This looks pretty messy...
Waiting patiently for the babes reply...

Please help take a brief survey....link is in my bio

maynia:


She will also have to explain why she deleted those pictures in the first place.
Have to explain why she brought contraceptive pills
Have to explain why she was threatening and saying to People that she will accuse him of rape.

Everything is explainable brother. Let me try to do justice to these questions, as if I am her lawyer.

1. She deleted those pictures to hide her identity, yes it probably dumb now thinking about it but she was intimidated and scared because of how many followers the doc had and how influencial he was. She was scared people would bash her physically and that her face will be plastered everywhere making it hard for her to get a job or find love again.


2. The doc said she has other male friends who she visits. So its a no brainer as to why she did that. It necessary doesn't have to be because of him.

3. Because she has been molested but she actually loved him. But he treated her like shit. But because of her emotional attachment for him she wasn't ready to go all out at 1st. She had sex with him the second time despite his initial abuse because she actually did love him and felt it was an aberration (which she clearly stated in the chats after the 1st sex).

But she never felt safe enough to actually love him that way again. And she never seduced him. When she came into his room that day she wasn't only wearing bra and panties, she had a night gown on as well just that the buttons were bad. Infact he was the one always trying to sleep with her. Thats why he switched off the TV she was watching because she refused him sex.

If she wanted to sleep with him why was she sleeping with other men? If she wanted to really seduced him why do that? Its because she wasn't interested in him anymore. Thats why he became abusive both physically and verbally. Its why she had to leave the house for days and stay with her new man.

But the height of manipulation was when after their argument that day, he went online and bad mouthed her business. The abuse was just too much.



I hope you see what I did there? How I twisted everything and I am not even a lawyer not yet anyways. Now imagine what a competent lawyer can do. This is how to win cases like this. She has so much ammunition. And he gave it to her.

SmartyPants:


That in itself is a crime

Wait until ur whole career comes crashing before ur eyes because u couldn't provide evidence that what u had was consensual. You can ask Neymar Jr. Unless u have no career to protect

sassysure:


He should pray to whichever God he believes in. Guy is in deep shit if she decides to sue.

UK is not Nigeria.

After elderly, children, women, pets and then men.

Uk is not Nigeria lol so with all what he wrote he is at fault thank God u no b jugde

Dobson43:
:


That they both had sex when they were both drunk can actually land him in hot water. A smart lawyer can turn the matter on its head.

As it stands, the lady has scores she wants to settle with the man and she is willing to go any length to tarnish his image.

I have advised my fellow men to draft an agreement before engaging in fuckery.


...*AGREEMENT BEFORE SEX!*
Due to the current and numerous allegations made by women, which include rape and many other sexual misconduct towards women, there is now an agreement to be signed before any poking "*action*".
Please print a Copy which can be used in the Court of Law .

*AGREEMENT BEFORE SEX*......
I, __________________________, the undersigned Female Partner (herein referred to as the 'Screwee'), am about to enjoy sexual intercourse with________________________ (hereafter referred to as the 'Screwer'), certify the following:-
1. THAT I am above the lawful age of consent.
2. THAT I am not under the influence of any narcotic. N(s).
3. THAT the afore mentioned Screwer did not use any force, threats, coercion or promises to influence me.
4. THAT I, the Screwee, am in no fear of him whatsoever.
5. THAT I do not expect or wish to marry him.
6. THAT I do not know if he is married or not and neither do I care.
7. THAT I am neither asleep nor drunk.
8. THAT I am entering this relationship with him; because I love SEX and want it as much as he does.
9. THAT in the event that I receive full satisfaction, which I expect, I declare in advance the capacity and willingness for further participation at regular intervals.
10. THAT I will not act as a witness against him nor will I file charges against him in the event that,
(a) I contract an STD
(b) I become pregnant
(c) I feel that he is violating any legislation - moral, legal or otherwise.
*SIGNED BEFORE JUMPING INTO BED ON THIS* ___ *DAY OF* _____ (MONTH) ________ (YEAR) AT ______ (AM/PM)
________________________________
Signature of Screwee :=-...
PS: Not taking anything for granted...erryting is now strictly bizniz...

Lobaton

jikins:


Everything is explainable brother. Let me try to do justice to these questions, as if I am her lawyer.

1. She deleted those pictures to hide her identity, yes it probably dumb now thinking about it but she was intimidated and scared because of how many followers the doc had and how influencial he was. She was scared people would bash her physically and that her face will be plastered everywhere making it hard for her to get a job or find love again.


2. The doc said she has other male friends who she visits. So its a no brainer as to why she did that. It necessary doesn't have to be because of him.

3. Because she has been molested but she actually loved him. But he treated her like shit. But because of her emotional attachment for him she wasn't ready to go all out at 1st. She had sex with him the second time despite his initial abuse because she actually did love him and felt it was an aberration (which she clearly stated in the chats after the 1st sex).

But she never felt safe enough to actually love him that way again. And she never seduced him. When she came into his room that day she wasn't only wearing bra and panties, she had a night gown on as well just that the buttons were bad. Infact he was the one always trying to sleep with her. Thats why he switched off the TV she was watching because she refused him sex.

If she wanted to sleep with him why was she sleeping with other men? If she wanted to really seduced him why do that? Its because she wasn't interested in him anymore. Thats why he became abusive both physically and verbally. Its why she had to leave the house for days and stay with her new man.

But the height of manipulation was when after their argument that day, he went online and bad mouthed her business. The abuse was just too much.



I hope you see what I did there? How I twisted everything and I am not even a lawyer not yet anyways. Now imagine what a competent lawyer can do. This is how to win cases like this. She has so much ammunition. And he gave it to her.

Now do for the man, defend the man

geokay777:

So na today wey day break

You had to quote the long post to say something as short as this.

Dobson43:




It's very nice you pointed out the bone of contention here: consent. Under law, you are not supposed to violate a lady under the influence of drugs or alcohol.

Nobody made the assertion that the guy fed her alcohol. You made that. If he was that drunk, how did he manage to drive her back home? If he was able to coordinate his motor skills in driving her home then he should be able to understand that her consent was needed before he had sex with her. If he was that drunk then we should be reading about their auto accident or obituaries.


We live in uncertain times and should get consent to avoid such stories such as this that touch.


What are we even debating about? We all know the lady just want to soil his reputation. How?
They are adults.
Agreed to meet.
He sponsored her visa and trip over. Which would have come at a hefty price.
Was she supposed to play hide and seek while with him?
She cohabited with him for a period of 4months.
They had another round of sex.
He provided her with her basic needs.
He paid her flight fare back.
These circumstances collaborates the guys innocence.



But the excuse we were both drunk alone isn't enough.

I don't know what you two are arguing abt. Is like you and the other guy didn't read the entire write up. They both had the drink at home, not in a bar of outside their home..

jikins:


Everything is explainable brother. Let me try to do justice to these questions, as if I am her lawyer.

1. She deleted those pictures to hide her identity, yes it probably dumb now thinking about it but she was intimidated and scared because of how many followers the doc had and how influencial he was. She was scared people would bash her physically and that her face will be plastered everywhere making it hard for her to get a job or find love again.


2. The doc said she has other male friends who she visits. So its a no brainer as to why she did that. It necessary doesn't have to be because of him.

3. Because she has been molested but she actually loved him. But he treated her like shit. But because of her emotional attachment for him she wasn't ready to go all out at 1st. She had sex with him the second time despite his initial abuse because she actually did love him and felt it was an aberration (which she clearly stated in the chats after the 1st sex).

But she never felt safe enough to actually love him that way again. And she never seduced him. When she came into his room that day she wasn't only wearing bra and panties, she had a night gown on as well just that the buttons were bad. Infact he was the one always trying to sleep with her. Thats why he switched off the TV she was watching because she refused him sex.

If she wanted to sleep with him why was she sleeping with other men? If she wanted to really seduced him why do that? Its because she wasn't interested in him anymore. Thats why he became abusive both physically and verbally. Its why she had to leave the house for days and stay with her new man.

But the height of manipulation was when after their argument that day, he went online and bad mouthed her business. The abuse was just too much.



I hope you see what I did there? How I twisted everything and I am not even a lawyer not yet anyways. Now imagine what a competent lawyer can do. This is how to win cases like this. She has so much ammunition. And he gave it to her.

Bravo. But why expend so much energy explaining things to a dunce
Can't you see the guy you're quoting has the mentality of a 9 year old?

maynia:


Now do for the man, defend the man

Thats the point, I can't because he has already done so himself.

Gerrard59:


It's like you don't know how feminist groups have hijacked the justice system in the UK. You think it's Nigeria or Iran?

Feminism brings logic, not sentiment. This is simple logic: is sex with a drunk man rape? The answer to that is the answer to the case.

BluntTheApostle:


Even a woman in a kidnapper's den can sometimes fall in love with the man that kidnapped her. Ever heard about capture-bonding?

You people are so stupid, I swear.

It is people like you who rush to the police thinking you have a case figured out. They start screaming, "I want to go to court". The police will beg and beg for an out-of-court settlement, but no, they think they have the better case. Then, they go to court and lose woefully.

My friend, the law is not always logical.

What do I expect from the apostle? Your antics are well know here. Unstable as water and unreliable as quick sand.

What is the correlation of capture bonding to the case now, did the doctor kidnap her? By the way,its called Stockholm syndrome. So be educated bro.

Did you say the law is not logical? I give up on your case. You remind of the doctor himself. Bold and brush online but meek little lambs offline. Men who rely on a woman's appraisal to feel good are simps.

bizzibodi:
A female doc to hav such nasty xters is a shocker,he shld hav post her pictures so that we blacklist her,I pity d idiot that will marry her,lesson do not house any lady u pick frm d gutter,street let someone that knows her recommendation her to you.

She actually posted pictures of herself enjoying and being happy in the guys crib before she deleted the tweet.

Men should wise up and avoid these demons in human form

Kwon1999:
Nairaland why will you bring to the front page "SEX"

It is very childish.

So if a foreigner visit this site, what he will see is the case shameless Nigerians who bring private things in the public.

there are hundreds of thousands of foreigners on this platform, majority of them are guest. So what's the big deal? Is there anything hidden under the planet of this earth? If Donald Trump could be blackmail, then who else can't be. Women are too dangerous species.... I'm in my late 20s, seeing all these kinda wicked act from women just makes me to loose interest in ladies, and majority pose same attitude. Well, I ready anyway. Still hustling

BluntTheApostle:


No, it doesn't.

The law may ask if he intentionally left a bottle of wine hanging around just so he could get her drunk and vulnerable.

is house he has right to have a bottle of wine there and again who took the wine to the room the lady

BluntTheApostle:


The thread is one person's testimony. It can't be taken as the whole truth.

If I were a prosecutor, that would be the easiest to trash of whatever defense the defendant has.

if you where and you are not so i cant have wine in my house again

luminouz:


What do I expect from the apostle? Your antics are well know here. Unstable as water and unreliable as quick sand.

Your opinion.

What is the correlation of capture bonding to the case now, did the doctor kidnap her?

Capture bonding is just one case where logic is defied. It is to tell you that logic does not strengthen cases all the time. There is not always a reasonable motive for all our actions. Some actions are driven purely by illogicalities.

By the way,its called Stockholm syndrome. So be educated bro.

It is the same thing. I chose capture bonding because I feared that Stockholm syndrome would go over your head. So, concerning getting an education, you should take your own advice.

Did you say the law is not logical? I give up on your case. You remind of the doctor himself. Bold and brush online but meek little lambs offline. Men who rely on a woman's appraisal to feel good are simps.

I wrote that the law is not always logical

Learn to read.

richard16:
Reading some people's comments here amuse me...That guy has already implicated himself by saying they had sex when both were drunk! In a law court anywhere in the world that guy will be jailed for rape! Be you drunk or not having sex with a drunk lady without consent is rape! Even an amateur lawyer will turn this case against this guy! It's always advisable to contact your lawyer before making any statement..now this guy just shot himself on the foot by that statement alone!

Wrong!!

They were both drunk. Does a man's consent not count? Who first initiated the sex,what if it was the geh and he was the one actually molested?

Think niggas,think!!! Unless the law the world over(including) Nigeria, thinks a man is worth nothing,but even his own consent

joyandfaith:


rule 1. You do not have sex with a drunk woman because she cannot give consent.

Rule number two they had sex again and she stay for 4month


use your senses

Adeoye2103:



if you where and you are not so i cant have wine in my house again

I don't understand why many people are finding it difficult to understand such a simple matter.

You are allowed to have things in your house, but those things can also be used against you should your house turn into a crime scene.

BluntTheApostle:


Your opinion.



Capture bonding is just one case where logic is defied. It is to tell you that logic does not strengthen cases all the time. There is not always a reasonable motive for all our actions. Some actions are driven purely by illogicalities.



It is the same thing. I chose capture bonding because I feared that Stockholm syndrome would go over your head. So, concerning getting an education, you should take your own advice.



I wrote that the law is not always logical

Learn to read.

Awwwwnnnn...the apostle shooting outta the blocks,gun blazing,eye red and glaring, trying to take luminouz out!!!

Wrong again! You assume a lot of shiit and that ain't good for you. You write a lot of grammar and assume a guy like me won't know shiit. Capture bonding in place of Stockholm syndrome so that I won't faint? Lmaooooo!!! Why not hydrogen bonding or Van der Waals forces?

You have no points bro. Logic is simple as fuq.... and the law is based on that. Technicalities are what differ. That babe has no case. But then the doctor is a glaring simp. So they deserve each other.

"They", both of them, were drunk. in that case, they were both unable to give nor deny said consent. They, the 2 of them, ADULTS, were BOTH responsible. You cannot pin this on the GUY alone.

J111333:
..."According to him, they had consensual sex, twice. The 1st being after they were both drunk, only for her to tell him the next day she didn’t give her consent to the sex they had"...






The above statement alone will get him in serious trouble. When she is drunk, you ain't suppose to sleep with her especially when not in an established relationship.
Guys be careful and know when to abort mission. Control your prick, don't let it control you. Yea it can be hard and strong but e no go break for sure.

maynia:


He can also claim that she raped him while he was drunk, it goes both ways.

It doesn't work that way my brother... This world no balance

J111333:
..."According to him, they had consensual sex, twice. The 1st being after they were both drunk, only for her to tell him the next day she didn’t give her consent to the sex they had"...






The above statement alone will get him in serious trouble. When she is drunk, you ain't suppose to sleep with her especially when not in an established relationship.
Guys be careful and know when to abort mission. Control your prick, don't let it control you. Yea it can be hard and strong but e no go break for sure.

But she wasn't the only one that was drunk nah...
Both were drunk!
Besides,if she felt she never consented to the sex,why did she not leave the house that very day!
However,she stayed for 4 months!
Did he kidnap her for those four.months?

My Lord,
This case does not hold water. Please sentence the accuser to everlasting rape.

the sermon is too long. just in the name of fhuck called rape .

i tire for this generation o.


any way happy new month to all the good people of NL stay strong let's keep matching on.
july wil be good to us all ijmn amen.

BluntTheApostle:


I am going to refrain from insulting you back.

Rather, I will educate you.

A lawyer can make a case against the doctor by claiming that he left the bottle lying there on purpose so the girl could find it easily and get drunk. This is a possibility, and is thus a strong case.

Supposing you are the defense counsel, how do you intend to win a case like this by abusing me or becoming so overly emotional and aggressive?

lol who took the wine to the room

wisdomiskey:


Don't mind typical Nigerians and their idi0tic way of reasoning. They think every country is as lawless as our beloved jungle country.

Based on his write up alone, if that girl should file in the UK, dude is a goner!

This is why I say academic/career achievement doesn't necessarily translate to common sense. Dr-itk has implicated himself without realising

However, I don't trust the intellectual capability of this Bola chick to take full advantage of his confession and make the "unintentional" rapist pay for what he did to her

Honestly the guy just presented this girl a tangible evidence to hold on and get him jailed! That's if the girl really want to take it up and complete her "Blackmail" in quote...It's just relationship gone wrong and the girl want to use it against him. The guy should just reach out to settle it amicably or else if this case ends in court the girl has a case based on this guys foolish statement now and the guy is in soup if the girl decides to sue him in UK where the sex took place! fear women

Gerrard59:


Unfortunately, that's what most NL males aren't considering. It happened in a prominent western country where social justice warriors have hijacked and influenced the system to their benefits. Even the Dr Funmi has always been on the side of the accuser without hearing from the other party. Today, see am see case?

At this point, people should begin to read Sagamite's posts. He predicted everything!

Link to Sagamite's post pls

J111333:
..."According to him, they had consensual sex, twice. The 1st being after they were both drunk, only for her to tell him the next day she didn’t give her consent to the sex they had"...






The above statement alone will get him in serious trouble. When she is drunk, you ain't suppose to sleep with her especially when not in an established relationship.
Guys be careful and know when to abort mission. Control your prick, don't let it control you. Yea it can be hard and strong but e no go break for sure.

Did you read the post at all? He said they were both drunk.

luminouz:



Awwwwnnnn...the apostle shooting outta the blocks,gun blazing,eye red and glaring, trying to take luminouz out!!!

Wrong again! You assume a lot of shiit and that ain't good for you. You write a lot of grammar and assume a guy like me won't know shiit. Capture bonding in place of Stockholm syndrome so that I won't faint? Lmaooooo!!! Why not hydrogen bonding or Van der Waals forces?

The concepts of Capture-bonding or Stockholm syndrome can be used to understand historical events from the Rape of the Sabine Women to the accounts of Europeans who were captured and assimilated into Native American tribes.
https://psychology.wikia.org/wiki/Capture-bonding

You have no points bro. Logic is simple as fuq.... and the law is based on that. Technicalities are what differ. That babe has no case. But then the doctor is a glaring simp. So they deserve each other.

Explain to me this saying: The law is not logical but it is legal

If you can't, I will gladly explain it to you. There are so many things you need to unlearn, if your arrogance will allow you, though.

TemmyT002:



Bros, your opinion doesn't hold water. It's okay.
Watch law series to see how courts work

Your opinion doesn't matter here either. We ain't discussing movies here. If you don't have a valid point to make, go back to watching series.