3 Evidence That Confirm The Bible Is Not Made Up
by Tim Chaffey on February 22, 2017

Why the Bible Is True Exhibit

We occasionally receive the following question: How do you know the Bible isn’t just made up?

Surely, even the most ardent skeptic will have a difficult time believing that the entire Bible was just made up since many of its details are corroborated by archaeology and in other historical writings. So let’s look at three aspects of the Bible taken together to explain how we know it wasn’t simply made up.

Read More Here

olamidedivotee:

Are you alright?

OLAADEGBU:

Are you alright?

where is the list

OLAADEGBU:

Are you alright?

where is the list

olamidedivotee:


where is the list
where is the list

Click on the hyperlink.

OLAADEGBU:
3 Evidence That Confirm The Bible Is Not Made Up
by Tim Chaffey on February 22, 2017

Why the Bible Is True Exhibit

We occasionally receive the following question: How do you know the Bible isn’t just made up?

Surely, even the most ardent skeptic will have a difficult time believing that the entire Bible was just made up since many of its details are corroborated by archaeology and in other historical writings. So let’s look at three aspects of the Bible taken together to explain how we know it wasn’t simply made up.

Read More Here

The Bible Is Unique in Content

First, compared to other “holy books,” the Bible is unique in many respects. Not only was it composed by at least 40 writers, on multiple continents, over a span of 1,500 years, but it is not what we would expect to find were it “made up.” The Bible also includes major moral failings of its heroes, yet most writings of other religions tend to whitewash the flaws of their heroes.

Moreover, the Bible’s theme is quite unlike those found in other religions. Man Made religions teach that a man can earn salvation through various practices and good works. The Bible explains that man is sinful, deserving of God’s judgment, and that no amount of good works could ever remove our guilt. God Himself solves our problem by becoming a man and taking our punishment upon Himself. Man Made religions are about what man can do for his god, but the Bible is about what God has already done for man.

Read More Here

OLAADEGBU:


The Bible Is Unique in Content

First, compared to other “holy books,” the Bible is unique in many respects. Not only was it composed by at least 40 writers, on multiple continents, over a span of 1,500 years, but it is not what we would expect to find were it “made up.” The Bible also includes major moral failings of its heroes, yet most writings of other religions tend to whitewash the flaws of their heroes.

Moreover, the Bible’s theme is quite unlike those found in other religions. Man Made religions teach that a man can earn salvation through various practices and good works. The Bible explains that man is sinful, deserving of God’s judgment, and that no amount of good works could ever remove our guilt. God Himself solves our problem by becoming a man and taking our punishment upon Himself. Man Made religions are about what man can do for his god, but the Bible is about what God has already done for man.

Read More Here

The Bible Is Confirmed by Archaeology

Second, the Bible accurately reveals historical people, events, and places. Consider the following items described in our article, “Archaeological Finds.”

• Discovered in Israel, the Tel Dan Stele has been dated to the ninth century BC and mentions the “House of David,” shattering the long-held view of many skeptics that David was a mythical person.
• The Mesha Stele describes Moab’s subjection under Omri, the king of Israel. It also references the personal name of the God of the Bible (Yahweh), and very likely contains a reference to the “House of David” (this is debated due to an unreadable letter).
• The Pilate stone provides archaeological evidence for the existence of the man who sentenced Jesus to death on the Cross. Skeptics frequently denied his existence until the discovery of this stone, which identifies Pontius Pilate as the Prefect of Judea.¹

Dr. Nelson Glueck was the president of Hebrew Union College and a highly respected archaeologist whose reliance upon the historical accuracy of
Scripture led to the discovery of 1,500 ancient sites. Regarding the Bible and archaeology, he stated the following:

"It may be stated categorically that no archaeological discovery has ever controverted a Biblical reference. Scores of archaeological findings have been made which confirm in clear outline or exact detail historical statements in the Bible. And, by the same token, proper evaluation of biblical description has often led to amazing discoveries."²

The distinguished archaeologist Dr. William F. Albright also asserted the accuracy of the Bible’s history.

"Thanks to modern research we now recognize its substantial historicity. The narratives of the Patriarchs, of Moses and the Exodus, of the Conquest of Canaan, of the Judges, the Monarchy, Exile, and Restoration, have all been confirmed and illustrated to an extent that I should have thought impossible forty years ago."³

Glueck and Albright focused their attention on the Old Testament, but what about the New Testament? Does it enjoy a similar level of confirmation? Actually, perhaps because it is more recent, the evidence consistent with the New Testament is more abundant. Consider the following details in just a single chapter of the Bible that have been confirmed by historians and archaeologists:

• The proper location (Amphipolis and Apollonia) of where travellers would spend successive nights on this journey (Acts 17:1)
• The presence of a synagogue in Thessalonica (Acts 17:1)
• The proper title, “politarchs,” used of the magistrates there (Acts 17:6)
• The correct implication that sea travel is the most convenient way of reaching Athens with favouring east winds of summer sailing (Acts 17:14)
• The abundant presence of images in Athens (Acts 17:16)
• The reference to a synagogue in Athens (Acts 17:17)
• The depiction of the Athenian life of philosophical debate in the Agora (Acts 17:17)
• The use of the correct Athenian slang word for Paul, a spermologos (Acts 17:18), as well as the court (areios pagos)
• The proper characterization of the Athenian character (Acts 17:21)
• An altar to an “unknown god” (Acts 17:23)
• The proper reaction of Greek philosophers who denied bodily resurrection (Acts 17:32)
• Areopagites as the correct title for a member of the court (Acts 17:34)⁴

Remember, all of these accurate details are found in just one chapter. This does not prove every word of Scripture is true, but it reveals that the writer (Luke) had intimate knowledge of the people, customs, and places he wrote about. Also, we have no record of any ancient writer denying the historicity of the people and places described in Scripture, but we do have a number of first-and second-century sources from outside the Bible confirming the existence of Jesus.

Many more archaeologists could be cited who verify the accuracy of the biblical text. Of course we’ll never find archaeological or paleographic evidence to confirm every person, event, or place described in the Bible. For example, historical research can provide corroborating evidence for the Crucifixion of Jesus under Pontius Pilate (Tacitus mentions these details in Annals), but scientific disciplines cannot confirm that His death on the Cross satisfied God’s wrath against sin. However, the abundance of finds matching Scripture perfectly that have already been found show that the Bible was not just “made up.”⁵

THE ABUNDANCE OF FINDS MATCHING SCRIPTURE PERFECTLY THAT HAVE ALREADY BEEN FOUND SHOW THAT THE BIBLE WAS NOT JUST “MADE UP.”

Compare the Bible’s accuracy with the miserable archaeological record of the Mormon religion. The Mormon “holy books” teach that Native Americans are really Jews who fled Jerusalem, but DNA studies have falsified this claim. Furthermore, despite millions of dollars spent on excavations in the Americas, archaeologists have not uncovered a shred of evidence to support Mormon claims, and the early Americans did not wield scimitars or ride horses and elephants.⁶

Scientists from every discipline could be quoted whose work in their respective fields have either persuaded or further convinced them that the Bible is true. But we should not rely primarily on the conclusions of learned men and women of science. While their statements are helpful, we must recognize that they can err and change their minds. So is there anything we can look at to demonstrate the Bible was not just an invention of man? Indeed there is.

Read More Here

The Bible Is Confirmed Through God’s Challenge to Other Religions

Throughout Isaiah 40–46, God, speaking through the prophet, repeatedly challenges the false gods to prove themselves. Specifically, He challenges them to tell the future and bring it to pass.

“Present your case,” says the Lord. “Bring forth your strong reasons,” says the King of Jacob. “Let them bring forth and show us what will happen; let them show the former things, what they were, that we may consider them, and know the latter end of them; or declare to us things to come. Show the things that are to come hereafter, that we may know that you are gods." (Isaiah 41:21–23)

So here is the test for the other religions of the world. Can they accurately foretell future events? After all, only the all-knowing, all-powerful Creator knows everything that will happen and has the ability to bring it to pass. And God has established His righteous character through this unique ability. In Isaiah 41:26, the Lord asks, “Who has declared from the beginning, that we may know? And former times, that we may say, ‘He is righteous’?”

Most of the founders of the world’s religions never attempted to tell the future.⁷ Outside of the Bible, the other “holy books” of the world do not really include prophecies. The vague predictions of Nostradamus and demonstrably false prognostications of Edgar Cayce do not meet the biblical standard of 100 percent accuracy for a prophet (Deuteronomy 18:22).

Now take a look at what God says about His own ability in this area:

"I am the Lord, that is My name; and My glory I will not give to another, nor My praise to carved images. Behold, the former things have come to pass, and new things I declare; before they spring forth I tell you of them." (Isaiah 42:8–9)

What does prophecy have to do with whether the Bible was “made up”? Mere men cannot accurately tell the future, and yet more than one-fourth of the Bible was prophetic at the time of its writing, indicating that these men were not simply making up what they wrote—their writing was inspired by God. The biblical prophecies contain specific people, times, places, and events, and they are generally straightforward. Most of them were written centuries before the events described, and those that have already been fulfilled came to pass exactly as foretold (some prophecies await future fulfillment).

Consider just a handful of the hundreds of accurate prophecies recorded in Scripture:

Read More Here

OLAADEGBU:
The Bible Is Confirmed Through God’s Challenge to Other Religions

Throughout Isaiah 40–46, God, speaking through the prophet, repeatedly challenges the false gods to prove themselves. Specifically, He challenges them to tell the future and bring it to pass.

“Present your case,” says the Lord. “Bring forth your strong reasons,” says the King of Jacob. “Let them bring forth and show us what will happen; let them show the former things, what they were, that we may consider them, and know the latter end of them; or declare to us things to come. Show the things that are to come hereafter, that we may know that you are gods." (Isaiah 41:21–23)

So here is the test for the other religions of the world. Can they accurately foretell future events? After all, only the all-knowing, all-powerful Creator knows everything that will happen and has the ability to bring it to pass. And God has established His righteous character through this unique ability. In Isaiah 41:26, the Lord asks, “Who has declared from the beginning, that we may know? And former times, that we may say, ‘He is righteous’?”

Most of the founders of the world’s religions never attempted to tell the future.⁷ Outside of the Bible, the other “holy books” of the world do not really include prophecies. The vague predictions of Nostradamus and demonstrably false prognostications of Edgar Cayce do not meet the biblical standard of 100 percent accuracy for a prophet (Deuteronomy 18:22).

Now take a look at what God says about His own ability in this area:

"I am the Lord, that is My name; and My glory I will not give to another, nor My praise to carved images. Behold, the former things have come to pass, and new things I declare; before they spring forth I tell you of them." (Isaiah 42:8–9)

What does prophecy have to do with whether the Bible was “made up”? Mere men cannot accurately tell the future, and yet more than one-fourth of the Bible was prophetic at the time of its writing, indicating that these men were not simply making up what they wrote—their writing was inspired by God. The biblical prophecies contain specific people, times, places, and events, and they are generally straightforward. Most of them were written centuries before the events described, and those that have already been fulfilled came to pass exactly as foretold (some prophecies await future fulfillment).

Consider just a handful of the hundreds of accurate prophecies recorded in Scripture:

Read More Here

In addition to dozens of prophecies about the Messiah, Jesus Christ, the Old Testament contains hundreds of detailed prophecies, often to announce judgment upon Israel and the surrounding nations for their disobedience.

When addressing Messianic prophecies, skeptics often assume that Jesus simply set out to fulfill certain predictions; but if Jesus were merely a man, how would He make sure that He would be born of a virgin in Bethlehem or that He would be raised from the dead?

Many skeptics also assume these prophecies were written after the fact, but all of the prophecies mentioned in the chart above were written at least 400 years before the events occurred. Even if a person rejects the well-supported traditional dates assigned to the Old Testament books, he still needs to deal with the fact that the Greek translation of the Old Testament, known as the Septuagint, includes these prophecies and was translated well before Christ’s birth. Furthermore, portions of each of the Old Testament books in the chart were discovered among the Dead Sea Scrolls, including the great Isaiah Scroll, which is dated to at least a century before Christ’s birth and contains multiple precise prophesies about the Messiah. How could the writers of the Old Testament possibly know what would come to pass with perfect accuracy? There is only one logical answer. God inspired their words; they did not make up what they wrote.

Read More Here

Argument 1 was that the bible is unique. Well duh, all books are unique.

Argument 2 was that some of the physical places described in the bible are real. Big deal, NYC is real, but that doesn't make Spider-man non-fiction.

Argument 3 was about the continuity between the stories in the bible. What that establishes is that the New Testament was written by people familiar with the Old Testament; but we already knew that!

That article isn't designed to convince the skeptic, it is designed to convince those who already believe. Don't expect it to resonate with everybody.

OLAADEGBU:


In addition to dozens of prophecies about the Messiah, Jesus Christ, the Old Testament contains hundreds of detailed prophecies, often to announce judgment upon Israel and the surrounding nations for their disobedience.

When addressing Messianic prophecies, skeptics often assume that Jesus simply set out to fulfill certain predictions; but if Jesus were merely a man, how would He make sure that He would be born of a virgin in Bethlehem or that He would be raised from the dead?

Many skeptics also assume these prophecies were written after the fact, but all of the prophecies mentioned in the chart above were written at least 400 years before the events occurred. Even if a person rejects the well-supported traditional dates assigned to the Old Testament books, he still needs to deal with the fact that the Greek translation of the Old Testament, known as the Septuagint, includes these prophecies and was translated well before Christ’s birth. Furthermore, portions of each of the Old Testament books in the chart were discovered among the Dead Sea Scrolls, including the great Isaiah Scroll, which is dated to at least a century before Christ’s birth and contains multiple precise prophesies about the Messiah. How could the writers of the Old Testament possibly know what would come to pass with perfect accuracy? There is only one logical answer. God inspired their words; they did not make up what they wrote.

Read More Here

Conclusion

The truth is that God has inspired the writing of His Word in the collection of 66 books we call the Bible (2 Timothy 3:16). The notion that men just made it up is quite reasonably dispensed by Scripture’s uniqueness, its historical and archaeological accuracy, and its inclusion of fulfilled detailed prophecy. These facts do not necessarily prove that every word of the Bible is accurate, but they do provide verification for many portions of Scripture, demonstrate its divine origin, and give us great confidence that the details not subject to scientific verification are also true. Ultimately, the reason we believe that all Scripture is inspired by God is because the Holy Spirit dwells within us, providing assurance and conviction as we prayerfully read and study the Bible.

THE BIBLE EXPLAINS THE MOST IMPORTANT MESSAGE WE COULD EVER KNOW.

Finally, in addition to the divine origin of the text, the Bible explains the most important message we could ever know. As people who have sinned against our perfectly holy Creator, we deserve His judgment, but God sent His Son to die a sacrificial death on the Cross so that we can be forgiven. Three days later, He rose from the dead, demonstrating His power over sin and death and providing the guarantee of eternal life to all who trust in Him (Romans 10:9).

If you have not already done so, call out to the God who inspired the writing of the Bible. Turn from your sin and ask for His forgiveness.

Read More Here

Tamaratonye5:
Argument 1 was that the bible is unique. Well duh, all books are unique.

Argument 2 was that some of the physical places described in the bible are real. Big deal, NYC is real, but that doesn't make Spider-man non-fiction.

Argument 3 was about the continuity between the stories in the bible. What that establishes is that the New Testament was written by people familiar with the Old Testament; but we already knew that!

That article isn't designed to convince the skeptic, it is designed to convince those who already believe. Don't expect it to resonate with everybody.

Does it resonate with you.

OLAADEGBU:


Does it resonate with you.

U picture screams arrogance. If someone questions you on ur book u claim they should read the book. If they read and make known their findings to u, you claim they have not received holy spirit.. How far will you people move the goal post? Very sad.

kimco:


U picture screams arrogance. If someone questions you on ur book u claim they should read the book. If they read and make known their findings to u, you claim they have not received holy spirit.. How far will you people move the goal post? Very sad.

Have you read it, and if so, what are your findings?

OLAADEGBU:


Have you read it, and if so, what are your findings?

So that you can call me names again...no thank you. You are not worth my time. I have had enough of you.

kimco:


So that you can call me names again...no thank you. You are not worth my time. I have had enough of you.

Thanks for passing by.

OLAADEGBU:


Does it resonate with you.

Of course it doesn't.

I had already tagged this thread of yours as a classic drive-by. That is, you post your "authoritative" drivel and then when challenged do not respond, most likely due to not being able to construct a coherent thought of your own. On that note, I am glad to see your response.

From your OP it is supposed that when you die and go to your expected judgment before your god you will have a relevant Microsoft Powerpoint presentation ready by the lake of fire, so that God won't think you are a goat. Do not offer him a url link.

Just to show you how discussion and debate works on any online chat forum, I (properly this time) offer the following rebuttal on a single item in your generous copy'n'paste of a url which you offer as a claim to the depth, width and strength of your faith in your glorious god who must be really impressed with your witness to his ineffable glory...a website reference...*sigh

Isaiah 7:14 is one of the most Christian abused verses of the Old Testament.
Isaiah 7:14 was the prophecy meant for King Azah of Judah (c. 730 BC), a prediction Isaiah made about his deliverance from the rival kingdoms of Syria and Israel through their invasion by Assyria.

There is no direct reference to a baby being born 700 years later. The baby referred to is to be named "Emmanuel" which means "God is with us", a most comforting idea for a king in fear of an invasion.

In fact only several verses later, Isaiah 8:3 Isaiah has sex with his wife "the prophetess" with witnesses (kinky)and before the son born of this union "shall have knowledge to cry" (good and bad) Assyria will take care of Ahaz's foes. The boy was named Maher-shalah-hash-baz, "swift are the spoils, speedy is the plunder" which adequately describes the short sharp plunder of Assyrian forces in the state of Israel and in Syria. And in case you overlooked it "Jesus" is never mentioned.

And in the end Isaiah's prophecy did not guarantee a complete deliverance. Ahaz became a vassal of Assryria, paying tribute to avoid annihilation. It seems the deliverance was achieved by going "belly up". This verse is also the origin of the fatuous virgin myth where almah (a maiden) was translated as betulah (a virgin). The original Hebrew text used the word "almah".

Now OLAADEGBU, I have taken time out of my day to read, consider and answer your OP or rather Mr Ham's Answers in Genesis article. Your glib and easy url reference contains a multitude of claims, you apparently can't be arsed enough to disseminate yourself. Click and paste witnessing just doesn't reveal what you believe or think, only what Mr Ham does.

Because of time restraints and a sense of being insulted by your indifferent and casual brevity I answered, in my own words, only the one reference to the Isaiah prophecy. I did so with my own research and without resort to parroting predigested third party opinions. I researched the KJV Bible, the Orthodox Jewish Bible, the Webster and Macquarie dictionaries and summarised some observations from independent sites.

Do you think you might spend just a little time responding and preferably without another lame cut and paste effort?
Otherwise I am done.

Tamaratonye5:

Of course it doesn't.

I had already tagged this thread of yours as a classic drive-by. That is, you post your "authoritative" drivel and then when challenged do not respond, most likely due to not being able to construct a coherent thought of your own. On that note, I am glad to see your response.

From your OP it is supposed that when you die and go to your expected judgment before your god you will have a relevant Microsoft Powerpoint presentation ready by the lake of fire, so that God won't think you are a goat. Do not offer him a url link.

Just to show you how discussion and debate works on any online chat forum, I (properly this time) offer the following rebuttal on a single item in your generous copy'n'paste of a url which you offer as a claim to the depth, width and strength of your faith in your glorious god who must be really impressed with your witness to his ineffable glory...a website reference...*sigh

Isaiah 7:14 is one of the most Christian abused verses of the Old Testament.
Isaiah 7:14 was the prophecy meant for King Azah of Judah (c. 730 BC), a prediction Isaiah made about his deliverance from the rival kingdoms of Syria and Israel through their invasion by Assyria.

There is no direct reference to a baby being born 700 years later. The baby referred to is to be named "Emmanuel" which means "God is with us", a most comforting idea for a king in fear of an invasion.

In fact only several verses later, Isaiah 8:3 Isaiah has sex with his wife "the prophetess" with witnesses (kinky)and before the son born of this union "shall have knowledge to cry" (good and bad) Assyria will take care of Ahaz's foes. The boy was named Maher-shalah-hash-baz, "swift are the spoils, speedy is the plunder" which adequately describes the short sharp plunder of Assyrian forces in the state of Israel and in Syria. And in case you overlooked it "Jesus" is never mentioned.

And in the end Isaiah's prophecy did not guarantee a complete deliverance. Ahaz became a vassal of Assryria, paying tribute to avoid annihilation. It seems the deliverance was achieved by going "belly up". This verse is also the origin of the fatuous virgin myth where almah (a maiden) was translated as betulah (a virgin). The original Hebrew text used the word "almah".

Now OLAADEGBU, I have taken time out of my day to read, consider and answer your OP or rather Mr Ham's Answers in Genesis article. Your glib and easy url reference contains a multitude of claims, you apparently can't be arsed enough to disseminate yourself. Click and paste witnessing just doesn't reveal what you believe or think, only what Mr Ham does.

Because of time restraints and a sense of being insulted by your indifferent and casual brevity I answered, in my own words, only the one reference to the Isaiah prophecy. I did so with my own research and without resort to parroting predigested third party opinions. I researched the KJV Bible, the Orthodox Jewish Bible, the Webster and Macquarie dictionaries and summarised some observations from independent sites.

Do you think you might spend just a little time responding and preferably without another lame cut and paste effort?
Otherwise I am done.

If the Bible (Christianity) is true will you believe?

OLAADEGBU:


If the Bible (Christianity) is true will you believe?

Are you really asking if I would believe the bible is true, if I believed the bible is true?

Tamaratonye5:


Are you really asking if I would believe the bible is true, if I believed the bible is true?

If by answering your question, would you then believe that the Bible is true and become a Christian?

OLAADEGBU:


Thanks for passing by.

There is a mistake we Christians trying to avoid in the bible which is the prophecy of virgin giving birth by prophet Isaiah, That place was not talking about Jesus because it's clear there that the king was given a sign concerning the war battling his kingdom and how Almighty will come for his rescue! I read chapter often and I did not see where the chapter is not talking about Christ.

OLAADEGBU:


If by answering your question, would you then believe that the Bible is true and become a Christian?

Maybe.

However, if your answers are not constructed with valid objective evidence, then your answers will be disregarded, and not worth consideration.

But maybe, I will be surprised with new information. Stranger things have happened.

Let me try...

Do you have any objective evidence of your version of a god?

jcross19:


There is a mistake we Christians trying to avoid in the bible which is the prophecy of virgin giving birth by prophet Isaiah, That place was not talking about Jesus because it's clear there that the king was given a sign concerning the war battling his kingdom and how Almighty will come for his rescue! I read chapter often and I did not see where the chapter is not talking about Christ.

If Christianity were to be true would you become a Christian?

Tamaratonye5:


Maybe.

However, if your answers are not constructed with valid objective evidence, then your answers will be disregarded, and not worth consideration.

But maybe, I will be surprised with new information. Stranger things have happened.

Let me try...

Do you have any objective evidence of your version of a god?

Maybe is not good enough. Why should I confuse you with the truth when your mind is already made up?

OLAADEGBU:


Maybe is not good enough. Why should I confuse you with the truth when your mind is already made up?

Your version of truth? Maybe you’re the one that’s confused?

What is the most compelling objective reason you have for believing a deity is real?

Tamaratonye5:


Your version of truth? Maybe you’re the one that’s confused?

What is the most compelling objective reason you have for believing a deity is real?

You are yet to meet my terms and conditions for answering your questions.

OLAADEGBU:


You are yet to meet my terms and conditions for answering your questions.

Well, atheism is a disbelief in what you personally think is real. You need to validate what you believe, so your belief can exist in reality. That is reason enough to answer everyone for your unfounded assertions. Believing in something that is not objectively evidenced in reality, makes people not only disbelieve your assertion, but also makes people question your sanity. So it might be something you should always answer.

Being religious prior to learning about critical thinking, belies being ever confused about religion, or what you believe to be "the truth".

Now speaking about confusion, How is something real or the absolute truth, when it does not exist in reality, or has zero validation ever? That was a rhetorical question, I already know the answer.

Now all I am trying to do, is give you a chance to address the people that think you are nuts, and you are dragging your feet? LOL.

Here you go, another chance

Do you have any objective evidence of your version of a god?

OLAADEGBU:


If Christianity were to be true would you become a Christian?

controversial and contradiction in Bible never change my faith in Christ for once!!!
.

Text me @ +2347053450467 on WhatsApp to be added to my "Atheism vs. Religions WhatsApp group chat".

OLAADEGBU ,Listen my friend, whether the bible contains the whole navigation system of the universe and not just archeology means nothing than that it is yet another book.

Hence, comparing side by side, the Google search engine ranks a million times better than it. No offence.

Tamaratonye5:


Well, atheism is a disbelief in what you personally think is real. You need to validate what you believe, so your belief can exist in reality. That is reason enough to answer everyone for your unfounded assertions. Believing in something that is not objectively evidenced in reality, makes people not only disbelieve your assertion, but also makes people question your sanity. So it might be something you should always answer.

Being religious prior to learning about critical thinking, belies being ever confused about religion, or what you believe to be "the truth".

Now speaking about confusion, How is something real or the absolute truth, when it does not exist in reality, or has zero validation ever? That was a rhetorical question, I already know the answer.

Now all I am trying to do, is give you a chance to address the people that think you are nuts, and you are dragging your feet? LOL.

Here you go, another chance

Do you have any objective evidence of your version of a god?

Are you for real, do you exist in reality?

jcross19:


controversial and contradiction in Bible never change my faith in Christ for once!!!
.

What is the basis for your faith in Christ if you believe the Bible is made up?