Dapcity247:

Except you plan on being poor I don't see any reason why you should fear being the sole breadwinner of your household, if you are so naive to think your wife's economic support will make her respect you then you are deluded , learn from western societies where these is the norms and see how men have been reduced to second class citizens

Dapcity247:

Gullibility like these makes Redpillers gender equalist unknowningly and subconsciously...

You must be very naive and extremely plugged into bluepilled Feminine social matrix
May you're a weak simp disguised as a redpillers, who knows?

yorubarere:

There is but only one flaw in ur lion-man analogy. You didn't complete the other side of the story!

If the man should release the lion from the cage. The lion will not only eat goats, she will eat everything edible in the compound and eat the man. After that, she will go into the community and cause chaos.

Taming women in the cage like a lion is the price men have to pay to keep the civilization running and prevent chaos.

Martinez39s:
Finally, for the night, I urge everyone to live the red-pill life just as they profess to be redpillers online. If you are discovered to be a hypocrite, don't blame anyone for not taking you seriously. What's the point of simps and other "mumu boyfriends" listening to you when you act like them at the end?

naenaesosa:

Your logical side of your brain is working. You are a sure boy. I see people make this mistake time and time again they don't think concept through. They just use emotive reasoning and just damn everything else.

Comparing marriage with lion in a cage did not make sense one bit. Lion doesn't really need human beings and vice versa as long as they stay apart, but as long as theres konji, procreation, and needed professions such as nursing, teaching and counsellors men and women need each other.

This anarchist view that everyone should go their own way and men should strip themselves of their masculinity is pure idealism. Biology has sealed your fate by giving you testoterone. The red pill is against all forms of idealism and seeing realism in life. For e.g. idealistically i abhor fraudsters and Gboys but the moment in my life I realized that people will watch u die and not lift a finger is when I realized that people at the bottom without anything to lose will take massive amounts of risk. I still hate it but realism of human nature lets me know it's a necessary evil

naenaesosa:

Your logical side of your brain is working. You are a sure boy. I see people make this mistake time and time again they don't think concept through. They just use emotive reasoning and just damn everything else.

Comparing marriage with lion in a cage did not make sense one bit. Lion doesn't really need human beings and vice versa as long as they stay apart, but as long as theres konji, procreation, and needed professions such as nursing, teaching and counsellors men and women need each other.

This anarchist view that everyone should go their own way and men should strip themselves of their masculinity is pure idealism. Biology has sealed your fate by giving you testoterone. The red pill is against all forms of idealism and seeing realism in life. For e.g. idealistically i abhor fraudsters and Gboys but the moment in my life I realized that people will watch u die and not lift a finger is when I realized that people at the bottom without anything to lose will take massive amounts of risk. I still hate it but realism of human nature lets me know it's a necessary evil

sajmark:

we should really learn to control our emotions while reading/replying comments, the bro you quoted told you the bitter truth but you are subtly attacking him.
the lady in question isn't sexually attracted to you, simple... forget whatever she told you, she is ready to be a LovePeddler for the right guy.

SOZINN:

Some people are posting annoying things

This is just a thread on Nairaland, If you don't like it fvck off
Coming here to criticize what we are doing just shows how irresponsible you are

QuadrilAyinde:

Lol... Now I understand why MrColdSweat has not replied any mention since Yesterday and he has been viewing the thread... its quite obvious people Like U are not just Ready to be Flexible to see the other side of the coin Coz U believe Any Contrary Opinion to yours is Trash...

Don't forget that 10 × 3 = 30, 18 + 12 = 30, 45 - 15 = 30, and 60 ÷ 2 = 30 (Hope u get the Analogy Now... +,×,÷,-)

I Wish you all the best bro

PEACE bro

MrColdsweat:
MODIFY MASCULINITY OR LOSE OUT

Women are collectively abandoning the traditional definition of femininity. They now have a new motto: You have one life, pursue happiness and goals within the confines of society. They have broken their limits. They encourage each other by going against gender norms. Whether they're happier or not, is still in contention. But we can recognize significant progress made by the female gender. We have more women joining the tech companies, NASA and the military, we have more women in participative and active politics, we have more female entrepreneurs, and we have more female making names in the scientific field.

Of all the baby steps, one seem to be of concern: The massive influx of women in the STEM fields whilst monopolizing the field of humanities and education. The enrollment rate of women in the field of mathematics, building technology, physics and engineering is taking an upward trend. More and more women are encouraged to break the norms by entering the fields dominated by men.

While this happens, the male enrollment rate in the universities is slightly declining. A small portion of men are losing interest in schools for diverse reasons.

Comparing the trends i.e looking at the female enrollment rate in the STEM and the reduced interest in schooling by men, women are projected to monopolize the STEM fields in the next 50years. This will likely result in a competition of jobs between men and women in the field of physics, mathematics and engineering. This is not good for men because women have monopolized the biological and chemical sciences, the field of psychology and nursing. While women aggressively instream the fields dominated by men, only very few men consider enrolling in the fields dominated by women.


Traditional masculinity has it's ingrained apportionment of jobs. There are fields and jobs that are tagged unmanly. Fields like nursing and midwifery, child education, and Jobs involving the the care, beautification and fashion of infants and women.

Men who deal in beautification and sales of female wares complain of being stigmatized by fellow men. This is due to the demanding nature of masculinity. A man must always be a man and must never involve in anything unmanly.

Because of this, men are losing at risk of losing out. Some men would rather be unemployed than be seen working in, or running a beauty saloon. Some men would rather be unemployed than work in a daycare, tending to children.

While women work towards taking the jobs of men, men blatantly refuse taking the jobs of women.

The choice before men is simple. Modify masculinity so that men will unashamedly influx the female dominated fields and take the jobs of women, or remain rigid and lose your jobs to women.


Modify masculinity or lose out.

TheUndercover:
MrColdsweat, no one is perfect. You may be right and you may be wrong. I don't condone abuses either. We can't fully agree with each other. Just because someone goes against your views doesn't make one dogmatic.

MrColdsweat:
Have you seen me attack anybody on this thread?

MrColdsweat:

MODIFY MASCULINITY OR LOSE OUT
Some men would rather be unemployed than be seen working in, or running a beauty saloon. Some men would rather be unemployed than work in a daycare, tending to children.

While women work towards taking the jobs of men, men blatantly refuse taking the jobs of women.

Modify masculinity or lose out.

ichidodo:
The scale of Idealism this Mrcoldsweat be spewing is not only confusing but impracticable and if researched very well isn't even redpill...As a brand new simp coming into redpill for the first time, if came across his write up, I would just choose being a simp...Even Ubunja himself wasn't that confusing when preaching the goodnews....You want to modify masculinity? Why don't you bury the ocean? Or better still fight the wind?...

ichidodo:
The scale of Idealism this Mrcoldsweat be spewing is not only confusing but impracticable and if researched very well isn't even redpill...As a brand new simp coming into redpill for the first time, if came across his write up, I would just choose being a simp...Even Ubunja himself wasn't that confusing when preaching the goodnews....You want to modify masculinity? Why don't you bury the ocean? Or better still fight the wind?...

TheUndercover:
So @MrColdsweat, why are women not found in jobs where extreme labour and critical thinking is required? Why are they not found where the probability of losing one's life in the line of duty is very high?

TheUndercover:

I'm still trying to decipher his points on what he truly meant on modifying masculinity

QuadrilAyinde:

Gender roles and the pressures to conform to these roles for women vary across regions, religions and households. One way the pressure to conform manifests itself is through marital status. For instance, in developed and emerging economies, women who have a spouse or a partner are less likely to be employed in a paid job or be actively looking for one.

This can often arise from the economic stability of a partner’s income that can reinforce the “male breadwinner” bias in some marital arrangements.

In developing countries the reverse is true: the economic necessity in the region gives all women little choice but to work despite their marital status.