VEXT:
Honestly most women are ingrate... In my own house,you still accuse me of rape!! Did he force her for sex? "No"
Check out the pic below and imagine a man carry this same act with his daughter and post it on social media... All the stupid feminists and simp will have call him names and want him to be jail....

maynia:


Pure rubbish.

They were both drunk, they had sex.

Where in the law is it written that when both parties are drunk and they have sex the man is the guilty one?

Show me, omo judge

BluntTheApostle:


Calm down.

Of course, the guy would have to hire his own lawyer.

But my argument is about the drunk part of the doctor's testimony which any good lawyer can manipulate to favor the lady.

I manipulated that part. Of course, the guy's lawyer would try to make a defense, and even come up with a counter claim. But that is law.

I was raised by a judge (my mother). So, I know that in law, black is not always black. You think the guy has a case because you are a layman. Wait till you get to court, that is when they will turn everything upside down in front of you.

MoneyMindset:
according to him she also came to stay in his home for 4 mths,why stay with your rapist that long

FlordFlorez:
I fear who no fear woman.

Dobson43:




Brother, I am glad you agreed with the other paragraph. If the case centered on just the sex scene after their alcohol intoxication, and the lady cried foul and took the case up immediately after submitting herself for medical evaluation and filed a case in the police station. Brother, that man would find it hard to get out of that matter. It seems like an injustice here but it is what it is.

J111333:
..."According to him, they had consensual sex, twice. The 1st being after they were both drunk, only for her to tell him the next day she didn’t give her consent to the sex they had"...






The above statement alone will get him in serious trouble. When she is drunk, you ain't suppose to sleep with her especially when not in an established relationship.
Guys be careful and know when to abort mission. Control your prick, don't let it control you. Yea it can be hard and strong but e no go break for sure.

sassysure:

The guy is the one who actually dug his own grave by admitting they had sex while drunk. She obviously said it's without her consent.

In laws of most country, a drunk man is no defence in court at all.

Normally if u read that link I provided, what constitutes problem when a lady say she did it without consent is how to determine the level of intoxity. Our bros made it very easy by saying both were drunk.

He should go and beg. He should have consulted a lawyer before hastily releasing that implicating evidence.

Dobson43:




It's very nice you pointed out the bone of contention here: consent. Under law, you are not supposed to violate a lady under the influence of drugs or alcohol.

Nobody made the assertion that the guy fed her alcohol. You made that. If he was that drunk, how did he manage to drive her back home? If he was able to coordinate his motor skills in driving her home then he should be able to understand that her consent was needed before he had sex with her. If he was that drunk then we should be reading about their auto accident or obituaries.


The other point to note is that the case, if it goes to court, will be decided in the UK, so it is dicey.
All the points of living in his house for 4 months, sponsoring her visa and both being drunk will not hold water in the uk. the time frame is also irrelevant as people are being convicted of rate that happened 10 to 30 years ago.

The judge would simply determine if she gave her consent. The fact that she couldn.t have given consent under the influence of alcohol is a negative to the man. It is not that simple


We live in uncertain times and should get consent to avoid such stories such as this that touch.


What are we even debating about? We all know the lady just want to soil his reputation. How?
They are adults.
Agreed to meet.
He sponsored her visa and trip over. Which would have come at a hefty price.
Was she supposed to play hide and seek while with him?
She cohabited with him for a period of 4months.
They had another round of sex.
He provided her with her basic needs.
He paid her flight fare back.
These circumstances collaborates the guys innocence.



But the excuse we were both drunk alone isn't enough.

maynia:


You are the ignorant and proud layman here bro.

Did you also read the part in the thread where she came to his room wearing just pant and bra?
The other housemates can testify to it

Denique:
The Lawyers above are already settling the matter even before getting to court...no breaking of bottles on this thread sha

jikins:


Everything is not fight na. Haba! Calm down. He is only telling you how reality works. It like you haven't been to a law court and see how lawyers twist facts and even the law to win their case.

What he did is tell you that if this girl gets a competent lawyer, they can spin this "we were both drunk" narrative in favour of the girl.

Its clear its not something you want to hear. But what he is saying is, it can be done and it can be done effectively. When I read that part I was like f**k. He has given her a case right there. See like it or not this is just his own account of things. It isn't a fact. She can come in court on the advice of her lawyer to say she already had drank a considerable amount of the wine before going to his room. Which would implicate she would obviously be more drunk than he was.

You guys look at the law or court like it is static or unmalleable, where only the guilty loses. No innocent people lose cases everyday because the other lawyers knew how to bend the law and manipulate facts to tell a seemly accurate tale (even though its completely trash) that's believable...

abasscity:
See the girl chilling in his living room. Very happy. Women sha

MrMcJay:
I just pity this guy. I really pity him. You slept with a lady who was drunk. And she mentioned the fact that she didn't give consent the morning after.

He should hope this matter doesn't come before a female British judge. Oh my God, even his village people will cry for him.

Him own go pass black lives matter.

maynia:

Bro I was not insulting you, I'm just wondering why you continue to bask in ignorance, why not read the thread and get the full picture?

Why did she say she want to drink the red wine with him in the first place?
Why did she bring the red wine to his room by herself.
Why did she drink it?

Think na

TheKingIsHere:


Adjusted...men dey suffer now

wisdomiskey:



Does that mean she consented to sex?

Foolish rape apologist!

wisdomiskey:



Does that mean she consented to sex?

Foolish rape apologist!

luminouz:


They will both undergo alcohol test. If they both carry more than the accepted limit in their bloodstreams,the guy goes scot free.

But you may have a case where there is video or cctv recording of him COERCING/FORCING her to drink,then sleeping with her afterwards. But in the doctors case,they got drunk together and no evidence of foul play or coercion was found.

sassysure:


He should pray to whichever God he believes in. Guy is in deep shit if she decides to sue.

UK is not Nigeria.

After elderly, children, women, pets and then men.

sassysure:

The guy is the one who actually dug his own grave by admitting they had sex while drunk. She obviously said it's without her consent.

In laws of most country, a drunk man is no defence in court at all.

Normally if u read that link I provided, what constitutes problem when a lady say she did it without consent is how to determine the level of intoxity. Our bros made it very easy by saying both were drunk.

He should go and beg. He should have consulted a lawyer before hastily releasing that implicating evidence.

BluntTheApostle:


How can I get the true picture from one person's testimony?

There are two people who have primary interest in this case (the woman and the doctor). You can't believe either of their stories just like that.

Even a judge cannot just take sides just from reading Twitter or Facebook posts of two people who both have equal interests in a case. That is why we have lawyers to present the case as best as they can before a judge who will then make the final decision.

My own argument all this while is that people should only speak through their lawyers. Let your lawyer do the speaking for you because if you do so yourself, you may create holes in your defense.

That getting drunk part of the doctor's post can be exploited by a good lawyer.

maynia:


A dunce, can't you just read the thread and stop displaying your foolishness.

BluntTheApostle:


How can I get the true picture from one person's testimony?

There are two people who have primary interest in this case (the woman and the doctor). You can't believe either of their stories just like that.

Even a judge cannot just take sides just from reading Twitter or Facebook posts of two people who both have equal interests in a case. That is why we have lawyers to present the case as best as they can before a judge who will then make the final decision.

My own argument all this while is that people should only speak through their lawyers. Let your lawyer do the speaking for you because if you do so yourself, you may create holes in your defense.

That getting drunk part of the doctor's post can be exploited by a good lawyer .

legionISproteus:


THEY WERE BOTH DRUNK.

THEY, in this context, is the pronoun for two people. So she wouldn't get into trouble for having sex with a drunk guy, but the guy should get into trouble for having sex with a drunk girl, abi?

I'm happy you're not a judge

Update: You too Dobson43, I had to include you here

wisdomiskey:



ODe
Tell that to the same "Dr" who said this:

maynia:


She came to his room wearing pants and bra and seducing him that he had to ran out of the room and go to the other housemates room.
Did she came to play ball?

Foolish and ignorant false rape apologist