Fucsheetup:
So you would believe a man who tells you he will resurrect after dying? Fear ‘God’ and say it with your chest that you will.

Time magazine? Really?

Lol... You need to come back to faith Sister. The Lord needs you back

Fucsheetup:
So you would believe a man who tells you he will resurrect after dying? Fear ‘God’ and say it with your chest that you will.

Time magazine? Really?

While at it read job chapter 41 for a beast called leviathan..
1. That it had scales as tough as iron
2. That even brave warriors think twice before approaching it with Spears ( meaning it lived alongside men)
3. That it's teeth were like rows of dagger
4. That it had a great size
5. That it's breath could rekindle a dying coal
6. That it could swim in the deepest seas....job obviously knew the animal as God asked him if he can explain the might of the beast..you said you read genesis to revelation...I don't think you ever did.

Fucsheetup:
Such a magnificent creature surely must have fossils somewhere. Where are its bones?

I thought the book of Job was a parable?

You see the bones littered and discovered by archeologist..they call it a dinosaurs but it had names in the ancient times..probably most were destroyed in the flood...that goes to show that men actually lived with the beasts we now call dinosaurs..read the accounts of the historian josephus who went from Asia Minor to India..he described flying serpents that he saw all over India..people have called them dragons, leviathan, dinosaurs, great flying serpents..but one thing is for sure, men saw them..they didn't live millions of years ago as evolutionists falsely assume.

ChristineC:
oga go and sleep, you are not making sense at all. in your quest to form "not lazy" you haven't explained why the evolution of man stopped thousands of years back..
you have been asked why gorillas and apes no longer evolve into man or why has man not evolved into some other homo something... homo erectus, homo abilis, homo sapiens, why stop there? you just dey beat about the bush with more nothings.
Otem ko Otele ni

I am here, who called my name? Dragunov? 4evergod?

GodSaklek:


It's not 1 million, it's 100 million years... But the age of earth is 4.5billion years old, so don't believe the nonsense u red on bible, believe in what u saw and what is happening during Ur existence

Can you ever proof this that is 4.5billions years. Am not a Christian and am just joking about that statement. But the scientist or geology cannot proof it.

They only make absolutely assumptions.

AkpaMgbor:

Lol here goes a white worshipper..what does that even mean in your last paragraph? Does it mean you have no mind and reasoning of your own? You can't even understand how an explosion will start creating things and life but you think it makes sense?? My goodness!

You worship the whites also, can’t you see how you worship the god of your fathers?

We’re conversing in their language using their technology
You’re wearing their clothes
Your education
Your vehicles houses, roads, electricity, phones, method of cooking, plastic, shoes, medicine... I digress, the only thing you own is the color of your skin.

Here you are asking me if I have a my mind of my own while still clinging on to the beliefs your white slave masters beat into your grandfather


I understand how an explosion can create life, I have typed this several times. It is you whose increased befuddledment of subject continues to amuse me.

AkpaMgbor:

You see the bones littered and discovered by archeologist..they call it a dinosaurs but it had names in the ancient times..probably most were destroyed in the flood...that goes to show that men actually lived with the beasts we now call dinosaurs..read the accounts of the historian josephus who went from Asia Minor to India..he described flying serpents that he saw all over India..people have called them dragons, leviathan, dinosaurs, great flying serpents..but one thing is for sure, men saw them..they didn't live millions of years ago as evolutionists falsely assume.

Know that all these mythical creatures you have mentioned, are to be found everywhere in all religions and folklores. Does that validate their existence? These other religions?

Fucsheetup:
You worship the whites also, can’t you see how you worship the god of your fathers?

We’re conversing in their language using their technology
You’re wearing their clothes
Your education
Your vehicles houses, roads, electricity, phones, method of cooking, plastic, shoes, medicine... I digress, the only thing you own is the color of your skin.

Here you are asking me if I have a my mind of my own while still clinging on to the beliefs your white slave masters beat into your grandfather


I understand how an explosion can create life, I have typed this several times. It is you whose increased befuddledment of subject continues to amuse me.

You understand nothing, nada, zilch! An explosion cannot create life..even knowledgeable scientists don't go that far na una wey just read one or two comments on social media go begin parrot the big bang like some new found eldorado of knowledge.

AkpaMgbor:

While at it read job chapter 41 for a beast called leviathan..
1. That it had scales as tough as iron
2. That even brave warriors think twice before approaching it with Spears ( meaning it lived alongside men)
3. That it's teeth were like rows of dagger
4. That it had a great size
5. That it's breath could rekindle a dying coal
6. That it could swim in the deepest seas....job obviously knew the animal as God asked him if he can explain the might of the beast..you said you read genesis to revelation...I don't think you ever did.

This doesn’t prove anything. I could name a thousand creatures across all religions that fill this bill.

Fucsheetup:
Know that all these mythical creatures you have mentioned, are to be found everywhere in all religions and folklores. Does that validate their existence? These other religions?

Have you read the passages? Good, now we have shown that the Bible mentioned this great beasts..I don't know about other religions mentioning the beasts..I know for a fact that different ancient cultures and civilisation mentioned these animals..josephus the Jewish Roman historian talked about them..China has them in their history..they have the year of the Tiger, rat, horse, dog, and a few other animals and then the year of the dragon..how will the put animals that is a myth with one that isn't? The ancient atzec has these beasts in their culture even in their artworks...Yet you think they didn't actually see these beast? Lol I laugh.

AkpaMgbor:

You understand nothing, nada, zilch! An explosion cannot create life..even knowledgeable scientists don't go that far na una wey just read one or two comments on social media go begin parrot the big bang like some new found eldorado of knowledge.

Lmao! You didn’t learn about the Big Bang in high school? You learnt about it on social media?

Fucsheetup:
This doesn’t prove anything. I could name a thousand creatures across all religions that fill this bill.

lol funny..name them....you find it hard to believe that men lived with dinosaurs or dragons or whatever name they go by? When historians and modern archeologist have unearthed their bones? You doubt the Bible and still doubt the evidence of science?? Or your confusion is that they didn't walk with men? Because of their size?

AkpaMgbor:

You see the bones littered and discovered by archeologist..they call it a dinosaurs but it had names in the ancient times..probably most were destroyed in the flood...that goes to show that men actually lived with the beasts we now call dinosaurs..read the accounts of the historian josephus who went from Asia Minor to India..he described flying serpents that he saw all over India..people have called them dragons, leviathan, dinosaurs, great flying serpents..but one thing is for sure, men saw them..they didn't live millions of years ago as evolutionists falsely assume.

Why do you have to lie to prove your point? You obviously read my excerpt in the previous pages to get the scriptural passage of job I quoted. The description of Behemoth do no anyway match that of a dinosaur. Dinosaurs couldn't have lived with humans because they are largely territorial. Atleast consult google to see the pictorial representation of behemoth from the description.
You guys never want to learn, you believe everyone is out to deceive you.

AkpaMgbor:

Have you read the passages? Good, now we have shown that the Bible mentioned this great beasts..I don't know about other religions mentioning the beasts..I know for a fact that different ancient cultures and civilisation mentioned these animals..josephus the Jewish Roman historian talked about them..China has them in their history..they have the year of the Tiger, rat, horse, dog, and a few other animals and then the year of the dragon..how will the put animals that is a myth with one that isn't? The ancient atzec has these beasts in their culture even in their artworks...Yet you think they didn't actually see these beast? Lol I laugh.

Lol. Next thing you’ll tell me you believe in Unicorns , leprechauns and fairies because the Irish have Unicorns as their nations mascot. Or the 3 headed hell hound guarding hell in Greek mythology were also real because men saw them.


Y

destinable:


Why do you have to lie to prove your point? You obviously read my excerpt in the previous pages to get the scriptural passage of job I quoted. The description of Behemoth do no anyway match that of a dinosaur. Dinosaurs couldn't have lived with humans because they are largely territorial. Atleast consult google to see the pictorial representation of behemoth from the description.
You guys never want to learn, you believe everyone is out to deceive you.

Just imagine bro, a grown man believing in mythical creatures.

destinable:


Why do you have to lie to prove your point? You obviously read my excerpt in the previous pages to get the scriptural passage of job I quoted. The description of Behemoth do no anyway match that of a dinosaur. Dinosaurs couldn't have lived with humans because they are largely territorial. Atleast consult google to see the pictorial representation of behemoth from the description.
You guys never want to learn, you believe everyone is out to deceive you.

I read your what?? The amount of amusements I get on this forum eh! Chaii..lions are territorial, elephants, hippos, rhinos, etc...man is the most territorial of them all..and the most dangerous..in a world of dinosaurs man will still be the apex predator..his brain gives him the edge above all else..the blue whale is the biggest known beast in modern times..even bigger than the biggest dinosaur bones found..YET whales are at the whims and mercy of man! The new born baby of a blue whale is bigger than a full grown African bull elephant! Let that sink in...dude, you can't lecture me on a subject I've read since my junior school days..

Fucsheetup:
Lol. Next thing you’ll tell me you believe in Unicorns , leprechauns and fairies because the Irish have Unicorns as their nations mascot. Or the 3 headed hell hound guarding hell in Greek mythology were also real because men saw them.


Y

Now you've run out of tangible discuss..that normally happens when you're jolted out of your fantasy with logic, common sense and observable facts.

AkpaMgbor:

Now you've run out of tangible discuss..that normally happens when you're jolted out of your fantasy with logic, common sense and observable facts.

K

Macsjebs:
Source: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-8253453/Africa-s-Sahara-dangerous-place-Earth-100-million-years-ago.html

It is not the whole sahara,it is a place in morroco now known known as western Sahara.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Josephus
josephus a Jewish Roman historian who lived 37 years AD is well referenced in the history between the Jewish nation and their Roman overlords..he put many of his knowledge into writings that still survive today..he was also well travelled from Jeruselem to Asia Minor to even India..this same man documented the 'flying serpents' which he saw in India..according to him they had leathery wings with great span..

AkpaMgbor:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Josephus
josephus a Jewish Roman historian who lived 37 years AD is well referenced in the history between the Jewish nation and their Roman overlords..he put many of his knowledge into writings that still survive today..he was also well travelled from Jeruselem to Asia Minor to even India..this same man documented the 'flying serpents' which he saw in India..according to him they had leathery wings with great span..

You can see the proponents of scientific lies can't stand what the Bible said, so they had to shift the goal post as usual

Jokerman:


You can see the proponents of scientific lies can't stand what the Bible said, so they had to shift the goal post as usual

The funny thing is that in most cases creationists are more versed in science and nature than the self proclaimed atheists..they can't make detail research even if their lives depended on it...if you ask them they will say "some scientists said" ask them what is their own observable opinion and research they will say "talking to you is a waste of time"....and then zoom off

Jokerman:


This is because the resurrected man, told us things that will happens after his resurrection, and they are still happening and would continue to the end of the word...

Moreover time magazine some years ago actually acknowledged that Jesus was the most significant man that ever walk on the Earth..

Which things did the resurrected man tell us that did not happen before and has not been happening since?

That is the opinion of time magazine. Some others would say Mohammed was the most significant man that ever walked the earth. Others would say it was Mohammed. Some others would even say it's Kim II-sung, they commited suicide when he died.

Zeezxo:


Can you ever proof this that is 4.5billions years. Am not a Christian and am just joking about that statement. But the scientist or geology cannot proof it.

They only make absolutely assumptions.

The proof is in your hands right now,proof is your phone, how did u believe that if u buy Recharge cards, u can talk to people u didn't know their whereabouts, u can use smart phones, watch live events on TV in your house, travel to abroad with flying plane..

wirinet:

You are only partially correct. The natural sciences are all interconnected, so you must have a general knowledge of all related field to be a specialist in your field. It's like medicine, you must have general knowledge of medicine before you can specialize in dentistry, Ophthalmology, E.N.T, etc. An aerospace engineer must have basic knowledge of space science as he is designing nachines that is expected to travel through space - whether on earth or in actual space.

If you are talking about roadside electricians and mechanics, then you don't need to know anything goes about space science, but if you want to be an academic mechanic or electrician then you need to understand mechanics and electromagnetism. Mechanics is the study of motion in general and electromagnetism is the study of light itself.


Doesn't mean anything. Atheism is simply a lack of belief in God's. It has little to do with science, arts or any other discipline. You will be surprised that some academic theologians are atheists.


Billions of years has everything to do with science. When you measure the age of rocks, when you measure the distances of galaxies and quasars to be billions of light years, are these not real science?
Science is not necessarily trying to answer how the world came to be. That the goal of the theists. What scientist do is to make observations and look for hypothesis and theories that can best explain and predict the observations.



Wrong precepts. The big bang and evolution is observed indirectly. Galaxies and distant objects is measured to be accelerating away from us according to their red shift measurements, this can only mean that the universe is inflating in all directions. The big bang theory only theorised what would happen if we go back in time, the universe would be deflating until it gets to its starting point - a point. The moment that point started to inflate is the big bang. Besides, the discovery of the the cosmic microwave background (CMB) is the strongest proof of the big bang. The big bang theory was proposed in 1927, and it predicted a background radiation that pervades the whole universe, it was not until 1965 that it was discovered and confirmed.

The Cosmic Background Radiation is predicted to be leftover radiation from the Big Bang, or the time when the universe began. As the theory goes, when the universe was born it underwent a rapid inflation and expansion.

1. Most science fields are interconnected while others have little to no connvetion. As an example, an aeronautic engineer knows how to build a plane, knows physics or chemistry but doesn't know shit about space. For the last time, space science is mostly cosmology, astrology, astophysics, astronomy etc.

2. You said it doesn't matter whether or not I'm an atheist but you were quick to label me a theist (and insulted me for believing in god) without asking, so yes it does matter because that's always the first line of offence most people use against you when you disagree with them on issues such as this.

3.The millions & billions of years talk is all made up BS. If you want to believe them, good for you but don't call others stupid for refusing to be indoctrinated. Carbon-dating has its flaws (thats a topic for another day). ALso, the big bang and evol was never observed. They can't be observed but were merely poputed cause it made the most sense among all the theories suggested at the time.

4. All what you are writing concerning the galaxies, red shifts and cosmic rays is all part of whole big bang hoax. Good news is that, expect more of these kind of stories in the future. Everything you are saying is based on what those space scientists say, which is not entirely different from what creationist do.
[b]Today, ideas like The Big Bang are pushed so vehemently, especially among higher education, that anyone who questions its validity, even in light of the countless flaws of the Big Bang Theory, can be subject to intense criticism, be ostracized and face social rejection, be given failing grades, and even face expulsion from universities. Professional licenses can be revoked, you can be rejected from associations, lose your job, and worse. All because you went against the prevailing notions.

It’s not about what is true. It’s about what the educational and governing authorities say they want you to believe and say is true. As a result almost all professors and scientists are too afraid of being ostracized from their communities and face losing their jobs to speak out against the prevailing notions.

This is why false ideas unsupported by science like the Big Bang theory and evolution are so pervasive. Most people believe what they are told without even bothering to research it for themselves; and the ones who are informed enough and think for themselves enough to question it are too afraid to say anything.

If you want to believe in the Big Bang theory, you must believe it one of three ways: by faith, by ignorance, or by indoctrination. By faith, because you can’t believe something which does not have adequate scientific evidence except as a philosophical viewpoint.

By ignorance because the only way to be certain in your mind that the Big Bang theory could work is because you don’t have all the facts. Or if you have been so far indoctrinated you haven’t made a logical conclusion with your own rational mind, you may have never even tried to question what you have been told.

However you must decide for yourself what you will believe. If you decide to believe in the Big Bang theory, that’s fine, just realize that since it is not supported by science, you have to believe it as a philosophical viewpoint, not as a scientific fact.[/b]

wirinet:

You are only partially correct. The natural sciences are all interconnected, so you must have a general knowledge of all related field to be a specialist in your field. It's like medicine, you must have general knowledge of medicine before you can specialize in dentistry, Ophthalmology, E.N.T, etc. An aerospace engineer must have basic knowledge of space science as he is designing nachines that is expected to travel through space - whether on earth or in actual space.

If you are talking about roadside electricians and mechanics, then you don't need to know anything goes about space science, but if you want to be an academic mechanic or electrician then you need to understand mechanics and electromagnetism. Mechanics is the study of motion in general and electromagnetism is the study of light itself.


Doesn't mean anything. Atheism is simply a lack of belief in God's. It has little to do with science, arts or any other discipline. You will be surprised that some academic theologians are atheists.


Billions of years has everything to do with science. When you measure the age of rocks, when you measure the distances of galaxies and quasars to be billions of light years, are these not real science?
Science is not necessarily trying to answer how the world came to be. That the goal of the theists. What scientist do is to make observations and look for hypothesis and theories that can best explain and predict the observations.



Wrong precepts. The big bang and evolution is observed indirectly. Galaxies and distant objects is measured to be accelerating away from us according to their red shift measurements, this can only mean that the universe is inflating in all directions. The big bang theory only theorised what would happen if we go back in time, the universe would be deflating until it gets to its starting point - a point. The moment that point started to inflate is the big bang. Besides, the discovery of the the cosmic microwave background (CMB) is the strongest proof of the big bang. The big bang theory was proposed in 1927, and it predicted a background radiation that pervades the whole universe, it was not until 1965 that it was discovered and confirmed.

The Cosmic Background Radiation is predicted to be leftover radiation from the Big Bang, or the time when the universe began. As the theory goes, when the universe was born it underwent a rapid inflation and expansion.

1. Most science fields are interconnected while others have little to no connvetion. As an example, an aeronautic engineer knows how to build a plane, knows physics or chemistry but doesn't know shit about space. For the last time, space science is mostly cosmology, astrology, astophysics, astronomy etc.

2. You said it doesn't matter whether or not I'm an atheist but you were quick to label me a theist (and insulted me for believing in god) without asking, so yes it does matter because that's always the first line of offence most people use against you when you disagree with them on issues such as this.

3.The millions & billions of years talk is all made up BS. If you want to believe them, good for you but don't call others stupid for refusing to be indoctrinated. Carbon-dating has its flaws (thats a topic for another day). ALso, the big bang and evol was never observed. They can't be observed but were merely poputed cause it made the most sense among all the theories suggested at the time.

4. All what you are writing concerning the galaxies, red shifts and cosmic rays is all part of whole big bang hoax. Good news is that, expect more of these kind of stories in the future. Everything you are saying is based on what those space scientists say, which is not entirely different from what creationist do.
[b]Today, ideas like The Big Bang are pushed so vehemently, especially among higher education, that anyone who questions its validity, even in light of the countless flaws of the Big Bang Theory, can be subject to intense criticism, be ostracized and face social rejection, be given failing grades, and even face expulsion from universities. Professional licenses can be revoked, you can be rejected from associations, lose your job, and worse. All because you went against the prevailing notions.

It’s not about what is true. It’s about what the educational and governing authorities say they want you to believe and say is true. As a result almost all professors and scientists are too afraid of being ostracized from their communities and face losing their jobs to speak out against the prevailing notions.

This is why false ideas unsupported by science like the Big Bang theory and evolution are so pervasive. Most people believe what they are told without even bothering to research it for themselves; and the ones who are informed enough and think for themselves enough to question it are too afraid to say anything.

If you want to believe in the Big Bang theory, you must believe it one of three ways: by faith, by ignorance, or by indoctrination. By faith, because you can’t believe something which does not have adequate scientific evidence except as a philosophical viewpoint.

By ignorance because the only way to be certain in your mind that the Big Bang theory could work is because you don’t have all the facts. Or if you have been so far indoctrinated you haven’t made a logical conclusion with your own rational mind, you may have never even tried to question what you have been told.

However you must decide for yourself what you will believe. If you decide to believe in the Big Bang theory, that’s fine, just realize that since it is not supported by science, you have to believe it as a philosophical viewpoint, not as a scientific fact[/b]

wirinet:

You are only partially correct. The natural sciences are all interconnected, so you must have a general knowledge of all related field to be a specialist in your field. It's like medicine, you must have general knowledge of medicine before you can specialize in dentistry, Ophthalmology, E.N.T, etc. An aerospace engineer must have basic knowledge of space science as he is designing nachines that is expected to travel through space - whether on earth or in actual space.

If you are talking about roadside electricians and mechanics, then you don't need to know anything goes about space science, but if you want to be an academic mechanic or electrician then you need to understand mechanics and electromagnetism. Mechanics is the study of motion in general and electromagnetism is the study of light itself.


Doesn't mean anything. Atheism is simply a lack of belief in God's. It has little to do with science, arts or any other discipline. You will be surprised that some academic theologians are atheists.


Billions of years has everything to do with science. When you measure the age of rocks, when you measure the distances of galaxies and quasars to be billions of light years, are these not real science?
Science is not necessarily trying to answer how the world came to be. That the goal of the theists. What scientist do is to make observations and look for hypothesis and theories that can best explain and predict the observations.



Wrong precepts. The big bang and evolution is observed indirectly. Galaxies and distant objects is measured to be accelerating away from us according to their red shift measurements, this can only mean that the universe is inflating in all directions. The big bang theory only theorised what would happen if we go back in time, the universe would be deflating until it gets to its starting point - a point. The moment that point started to inflate is the big bang. Besides, the discovery of the the cosmic microwave background (CMB) is the strongest proof of the big bang. The big bang theory was proposed in 1927, and it predicted a background radiation that pervades the whole universe, it was not until 1965 that it was discovered and confirmed.

The Cosmic Background Radiation is predicted to be leftover radiation from the Big Bang, or the time when the universe began. As the theory goes, when the universe was born it underwent a rapid inflation and expansion.

1. Most science fields are interconnected while others have little to no connvetion. As an example, an aeronautic engineer knows how to build a plane, knows physics or chemistry but doesn't know shit about space. For the last time, space science is mostly cosmology, astrology, astophysics, astronomy etc.

2. You said it doesn't matter whether or not I'm an atheist but you were quick to label me a theist (and insulted me for believing in god) without asking, so yes it does matter because that's always the first line of offence most people use against you when you disagree with them on issues such as this.

3.The millions & billions of years talk is all made up BS. If you want to believe them, good for you but don't call others stupid for refusing to be indoctrinated. Carbon-dating has its flaws (thats a topic for another day). ALso, the big bang and evol was never observed. They can't be observed but were merely poputed cause it made the most sense among all the theories suggested at the time.

4. All what you are writing concerning the galaxies, red shifts and cosmic rays is all part of whole big bang hoax. Good news is that, expect more of these kind of stories in the future. Everything you are saying is based on what those space scientists say, which is not entirely different from what creationist do.
[b] Today, ideas like The Big Bang are pushed so vehemently, especially among higher education, that anyone who questions its validity, even in light of the countless flaws of the Big Bang Theory, can be subject to intense criticism, be ostracized and face social rejection, be given failing grades, and even face expulsion from universities. Professional licenses can be revoked, you can be rejected from associations, lose your job, and worse. All because you went against the prevailing notions.

It’s not about what is true. It’s about what the educational and governing authorities say they want you to believe and say is true. As a result almost all professors and scientists are too afraid of being ostracized from their communities and face losing their jobs to speak out against the prevailing notions.

This is why false ideas unsupported by science like the Big Bang theory and evolution are so pervasive. Most people believe what they are told without even bothering to research it for themselves; and the ones who are informed enough and think for themselves enough to question it are too afraid to say anything.

If you want to believe in the Big Bang theory, you must believe it one of three ways: by faith, by ignorance, or by indoctrination. By faith, because you can’t believe something which does not have adequate scientific evidence except as a philosophical viewpoint.

By ignorance because the only way to be certain in your mind that the Big Bang theory could work is because you don’t have all the facts. Or if you have been so far indoctrinated you haven’t made a logical conclusion with your own rational mind, you may have never even tried to question what you have been told.

However you must decide for yourself what you will believe. If you decide to believe in the Big Bang theory, that’s fine, just realize that since it is not supported by science, you have to believe it as a philosophical viewpoint, not as a scientific fact [/b]

I tried posting with my precious account but I couldn't.

Nggs121:

You cannot change someone's opinion using logic if logic wasn't used to form the opinion in the first place

Dru here, I think my account got suspended or something.

Logically, the big bang doesn't make sense. So you tryna tell me everything we have today came from some expansion that happened billions of years ago. Somehow, unconsciousness created Consciousness, created the human brains, somehow, the complex human body just came to be and was perfect. Bro, that's not logic. That's foolishness. Believe whatever you want to believe. It doesn't make you smarter than the average creationist who think god created the heavens and the earth.

Fucsheetup:
This guy again, who talks a whole lot of smack but can disprove nothing. I keep hoping you’ll talk about the star that was found to be older than the universe itself or at least something like this -


It violates the first law of thermodynamics, which says you can't create or destroy matter or energy. Critics claim that the big bang theory suggests the universe began out of nothing. Proponents of the big bang theory say that such criticism is unwarranted for two reasons. The first is that the big bang doesn't address the creation of the universe, but rather the evolution of it. The other reason is that since the laws of science break down as you approach the creation of the universe, there's no reason to believe the first law of thermodynamics would apply.
Some critics say that the formation of stars and galaxies violates the law of entropy, which suggests systems of change become less organized over time. But if you view the early universe as completely homogeneous and isotropic, then the current universe shows signs of obeying the law of entropy.
Some astrophysicists and cosmologists argue that scientists have misinterpreted evidence like the redshift of celestial bodies and the cosmic microwave background radiation. Some cite the absence of exotic cosmic bodies that should have been the product of the big bang according to the theory.
The early inflationary period of the big bang appears to violate the rule that nothing can travel faster than the speed of light. Proponents have a few different responses to this criticism. One is that at the start of the big bang, the theory of relativity didn't apply. As a result, there was no issue with traveling faster than the speed of light. Another related response is that space itself can expand faster than the speed of light, as space falls outside the domain of the theory of gravity

Or at least speak about the other theories like plasma cosmology or the big bounce


BUT HE KNOWS NOTHING ABOUT ANY OF THIS, HE JUST KNOWS IT IS A THEORY

Even the rejectors of the Big Bang know why they rejected it, and have their own theories to supplement.. I gave you several chances to tell me why you feel the Big Bang theory did not happen but you know nothing.

Dru here, I think my old account got suspended or something.

https://thetechreader.com/top-ten/top-ten-scientific-flaws-in-the-big-bang-theory/

Here's a good place to start.

ValCon888:
These animals were the real bad guys back in the day. Man was just a tasty snack like bush rat and life was like living in a nightmare.

Back then, a 40yr old man was considered a very old man because the mortality rate was so high.

If not for the Chicxulub Event, human beings (Homo Sapiens) would not be the Apex predator that they are today.

There were no humans during the Cretaceous Period, which began 145.0 million years ago and ended 66 million years ago.

The Cretaceous Period, in geologic time, was the last of the three periods of the Mesozoic Era.

Modern humans (Homo sapiens) emerged only 300,000 years ago, during the Age of Mammals, a.k.a. the Cenozoic Era, which was the third of the major eras of Earth’s history, beginning about 66 million years ago and extending to the present.

Jokerman:


See what the book of Genesis tells us...

Genesis 1:1-5
In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth.
And the earth was without form, and void; and DARKNESS was upon the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the WATERS.
And God said, Let there be light: and there was light.
And God saw the light, that it was good: and God divided the light from the darkness.
And God called the light Day, and the darkness he called Night. And the evening and the morning were the first day.

How then am I ignorant??

And did God tell you when he made the light, or how many billions of years ago he made the light that you are quoting scripture to support ignorance? Even when reading your holy books, utilize knowledge, it is important