Hathor5:


bold



But IamPlato is convinced that he is better at decision making than any female just because he has a d.ick.

I have not even told you my own answer yet but you don dive into conclusion... Read the question intelligently and answer

tobechi74:
This is a moral question not a political one. Politicians will draw them closer to try to be their friends like Trump did to north Korea . Politics is about Power . Not about good or bad guy. In politics,you draw your friends close and your enemy closer.


Post this in Religion section .for it is only religion that claim to know what is right and wrong. Over 5000 children were killed when Jesus was born. As long as Jesus was not killed, Christians jubilate.
If we had a prophesy saying that Adolph Hitler would cause World war, religious people will gather and kill Hitler.


As for your question, kill them,their followers will be very angry with you and may begin to kill your people in their country. At the end you will end up causing war . They are all allegation no legal evidence yet. This is how USA wiped out Iraq over nuclear weapons allegation only to be false.

I will not do any harm to them. I will only strengthen my security system including spies to fish out more information.

The first brilliant analysis

IamPlato:
Dumb girl, I asked you a question, just answer the question....


That question came from a movie, it was basically the story of the film...


Just answer it if you don't know what to do just say you don't know and stop talking trash.

What's the title of this fantastic movie?

IamPlato:
The person you replied is not a logical think so there is no point indulging him...

That question is an example of tough decision for a world leader, what would you do as a leader?


The question is very realistic, the mumu you quoted said he would kill himself.


He said how can nuclear strike be the only option yet he could not bring another option, no be every body sabi think... If you can't think then say you cant

The way you keep calling people mumu, shows that you should not be allowed to handle any weapon higher than a table spoon, not even a kitchen knife should be in your disposal, so I'm mumu because I have a different view, I never said I will kill myself I said if we fail to profer solution in 1 hour then, the presidential house should be bombed but you dont get the message, no live is higher than the other, one civilian live is very precious, as a president I had achieved a lot in life, there will be a child, a teenager or young adult in that vicinity you wish to nuke, talents the world never seen and you expect me to make the decision of nuking them, as for the security chief, if we can't protect the people from terrorism then no need for us to continue to be there. It is simple, you expect me to give you a detailed analysis of how I hope to achieve flushing out of terrorist, you are a joke, that's a classified secret whether I'm the president or not, you talk it they get a counter measure, so deal with it, the mother of all bomb gets targeted at the government house while our men on ground, air and on sea swing to action, all the national resources will be channelled here, I may try to save 2 million people in a gamble with my life but the next guy to assume presidency may not, then the citizens may risk a nuclear option, then every non nuclear option nd non mass destruction option must be put in place to stamp out the terrorist

AlexBells:

The way you keep calling people mumu, shows that you should not be allowed to handle any weapon higher than a table spoon, not even a kitchen knife should be in your disposal, so I'm mumu because I have a different view, I never said I will kill myself I said if we fail to profer solution in 1 hour then, the presidential house should be bombed but you dont get the message, no live is higher than the other, one civilian live is very precious, as a president I had achieved a lot in life, there will be a child, a teenager or young adult in that vicinity you wish to nuke, talents the world never seen and you expect me to make the decision of nuking them, as for the security chief, if we can't protect the people from terrorism then no need for us to continue to be there. It is simple, you expect me to give you a detailed analysis of how I hope to achieve flushing out of terrorist, you are a joke, that's a classified secret whether I'm the president or not, you talk it they get a counter measure, so deal with it, the mother of all bomb gets targeted at the government house while our men on ground, air and on sea swing to action, all the national resources will be channelled here, I may try to save 2 million people in a gamble with my life but the next guy to assume presidency may not, then the citizens may risk a nuclear option, then every non nuclear option nd non mass destruction option must be put in place to stamp out the terrorist

You are clueless on what to do...


BTW I never told you what I would do

Hathor5:


What's the title of this fantastic movie?

An acceptable loss

Directing the question to ladies show how feeble you are..

Why using Nukes for just 6 people when you can organise 100's of suicide bombers..

Some of you guys would be worst ordinary class captain

IamPlato:
An acceptable loss

The casualties amounted to 150,000 in the movie and not 2,000,000.

2,000,000 causalities and you think that this a tough question. Oh boy!

IamPlato:
The first brilliant analysis

What is brilliant about it?

Come on, you called ladies to this thread to prove your point that we would be too emotional to take the tough decision of killing 2,000,000 people and in the course of it made a fool of yourself.

Hathor5:


The casualties amounted to 150,000 in the movie and not 2,000,000.

2,000,000 causalities and you think that this a tough question. Oh boy!

You don go read movie plot, whatever.

Arguing with you is like arguing with zombie...


Have a nice day

IamPlato:
This question puts you in position of world power

This an example of a situation where the president of America is forced to take action immediately.

I would prefer the ladies answering this question...




Six men are the leaders and master mind of the six deadliest terrorist groups on earth, each man has successfully carried out one deadly attack or the other from 9/11 to bombing of public malls to assassination of presidents to slaughtering of hundreds of US troops to killing of women and children and many more, now info reaching you is that each man is plotting another massive attack on locations you don't know; these men have successfully remained hidden but now you discovered that coincidentally all six men will be at same location in a town, there will never be another time of their gathering like this again, you have only an hour to take them down but it's impossible to take them down one by one so you only have the option of launching a nuclear strike into that city so they all die but not without 2,000,000 lives perishing along with them.


What do you do?


Answer this question with your knowledge and understanding of reality

No, I'm not killing 2million innocent people just because of some hoodlums.

IamPlato:
You don go read movie plot, whatever.

Arguing with you is like arguing with zombie...


Have a nice day

I did read it because I couldn't believe that anyone would write a film script in which 2 million innocent people would be killed to take out 6 terrorists.

And you called it a tough question.

It's boys like you who tell themselves that they are more logical than the female gender.