skywalker240:
A wonderful evening freinds.

this write up would be long, so this would be directed to whom it may concern.

no matter how educative or not, enlightening or not a thread might be, you would agree with me that we do grab some lessons, some morals, experience that impact us either nagatively or anti nagative. But at the end, the message is passed and points grabbed.

i beleive alot of us are at the stage where we just starting or about to get started in the phase of life. Life in general ie goals, decision, plans, and actions. What am trying to simply say is alot of us know our left from our right.

Now someone created a thread asking why do the ladies get worked up when a Man decides to go for a particular type of woman?

funny isnt it? Well for a start, virginity does not and can never determine the outcome of a virtuos woman. thats the greatest fallacy.

heck iv'e seen women married as virgins become the tennis ball of every bat, and hoe's making great homes (life is such)

skywalker 240

typing....

skywalker240:
So never judge any non-virgin girl, (heck some where raped, some where compelled to give it) am not arguing the fact that alot of them willingly and gladly offered it on a rubber tray.

Men are naturally providers, the Almighty has made it so. Women on the other hand are supporters and at same time follower (they most times depends from who they follow). So naturally most of them tend to be less financially capable or even broke and dependent (their weakness) hence they look for the finest, the fittest, the wealthiest infact speaking in laymans term THE BEST! to bond with. (cc ubunja)

Now since men are viewed as providers, a virgin or a Non-Virgin broke Woman would always desire a man who is the best, (in this gendration these class of men falls in the rich and wealthy)

so its safe to say maybe there is no harm if a broke non-virgin woman wants a wealthy man.

thats what majority of the f monikers here always sing, hence the broke boys needs no erection.

skywalker240

typing..

PerfectMaster:
yes some women lost their virginity through rape and other means those are exceptional cases as it is understandable.
Virtous woman cannot be a hoe and a hoe cannot be virtous.
See where you contradicted yourself, a hoe cannot make a good home by the way not all non virgins a hoes but the tendencies for a non virgin turning to an hoe is high.

PerfectMaster:
Men are natural providers dont forget many women are kicking against the natural arrangement of things.
God Almighty made women natural virgin by placing a hymen which should only be broken by their husbands after marriage. In the old testament if a woman should lose her virginity because of her promiscuity a death sentence is placed on her telling you how important it is.

@bolded so women are free to desire a wealthy man but a man is not free to desire a virgin too?
Where is your sense?

skywalker240:
So never judge any non-virgin girl, (heck some where raped, some where compelled to give it) am not arguing the fact that alot of them willingly and gladly offered it on a rubber tray.

Men are naturally providers, the Almighty has made it so. Women on the other hand are supporters and at same time follower (they most times depends from who they follow). So naturally most of them tend to be less financially capable or even broke and dependent (their weakness) hence they look for the finest, the fittest, the wealthiest infact speaking in laymans term THE BEST! to bond with. (cc ubunja)

Now since men are viewed as providers, a virgin or a Non-Virgin broke Woman would always desire a man who is the best, (in this gendration these class of men falls in the rich and wealthy)

so its safe to say maybe there is no harm if a broke non-virgin woman wants a wealthy man.

thats what majority of the f monikers here always sing, hence the broke boys needs no erection.

skywalker240

typing..

ubunja:
can you forward the verse where God commands men to provide for women.

ubunja:
can you forward the verse where God commands men to provide for women.

ubunja:
can you forward the verse where God commands men to provide for women.

skywalker240:

not just the woman, the entire houshold (a woman is almost in all household)i was speaking in general terms. 1 timothy 5:8. I hope you read the post till the end

PerfectMaster:
yes some women lost their virginity through rape and other means those are exceptional cases as it is understandable.
Virtous woman cannot be a hoe and a hoe cannot be virtous.
See where you contradicted yourself, a hoe cannot make a good home by the way not all non virgins a hoes but the tendencies for a non virgin turning to an hoe is high.

skywalker240:
@ Emmaodet you're right,

but did you guys actually read my last post ?

skywalker240:
@ Alfather please read the post till the end, you guys have mistooked the massage i passed
We're saying samething.


read my last post, read again

ubunja:

That's really bending the verse here. This doesn't say men must provide for women.


1 Timothy 5:8, NIV: "Anyone who does not provide for
their relatives, and especially for their own household,
has denied the faith

skywalker240:

There is bound to be a Mother or a Wife in almost every household.

if he is providing for his household, then that means he is providing for each and every individual of that house. If a woman (say Mother or Wife or maybe even Sister) is among the individuals benefiting from his providance in that household, then what do we call that?

skywalker240:

There is bound to be a Mother or a Wife in almost every household.

if he is providing for his household, then that means he is providing for each and every individual of that house. If a woman (say Mother or Wife or maybe even Sister) is among the individuals benefiting from his providance in that household, then what do we call that?

Omar09:


Bro why are you twisting the Bible? It stated something clear and you are twisting it?

Let's go by your analogy, isn't a man part of a household? The boy child (brother, son husband and father)?

ubunja:
there's bound to be a mother? Well go to Proverbs 31:10–31 and learn the wife's own responsibilities of entrepreneurship and making money.

No one was put on this world to be a burden to another. Except a child.

skywalker240:

Yeah, a child thats true,

what about aged parents?

what about disabled or sick relatives and even siblings ?

the wife have responsibilities, dam true, but that doesnt change the fact that the Man is the leader. She compliments his efforts with her responsibilities. Thats reality bro, how else can i make you see my point.

one love.

skywalker240:

honestly bro, am not twisting it. I dont know how to explain it better to make you guys understand my point. And yes the bible didnt said a man should provide for a woman.

and you're right, the man is also part of the household, but the bible you said am twisting also said that he has been put incharge of the household, he is responsible for the houshold. The others (mother, wife, son, daughter, etc) look up to him.

no matter what, all women even feminist and lesbians (to some extent )definetly look up to Men in the system of life.

thats why you see feminist twist alot of things to favour them, but would still chicken out when it comes to responsibilities, spending, etc.

i hope you see what am trying to say bro.

one love.

its imbibed in their blood.

emmaodet:


Exactly my thought ubunja.
Though at the beginning, men shot themselves on the leg by shifting the job of providing and protecting on themselves while shifting the job of maintaining the home/family to women.
Where protecting by man and running the home by woman are all service based jobs and are Measurable and Reasonable, PROVIDING is where all the Scams are because it can not be quantified.
When the agreement was made, cost of living and standard of living were extremely Low.
A man builds a hut, goes to farm or hunt or fish while the woman stays at home to take care of the child. It was all Simple and Easy.
But unfortunately for men, they never knew Relationship/Marriage are just another form of Business that is always/regularly been affected by INFLATION because rendering personal Services is hardly if not affected by Inflation.
If the men of old knew about Inflation, none of them would have agreed to be Providers, they didn't see the Future.
From living in a hut, inflation sets in... To living in one room face you and face me ... To Room and Parlour self contain... To Flat ... To duplex etc yet the service the woman is to render neither changed, rather reducing.
As the pressure keeps increasing on men, nobody deems it fit to add to the women side by instructing them to instead of cooking for the Family, they should cook for the community.

Wawu. Now a providing man and a nurturing woman is no more nature's dictate.

I thought it was our natural makeup naa.

We can observe it in our animal relatives.

Why do you get mad that 'men's roles' are being ripped from them?

Are women not acting like men now? Doing everything?

You pipu and your confucius philosophy.

You're soo inadequate to teach and ignorant of what you want to speak on.

I thought women are rejecting their traditional roles, how come you're saying nothing has changed about their roles?

The majority of men are the ONLY ones here who've changed nada. Providing can be quantified. Nurture can't. You can see money, calculate how much you bought, houses you built, etc. That is not comparable with emotional sacrifice and burden. You can't measure feelings, care, love, guilt, happiness. Physical and material objects cannot be equated with abstract concepts (which the woman has been groomed to provide.)

Cook for community ko, cook for nation ni.

Leoniine:


Wawu. Now a providing man and a nurturing woman is no more nature's dictate.

I thought it was our natural makeup naa.

We can observe it in our animal relatives.

Why do you get mad that 'men's roles' are being ripped from them?

Are women not acting like men now? Doing everything?

You pipu and your confucius philosophy.

You're soo inadequate to teach and ignorant of what you want to speak on.

I thought women are rejecting their traditional roles, how come you're saying nothing has changed about their roles?

The majority of men are the ONLY ones here who've changed nada. Providing can be quantified. Nurture can't. You can see money, calculate how much you bought, houses you built, etc. That is not comparable with emotional sacrifice and burden. You can't measure feelings, care, love, guilt, happiness. Physical and material objects cannot be equated with abstract concepts (which the woman has been groomed to provide.)

Cook for community ko, cook for nation ni.

emmaodet:


I get ur points but you can't compare emotional investment to financial one.

The reason why most guys are struggling today is bcus the financial demand of the society has overwhelmed them and that is why it's spilling over to the ladies to pick up the tab.

Imagine if all it takes to get married is just for a guy to have One room apartment - it means 98% of guys who are matured for marriage presently will all get married. You will also be surprised that even the so called dead beat dads are not deadbeats after all.

The Taste and appetite of the modern woman is Extremely high and only a sizeable percentage of guys can only meet such ridiculous demands.

You will see a guy earning 100-150k per month and out of it the woman wants him to buy a car, buy land and build house, monthly upkeep, family events, house rent, school fees, yearly family shopping etc

But that's the point of the traditional system. It's not same-balanced. If you provide, she will take care of your kids. Shikena. Are you forgetting that you're supposed to take care of the woman? That's how God designed it na. You give her everything as her protector, in return for her faithfulness and fertility. Be a man!

You make money, and she helps you allocate and manage it. Why are you complaining against the natures of a woman? She's the homemaker.

There is a reason babymama is growing and a large percentage of men are not married even though they want to.