SweetCunt97:
If these same scientist come out and say phones existed 200m years ago, zombies like you will believe hook line and sinker... D white man can make no error in your dictionary

Another erroneous statement

Sister there are billions of white people and barely ten million of them are reputable scientists so how can I believe everything the white man says?
Hundred percent certain of this plenty of the scientists on the team who made this discovery were black or people of color so what's with the whitewashing?

Jokerman:


Lol ..I love this.

Those scientists keep deceiving themselves

The irony is, there's no way you will delve deeper into science and not disbelieve the big bang theory..the more you penetrate into the sciences, the more you will see the intricacies, the fine tuning and wonder that is the universe..the more you will realise that there's a thought/reason behind it all..

AkpaMgbor:

Or imagine those engineering tools computing themselves without human instructions..even if it can do so later via artificial intelligence, it is human that originally designed them to do so..there has to be a designer in the beginning..there's artificial intelligence in modern technology nowadays...if an artificial intelligence came from a designer..then human/natural intelligence must also come from a designer..

Those scientists know the truth. But ego won't make them accept it

Even atheists, their only topic is always, "is there God" ... God wants them to get the answers by themselves and be converted... Lol

Mummyfour:
so like I said,if they all go extinct,we will not need to do researches to get anti venom to destroy another venom.the money wasted on carrying out all those researches can be channeled into profitable things. What exactly are snakes good for? Nothing. They only bite,spit venom and well eventually end up in pots of pepper soup for those that find it edible, yuuk!!!!. So my point is they are useless creatures.i have had experiences with them,and I Know what I am talking about. We could argue from now till next year,but nothing would change my mind about ropes. That's what we call them in my house.

snakes are not the only venomous creatures, there are other venomous creatures out there like scorpion, stone fish etc and these other creatures are difficult to find and extract the venom, moreover I don't think there is any venomous creature out there whose anti venom is as effective as the anti venom from snake.
If snake goes into extinction and human get bitten by another venomous creature(though rare), how do u think u can cure the victim?
Also snakes importance is not limited to anti venom, it is useful in the warefare. These creatures need to survive, all u need to do is clean ur environs so they don't come and live with u

AkpaMgbor:

The irony is, there's no way you will delve deeper into science and not disbelieve the big bang theory..the more you penetrate into the sciences, the more you will see the intricacies, the fine tuning and wonder that is the universe..the more you will realise that there's a thought/reason behind it all..

I'm telling. The being called "Human" is enough to convince any right thinking individual

Jokerman:


Those scientists know the truth. But ego won't make them accept it

Even atheists, their only topic is always, "is there God" ... God wants them to get the answers by themselves and be converted... Lol

Their ego is so laughable if it wasn't sad and destructive on its own..they reference Einstein in science discussions when not even he dared to think that there was no intelligence behind the universe..na these new wannabe atheist(not scientists o) strut about with those theories...it gives them a sense of increased Intelligence Quotient.

AkpaMgbor:

Their ego is so laughable if it wasn't sad and destructive on its own..they reference Einstein in science discussions when not even he dared to think that there was no intelligence behind the universe..na these new wannabe atheist(not scientists o) strut about with those theories...it gives them a sense of increased Intelligence Quotient.

Lmao ..

Jokerman:


I'm telling. The being called "Human" is enough to convince any right thinking individual

Man is the pinnacle of 'known' creation and what a wonder man is! A being that can feel emotions, a being that can think of the welfare of other beings he shares the world with, a being that harnessed his world for food, medicine, science, sports, etc...a being that is religious...a being that has dared to go beyond his own world...look at the human anatomy inside out...and some people want to give the accolade to a random one in a billion billion billion explosion that has no thought or reason behind it..

AkpaMgbor:

Man is the pinnacle of 'known' creation and what a wonder man is! A being that can feel emotions, a being that can think of the welfare of other beings he shares the world with, a being that harnessed his world for food, medicine, science, sports, etc...a being that is religious...a being that has dared to go beyond his own world...look at the human anatomy inside out...and some people want to give the accolade to a random one in a billion billion billion explosion that has no thought or reason behind it..

Lol... You know the devil always like to thwart and deceive people away from God, that's why clowns who haven't even lived up to 40 years on Earth or haven't seen the mysteries in oceans and beyond in Nairaland, will start typing there's no God and they are atheists ...

Like St Paul said, "people who reverence the creature more than the creator".. lol.. the Bible already knew ahead sef

AdmiralDru:


Like I said earlier, science and Tech is a broad field. That you are an expert in aerospace doesn't mean you know much about space science. There are electricians and mechanics who are good in their fields but don't know much about space.
Space science is mostly astronomy, astrology and astrophysics.

You are only partially correct. The natural sciences are all interconnected, so you must have a general knowledge of all related field to be a specialist in your field. It's like medicine, you must have general knowledge of medicine before you can specialize in dentistry, Ophthalmology, E.N.T, etc. An aerospace engineer must have basic knowledge of space science as he is designing nachines that is expected to travel through space - whether on earth or in actual space.

If you are talking about roadside electricians and mechanics, then you don't need to know anything goes about space science, but if you want to be an academic mechanic or electrician then you need to understand mechanics and electromagnetism. Mechanics is the study of motion in general and electromagnetism is the study of light itself.

2. I'm an atheist.

Doesn't mean anything. Atheism is simply a lack of belief in God's. It has little to do with science, arts or any other discipline. You will be surprised that some academic theologians are atheists.

3. I took some networking classes in school and have my Ccna. Radio tech is different from space science. All that billions of years talk has nothing to do with real science, they're there so science have it's own answer to how the world came to be.

Billions of years has everything to do with science. When you measure the age of rocks, when you measure the distances of galaxies and quasars to be billions of light years, are these not real science?
Science is not necessarily trying to answer how the world came to be. That the goal of the theists. What scientist do is to make observations and look for hypothesis and theories that can best explain and predict the observations.

Christians swallow everything in the Bible and would argue with you based on what's in the Bible even if it makes no sense, that's the same way big bang theorists argue. They tell you scientists said this and that.

know this. The big bang was never observed, neither was Evol. The reason it's popular is cause that's the most accepted theory that makes sense out of all the suggested theories by scientists of that time.
I hope you know this before you call anyone stupid for not agreeing with you. Also, you don't believe in theories. You either prove them to be correct or refute their claims.

Cc wirinet
Kingxsamz
Fucsheetup

Wrong precepts. The big bang and evolution is observed indirectly. Galaxies and distant objects is measured to be accelerating away from us according to their red shift measurements, this can only mean that the universe is inflating in all directions. The big bang theory only theorised what would happen if we go back in time, the universe would be deflating until it gets to its starting point - a point. The moment that point started to inflate is the big bang. Besides, the discovery of the the cosmic microwave background (CMB) is the strongest proof of the big bang. The big bang theory was proposed in 1927, and it predicted a background radiation that pervades the whole universe, it was not until 1965 that it was discovered and confirmed.

The Cosmic Background Radiation is predicted to be leftover radiation from the Big Bang, or the time when the universe began. As the theory goes, when the universe was born it underwent a rapid inflation and expansion.

FuckAllTheMODs:


I said untruth... i.e it's not true (truth)

Oh ok

Jokerman:


Another lie. No proof of this

carbon dating technique's was used in determining this, with fossils found by archeologist...

LINTUNE:
carbon dating technique's was used in determining this, with fossils found by archeologist...

Lol... The radioactive carbon dating lied.

Scientists said about that time itself water was everywhere, so how did the man survive living in water??

Man is about 6000 years old.

Jokerman:


Lol... The radioactive carbon dating lied.

Scientists said about that time itself water was everywhere, so how did the man survive living in water??

Man is about 6000 years old.

.. smh..go make ur research right and stop arguing blindly..

I keep wondering the wonders benith those hip of sands thinking on taking an archaeologist so we can make some research

LINTUNE:
.. smh..go make ur research right and stop arguing blindly..

Lol... So God made man evolve from hominids(the great apes)... Lol

I rather believe God

MyVILLAGEpeople:
But according to Christains and their Bible, they claimed the earth is just 6,000 years.

This table you are shaking.

Jokerman:


Lol... The radioactive carbon dating lied.

Scientists said about that time itself water was everywhere, so how did the man survive living in water??

Man is about 6000 years old.

Rubbish. So who should we believe you, the Greeks, the Romans, the Yorubas, the Igbos, the Chinese who? Stop thinking from your own perspective only look at others too.

Ausrichie:

Rubbish. So who should we believe you, the Greeks, the Romans, the Yorubas, the Igbos, the Chinese who? Stop thinking from your own perspective only look at others too.

My belief comes from the Bible which is the word of God

AkpaMgbor:

And their hypothesis is that a random thoughtless, consciousless, inanimate explosion formed the universe and all that lives in it? Including animate and living beings...beings that have morals, emotions, intelligence and consciences?? That is their hypothesis? What a balooney! This universe and all that's in it was designed and created..none life CANNOT give life..something that has no conscience cannot give conscience. Something that can't think(as in explosion) CANNOT then create what can think on its own...something that has NO morality CANNOT give morality...the universe and man was preconceived, designed and created..by who is a question you can answer for yourself (and is another subject)....

What is your bane exactly?
You do not understand how the universe came to be by a Big Bang or you do not believe whoever preconceived, designed and created our universe did it by an explosion?

Whatever creationist ideas you have are your business, hypothetically since you cannot comprehend the Big Bang being a random act, why can’t you just believe that it was not random but a way for the ‘creator’ to create your universe? Science is based on FACTS, and facts are there is no proof that the universe was created by any being. That is why science calls it ‘RANDOM’. Of course there are creationists in science who ‘believe’ the universe must have been brought about by something but science cannot tell you what it does not know, it tells what it does know. They didn’t just come with the Big Bang, a whole lot of physics and maths accompany what you think is just an explosion, a whole lot of calculations, generations of it. I’m sorry to say you are not qualified to speak on it, because you can not even understand it. How can you refute something you don’t understand in the first place?

The Big Bang hypotheses is widely accepted by Astro scientists far more knowledgeable than yourself for a reason, the scientists that dispute it, do so also for a reason. You dispute it because “ITS DOESN’T MAKE SENSE” while not giving a reason. How do you believe the universe was “created”? Mention me when you have something concrete to say.


By the way, the chemicals in your brain are responsible for perceived concepts of morality, conscience, emotions. I wouldn’t make too much of those terms if I were you.

Jokerman:


Those scientists know the truth. But ego won't make them accept it

Even atheists, their only topic is always, "is there God" ... God wants them to get the answers by themselves and be converted... Lol

only pained atheists make it a life dream.

AkpaMgbor:

Or imagine those engineering tools computing themselves without human instructions..even if it can do so later via artificial intelligence, it is human that originally designed them to do so..there has to be a designer in the beginning..there's artificial intelligence in modern technology nowadays...if an artificial intelligence came from a designer..then human/natural intelligence must also come from a designer..

This is not justifiable. So what about god why does he not have a designer? This is just like the argument Aquinas put forward. If an entity can create it must exist and for an entity to exist it must be created. Therefore God was created . I believe man has a creator but I don't believe in the existence of a God. A being cannot be omnipotent and omniscient at the same time. There are some questions we can never answer eg how the world came to be, and who created man.

Jokerman:


My belief comes from the Bible which is the word of God

Of course as usual. Chai.

Ausrichie:

Of course as usual. Chai.

Shows us any book more complete than the Bible

Jokerman:


Shows us any book more complete than the Bible

Which of the Bibles are you referring to as complete, have you compared Catholic and Pentecostal Bible which omitted Maccabees and some other scriptures...controversies even surrounds some passages n chapters

***I am also a Christian too***

AkpaMgbor:

And their hypothesis is that a random thoughtless, consciousless, inanimate explosion formed the universe and all that lives in it? Including animate and living beings...beings that have morals, emotions, intelligence and consciences?? That is their hypothesis? What a balooney! This universe and all that's in it was designed and created..none life CANNOT give life..something that has no conscience cannot give conscience. Something that can't think(as in explosion) CANNOT then create what can think on its own...something that has NO morality CANNOT give morality...the universe and man was preconceived, designed and created..by who is a question you can answer for yourself (and is another subject)....

Have you read Rousseau's documents on social contracts. Man made social contracts to protect himself thus giving birth to good and evil and thus giving birth to morality. Read up on feral children like the wild boy of aveyron. The boy had no knowledge of morality, society or good and evil. (a French doctor Monsieur Itard helped him develop these though it didn't even go far) children are born with an empty mind, it is the parents and society's duty to install morals in the child. Besides if we were to go by the Bible's definition of morality we would have still been slaves, there would have been religious intolerance (thank Locke for eradicating that), there would have still been so called holy wars.

Jokerman:


Shows us any book more complete than the Bible

What the hell do you mean by complete?

Fucsheetup:
What is your bane exactly?
You do not understand how the universe came to be by a Big Bang or you do not believe whoever preconceived, designed and created our universe did it by an explosion?

Whatever creationist ideas you have are your business, hypothetically since you cannot comprehend the Big Bang being a random act, why can’t you just believe that it was not random but a way for the ‘creator’ to create your universe? Science is based on FACTS, and facts are there is no proof that the universe was created by any being. That is why science calls it ‘RANDOM’. Of course there are creationists in science who ‘believe’ the universe must have been brought about by something but science cannot tell you what it does not know, it tells what it does know. They didn’t just come with the Big Bang, a whole lot of physics and maths accompany what you think is just an explosion, a whole lot of calculations, generations of it. I’m sorry to say you are not qualified to speak on it, because you can not even understand it. How can you refute something you don’t understand in the first place?

The Big Bang hypotheses is widely accepted by Astro scientists far more knowledgeable than yourself for a reason, the scientists that dispute it, do so also for a reason. You dispute it because “ITS DOESN’T MAKE SENSE” while not giving a reason. How do you believe the universe was “created”? Mention me when you have something concrete to say.


By the way, the chemicals in your brain are responsible for perceived concepts of morality, conscience, emotions. I wouldn’t make too much of those terms if I were you.

We want you to believe along with other scientists that the big bang was formed by God.

Scientists states that universe is about 14 billion years i.e when the big bang event occured and then expansion continued from there... We ain't arguing, our argument is that God is the centre of everything

Ausrichie:

Have you read Rousseau's documents on social contracts. Man made social contracts to protect himself thus giving birth to good and evil and thus giving birth to morality. Read up on feral children like the wild boy of aveyron. The boy had no knowledge of morality, society or good and evil. (a French doctor Monsieur Itard helped him develop these though it didn't even go far) children are born with an empty mind, it is the parents and society's duty to install morals in the child. Besides if we were to go by the Bible's definition of morality we would have still been slaves, there would have been religious intolerance (thank Locke for eradicating that), there would have still been so called holy wars.

You haven't heard of the Lord Jesus Christ. Seek him for clearer understanding of what God wants from man... Not some empty written words by profane men who can't help themselves

Jokerman:


We want you to believe along with other scientists that the big bang was formed by God.

Scientists states that universe is about 14 billion years i.e when the big bang event occured and then expansion continued from there... We ain't arguing, our argument is that God is the centre of everything

Not all scientists believe in it. I am an atheist but I don't think the shit really happened.

Macsjebs:

Which of the Bibles are you referring to as complete, have you compared Catholic and Pentecostal Bible which omitted Maccabees and some other scriptures...controversies even surrounds some passages n chapters

***I am also a Christian too***

Lol... Everything I need to survive as a being is in the Bible. Principles that every human being applies on earth.... I don't need the book if Maccabees or writings of Nehemiah....

Ausrichie:

What the hell do you mean by complete?

Jesus answered, "man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word of God"

This is all.