jln115:
RVP2018

East Africans may have up to a quarter of Asian and European DNA, says report

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/east-africans-may-have-up-to-a-quarter-of-asian-and-european-dna-says-report-a6686826.html

No wonder Kenyans are easily dominated on their own land by everyone, Indians, whites, Nigerians, Somalis, etc.

Maasai are 50% afro-Asiatic - middle eastern - nothing wrong - like Somalis.

jln115:
Let me teach you this:
Further, we show that there was significant Neanderthal admixture into the Maasai population of East Africa

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3632468/

rvp20182:
The weak bushmen are not Africans. You just need to take a quick look at them. Asians who returned back to Africa - Afrikaan now have their cousins - how long before the Afrikaan have nappy hair and swarthy skin


The team acquired DNA samples from 32 people living in Khoisan tribes in southern Africa—an analysis revealed Eurasian gene segments in all of them. ... The researchers found something else—the Khoisan tribespeople also had snippets of Neanderthal DNA in their genes as well—courtesy of their Eurasian heritage

https://phys.org/news/2014-02-western-eurasian-genes-southern-african.html#:~:text=The%20team%20acquired%20DNA%20samples,segments%20in%20all%20of%20them.&text=The%20researchers%20found%20something%20else,courtesy%20of%20their%20Eurasian%20heritage.

They have Eurasian admixture but they're not Asian

Just30:


Maasai people that were constantly exploited because they didn't know shit such that up till date they look like hungry slaves starving and still drinking animal blood. Those animals were not good for anything so than rape victims and all their territories taken from them such that they became squatters.

what territories did they loose?

Well, the story goes, they left Africa with other Euroasias - and they cameback to Africa- and quietly lived in forests. The rest of the Africans never really left Africa.

Justnotyou:


They have Eurasian admixture but they're not Asian

rvp2018:
Maasai are 50% afro-Asiatic - middle eastern - nothing wrong - like Somalis.

So they are Asian then Not African! just like the Khoisan

Acadavah:


Two Alshabab terrorists scared the hell out of Nairobi, what do you think the boers would have done to the Maasai and Kikuyu men with their spears and arrows.

You're confusing the Maa community for the majimaji...

Jonraid:
Now say that again without crying!

he's all over the place thinking his opinion matters...

kikuyu3:


TayserMahrii, rmbr the vid of the Boer deliberate spread of AIDS? Where Stoffie said it was a failed EXPERIMENT. Pls post it here so everyone knows what we're dealing with.

Why not! Stoffie repeatedly called the sadistic episode a mere experiment and questioned how effective it was, due, obviously, to the unmatched innate sociopathic nature. We forgot to remind him that even one successful case was bad enough!

https://www.nairaland.com/3327789/kenya-ahead-nigeria-all-aspect/7220#88815716

They have like 5% European blood. Jews are not Europeans. And so are Arabs. They are half African. Half Asians (middle eastern-northern africa decent)

jln115:
So they are Asian then Not African! just like the Khoisan

rvp2018:
TheyKenyan Indians are not Africans. They are Kenya Asians. Now a tribe in Kenya.
.

End of discussion!
If Indians and whites in Kenya are not Africans, it is stupid to call them Kenyans. Stop posting their achievement as yours.

LOL

Justnotyou:


You're confusing the Maa community for the majimaji...

jln115:

The team acquired DNA samples from 32 people living in Khoisan tribes in southern Africa—an analysis revealed Eurasian gene segments in all of them. But that wasn't the end of the story. To understand how the gene fragments got into the Khoisan tribespeople, the researchers turned to archeological and linguistic evidence to build a possible time-line of events. In so doing, they've found what they believe to have been a migration back into Africa by people of the Middle East (ancestors of the people that migrated to Europe and Asia) approximately 3000 years ago. Those people made their way to various parts of the continent, including a part of eastern Africa from which the Khoisan tribespeople had migrated south approximately 900 and 1800 years ago.

Their phenotype is suspicious when compared to the common S.S.African stereotype. But they are as much African as the rest...

Polemics. Kenya is a modern country. Africa is an old construct.

obaaderemi:
End of discussion!
If Indians and whites in Kenya are not Africans, it is stupid to call them Kenyans. Stop posting their achievement as yours.

rvp2018:
Polemics. Kenya is a modern country. Africa is an old construct.

A modern country ravaged by starvation and filth.
Africa remains Africa. Stop giving excuses. According to your logic, Indians and whites in Kenya are not Africans, so they are not Kenyan.

TayserMahrii:


Why not! Stoffie repeatedly called the sadistic episode a mere experiment and questioned how effective it was, due, obviously, to the unmatched innate sociopathic nature. We forgot to remind him that even one successful case was bad enough!

https://www.nairaland.com/3327789/kenya-ahead-nigeria-all-aspect/7220#88815716

Quote were I said this: THE NIGGA ACTUALLY SAID IT WAS "A FAILED EXPERIMENT"

They are Kenyan Asian. I don't know how more descriptive a name can be. Kenya is only a 100 yr construct. Africa was formed millions of years. They can never be Africans. Otherwise we wont have to include Asia in their name.

Afrikaan is not African - but they are South African europeans.

obaaderemi:
A modern country ravaged by starvation and filth.
Africa remains Africa. Stop giving excuses. According to your logic, Indians and whites in Kenya are not Africans, so they are not Kenyan.

rvp2018:
They have like 5% European blood. Jews are not Europeans. And so are Arabs. They are half African. Half Asians (middle eastern-northern africa decent)

So they are Asian like the Khoisan by your logic.........And just FYI the Kikuyu, Mau Mau also have Eurasian DNA

rvp2018:
Yes mor.on, we have them in Kenya, called Dorobo or Okiek, They have red legs and are light skins. And they are bush-men- hunter-gatherer. They are Asian (say Chinese) who returned back to Africa. You're now the 2nd group to come back to mother Africa carrying even more NEATHDEARTHAL destructive gene - we only have homo Erectus gene around here. Welcome, and prepare to grow nappy hair, darker skin and be a proud African.

They may be weak but no human being understands animals like those bushmen. They have studied their forest so much I wish they could record it.

Kenya Dorobos (Khoisan) snatch meat from the Lion.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y3MTDFNf71I

They're not weak. They're victims, no one blames someone for being raped.

The allele for lightskin is higher on average Kenyans than even the San communities but today Kenyans are far more darker, this is due to the geographical differences. Also nilotes & Khoisan communities share the exact same haplogroups. The capoids just lived in a more Mediterranean environment while Kenyan nilotes are right at the equator.

Justnotyou:


Their phenotype is suspicious when compared to the common S.S.African stereotype. But they are as much African as the rest...

The Khoisans are one of the oldest tribes in Africa. Only an idiot would call them Asians.

jln115:
Afrikaans itself developed in South Africa and is only spoken in South Africa(Nambia used to be a SAn colony hence why Afrikaans is also popular there) hence it is a indigenous South African language

It would definitely do you good to learn the names of your former colonies. See what it's done to you (white privilege)

jln115:
So they are Asian like the Khoisan by your logic.........And just FYI the Kikuyu, Mau Mau also have Eurasian DNA

Rvp is Asian. He is a candyass.

jln115:
RVP2018

East Africans may have up to a quarter of Asian and European DNA, says report

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/east-africans-may-have-up-to-a-quarter-of-asian-and-european-dna-says-report-a6686826.html

This is in fact true. The capoids have far less compared to Kenyans. But the phenotype vary greatly hence why they're not seen as being true Africans

Interesting. I will research. I grew up with few Okieks. I know them for being little reddish-brown. And they are anal about forests and hunting.

Justnotyou:


They're not weak. They're victims, no one blames someone for being raped.

The allele for lightskin is higher on average Kenyans than even the San communities but today Kenyans are far more darker, this is due to the geographical differences. Also nilotes & Khoisan communities share the exact same haplogroups. The capoids just lived in a more Mediterranean environment while Kenyan nilotes are right at the equator.

rvp2018:
They are Kenyan Asian. I don't know how more descriptive a name can be. Kenya is only a 100 yr construct. Africa was formed millions of years. They can never be Africans. Otherwise we wont have to include Asia in their name.

Afrikaan is not African - but they are South African europeans.

Are the Boers less South African than the Zulus?

YEARS OF CONSTANT rape

rvp2018:
Maasai are 50% afro-Asiatic - middle eastern - nothing wrong - like Somalis.

Some. I underlined ALL Khoisan measured had euroasian genes. That is BIG, Most people have admxitures.

jln115:
So they are Asian like the Khoisan by your logic.........And just FYI the Kikuyu, Mau Mau also have Eurasian DNA

jln115:
Are you sure? I could swear they had TV back then I mean how else would they have known about slavery before the colonists came?

You forgot Arabs are/were the initial colonists.

TayserMahrii:


Tanzanian Swahili is mbaya Kenyan is chafu. Let's learn to respect each others language. Don't forget the best Swahili scholars on earth are Kenyan.

I think they are both correct,and in TZ,we use both sometimes

Justnotyou:


what territories did they loose?

Squirting on a land does not make it yours

Nope. They should enjoy equal rights after they sort historical injustices. They are doing BEE to correct the business or capital part of it - but what about poor south africans who need farms. The land belonged to somebody. They give up land and they will become South Africans. Africans - hell no.

obaaderemi:
Are the Boers less South African than the Zulus?

TayserMahrii:


They saw it and took part in Arab slave trade before themselves becoming slave traders. Hands on experience from their Arabic Islam Massa's. There was no TV back in the day in case you didn't know.

Slavery was a custom in all human societies in fact sex slaves in the name of betrothed daughters still persist today. Let's not peddle misinformation. The differences in brutality is what should be discussed here.