Macsjebs:


Source: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-8337085/Giant-fish-380-million-years-ago-suspension-feeder.html

AreaFada2:

But SU people will tell us the world is 6,000 years old.
Not knowing religious books are coded words largely. Not literal.

sulasa07:

You are the crazy fellow.How are you sure I'm from d said certain region.At least I know d production date of my phone and TV and when exactly Vacuum Tube was invented.Just coz some scientist said the carbon dating of something dates back to so and so yrs,I should just accept it like that like and stick that to my brain.
If you don't like my reply,beta go n jump inside river.

ProfAmaben:

Most of their findings cannot be empirically validated. I leave everyone to their belief.

Sammy07:
How were they sure that it's around 380million years ago?
Carbon dating?

GOFRONT:
380 million years........I mean when did the earth came into existence??

Sammy07:
How were they sure that it's around 380million years ago?
Carbon dating?

pjhyde:

Its called radio active dating sir. Rubidium, Strontium, and many other radioactive elements. But for organic substances, carbon 14 dating is mostly used

grim33:
Science fact is science fact whether you choose to “take it like that” and put it in your brain is left to you. What ever you choose to believe have no impact regardless how small. Facts don’t care about your feelings...

kingxsamz:
...
Waiting for religious clowns to come here and try to disprove this.
If you don't believe that scientists can discover things which dates back to millions of years, but believe that a virgin gave birth to a boy who walked on water and then died, only to wake up three days later and ascend into the sky, then you're a compound fool.

kingxsamz:


Eyah... So now it's believe or reject? Lol.
It's good that you've finally come to the conclusion that since God hasn't been proven to exist, therefore he doesn't, untill his existence is proved.
If you can't prove it, don't expect me to disprove it.

grim33:
Science fact is science fact whether you choose to “take it like that” and put it in your brain is left to you. What ever you choose to believe have no impact regardless how small. Facts don’t care about your feelings...

AreaFada2:

But now we all know even if dating not exact science, ranges are quite reliable.

Of course there is freedom of belief. Fundamental human right even. But some imposing theirs on others or refusing outright due to dogma is the issue.

sulasa07:

The same science that gave us fact about the Moon landing is also the science that also gave us fact about the Moon landing being false.
Science fact my foot

kingxsamz:
...
Waiting for religious clowns to come here and try to disprove this.
If you don't believe that scientists can discover things which dates back to millions of years, but believe that a virgin gave birth to a boy who walked on water and then died, only to wake up three days later and ascend into the sky, then you're a compound fool.

GOFRONT:
380 million years........I mean when did the earth came into existence??

AreaFada2:

People were once killed by religious authorities for saying the earth was round and the earth was not centre of the universe but the sun. Imagine if we relied the religious zealots till now.

There would be no satellites, no space lunch, no modern shipping lanes. Nothing. Yet people refuse to learn.

ProfAmaben:

Once you defend your belief, they hurl all sorts of insult on you, they would even call you derogatory names like transgender, demon etc. and this makes me strengthen my assertion that atheists are the sanest of all.

WILLuKPquiet:


And is it not gross stupidity to not believe that a world wide Flood happened sometime during the time of a man called Noah, but to believe that a Giant Fish is found in Sahara desert?

What on earth could have taken a Giant Fish to a desert if not a flood and not a mere flood but of a magnitude big enough to wash off such a Big Animal.

Giant fish found in the Desert. The fish must have been living in sand.

The Bible Can't be mocked!!!

Another name for Atheism is Stupidity.

Grandmeister:

But job 26:7 told us that the earth is spherical and was hung on nothing(space)..that's a book that's over 3000 years ago. You pseudo-atheist really think you know it all when the foremost physicians and and inventors of the past were religious men..there are more religious surgeons, physicists, biologists than there are non religious ones today, but you guys without an invention to your name think you're better than them because you don the cloak of atheism? There is NO way one can study nature deeply and still think there was no intelligent design behind it all..

donvicky2007:
Wow
This shows that Sahara desert was once a sea

ladilawal82:
...dishing out millions of years as if...

Jeromejnr:


Carbon dating has been found to be false and inconsistent.

A penguin in our present time was recently carbon dated and it dated back to millions of years.

Also a fossil was found and different parts of its bones were carbon dated, all parts of the body of this same creature came back with different dates by a wide margin.

There are many other things also that even show the lies of evolution being taught in schools.

The images for the different species of sapiens were mostly drawn off the top of ones head just by looking at a tooth or a small part of a skull.

But you know people especially the so called nairaland atheists don't do their research so they would swallow any deception.

And no one should come up to me with radiometric dating:

WILLuKPquiet:


And is it not gross stupidity to not believe that a world wide Flood happened sometime during the time of a man called Noah, but to believe that a Giant Fish is found in Sahara desert?

What on earth could have taken a Giant Fish to a desert if not a flood and not a mere flood but of a magnitude big enough to wash off such a Big Animal.

Giant fish found in the Desert. The fish must have been living in sand.

The Bible Can't be mocked!!!

Another name for Atheism is Stupidity.

KenModi:


Please show me scientific articles disproving carbon dating, a sentence off a website would not suffice.