kestolove95:
Dix dinosaur tin na just fallacy, nothing like dat existed

lagdmark:

Story, so you believe in 170 million years dating technology which is based on assumption.

WILLuKPquiet:


I be wan type same thing.

The whites can lie ehn!

Atheists won't challenge them, they are zombies.

Na to antagonise the Bible even when science confirms its accounts.

I foresee them coming like a swam of angry bees to bite.

Make I Dodge them

ReneeNuttall:
My qstn is,How do they discover these things?Cuz we were told Rhinos ,Dino's,And stygos existed millions of years ago,even though the Bible said the world started existing thousands of years ago.And these scientists were non existent then.

For all I can imagine that could be a Print of maybe a stone or an object that once landed there during a volcanic eruption.I'm just thinking out loud.

ReneeNuttall:
My qstn is,How do they discover these things?Cuz we were told Rhinos ,Dino's,And stygos existed millions of years ago,even though the Bible said the world started existing thousands of years ago.And these scientists were non existent then.

For all I can imagine that could be a Print of maybe a stone or an object that once landed there during a volcanic eruption.I'm just thinking out loud.

toscolee:





Another world existed on earth, was destroyed in the devil's rebellion before the present one, which is earth.

musicwriter:


The bible is not a history book. Its mythology mixed up with little real events here and there.

In about 450 BC, a historian named Herodotus traveled to Egypt and he was fascinated that the Egyptians had more Gods than the Greeks, in fact, the Egyptians also had all the Gods the Greeks had plus many more. Then he asked the Egyptians how long they've been worshiping a God called Heracles, and they told him that Heracles has been worshiped for ''seventeen thousand years to the beginning of the reign of Amasis.'' The Egyptians knew this because they kept record of all their past kings, queens and dynasties and their times of reign.

Amasis a.ka Ahmose II, reigned from 570–526 BC and by that time Heracles (which wasn't even the oldest God) was already worshiped for 17,000 years!!.

If you add 17,000 years plus 2,500 years when this inquiry took place, you have about 20,000 years already. Remember, this isn't how old the Egyptian civilization but how old they've known a God that the Greeks called Heracles.

What am I trying to tell you? Heracles as a God is older than Jehovah!. Jehovah is a new God not older than 4,000 years. That's why your bible told you that the world is 6,000 years old.

The bible is mythology taken too far.

NB: This's not to say there're millions years old animal foot prints out there in the forest because no such foot print would survive on soil for millions of years.

enamored1:


The Bible doesn't say the world started existing thousands of years ago. The Bible doesn't tell us how many years Adam and Eve used in the garden. For all we know, they could have spent millions of years before eating the damning fruit.

Also, the Bible describes two animals in the book of Job which don't exist today, Leviathan and Behemoth. They COULD be remnants of the Dino-race.

rottennaija:


My dear, I'm going to say this... The bible was written by men whose views and thoughts about the world was limited. What was written reflected the limited human thinking of that time.

For example, while many religious people had held to the belief that the earth is just a few thousand years old, these grounds are quickly shifting as new evidence comes into being. Now, they are saying the days referred to in the creation story of genesis was an undefined period (which could be millions of years or thousands but definitely not a literal 1 day period). But again, they still have to grapple with the other part that says 'they came to be morning and evening'

About 4 years, watchtower, the publishing corporation or the parent company of Jehovah's Witnesses made a statement in one of their Awake magazines, saying that the Genesis said God created the heavens and the earth, but did not say how he did it. That it could have been by a big bang.

My point is, many religious apologist are not taking the genesis account as literal anymore as it used to be taken in time past. The genesis account carries a lot of question marks and reflects the thinking of that time.

rottennaija:


My dear, I'm going to say this... The bible was written by men whose views and thoughts about the world was limited. What was written reflected the limited human thinking of that time.

For example, while many religious people had held to the belief that the earth is just a few thousand years old, these grounds are quickly shifting as new evidence comes into being. Now, they are saying the days referred to in the creation story of genesis was an undefined period (which could be millions of years or thousands but definitely not a literal 1 day period). But again, they still have to grapple with the other part that says 'they came to be morning and evening'

About 4 years, watchtower, the publishing corporation or the parent company of Jehovah's Witnesses made a statement in one of their Awake magazines, saying that the Genesis said God created the heavens and the earth, but did not say how he did it. That it could have been by a big bang.

My point is, many religious apologist are not taking the genesis account as literal anymore as it used to be taken in time past. The genesis account carries a lot of question marks and reflects the thinking of that time.

ReneeNuttall:


This topic of discussion has really opened my eyes to so many things I never knew happened before now,I mean all this while,av always thought the world hasn't been more than 3or4 thousand years of existence.And when scientists come up with their theories of millions and thousands of years I always find it vague and conflicting..... Thanks a lot.

ReneeNuttall:
My qstn is,How do they discover these things?Cuz we were told Rhinos ,Dino's,And stygos existed millions of years ago,even though the Bible said the world started existing thousands of years ago.And these scientists were non existent then.

For all I can imagine that could be a Print of maybe a stone or an object that once landed there during a volcanic eruption.I'm just thinking out loud.

ReneeNuttall:


Wow! Thanks for opening my eyes, I'm already googling this info.This is more interesting than I thought.

kestolove95:
Dix dinosaur tin na just fallacy, nothing like dat existed

ToluNazzal:
All lies. They are always fond of finding one thing or the other to stay relevant.

Guys, pls rate my Youtube channel

Here's my First Video


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JgZuUXHBzSA

lasmile:
How do they calculate these years?

Gartol:
lol baba no be so. I am a Muslim and I am a strong believer but i am also a scientist. I read a lot about science related topics and articles especially astronomy, quantum physics and anything space related.

I am not here to criticize your believe or anything but I don't think you should blame religion. Blame the worshippers who do not understand religion.

For example, supposing you have a car and you want to know how good it is then you employ a driver who is not an expert to drive your car, he crashes the car who would the blame go to the driver or the car? Obviously the driver.

Religion never asked us to be stupid, never asked us to be backward but those who do not understand what religion is all about makes someone think it is crap.

Religion and science are two different things. I haven't read all religion scriptures but I am very sure no religion scripture is against discovery and science advancement, no religion scripture tells us to be lazy. It is the followers of the religion that just want to be.

An average Nigerian will rather believe in prophecy from one Alfa or pastor instead of him to work hard. If the creator is lazy would the universe be in place

An average Nigerian will rather curse a bad government instead of him to go out and vote during elections. The blame is on the individual not religion.

We should all understand the purpose why we are here, make peace with our maker help solve the problem of humanity, love our neighbours and we will just be on the right track.

gypsey:
Precisely my point, but i still doubt some religious believes esspecially when they are unexplained. you would find also that believes or religion is relative. i can choose to believe in or worship a tree in front of my house or my shoes as long as i am convinced within me that the tree or my shoes are my God.

In India some people believes that cows are their Gods and they worship those cows. are we then going to conclude that they are stupid? or that they are worshipping the wrong God?

Nairalandmonika:

Tell me any account of the Bible that has been scientifically proven.
Is it the fact that a donkey talk or the fact that snake talked or the fact that Jesus die and woke up or all the miracle. Am such you believed dragon existed because it was written in the Bible.

Stupidity is when you believe a donkey can talk but you don't believe half life formula which has been proven by scientist all over the world.

ToluNazzal:
All lies. They are always fond of finding one thing or the other to stay relevant.

Guys, pls rate my Youtube channel

Here's my First Video


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JgZuUXHBzSA

musicwriter:


The bible is not a history book. Its mythology mixed up with little real events here and there.

In about 450 BC, a historian named Herodotus traveled to Egypt and he was fascinated that the Egyptians had more Gods than the Greeks, in fact, the Egyptians also had all the Gods the Greeks had plus many more. Then he asked the Egyptians how long they've been worshiping a God called Heracles, and they told him that Heracles has been worshiped for ''seventeen thousand years to the beginning of the reign of Amasis.'' The Egyptians knew this because they kept record of all their past kings, queens and dynasties and their times of reign.

Amasis a.ka Ahmose II, reigned from 570–526 BC and by that time Heracles (which wasn't even the oldest God) was already worshiped for 17,000 years!!.

If you add 17,000 years plus 2,500 years when this inquiry took place, you have about 20,000 years already. Remember, this isn't how old the Egyptian civilization but how old they've known a God that the Greeks called Heracles.

What am I trying to tell you? Heracles as a God is older than Jehovah!. Jehovah is a new God not older than 4,000 years. That's why your bible told you that the world is 6,000 years old.

The bible is mythology taken too far.

NB: This's not to say there're millions years old animal foot prints out there in the forest because no such foot print would survive on soil for millions of years.

kestolove95:


Dix dinosaur tin na just fallacy, nothing like dat existed

ToluNazzal:
All lies. They are always fond of finding one thing or the other to stay relevant.

Guys, pls rate my Youtube channel

Here's my First Video


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JgZuUXHBzSA

rottennaija:


My dear, I'm going to say this... The bible was written by men whose views and thoughts about the world was limited. What was written reflected the limited human thinking of that time.

For example, while many religious people had held to the belief that the earth is just a few thousand years old, these grounds are quickly shifting as new evidence comes into being. Now, they are saying the days referred to in the creation story of genesis was an undefined period (which could be millions of years or thousands but definitely not a literal 1 day period). But again, they still have to grapple with the other part that says 'they came to be morning and evening'

About 4 years, watchtower, the publishing corporation or the parent company of Jehovah's Witnesses made a statement in one of their Awake magazines, saying that the Genesis said God created the heavens and the earth, but did not say how he did it. That it could have been by a big bang.

My point is, many religious apologist are not taking the genesis account as literal anymore as it used to be taken in time past. The genesis account carries a lot of question marks and reflects the thinking of that time.

musicwriter:


I have books to assist you depending on your interest. Should you be interested in books, email: kemeticphilosophy@gmail, and let me know what historical topic you need book on.0

kestolove95:
Dix dinosaur tin na just fallacy, nothing like dat existed

kestolove95:
Dix dinosaur tin na just fallacy, nothing like dat existed