Saviolamemphix:
@Mrcoldsweat many are mad but few are roaming lmfao

Ishilove:

I'm not a mod, but I agree with your submission 100%. The comments I see nowadays are very nauseating. There's one called mosdii who goes around saying all Nigerian females, his mother and female relatives inclusive are useless. His kind of comment would not have been tolerated back when mukina2 was still active and SexKillz still a romance section moderator. Every where you turn in the Romance section misogynistic threads that have no business in civilised discourse.

It is quite shameful what Nairaland has become.

luminouz:


I.dey tell you bro. I caught her red-handed. Check my reply to her.

She wasn't cool that I called her out. She abused me o...calling me Ndi Uchu.

That's how I know that she was damn pained

MrColdsweat:
I remember how we treated each other with respect on nairaland.

I remember how we loved aunty idowuogbo because of her funny personality. I remember Mrs China, onila and several others.

There was so much sanity on this section.

But look at nairaland today. Misogyny everywhere!!

Once a romance thread appears on the front page, you see boys litter the thread with misogynistic posts, bullying women.

I like to believe seun, mynd44, lalasticlala ishilove and Dominique have observed the unhealthy level of misogyny on nairaland, but I'm surprised they have done nothing about it.


I'm surprised they're yet to modify the rules to suppress the disrespect towards genders.


I will take out time and compile all the misogynistic posts on this thread and forward them as evidence to seun, mynd44, lalasticlala and ishilove. So that they can know the major indoctrination hub and the emanating point of misogyny on nairaland. I will ask them to close down this thread and modify the rules so that men and women can respect each other like we do in the family section.

If they don't close down this thread, I'll have no choice but to kill the thread myself.

MrColdsweat:
[s][/s]

Are you not tired of regurgitating the same nonsense?

No blackmail will stop me from taking down this thread.

Skepticus:


U fûck up big time. What is wrong with some of us here? Let sleeping dogs lie and move on. No, una must drag something way go put una for trouble. Many monikers have drawn conclusion on recent events here, clear to everyone and have moved on. Pesiin (most likely a female hiding behind the moniker) don reveal im intention to bring down the thread that has educated a lot including you and saving a lot of men, but u choose to continue entertaining dem. Make dem close down the thread so some of us go get sense. My only pity is for the guys who are not yet aware of the truth being shared here.

A lot of us don't know the power of silence or ignoring a fruitless venture, not knowing when to end a trolling argument or even ignore a troublesome pussay when red flags are hanging all around it. Smh.

MJBOLT:

I thought there was an agreement to ignore stupid bitches and simp idiots too many irrelevant posts.

yorubarere:

Redpillers. I hope you can now confirm his true intentions. He is just a loser. He needs help and he can't find that help here if he continues to be a nuisance to us.

Jessepaid:
modern music by some female artists is a medium women use to further blue pill men...

singers like Cardi b infuse feminist and sex trade lyrics into their songs.. " if he don't swipe them cards, he don't get the pvssy...”

others like Doja cat, Sza, Iggy azalea Nicki minaj, Megan the stallion are all guilty of the same stuff..

inciting the notion that for a man to get laid, he has to spend heavily first for it..


mean while world class singers like Celine dion, kate hudson, alicia keys, beyonce, mariah carey etc..

all sang about being madly in love with men and how men made them crazy...

see the lyrics of celine dion's I drove all night, my heart will go on..

or the lyrics of Hold up by beyonce which was channelled to jay-z allegedly cheating on her...



I like Cardi's vibe but I dont buy what she raps about.. she's unconsciously simping men, raising the value of pvssy and creating dumb girls..

after Nicki minaj's gra gra, na still criminal she marry...

listen to rappers like migos, 50cent, nasty c, lil baby, rick ross, drake those niggas ooze red pill..

QuadrilAyinde:
See ehn, TRP Philosophy is Very good at Being a Step ahead of Women to beat them at their Manipulation Game, but it's quite obvious that quite a Large % of TRP Followers are not ready to see some of the Downsides therein.. Now, let me Try quickly expantiate:

(1) THE ISSUE OF GENERALIZATION:
U see ehn, it's very Illogical for Anyone to just come out and start claiming WOMEN in totality are this and that.. The 1st question I'd like to ask is How Many Ladies av U interacted with Personally b4 Arriving at this Conclusion? It's quite obvious most of these Conclusions are excerpts from RedPill books and Forums scattered all over the Internet. Rather Using MOST LADIES would av suffice and probably made sum1 like me not to even bother bringing up a discuss in the 1st place..... Always Know that to Every Established Attribute and Characteristics of the female Gender, there is Always an Exception, so Why are you TRP guys Deliberately Ommiting the Exceptions, No matter how Small their Population is?? Hope U know that Even if the Ratio is 95:5, then it's still bn classified as MAJORITY and not ALL... Even sef, let's look at this issue in the Surface sef. u guys av classified Guys into RedPilled, BluePilled, BlackPilled etc etc, Now does it even make any sense Now Grouping All Women under one Umbrella??

JackBizzle:



Excuse me, were you not a mod when nairaland went to the dogs?

You weren't even a good mod. You are part of the problem.

yorubarere:

Good luck with that simp! You remember the option number 2. I told you, you will misbehave and be frustrated.

You already misbehaved and blew ur last cover. You are now getting frustrated. I am having the fun, knowing fully that I am one of those upsetting you.

LESSON: Don't fvck with a bigger man

luminouz:


No need to quote him again bro. Just ignore

yorubarere:

Already doing that boss man. Make we allow am deh rant. He has been exposed. He will fade off with time.

luminouz:


No offence but we don't quote 'f' monikers here.

Martinez39s:
GLYCOLYSISS, please modify your post to properly quote the clown. His text is not in the green background.

GLYCOLYSISS:


I have actually unquoted him since more guys have seen that post.

Good morning bro.

JackBizzle:



I did not know the rules. That was my first comment here.


Anyhow, some people like that hag need to be put in their place

oyolohi:
A message from me, to all humans:

Know, and accept the fact that you are an animal (without special purpose) —just like every other animal on the face of this planet —and know peace!


You will never overcome your animalistic instincts if you still feel that your life has special meanings —which will consequently lead you into doing the many useless things/traditions propagated by society.


These animal instincts I speak of are the things that make you that irredeemable "simp" or whareva, an unsuspecting lover of stress, etc. —not just in female matters, but in all aspects of life!

The strongest of these instincts I speak of is the desire to replicate your gene. Yes, I said that.


I can't stress this enough: know that you are an animal like the chicken in your backyard, and know peace. Only then will you see the ultimate explanation to everything we've been trying to discover in this thread.......


-oyolohi

BLOODYSPERM:
I'm about to sleep now , before I forget it, a very powerful message for redpillers especially Tradcons,christian conservatives and aspiring Patriach,on the issue of marriage

Old women and used Harlotts have developed social conventions to shame men into marrying them

1) They demonize young fertile women who have strong sexual market value as promiscuous , immature and wayward
2) After Hoeing about in their youths they will claim that they are matured and experienced enough for marriage which is logically invalid and unsound because it's until you enter marriage before you can make such judgements
3) They shame men that they are unprepared, insecure, don't want to be responsible,tag you as a kid(boy) who lacks the understanding of what marriage entails
4) They claim that you have inferiority complex , fragile ego and low self-esteem to increase their depreciated SMV value and reduce yours


Note:
Any redpiller especially patriachs who succumb to these bullshit social convention deserves to be castrated and burnt alive, an ignorant SIMP is far better than you, How can you wife a HOE after redpill awareness? Are you cursed?

Special note:
I'm sorry for the display of histrionics and emotional extremes in my original note, I'm just trying to convey a very important message

Thank you
Goodnight

MrColdsweat:


Martinez39s what is this?

If these words are the words of females or simps, does that mean these claims should never be verified?

Despite all the patterns all redpillers observed on a daily basis, and are still observing (the red pill proves itself daily), that made them embrace the red pill and the confirmation from others who also observed these patterns, you expect these questions to deter anyone from the red pill?

Because they get the same observations, does that make the claim true?
Do you not know that beliefs shared by many, often becomes their reality but their beliefs could still be false?
Are you not sounding like the babalawo worshippers who claim their gods exists because of their personal experiences?

Your personal belief claims due to experiences has graduated to knowledge, but is it true? That is what you should be finding out.

You're a mathematician like me who engages in the verification of the truth value of statements, Why are you behaving like the others? If others behave like they do, should you do same? Since you have been trained to find truth, Shouldn't you be most interested in the truth values of the acclaimed truths of the redpill doctrine?


You are one of the pillars of this movement on nairaland. You should be armed with facts and statistics to shut arguers up.
You should be giving me facts so that I can back out of this thread.

Why resort to petty fallacies?

If you are asked to give a proof that certain abstract spaces, sets or structures possess certain qualities when endowed with certain restrictions or properties, do you ask for the intent of the person who gave you the proof? Do you not just give or construct the demanded proof?

Is there any inferential link between my intent and the truth? If I'm here for good, does it change the truth?

I expected better.