why is she always used for every kind of nonsense demonstration

its a female, that is giving us updates on the Bbnaija stuff. am not surprised

Orisirisi

S

Balaxx:
people like ona nah dey sin for secret pass.hypocrite

Oga my parents trained me well, there's nothing like secret sin in my dictionary. If I want to have sex my wife is there for me but as for me and my family we can never support that immorality they are practicing there.

I wonder the kind of people that would have the time to watch this display of immorality in the name of reality show.. Odiegwu

wasted sons and daughters of bitches

Total bulcrap of the Millennium, God have mercy...

post=92209425:
You can say that again.....




Here is your reply below by a sensible member.
He truly knows your reason for watching your favourite show on TV.

If people don't want to work, let them not work in peace. Don't go about condemning them for it. That's the reason why most youths don't end up successful, because they have unrealistically high expectations placed on them by people like you.

How is that educative? Smh! Shameless people

Jestin:
If u expect me to watch this useless show in this 2020 that COVID-19 took the entire world from us, then u must be sleeping on the bicycle.

Oil dey your head

All these for what?

Definitely,the only person that can handle and calm Nengi is kiddwaya.

motionarena:
Oya Nigerian youths come and see your role models and future leaders.

Admire them in their full glory while the Buhari administration milks you dry

What's the moral lesson of BBNaija?

Brunicekid:
What's the moral lesson of BBNaija?

Same moral lesson English Premier league has and with adult men kicking balls about, same moral lesson Hollywood movie has with fictional characters shooting fake guns

Entertainment

Brunicekid:
What's the moral lesson of BBNaija?

This life no be by gra gra, shakira, get sense pass, or who fine pass but by who favour dey follow

Irresponsibility at its peak, mates and fans included.

..

CAS VERDICT

This is an official summary of CAS verdict on mancity...........this goes to show how foolish a Case UEFA and the Hate 8 clubs presented to CAS

Honestly, I am so embarrassed reading this....... UEFA should be investigated.




https://www.manchestereveningnews.co

Man City vs Uefa court case details revealed by CAS

Manchester City DID provide to the Court of Arbitration for Sport the full content of the leaked emails which formed the basis of Uefa’s two-year ban.
And the independent court agreed with the Blues that nothing in them was proof that they had disguised owner investment as sponsorship money.
That was at the nub of the CAS decision to overturn Uefa’s two-year ban, which means City will be free to play in the Champions League next year.
CAS finally revealed the written reasons for their decision today, and said that three of Uefa’s allegations had been “time-barred” - that is, Uefa broke their own rules which state that any charges for breaches of financial fair play rule cannot stretch back further than five years.
But two more Uefa allegations were thrown out by CAS as lacking sufficient proof after City mounted a solid defence.

They pointed out that they were hacked by Rui Pinto, currently in jail facing criminal charges in Portugal, and said that “the Portuguese court has stated that Mr Pinto is not a whistleblower but is an extortionist, and that the stolen documents should not be used against the victims of his hacks.”
That was thrown out by Uefa, who said even if hacked, the emails were in the public interest.
But Uefa failed to show that the emails, once put into context, proved any wrongdoing.
The adjudicatory committee which initially found City guilty in February put great emphasis on mention in emails of “alternative sources” for most of the sponsorship fees in 2010. But that inadmissible as it referred to payments from a year BEFORE the break-even requirement.

The mistaken identification of Sheikh Mansour in one of the emails was central to City's defence
The leaked emails also made mention of “His Highness” which was assumed to mean City owner Sheikh Mansour.
But City’s team said that this in fact referred to Sheikh Tahnoon, chairman of the Abu Dhabi Tourist Authority – the CAS panel said there was no reason to believe that was untrue.
It was also claimed by City that the adjudicatory committee “wrongly assumed that the criminally obtained documents are genuine”, when they said it was obvious that at least some of the documents have been “edited to achieve a particular presentation”.
They also made the claim, accepted by CAS, that some of the financial “arrangements” discussed in the email had never come to fruition.
City said the leaked emails were “confusing snapshots, taken out of context, of matters that simply did not happen in the way that has been portrayed.”
The panel agreed that the CFCB adjudicatory committee had failed to reach the standard of proof required, and that the fairness of the market values of the sponsorship agreements was never questioned.
The Blues’ legal team said “MCFC has cooperated, in the face of a shifting and still uparticularised case involving allegations of fraud and conspiracy.”
They had said the leaked emails should not be admissible, but still answered the allegations based on them, and eventually agreed to release the original emails – there were six of them and one attachment used, out of around 5.5million hacked emails.
City also claimed that the CFCB had “systematically breached its duties of confidentiality and impartiality” during the process and that “ultimately MCFC has been investigated and prosecuted through a process that lacked impartiality and has, moreover, harmed MCFC.”
The CAS found that “leaked email number four is in fact a combination of two separate emails” which gives a “somewhat distorted impression”, and they based their decision on the originals, rather than the hacked versions published by Der Spiegel.
City and Uefa disputed when the five-year time bar should begin, and the panel adjudged any breaches before May 15, 2014 were inadmissible, which ruled out alleged breaches in 2012 and 2013.
But allegations dating to 2013-14 and 2015-16 were admissible – but the panel found insufficient evidence to find City guilty.
“The majority of the panel finds that the leaked emails by themselves are not sufficient evidence to support a finding that MCFC provided incorrect information to UEFA by disguising equity funding as sponsorship contributions”, they said.

City produced witnesses including board member Simon Pearce, also close to the Abu Dhabi Royal Family.
He replied “absolutely, categorically not” when asked if he had arranged payments to be made to Etihad to help fulfil sponsorship obligations.
The panel noted that none of the emails involved Etihad.
Uefa had claimed that the fact there were two separate payments of £59.5million and £8m made from Etihad was proof that one of them had been channelled through the airline from the funds of Sheikh Mansour’s Abu Dhabi United Group.
But City said the two payments came from two different budgets – central funds and marketing. Uefa said the £59.5 came from ADUG and the £8m from Etihad.
The panel found that the accounts also do not contradict City’s case, and that Uefa had singularly failed to provide any real proof that the Blues had breached FFP rules.
“Neither hypothesis is established and then it boils down to the burden of proof,” they said. “Given that UEFA carries the burden of proof and because the majority of the panel finds that it did not succeed in satisfying such burden, UEFA’s allegations must be dismissed.
They added: “There is no doubt that Etihad fully complied with its payment obligations towards MCFC and that MCFC rendered the contractually agreed services to Etihad in return.”
The award said the sponsorship agreements were “fair value” and there was no evidence City had tried to cover up any alleged violations or that they had actually gone through with some of the arrangements discussed in emails
They concluded that “UEFA’s theory on disguised equity funding remains unsubstantiated” adding the “theoretical possibility that this may have happened can certainly not be excluded but that is not the standard to be applied.”
City were eventually found guilty of failing to cooperate with the investigation by the semi-independent Club Financial Control Body.
City’s legal team had, CAS award, refused to cooperate because the evidence on which Uefa were proceeding was based entirely on hacked emails.
It said they “decided not to answer any questions on the authenticity of the criminally obtained documents or to produce any of the documents requested, suggesting that the request had not been made in good faith by the Chief Investigator.”
Uefa insisted they were relevant saying “Indeed they are at the core of this case.”
The panel found City should have cooperated with the investigation, and fined the Blues 10million euros.

Non of them carry woman come the show now. He should better b focus and not let this white witch distract am.. No go loose guard.

Fastestmanalive:

That's the reason why most youths don't end up successful, because they have unrealistically high expectations placed on them by people like you.

Hey kiddo, we hereby reply you for the last time.
We are not always as nice as this, Gerrit boy!
Now, we are not talking about people that are working that watch this show as a past time, we are talking about your kind of youth, that have to postpone important things, just to sit down 24 hours in a day watching your stupid show.
Even watching your role models when they snore, to see if you can 'catch' someone sneaking into another person's bed!
Na ur type we dey talk about.
Stand up and work.
Get Busy!

Rubbishienavirus

Christians celebrating evil in the open.

i don't know why i just hate this show

post=92210435:

Hey kiddo, we hereby reply you for the last time.
We are not always as nice as this, Gerrit boy!
Now, we are not talking about people that are working that watch this show as a past time, we are talking about your kind of youth, that have to postpone important things, just to sit down 24 hours in a day watching your stupid show.
Even watching your role models when they snore, to see if you can 'catch' someone sneaking into another person's bed!
Na ur type we dey talk about.
Stand up and work.
Get Busy!

It's alright man

I concede, you are right

Just know that I don't watch the show myself, I was trying to advocate for those who do.

But you had some solid points.

post=92210435:

Hey kiddo, we hereby reply you for the last time.
We are not always as nice as this, Gerrit boy!
Now, we are not talking about people that are working that watch this show as a past time, we are talking about your kind of youth, that have to postpone important things, just to sit down 24 hours in a day watching your stupid show.
Even watching your role models when they snore, to see if you can 'catch' someone sneaking into another person's bed!
Na ur type we dey talk about.
Stand up and work.
Get Busy!

sharrap there. nobody ever postpones everything to watch bbnaija. And u dont blame youths that have tried so hard in getting jobs but they couldnt and decided to get their minds off their predicaments by watching bbnaija

u should be more concerned about how the people ur darling daddy appointed are embezzling all the money meant for the development of the common man. How they are sharing billions amongst themselves under the watch of ur darling daddy. Leave those who want to watch BBN to watch it. After all it is generating millions of naira for ur darling daddy and his cronies to embezzle again