that I could see and believe (just like presidency, military chiefs and national assembly) in what many of you can't really see. Killings are immediate solution, how well has it worked so far? Can you answer that question?
But, now I see that you're jealous in some way because you see this as some kind of competition or rivalry.
Amnesty is not such a bad idea if killings doesn't help. Why was Amnesty introduced in the Niger Delta? Because killings the militants didn't help, rather it led to more economic loss. It is just that many of you have this weird opinion that Amnesty means free money for the repentant criminals because the first time many of you knew about it, it was introduced with free money for the repentant militants.
Amnesty doesn't mean free money, it means just pardon.

Storeyedbuildin:

No I can't drive!!

Olatara:
Make sense.

CSTR2:

You are so dumb not to realise that no terrorist can exist on the US soil

If they did, the US would crush them with no option.

America wants to save money. It is not their land.

If the govt of Iraq was strong enough, they would have been the ones to finish off the Taliban.

Xisnin:

Nah, you can't use your brain.
Oh, I actually thought Iraq, and Afghanistan are US lands

You and your Ipob goons kept boasting that you love Trump because he will destroy
terrorists everywhere but here he is negotiating with a mass murderer Islamic terrorist group.

Even when he assassinated the Iranian general we are told how badass Trump is and how all
terrorists fear him and how he will destroy Iran and how your god is with him.
You guys didn't remember that time that Iraq is not America's land, neither did you clarify that
Soulemaini isn't really a terrorist.

Now that your thin god has done the unthinkable, you are now segmenting Islamic terrorists into local and
foreign when even a kid with a brain knows that there are no Islamic terrorists base on US soil.

It is a simple question.
Which terrorist will America not negotiate with?

What a humiliating week for Ipob members.

When are you going to open a thread to praise the Taliban and tell us 10 reasons why
they are not a terrorist group?

Godons1:



See this Igbo MUSLIM. You better go and face the rise of Igbo Herdsmen in the EAst.

Commentor:
But wrong for Nigeria to release renounced Boko Haram suspects.

For many years, the USA told us the Taliban were a terrorist group.

Yet they've negotiated with terrorists today.

Olatara:
Ok lemme look for another for you

Macsjebs:

Source: https://www.bbc.com/news/amp/world-asia-51689443

DabuIIIT:


Self appointed special minister of Igbo affairs lolsssssss
ipob special analyst
BAAAHAHAHAHAHAAAHAHAA!!!!!!

Thunda faya joblessness Sha!!!!

Storeyedbuildin:
Pls am searching for job ooo.....

I can do anytin ooo ..so far it nuh related to blood or fraud....

Be it security,gateman ,office work or even factory work....am getting tired of this life already I wud be glad if anyone can be of help....

I can even do laundry for u...clean ur house and even prepare meals for u...so far its Lagos...


If u don't av the connection u can connect me to someone who has ...plsss..

THANKS IN ADVANCE

Pls safe a starving brother

Kopfschmerzenmd:
The Republican Party lost its fucking mind when Obama released 5 decrepit Taliban guys to get US Army soldier Bowe Bergdahl back home. Now Trump cuts a deal to release 5000 Taliban prisoners.

Amotekun2020:


Have you applied for Western Nigeria security?

pacespot:


Na your papa no get sense if that is how you talk to a man. Wasn't the Afghan war started by USA toppling a sharia-loving incumbent Taliban government and trying to install its pro western puppet into the government? If you don't know anything about what you talk about it is better to shut your warm-infested mouth for good

gaetano:


Never equate talibans to bokoharam, you can equate Boko Haram to isis.

The Talibans have been the ones in charge of govt ever since before the USA toppled their govt trying to force democracy down their throats and install a puppet. It was all about the oil game. The talibans are a legitimate people fighting for a just cause.

Once again bokoharam = isis, while Talibans = ND militants

gaetano:


Never equate talibans to bokoharam, you can equate Boko Haram to isis.

The Talibans have been the ones in charge of govt ever since before the USA toppled their govt trying to force democracy down their throats and install a puppet. It was all about the oil game. The talibans are a legitimate people fighting for a just cause.

Once again bokoharam = isis, while Talibans = ND militants

MoIbrahim:


Lol!

Commentor:
But wrong for Nigeria to release renounced Boko Haram suspects.

For many years, the USA told us the Taliban were a terrorist group.

Yet they've negotiated with terrorists today.

maasoap:


Firstly, I'm not from the North, just that I could see and believe (just like presidency, military chiefs and national assembly) in what many of you can't really see. Killings are immediate solution, how well has it worked so far? Can you answer that question?
But, now I see that you're jealous in some way because you see this as some kind of competition or rivalry.
Amnesty is not such a bad idea if killings doesn't help. Why was Amnesty introduced in the Niger Delta? Because killings the militants didn't help, rather it led to more economic loss. It is just that many of you have this weird opinion that Amnesty means free money for the repentant criminals because the first time many of you knew about it, it was introduced with free money for the repentant militants.
Amnesty doesn't mean free money, it means just pardon.

And BTW: Nigeria government watered Boko Haram, not you guys in the north

Commentor:
But wrong for Nigeria to release renounced Boko Haram suspects.

For many years, the USA told us the Taliban were a terrorist group.

Yet they've negotiated with terrorists today.

Gnaeusmagnus:


Hindsight is always 20/20

The truth is, from past experience, countries fighting insurgency like the US did in foreign lands either fight a total war of genocidal destruction, or end up negotiating and withdrawing

1.US went to Vietnam...in 1956...and in 1973...withdrew with a peace deal that in essence handed the country to the enemies they were fighting.

2.UK fought a war with Kenyan revolutioaries from 1953-60..they 'won',...and then granted Kenya independence by 1962...which meant the fighting was in vain...

3.France successfully beat the FLN in 1958...and then granted independence in 1962..and handed over...to the same FLN.

4.Russia fought in the same Afghanistan from 1979-89...and then left their weak puppet government to be beaten by the same Muhajjiden they were fighting (the Taliban were part of that Muhajjideen then).

5.The UK fought two wasted wars in that same Afghanistan in the 19th century. and ended up leaving the Afghnas alone.

So, IMHO...the US had no business in Afghanistan. At the end of the day, Afghanistan is not called 'the graveyard of empries' for nothing.They should have learned from the Russians and the UK, and their own past mistakes in Vietnam.

(And no, I don't back or excuse the Taliban, or Al Qaeda.)

maasoap:


Lol. I remember the last and final onslaught against the guerrillas in Sri Lanka not too long ago. It was a total annihilation.

gaetano:


Never equate talibans to bokoharam, you can equate Boko Haram to isis.

The Talibans have been the ones in charge of govt ever since before the USA toppled their govt trying to force democracy down their throats and install a puppet. It was all about the oil game. The talibans are a legitimate people fighting for a just cause.

Once again bokoharam = isis, while Talibans = ND militants

Lawren76:


Guy shut-up who tell you his is from igboland

Openbusiness:

Losing 2400 soldiers in 18 years = 134 soldiers (approx) per year = 11 soldiers per month. That is still a very good statistics military wise fighting on enemy soil, and enemy territory. And considering that the Taliban has suffered heavier casualties on their side, probably over a hundred thousand but trust the western governments to downplay the figures. How many Nigerian soldiers has bokoharam killed in Nigeria (their own country and territory) in the past one year? Going by all the news on the media etc, it is definitely more that 2400, being slaughtered back to back in their own backyard. Yet you are worried about the US military losses, no please, worry about Nigerian troops and may God help them and save them from the incompetent government directing their affairs.