BikeMan:
Sevilla beat this one and they all turned financial analysts. Make una go pump your money for Yoonited now if you are not satisfied with the Glaziers

Despite all the penalties and help from VAR they still went trophyless... even VAR is disappointed in them.

Depay can't be missing that at this level. The margins are too fine for that kind of miss.

haha Lyon are not here to play o

LOL I never even type finish smh

Gnabry
That's what you get when you miss your chances

chrisley024:
Gnabry
That's what you get when you miss your chances

You can’t be missing those kind of chances at this level. Not against a team like Bayern.

Heard what the commentator said?

“That’s what you get when you miss your chances.”

Missing against Bayern even makes it more costly.

Bayern sef dey miss chances sha. They just create so much ni.

I want Paris to lift the cup so that Neymar will be rightly recognized as the third best player behind CR7 and LA midget.

but its so obvious that Bayern will win the final without even breaking a sweat, very obvious its quite laughable.


again what was I thinking betting against dis side, no be even say na better team I choose, na shekpeteri. lol.

Hopefully one day we will be that team that punishes others for not taking their chances and not the other way round.

Afrodoc2 won't playing Greenwood on the RW affect him? Looks like he's not really cut for that position

Opata yarns full this thread sha. It was a leveraged acquisition/buyout. (see details here https://www.comcapfactoring.com/blog/what-is-an-lbo-how-does-it-work/). LBO is good as it aids prudence. Meanwhile, shareholders still own the company, as long as you are generating sufficient cashflows to service your debt, residual income/cash comes to the shareholders.

Current standing (re: the debt) is 500m pounds which is less than the cost of 2 Neymars. Infact, if you factor in existing cash of 90m pounds, then net debt is just a little above 400m. See https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20200521005296/en/Manchester-United-PLC-Reports-Quarter-Fiscal-2020

Of course, they could have used half of the money spent on the club to pay down the debt, but they invested it in the business, so why is everyone saying that they ruined the club?

These guys are trying abeg.

Panther7:
Afrodoc, Do you think part of the reasons Ferguson resigned was because he knew the Glazers couldn't keep up with the spending like City did?

What are you saying now, we spent close to what City has spent in the last 5 years. Where are all these yarns coming from now?

eph12:
Hopefully one day we will be that team that punishes others for not taking their chances and not the other way round

Lol.. the narrative will change to “we were lucky to win, if they scored this and that, we would have lost, we can’t keep relying on teams missing chances”.

Better to just dominate and win.

eph12:

They own the club, it's their money

I hope you have no mancunian neighbors if this thing must come out of your mouth in public. my hand no dey o

nitrogen:


What are you saying now, we spent close to what City has spent in the last 5 years. Where are all these yarns coming from now?

Try to read through the comments maybe you will get the argument/point.

ChristineC:
I hope you have no mancunian neighbors if this thing must come out of your mouth in public. my hand no dey o

LOL na dem sabi

Lyon is the toughest opponent Bayern has faced so far

nitrogen:
Opata yarns full this thread sha. It was a leveraged acquisition/buyout. (see details here https://www.comcapfactoring.com/blog/what-is-an-lbo-how-does-it-work/). LBO is good as it aids prudence. Meanwhile, shareholders still own the company, as long as you are generating sufficient cashflows to service your debt, residual income/cash comes to the shareholders.

Current standing (re: the debt) is 500m pounds which is less than the cost of 2 Neymars. Infact, if you factor in existing cash of 90m pounds, then net debt is just a little above 400m. See https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20200521005296/en/Manchester-United-PLC-Reports-Quarter-Fiscal-2020

Of course, they could have used half of the money spent on the club to pay down the debt, but they invested it in the business, so why is everyone saying that they ruined the club?

These guys are trying abeg.

They invested it in Hedgefunds not into the club.

nitrogen:
Opata yarns full this thread sha. It was a leveraged acquisition/buyout. (see details here https://www.comcapfactoring.com/blog/what-is-an-lbo-how-does-it-work/). LBO is good as it aids prudence. Meanwhile, shareholders still own the company, as long as you are generating sufficient cashflows to service your debt, residual income/cash comes to the shareholders.

Current standing (re: the debt) is 500m pounds which is less than the cost of 2 Neymars. Infact, if you factor in existing cash of 90m pounds, then net debt is just a little above 400m. See https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20200521005296/en/Manchester-United-PLC-Reports-Quarter-Fiscal-2020

Of course, they could have used half of the money spent on the club to pay down the debt, but they invested it in the business, so why is everyone saying that they ruined the club?

These guys are trying abeg.

That doesn't explain anything it only explains the method of acquisition. Which still translates to hostile takeover.

Panther7:
They invested it in Hedgefunds not into the club.

Lol, they invested in players (assets of the business).

nitrogen:


Lol, they invested in players (assets of the business).

No they shouldn't have bought players na. Invested kor investigator ni

Panther7:
No they shouldn't have bought players na. Invested kor investigator ni

Besides how can you call players assest of the club do they use players to secure loan?

Me when I remember my squad depth is filled with the likes of 70yrs old Juan Mata and 17yr old Jesse Lingard

Panther7:
Besides how can you call players assest of the club do they use players to secure loan?

players are assets to the club the same way employees are assets to companies.

Bjteensdes24:
Dimitar Berbatov: "I find McTominay’s situation really strange. He is fit and ready, he got his contract extension, but he doesn’t play. Is it because Matić and Fred play really well? I am not sure, but I like him a lot."

Ole is a manager of favouritism ..He has players he doesn't touch ..even if they are not inform he ll still play them..
McTominay u were there when the squad were shambles .we ll not forget...its a pity Ole chooses his favourite ahead of u..

I am not confused at all. Like Lingard I do not consider McTominay to be Utd quality, Berbatov should know better. Ppl act like McTominay is an 18 yrs old just breaking through, he is 23, let that just sink in 23. Compare him to other 23 yrs old or even younger in the PL.

lekkie073:
players are assets to the club the same way employees are assets to companies.

So when the club wants to secure loan from banks they put the players down as collateral? Ohh that's nice!

Bjteensdes24:
Dimitar Berbatov: "I find McTominay’s situation really strange. He is fit and ready, he got his contract extension, but he doesn’t play. Is it because Matić and Fred play really well? I am not sure, but I like him a lot."

Ole is a manager of favouritism ..He has players he doesn't touch ..even if they are not inform he ll still play them..
McTominay u were there when the squad were shambles .we ll not forget...its a pity Ole chooses his favourite ahead of u..

Ole na funny man.

We go dey all right.

How much does Bayern Munich pay players like Lewandowski, Alaba, Alcantara, Muller and the rest per week? They don't earn as much as United players yet see their commitment on the pitch for their club. United will just be increasing salaries of players anyhow, some players at United are heavily over paid without any meaningful end result. They is no hunger, no commitment from our players, very lazy set of players we have....

Panther7:
So when the club wants to secure loan from banks they put the players down as collateral? Ohh that's nice!

If you dont know, ask. Players are the key assets of a football club. Other assets include stadium, and maybe inventories. I am so sure the asset used as collateral was the stadium.

Meanwhile, LBOs sometimes can be on the back of existing assets and expected cashflows. So, for an entity that has few tangible assets, the banks would rely on future/predictable cashflows expected from the business.

Also, the club has been able to refinance the bank loans to bonds which require almost zero collateral.

MaziAlaye:

I am not confused at all. Like Lingard I do not consider McTominay to be Utd quality, Berbatov should know better. Ppl act like McTominay is an 18 yrs old just breaking through, he is 23, let that just sink in 23. Compare him to other 23 yrs old or even younger in the PL.

So, are you saying the guy isn't trying is best enough and should be sold? Someone that really played well before being dropped back to the bench.. Do you even consider playing this guys week in week out and see if they deliver or not

Panther7:
So when the club wants to secure loan from banks they put the players down as collateral? Ohh that's nice!

not all assets serve as collateral. Goodwill is an asset bit does not serve as collateral