QuadrilAyinde:

Funny enough, I can't help but Laugh... True True, Many of U so-called ONLINE WARRIORS no even get balls.. Wetin be some people, Oga stop Acting like a Coward and Mention Names of those You dey refer to, that's how Men with Balls do ... It's now quite obvious that Many of you guys are Just Blind followers who cant even think INDEPENDENTLY on their Own and come up with sumtin Logical

Just Imagine, After MrColdSweat posted his Submissions Yesterday, there were very few if not almost zero Tackles against his write up, but guys that seem to adore his Analysis. But Immediately @CaveAdullam took his time to make some Lenghty analysis Later in the day, Nah then The TRP blind-followers sef kum get The Boldness and Strenght to start attacking the Original poster, so That Means U Lots were actually waiting for ur Master to lead the CounterAttack b4 U make ur Suggestions known... Its quite a Shame... I don talk sey I no go talk anything about it b4, but this Ur post just reek of sheer Weakness and Fake live subordiment..

Funny enough, I'm beginning to Suspect the Kind of Ladies u TRP guys dey always discuss sef, They must surely be those wey No know their worth and Allows men to step on them Unrestricted Coz Take it or Leave it, Once U dey Mingle with Gal wey No get time for Nonsense, U act funny like this, U get discarded b4 U sef go even know wetin Xup... Smh... I Still Maintain my stand, A very smart Lady can Smell A Man pretending to be who he is inherently Not Miles Away, so u guys are rather free to keep chasing after the Unexposed Ladies in ur Domain... Best of Luck

It's now very glaring at this Juncture that TRP dey always shark person for head if you still dey Hustle and Never reach a meaningful stage of financial freedom... Even though me sef still dey street dey try get things right, but my Minggling with VERY RICH MEN in my Vicinity have shown that MONEY MAKES YOU TAKE LIFE EASY AND UR ORIENTATION CHANGES ON A LOT OF ISSUES

PEACE

Bro chill first
We no dey fight
E never come to that level

If you visited this thread yesterday you'll find out that I was one of those that criticized some of the posts he made yesterday.
I also agreed with some of the things he said.
If you think I'm lieing go through my profile and dig up my posts and my quotes.
Ask MrColdsweat himself
Even after CaveAdullam did what he did yesterday I didn't utter a word.
U know what I'm glad that you are finally able to express yourself self and tell us how you truly feel.
Even though you had to hide under my post to speak your mind
I'm glad you did
Next time please be sure before typing
I wasn't even thinking of MrColdsweat when I was typing my message
I even told those lashing out on him to calm down
If only you checked
You would have seen it

SOZINN:

Bro chill first
We no dey fight
E never come to that level

Haba Fight Keh, Not at all Brother... ONE LOVE

QuadrilAyinde:

Haba Fight Keh, Not at all Brother... ONE LOVE

Just so you know we are on the same side
That's why I was smiling when I was reading your post
I understand you
But you no suppose project the anger to me
NO BE ME FVCK THAT UP
U misunderstood my post

U should have come out plane
U no suppose quote me

DharmieDhrey:
. If women were free of financial cares, the majority of them would probably prefer to spend their lives in the company of other women rather than with men - and not because they are all lesbians. What men call lesbian tendencies probably have little to do with a woman's sexual drive. No - the sexes have almost no interests in common. What, besides money, can bind a woman to a man?


I'm still at the anger phase, I think I'll remain in this phase all my life.

D1ck, attention, protection, care, etc.

TheUndercover:

Even the so called masculine jobs some women are found in, most are not participating where extreme energy and power is needed. They still need masculine attention in fields where women are. There's a reason for that.

Let's take a quick look at the Nigerian Army and the Case of Female Soldiers and Officers...

Females were not even allowed to apply as an RC (Regular Combatant) Cadet for admission into the Nigerian Defense Academy, Kaduna. But in 2011 September, the Restriction was Lifted and we now have Ladies Enrolling to get admitted into NDA. THIS HAS SHOWN THAT GOVERNMENT REGULATIONS IS ALSO A FACTOR RESTRICTING THE ACTIVE PARTICIPATION OF FEMALES IN THIS CASE...

Now Let us also look at another Scenario

Just Early Last Month, the Nigerian Army Authorities decided that it's the Female soldiers they want as stand-in-men on the Bandits-Raiding Abuja-Kaduna Express Way, and what happened afterwards, they (Female soldiers) were deployed in Their Numbers... Now be sincere, When was the Last time you heard of Kidnap on that particular Abuja-Kaduna Express Way since the deployment of the Female soldiers to the Express way??

My explanation is just pointing out to the fact that Government regulation(s) is one of the Main reasons while Female are not actively participating in these so-called Hard Labor Works

QuadrilAyinde:

Let's take a quick look at the Nigerian Army and the Case of Female Soldiers and Officers...

Females were not even allowed to apply as an RC (Regular Combatant) Cadet for admission into the Nigerian Defense Academy, Kaduna. But in 2011 September, the Restriction was Lifted and we now have Ladies Enrolling to get admitted into NDA. THIS HAS SHOWN THAT GOVERNMENT REGULATIONS IS ALSO A FACTOR RESTRICTING THE ACTIVE PARTICIPATION OF FEMALES IN THIS CASE...

Now Let us also look at another Scenario

Just Early Last Month, the Nigerian Army Authorities decided that it's the Female soldiers they want as stand-in-men on the Bandits-Raiding Abuja-Kaduna Express Way, and what happened afterwards, they (Female soldiers) were deployed in Their Numbers... Now be sincere, When was the Last time you heard of Kidnap on that particular Abuja-Kaduna Express Way since the deployment of the Female soldiers to the Express way??

My explanation is just pointing out to the fact that Government regulation(s) is one of the Main reasons while Female are not actively participating in these so-called Hard Labor Works

Well I don't know about Abuja-Kaduna Express Way so I can't say anything on that but where government regulations are not involved women are no where to be found and being deployed to guard a position is different from being deployed for fighting a war. The risks involved in both position is different.

Well my brother, I don tire to dey explain. It's all good

AlphaAlex:
My 2Cents in the matter. That’s my take on everything.

Your 2 cents is worth a trillion dollars mate.
You said it all.
Kudos.

DharmieDhrey:
.
I'm still at the anger phase, I think I'll remain in this phase all my life.

Bro the earlier you leave the anger stage of the redpill the better for you.
Don't hate/be angry at women, the Redpill knowledge you have acquired is meant to give you the upper hand when and if you decide to go into any kind of relationship with them.

ichidodo:
The scale of Idealism this Mrcoldsweat be spewing is not only confusing but impracticable and if researched very well isn't even redpill...As a brand new simp coming into redpill for the first time, if i came across his write up, I would just choose being a simp...Even Ubunja himself wasn't that confusing when preaching the goodnews....You want to modify masculinity? Why don't you bury the ocean? Or better still fight the wind?...

I am not saying I disagree with mrcoldsweat, and I am not saying I agree with him.

I have read mrcoldsweat's post, the one above yours. What he is trying to say, I think, is that the society's status quo has changed, it's here to stay and it's not going back anytime soon to the traditional way of things no matter how men desire traditional life. On a societal level, things have changed. Therefore, according to mrcoldsweat, men must learn to adapt and flow with the tide and not remain rooted in CERTAIN archaic stereotypes and beliefs about masculinity that are limiting men and serving them no purpose in the modern world. Mrcoldsweat isn't saying in his last post that you should lose your balls as a man and become feminized, all he meant by modifying masculinity is that we put aside our egos and certain useless, archaic, and unproductive stereotypes and beliefs about masculinity and do what we can to make headway in life even if it comes down to doing certain jobs that were traditionally considered feminine like nursing, working in a hair saloon, babysitting in a daycare etc.

He is not saying men must do these jobs, all he is saying is if a man can make profit from these jobs and if he wants to do it, he shouldn't be seen as less a man and his ego shouldn't stop him since we don't consider a woman who becomes an engineer or doctor (former masculine professions) less feminine by society's standards. If women are now given rights and opportunities as men, and they are free to pursue any job or career, it shouldn't be different with men. Hence the ego and mindset that would make a man rather go hungry instead working in a daycare because he think it makes him less masculine should be abolished.

At any rate, mrcoldsweat's argument is reducible to the adage "as hunters learnt to shoot without missing, birds learnt to fly without perching." He is telling us to adapt or lose out. I think that's what he meant by modify masculinity or lose out.

I will still read his earlier posts to undeserved his arguments betters.

Martinez39s:
I am not saying I disagree with mrcoldsweat, and I am not saying I agree with him.

I have read mrcoldsweat's post, the one above yours. What he is trying to say, I think, is that the society's status quo has changed, it's here to stay and it's not going back anytime soon to the traditional way of things no matter how men desire traditional life. On a societal level, things have changed. Therefore, according to mrcoldsweat, men must learn to adapt and flow with the tide and not remain rooted in CERTAIN archaic stereotypes and beliefs about masculinity that are limiting men and serving them no purpose in the modern world. Mrcoldsweat isn't saying in his last post that you should lose your balls as a man and become feminized, all he meant by modifying masculinity is that we put aside our egos and certain useless, archaic, and unproductive stereotypes and beliefs about masculinity and do what we can to make headway in life even if it comes down to doing certain jobs that were traditionally considered feminine like nursing, working in a hair saloon, babysitting in a daycare etc.

He is not saying men must do these jobs, all he is saying is if a man can make profit from these jobs and if he wants to do it, he shouldn't be seen as less a man and his ego shouldn't stop him since we don't consider a woman who becomes an engineer or doctor (former masculine professions) less feminine by society's standards. If women are now given rights and opportunities as men, and they are free to pursue any job or career, it shouldn't be different with men. Hence the ego and mindset that would make a man rather go hungry instead working in a daycare because he think it makes him less masculine should be abolished.

At any rate, mrcoldsweat's argument is reducible to the adage "as hunters learnt to shoot without missing, birds learnt to fly without perching." He is telling us to adapt or lose out.

I will still read his earlier posts to undeserved his arguments betters.

I completely disagree with your arguments
I don't believe at all men should sacrifice their masculine roles and embrace feminine role, masculine careers will always be more profitable than feminine professions as they are risky and require more time, why should men settle of less,are you saying we are incapable of competing with our fellow women and men


We are no longer in the industrial age, we are now in information age, the rules of success for both ages are completely different, women are so uninformed and unintelligent that they are dominating the academics which require obsolete systems and subjects that doesn't guarantee success or even financial security in the future, because they are so Solipsisitic and can only function in groupthink dogma as they are incapable of real logic and intellectual curiosity, they are fooled and brainwashed by mainstream media who don't care about women's actual welfare but function as proxies for welfare government and crony-capitalist to embrace out-modeled masculine professions to provide cheap labor for their bosses in the workplace, they are used up as slaves and fed handouts by governments who don't care about them

Saviolamemphix:
Exactly redpill is a drug we need to take daily cus as humans nobody is perfect.
Y i like d redpill is even if u go back to simpin u just can't relax its just like ur DNA has being changed lolz

I bought a gift for a female friend last week, I dey Chop her once a while but after a while I felt that giving that gift wasn't necessary self even though I convince myself it was act just goodwill; I felt like a simp after a day or two.

Martinez39s:

Hence the ego and mindset that would make a man rather go hungry instead working in a daycare because he think it makes him less masculine should be abolished.

He is telling us to adapt or lose out. I think that's what he meant by modify masculinity or lose out.

Exactly... That's the Message brother

Martinez39s:
I am not saying I disagree with mrcoldsweat, and I am not saying I agree with him.

I have read mrcoldsweat's post, the one above yours. What he is trying to say, I think, is that the society's status quo has changed, it's here to stay and it's not going back anytime soon to the traditional way of things no matter how men desire traditional life. On a societal level, things have changed. Therefore, according to mrcoldsweat, men must learn to adapt and flow with the tide and not remain rooted in CERTAIN archaic stereotypes and beliefs about masculinity that are limiting men and serving them no purpose in the modern world. Mrcoldsweat isn't saying in his last post that you should lose your balls as a man and become feminized, all he meant by modifying masculinity is that we put aside our egos and certain useless, archaic, and unproductive stereotypes and beliefs about masculinity and do what we can to make headway in life even if it comes down to doing certain jobs that were traditionally considered feminine like nursing, working in a hair saloon, babysitting in a daycare etc.

He is not saying men must do these jobs, all he is saying is if a man can make profit from these jobs and if he wants to do it, he shouldn't be seen as less a man and his ego shouldn't stop him since we don't consider a woman who becomes an engineer or doctor (former masculine professions) less feminine by society's standards. If women are now given rights and opportunities as men, and they are free to pursue any job or career, it shouldn't be different with men. Hence the ego and mindset that would make a man rather go hungry instead working in a daycare because he think it makes him less masculine should be abolished.

At any rate, mrcoldsweat's argument is reducible to the adage "as hunters learnt to shoot without missing, birds learnt to fly without perching." He is telling us to adapt or lose out. I think that's what he meant by modify masculinity or lose out.

I will still read his earlier posts to undeserved his arguments betters.

Men are not excelling in schools is a blessing in disguise as we can embrace entrepreneurship and create businesses employing and using women's cheap labor with ease and move towards manual professions like bricklaying, mechanics, welding,etc which are masculine terrain and provides for us to embrace our masculinity as we thrive best among our peers

The model of Feminism is socialist welfare marxist dogmatism which will never make the majority of women amount to any tangible success as they will pursue their careers and profession sacrificing family and end up as cheap labor for the elites, the ones that will be elevated to society will be based on victimtocracy,quota policies and affirmative action, and they would be so incompetent and meritless and show their failure on a massive scale that it won't be ignored

The collectivization of women via herd consensus dogma through feminism will impoverish women and make most of them miserable and unhappy in the long run,the so-called sisterhood is a curse

QuadrilAyinde:

Exactly... That's the Message brother

Your argument is seductive but extremely flawed, and it provides no concrete solution to issues of men with the spread of westernized femcentric social conventions,and expect us to embrace the Feminine instead of encouraging creativity, innovation , skill acquisition and entrepreneurship while ladies can embrace outdated academic careers and be exploited by their bosses in the workplace

CamusMidas:

I bought a gift for a female friend last week, I dey Chop her once a while but after a while I felt that giving that gift wasn't necessary self even though I convince myself it was act just goodwill; I felt like a simp after a day or two.

Lolz giving gift to females ain't bad but just make sure u are not being used or manipulated bro.

Martinez39s:
I am not saying I disagree with mrcoldsweat, and I am not saying I agree with him.

I have read mrcoldsweat's post, the one above yours. What he is trying to say, I think, is that the society's status quo has changed, it's here to stay and it's not going back anytime soon to the traditional way of things no matter how men desire traditional life. On a societal level, things have changed. Therefore, according to mrcoldsweat, men must learn to adapt and flow with the tide and not remain rooted in CERTAIN archaic stereotypes and beliefs about masculinity that are limiting men and serving them no purpose in the modern world. Mrcoldsweat isn't saying in his last post that you should lose your balls as a man and become feminized, all he meant by modifying masculinity is that we put aside our egos and certain useless, archaic, and unproductive stereotypes and beliefs about masculinity and do what we can to make headway in life even if it comes down to doing certain jobs that were traditionally considered feminine like nursing, working in a hair saloon, babysitting in a daycare etc.

He is not saying men must do these jobs, all he is saying is if a man can make profit from these jobs and if he wants to do it, he shouldn't be seen as less a man and his ego shouldn't stop him since we don't consider a woman who becomes an engineer or doctor (former masculine professions) less feminine by society's standards. If women are now given rights and opportunities as men, and they are free to pursue any job or career, it shouldn't be different with men. Hence the ego and mindset that would make a man rather go hungry instead working in a daycare because he think it makes him less masculine should be abolished.

At any rate, mrcoldsweat's argument is reducible to the adage "as hunters learnt to shoot without missing, birds learnt to fly without perching." He is telling us to adapt or lose out. I think that's what he meant by modify masculinity or lose out.

I will still read his earlier posts to undeserved his arguments betters.

The funny thing is most of the few guys who work in these feminine professions get more pvssy than these guys who think doing those jobs emasculate them.

@Mrcoldsweat
U are an intelligent fellow no doubt and i kinda agree with some of ur points though, but instead of coming here to preach equality on a redpill thread y not open another thread for ur equality gibberish..
Truth b told most of ur posts here are misleading.

Peace

Junnior:


The funny thing is most of the few guys who work in these feminine professions get more pvssy than these guys who think doing those jobs emasculate them.

If pick up artistry (gaming) is why you chose the redpill , it's fine, it's your decision, but men looking for long term wealth and stability will embrace risk taking entrepreneurship , Patriachs who want to provide for their family will embrace risk taking,time consuming masculine professions

Junnior:


The funny thing is most of the few guys who work in these feminine professions get more pvssy than these guys who think doing those jobs emasculate them.

Who cares if they get more pussy lmfao
A man's achievement can never b measured by d number of pussy he gets..

Saviolamemphix:
Who cares if they get more pussy lmfao
A man's achievement can never b measured by d number of pussy he gets..

Getting more pussy shows strong masculinity. That's the point.

I'm not interested in arguing.

Junnior:

Getting more pussy shows strong masculinity. That's the point.

I'm not interested in arguing.

I'm kinda disappointed you have this mindset. It's fine. Everyone has his life to live.

Dapcity247:
I completely disagree with your arguments

Read to understand, not to respond. Put emotions aside. I didn't write my arguments. I was giving a report and interpretation of mrcoldsweat's argument to ichidodo. None of what I wrote was my argument, they are a summary of what I think mrcoldsweat actually meant.

I don't believe at all men should sacrifice their masculine roles and embrace feminine role, masculine careers will always be more profitable than feminine professions as they are risky and require more time, why should men settle of less,are you saying we are incapable of competing with our fellow women and men

You are putting words in my mouth and in that of mrcoldsweat's. Read my summary again. You don't understand what mrcoldsweat wrote. He is not saying men should abandon their masculine roles.

We are no longer in the industrial age, we are now in information age, the rules of success for both ages are completely different, women are so uninformed and unintellectual that they are dominating the academics which require obsolete systems and subjects that doesn't guarantee success or even financial security in the future, because they are so Solipsisitic and can only function in groupthink dogma as they are incapable of real logic and intellectual curiosity, they are fooled and brainwashed by mainstream media who don't care about women's actual welfare but function as proxies for welfare government and crony-capitalist to embrace out-modeled masculine professions to provide cheap labor for their bosses in the workplace, they are used up as slaves and fed handouts by governments who don't care about them.

Well, I was only giving a summary of what he said. I am not saying you are wrong or mrcoldsweat's is right. I just giving a summary to help others understand what he is trying to say, that doesn't you must agree with him.

Junnior:

Getting more pussy shows strong masculinity. That's the point.

I'm not interested in arguing.

So are you saying that those on monk mode don't have strong masculinity.

So we still have some Men who still equates sex with success. Seems I don't even know what Red Pill means again sef.

Truly, if a Man can't control his sexual urge, he's forever going to be at the mercy of women. He will continue to do things just to get their favour whether directly or indirectly. SMH.

TheUndercover:
So we still have some Men who still equates sex with success. Seems I don't even know what Red Pill means again sef.

Truly, if a Man can't control his sexual urge, he's forever going to be at the mercy of women. He will continue to do things just to get their favour whether directly or indirectly. SMH.

OK are you saying that those who are spinning plates are at the mercy of women

TheUndercover:

I'm kinda disappointed you have this mindset. It's fine. Everyone has his life to live.

It's okay. We all can't always have the same perspective and understanding.

For example, one of the gospels of the redpill is that men should spin plates. A guy that is able to do this effortlessly exhibits a strong masculine trait as opposed to incels. From my personal observations, most straight guys in these feminine professions don't have a hard time spinning plates. Let me stop here.

Martinez39s:
Read to understand, not to respond. Put emotions aside. I didn't write my arguments. I was giving a report and interpretation of mrcoldsweat's argument to ichidodo. None of what I wrote was my argument, they are a summary of what I think mrcoldsweat actually meant.

You are putting words in my mouth and in that of mrcoldsweat's. Read my summary again. You don't understand what mrcoldsweat wrote. He is not saying men should abandon their masculine roles.


Well, I was only giving a summary of what he said. I am not saying you are wrong or mrcoldsweat's is right. I just giving a summary to help others understand what he is trying to say, that doesn't you must agree with him.

He's for gender equality
He promotes reversing of gender roles, not completely but necessarily
Your interpretation of mrcoldsweat argument is very dangerous for the redpill community, as it can mislead many especially new redpillers
My understanding of your interpretation is that you stated evidence that women are embracing masculine careers except very risky occupations like bricklaying , mechanics, post sexual revolution has changed the culture of humanity for good and most probably we are not going back
But your advice or suggestions to redpillers is what I don't agree with

SOZINN:

So are you saying that those on monk mode don't have strong masculinity.

It depends on why they're on monk mode: are they incels or true Mgtow?

Incels are weak. Mgtow are strong.

However, the ability to spin plates is a strong masculine behaviour. And true monk mgtow could do it if they wanted to.

SOZINN:

OK are you saying that those who are spinning plates are at the mercy of women

If you decide to keep spinning plates, that's your own personal decision. Yes, for me, they are still at the mercy of women because they will keep working on their game skills for women to continue being attracted to them.

If you spin plates or spoons or whatever, that's your own personal decision but equating that with success or as a sign of alpha, then you have a problem.

You have absolutely nothing to gain from spinning plates. We know how some of those who think they are gurus in plate spinning ended. I rest my case.

Even simps can decide to spin plates. Anybody can decide to spin plates even spoons. I don't see how it's a sign of masculinity.

Dapcity247:
He's for gender equality
He promotes reversing of gender roles, not completely but necessarily

As I said, I will go back to earlier posts to understand mrcoldsweat better.

Your interpretation of mrcoldsweat argument is very dangerous for the redpill community, as it can mislead many especially new redpillers

No it's not. I gave a summary and interpretation of mrcoldsweat's argument. I didn't say I agreed with it, I didn't say I disagreed with it. My purpose for writing that summary is to for people to understand mrcoldsweat better since his choice of words lacks great precision to many. It's up to anyone to decide if they agree or not.

My understanding of your interpretation is that you stated evidence that women are embracing masculine careers except very risky occupations like bricklaying , mechanics, post sexual revolution has changed the culture of humanity for good and most probably we are not going back
But your advice or suggestions to redpillers is what I don't agree with

I gave no advice, neither did I make any suggestions. My entire post is simply a summary and interpretation of what mrcoldsweat is trying to pass across. I am not pushing anyone to accept it. Again, read mrcoldsweat's post and then read my summary to ichidodo, word for word.

Martinez39s:
I am not saying I disagree with mrcoldsweat, and I am not saying I agree with him.

I have read mrcoldsweat's post, the one above yours. What he is trying to say, I think, is that the society's status quo has changed, it's here to stay and it's not going back anytime soon to the traditional way of things no matter how men desire traditional life. On a societal level, things have changed. Therefore, according to mrcoldsweat, men must learn to adapt and flow with the tide and not remain rooted in CERTAIN archaic stereotypes and beliefs about masculinity that are limiting men and serving them no purpose in the modern world. Mrcoldsweat isn't saying in his last post that you should lose your balls as a man and become feminized, all he meant by modifying masculinity is that we put aside our egos and certain useless, archaic, and unproductive stereotypes and beliefs about masculinity and do what we can to make headway in life even if it comes down to doing certain jobs that were traditionally considered feminine like nursing, working in a hair saloon, babysitting in a daycare etc.

He is not saying men must do these jobs, all he is saying is if a man can make profit from these jobs and if he wants to do it, he shouldn't be seen as less a man and his ego shouldn't stop him since we don't consider a woman who becomes an engineer or doctor (former masculine professions) less feminine by society's standards. If women are now given rights and opportunities as men, and they are free to pursue any job or career, it shouldn't be different with men. Hence the ego and mindset that would make a man rather go hungry instead working in a daycare because he think it makes him less masculine should be abolished.

At any rate, mrcoldsweat's argument is reducible to the adage "as hunters learnt to shoot without missing, birds learnt to fly without perching." He is telling us to adapt or lose out. I think that's what he meant by modify masculinity or lose out.

I will still read his earlier posts to undeserved his arguments betters.

You have my respect.