Commmy:


I just tire
Na why I prefer the exam

Make we hear Watin otokx go talk, because this kind Yarn bitter for mouth

Unknownartiste:
168 for medicine, is not better I write the exam and fail, what rubbish!!

Chai!.. Oboy na this same wahala person see for 2k16!

Make we sha dey look Watin dem go do!..

O level result na scam!.. I no even know why dem dey put Mind for that kind result way person fit help me runz 2 seconds!.

Unknownartiste:
168 for medicine, is not better I write the exam and fail, what rubbish!!

Aswear I prefer writing the exam and failing to this method.

Commmy:

Aswear I prefer writing the exam and failing to this method.

Yes now!!

Odiaze no dey Disguise na. Watin sup u na?

There is supposed to be a relationship in performance, data analytics was able to show some of that.

otokx:
There is supposed to be a relationship in performance, data analytics was able to show some of that.

sir please can you explain more?
I'm confused

It begs the question that someone will score 90% in JAMB and will be unable to score at least 60% in o level that has 2 sittings.

.

otokx:
It begs the question that someone will score 90% in JAMB and will be unable to score at least 60% in o level that has 2 sittings.

so I getting 270 in Jamb and 168 as the screening score, means I have no chance of studying medicine?

Take it easy, the world may not end today.

otokx:
It begs the question that someone will score 90% in JAMB and will be unable to score at least 60% in o level that has 2 sittings.

Both are very different exams. I have only 2As in my O'level result, one could infer from that that I am not a good student but my CGPA would say otherwise.

The O'levels have never been a standardized exam, it's a terrible choice to base admission on its grades.
The performance of the u2016 class even further supports this.

There are people with over 300 in JAMB who are scoring 4 A1 like ludo, think about that.

It is understandable that many looked forward to improving their chances but that is life, there must be a measuring standard. NECO, WAEC, NABTEB cannot all be wrong.

Quit the pity party and look to the future which is bright.

Donpre:

Both are very different exams. I have only 2As in my O'level result, one could infer from that that I am not a good student but my CGPA would say otherwise.

The O'levels have never been a standardized exam, it's a terrible choice to base admission on its grades.
The performance of the u2016 class even further supports this.

I completely agree with you. I didn't even have an A in my O'level. I'm really disappointed uniport is making this decision

Sir otokx, please what is my chance of gaining admission with these scores.

Course: Chemical Engineering
Jamb score: 256
Screening score: 192

please what will be my aggregrate scores both in percentage(%) and average figure.

THANKS.

Brukx:
I completely agree with you. I didn't even have an A in my O'level. I'm really disappointed uniport is making this decision

COVID19 and ASUU strike combination besides UNIPORT is not the only university taking this approach.

otokx:


COVID19 and ASUU strike combination besides UNIPORT is not the only university taking this approach.

With all due respect sir, and total humility to your person, this method of screening is nothing but balderdash... Many potential good students are lively to be at disadvantage, the school should have conducted her own exam to access the students herself... After all, schools like UNN, and some other schools have fixed their Putme date for 18th of this month and much more, so why on Earth will UniPort not be able to follow track, COVID-19 my foot! School asked undergraduates to resume, they didn't think of COVID-19 when they asked them to resume, but to conduct an exam which they can even allow to span through 2 weeks to control crowd they're now giving silly excuse, it's quite unfortunate

The funny part is when some eventually fail putme you will hear things like the laptop was bad, too much math for medicine students, the time was not enough, why is the cut off 120? People will always complain especially when the decision does not favour them.

Oluwaseun1995:


With all due respect sir, and total humility to your person, this method of screening is nothing but balderdash... Many potential good students are lively to be at disadvantage, the school should have conducted her own exam to access the students herself... After all, schools like UNN, and some other schools have fixed their Putme date for 18th of this month and much more, so why on Earth will UniPort not be able to follow track, COVID-19 my foot! School asked undergraduates to resume, they didn't think of COVID-19 when they asked them to resume, but to conduct an exam which they can even allow to span through 2 weeks to control crowd they're now giving silly excuse, it's quite unfortunate

As a student of Uniport, I am appalled that the school is looking to employ this method of admission. The school is about to have a repeat of the rather unavoidable mistake they made in 2016 by admitting half-baked students into top courses.
Screening is never and will never be a good criteria for admitting students into an institution. This is probably what separates the 'top schools' like UI, OAU etc from the rest. They can never make a repeat of the 2016 saga.

Once bitten, twice shy.

.

Comrade otokx ,please a friend registered the putme with an awaiting result. As the result came out He had an F in mathematics, so he sat for GCE, which the result is yet to be released.
My question is that, should he send the result that is available now, or what ??

Send an email stating your problem.

The university cannot continue waiting for results to be released indefinitely.

otokx:
Send an email stating your problem.

The university cannot continue waiting for results to be released indefinitely.

Sir, were the screening scores graded over 400 or 300?

Is Jamb over 300 or 400?

otokx:
Is Jamb over 300 or 400?

Jamb is over 400.
Was only wondering, since candidates scores are very low

Do you have access to all the scores to conclude that performance is in your words "very low"?

otokx:
Do you have access to all the scores to conclude that performance is in your words "very low"?

I meant candidates I have "seen".

otokx:
Do you have access to all the scores to conclude that performance is in your words "very low"?

But comrade, Any hint as to how the Screening result was formulated?.. Because this 160/400 is sounding like the Guy had F9 all over.

Comrade otokx, please what is my chance of getting admission with my scores.
Jamb score: 256 screening score: 192 Course: Chemical Engineering.
i will be anticipating your reply, THANKS.

chukwukapromise:


But comrade, Any hint as to how the Screening result was formulated?.. Because this 160/400 is sounding like the Guy had F9 all over.

No hint sir, the person probably had poor o level.

Odiaze:
Comrade otokx, please what is my chance of getting admission with my scores.

Jamb score: 256
screening score: 192
Course: Chemical Engineering.

i will be anticipating your reply,
THANKS.

Relax, soon and very soon.

otokx:


Relax, soon and very soon.

Comrade, please I learnt somewhere that the school will only be admitting just 15% of the aspirants, how valid is this info sir?