Welcome, Guest: Register On Nairaland / LOGIN! / Trending / Recent / New
Stats: 3,195,865 members, 7,959,723 topics. Date: Friday, 27 September 2024 at 05:07 AM

Usisky's Posts

Nairaland Forum / Usisky's Profile / Usisky's Posts

(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (of 15 pages)

Islam for Muslims / Re: Why Qur'an Alone? by usisky(m): 7:36pm On Dec 10, 2012
maclatunji:
I am free to do anything as long as the Qur'an is silent on it? So, how did the Prophet (SAW) know he was meant to have people called to prayer and the method to use from the Qur'an when there is no text that says: "XYZ"?


Sure, why not. Can you mention one thing you believe the Quran should've talked about but failed to? The key point to note by any believer is that the Quran gives the most basic criteria/guidelines for living a Godly life. Often, the quran emphasizes "belief in God and then Righteousness". these two when synergized properly covers pretty much all one can think of. Regarding the issue of call to salaat. Why is it that the only question you guys hammer on is about the salaat? How about the many more commandments dictated in teh Quran but aren't heeded? Mr. MAC, believe me, the HADITHs corrupted the Sallat rather than preserving it. There's not a single hadith that explains Salaat as you know it today. All you have to do is go investigate...

Islam for Muslims / Re: Why Qur'an Alone? by usisky(m): 6:12pm On Dec 10, 2012
BetaThings: ^^^
He has "explained" it in another thread.
https://www.nairaland.com/757108/salaat-quran-sweetnecta
He wants us to stay away from this thread - it is reserved for Sweetnecta
I have been to that thread to ask some questions. I am waiting for his answer

I even forgot that verse about the Prophet (PBUH) being a PERFECT example. May be he will explain that only Prophet Ibrahim (PBUH) should be obeyed and he will use chapter 60 where Prophet Ibrahim (PBUH) is also mentioned as a perfect example

Above all, it is curious that the Usisky wants us to listen to him as he "explains or points out" to us how the Qur'an should be used to understand salat. But we can receive no such favours from the Prophet (PBUH)

I mean when a 10 yr old boy came to the Prophet (PBUH) to ask for guidance on how to pray, he (PBUH) must just have given the Qur'an to the boy afterall the Prophet (PBUH) was only instructed to deliver the Qur'an. It was even of no use that he (PBUH) knew the Qur'an by heart and understood the message. People could not copy him (PBUH) though he (PBUH) knew how to and actually prayed salat (without errors we should assumed). They just had to do self help with the Qur'an






Do not despair sir....i will answer the questions you posed on the other thread. As for the bold above, i have clarified that severally in other threads such as THIS. In case it isn't clear enough, i shall re-clarify.


Islam for Muslims / Re: Why Qur'an Alone? by usisky(m): 6:02pm On Dec 10, 2012
maclatunji: Does OP perform Salat? Tell us how you perform ablution and the things you say when you perform Salat and the number of rakat you perform a day.

What do you think about eating with the left hand?




I will describe how i observe my salaat to you HERE when i have less commitments to attend to.

As for eating with the left hand. Ain't Nothing wrong with it. There shouldn't be any religious relevance given to such things. You only find foolish ideas like these in man-made books called hadith/sunnah- Don't drink while standing, don't eat with left hand, don't sleep on your left side, don't urinate standing, don't urinate facing mecca, enter majid with right foot etcetera etcetra. You never find NONE-SENSE as these in the BOOK OF GOD- Quran. God created the people who are left handed. Why can't they eat with such a hand? What has any of these have to do with worship of GOD ALONE which is what the message of the Quran is? think about it.

Islam for Muslims / Re: Why Qur'an Alone? by usisky(m): 5:06pm On Dec 10, 2012



Peace Bro'. I must commend you for having taken the time to respond to my post in THE OTHER THREAD! I am not particularly happy that you had to divert it here. I suppose you did not want your "humble" thread to be tainted with some dose of "USISKY VENOM"....Anyways, no big deal. And talking about
guiding me, i think i am pretty much content with the guidance endeared to me by GOD in the Qruan....Taht sufficient for me.

tbaba1234: You do not have to respond to this post. I will not respond to subsequent post of this nature.


Oh no, i have to; it's important that i do you know. You are under no obligation to respond, but i would really be glad if you did.

tbaba1234: I will give you a detailed response and hope that you do some reflection within yourself, show some intellectual humility, maybe you will get some benefit. May Allah guide us both.

If by "intellectual humility" you mean being predisposed to acceptance of truth, if and when it is confirmed to be TRUTH- then sure; why not!! On the other hand, i will advice you to desist from exuding "intellectual penury" with all the false information about ISLAM you display on this forum. Desist from tainting the image of the prophet and reducing his efforts into farces by preaching from sources that insult him and GOD.

tbaba1234: "If anyone disobeys Allah and His Messenger he is indeed on a clearly wrong path." [Al-Ahzab, 33:36]

Very true. In fact, anyone who refuses to obey the message(Quran) preached by the messenger is far astray. God willing, we will confirm those who are guilty of disobeying the message(Quran) conveyed by the Messenger.

tbaba1234: Imagine you were in Arabia during the revelation of the Quran, remember the Quran was not in written form, the way it is today. It was essentially words recited from the mouth of a man. For the 7th century Arab hearing this man (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) reciting these words, belief in these words automatically meant belief in this man as a messenger.

Mr. tbaba, i do not need such bogus imaginations, what i subscribe to is what my faculty can fathom as being logically true. The underlined part above is fundamentally flawed and an erroneous deduction. Have you ever wondered why the quran often addresses itself as a "BOOK(Kitaab)"? Do you think that God will leave the writing and compilation of the scripture that is to serve as guidance to the entire human race in the hands of error prone humans after the prophets death? These are the lies fabricated in the hadiths books to introduce doubts in the credibility/authenticity of the Quran. The truth is, the quran was written down and arranged in the order we see it today by Muhammad(with the help of others) under God's direction. No human being could've written down and arranged the Quran in the way it is today, but the prophet himself. When the prophet died, the quran was already written(on leaves and parchments) with full instruction as to where every chapter should be placed. The quran bears testimony to this fact. Read the following verses:

[25:5] They also said, "Tales from the past that HE WROTE DOWN; they were dictated to him day and night."

Muhammad's contemporaries knew that he was a literate man who could read and write; he wrote God's revelations with his own hand. With this verse alone, we observe that Muhammad's detractors saying he was indeed writing down a book. God wouldn't put this in the quran if it isn't exactly what happened. Muhammad was a very Intelligent and Literate person; it is hadith fabrications that insults the prophet Muhammad by making him illiterate. For God sake, Muhammad was a successful merchant; in his time, you must know all the arabic letters because that was what they used for calculations during transactions as there were no numbers then. The arabic letters have numeric values called gematria. How could he have been illiterate? Would God appoint an illiterate person to deliver such a momentous message to the world? I don't think so!!

tbaba1234: Do you know the kind of regard, Allah holds for His messenger? If you do a proper study of the Quran, It is absolutely incredible, the way Allah talks about his messenger. It is a study in itself.

If you sir did a proper study, you would realize that God asks the believers never to make distinction amongst His messengers. You talk as though Muhammad was the only messenger honored in the quran. In fact, some messengers are honored more than Muhammad in the Quran. If God honors some above others, that is God for you. As far as we are concerned, they are all the same. For instance, God tells us He preferred some messengers above others, and the He gave the example of David([url=http://submission.org/QI#17%3A75]17:75[/url]), does that mean we should idolize David? When God tells us He chose Abraham as a beloved friend([url=http://submission.org/QI#4%3A125]4:125[/url]), does that imply we honor Abraham above others? when God said Moses was the only prophet God spoke to directly([url=http://submission.org/QI#4%3A164]4:164[/url]), is that an invitation to idolization of Moses? As you can see, this is only God's "perspective"; as far as we are concerned, we should never make a distinction among them([url=http://submission.org/QI#2%3A136]2:136[/url], [url=http://submission.org/QI#2%3A285]2:285[/url]).

tbaba1234: Let me give you a small example, Allah talks about changing the Qibla (roughly translated):

Many a time We have seen you [Prophet] turn your face towards Heaven, so We are turning you towards a prayer direction that pleases you........... (Surah 2:144)

Allah changed the prayer direction simply because the prophet looked to the sky, He didn't even have to ask for that. And Allah says, he changed it to please him...

This is how much Allah regards his messenger.



It is really sad and shameful reading such a statement from someone who supposedly understands what "GOD" means. A god who takes decisions without seeking consent from anyone. A god who is omnipotent. A god who is omniscient, and most importantly- a god who possesses the attribute of immutability decides to change the direction of prayer(Qibla) simply "because" He saw His servant was distressed.

Your years of follow-follow and reliance on hadith and Tafsir have benumbed your mind, and has really created thick barrier around your mind preventing you from understanding the Quran. First, you quoted the verse out of context- then you go on a build a straw-man case argument from it. what?!!

How on earth do you conclude that this verse was referring to Muhammad? Let's read the verse with our GOD given Aqal(Faculty) from verses 142 up to 144.

[2:142] The fools among the people would say, "Why did they change the direction of their Qiblah?" Say, "To GOD belongs the east and the west; He guides whoever wills in a straight path."

[2:143] We thus made you an impartial community, that you may serve as witnesses among the people, and the messenger serves as a witness among you. We changed the direction of your original Qiblah only to distinguish those among you who readily follow the messenger from those who would turn back on their heels. It was a difficult test, but not for those who are guided by GOD. GOD never puts your worship to waste. GOD is Compassionate towards the people, Most Merciful.

Qiblah Restored to Mecca:
[2:144] We have seen you turning your face about the sky (searching for the right direction). We now assign a Qiblah that is pleasing to you. Henceforth, you shall turn your face towards the Sacred Masjid. Wherever you may be, all of you shall turn your faces towards it. Those who received the previous scripture know that this is the truth from their Lord. GOD is never unaware of anything they do.

How you jumped to verse 144 and concluded it was in reference to Muhammad simply defies logic. Looking at verse 142, it's apparent there was a recognized Qiblah by the people which God decided to change out of His own will. and this is evident by the displeasure shown when the people exclaimed:"why did they change the direction of the Qiblah". Verse 143 tell us God changed this previous direction only to test the willingness of the people to listen and to "Obey the messenger"; it was a test. Nothing in these verses tell us Muhammad did not know of any Qiblah; Instead, the one they(including Muhammad) use to face was changed by God as a test of obedience to the messenger by the believers- this is evident from the sentence "only to distinguish those among you who readily follow the messenger from those who would turn back on their heels". Verse 144 isn't referring to Muhammad as you erroneously assumed, the verse is talking about the same category of people God termed as "fools" in verse 142. The verse goes on to tell us the Qiblah has been restored to mecca(i.e the sacred majid). This is the kind of confused, mishmash of ideas you get when read these hadiths and supposed tafsirs; they literally take your mind away from the true message in the Quran.


tbaba1234: For you to regard him as just a 'mailman' is ridiculous.

Another straw-man. Was there a time i ever referred to the messenger as such? I always referred to Muhammad as the messenger. Is it a crime to call him what he was? He was God's messenger(rasool) to the world, his duty was to deliver the message(risala) of the Quran to us- and he did that excellently. But he is dead and gone now, your duty is to listen to and heed the message he left for you in the Quran. If you fail to, you would be disobeying the messenger indirectly, while directly disobeying GOD.

tbaba1234: With all these said, The Quran is littered with Ayat where Allah commands the believers to follow the prophet, the prophet gave instructions to the muslims, many of which have been recorded.

"Obey Allah and obey the Messenger, " (surah Nur: 54)

"And obey Allah and the Messenger that you may obtain mercy" (Surah Aal-Imran: 132)

"O you who believe! Obey Allah and obey the Messenger, " (Surah An-Nisa: 59)

"And when it is said to them: "Come to what Allah has sent down and to the Messenger," you see the hypocrites turn away from you with aversion" (Surah An-Nisa: 61)

"We sent no Messenger, but to be obeyed by Allah's Leave, " (Surah An-Nisa: 64)

"But no, by your Lord, they can have no Faith, until they make you (O Muhammad sallalahu alayhi wasallam) judge in all disputes between then, and find in themselves no resistance against your decisions, and accept (them) with full submission" (Surah An-Nisa: 65)

"And whoever obeys Allah and His Messenger, fears Allah and keeps his duty to Him, such are the successful" (Surah Nur: 52)

"The only saying of the faithful believers, when they are called to Allah and His Messenger, to judge between them, is that they say:"We hear and we obey". And such are the successful" (Surah Nur: 51)

"O you who believe! Obey Allah, and obey the Messenger and render not vain your deeds" (Surah Muhammad: 33)

"Obey Allah, and obey the Messenger, " (Surah At-Taghabun: 12)

And how do we fulfil this obligation if not by observing what he said and did so that we may obey and follow these instructions? And are not the ahadith the collection of what the Prophet (SAW) said and did? Thus if it is compulsory for us to obey the Prophet (SAW), it is necessary for us to look at the ahadith so we may know WHAT it is we are supposed to be obeying, n'est-ce pas? "He who obeys the Messenger has indeed obeyed Allah, " (An-Nisa: 80)


Mr. tbaba, you are only spewing what you have been brainwashed into believing. If the hadith writers didn't back their claims from the Quran, of course they know it won't carry any weight. Yes we must "Obey GOD and Obey the messenger". But what does this really mean? According to you, God and The messenger are two separate entities. Well, you are wrong. God and the messenger are inseparable. The reason God uses this phrase in the quran is to tell us God and the messenger are one and the same. The messenger speaks on behalf of GOD, since God did not directly convey the message to us. Hence the reason you consistently see the Quran uses "Obey GOD and Obey the Messenger"- this is because , obedience to the messenger is in fact, obedience to God([url=http://submission.org/QI#4%3A80]4:80[/url]). the messenger never speaks out of his own volition. This is why you never find God use the phrase "Obey God and Obey Muhammad". Cos as Muhammad, he was just a human being as everybody else. He himself was required to follow the message. In fact, Muhammad(the man) disobeyed the messenger(God's representative) at some point; the following verse attests to that :"Recall that you said to the one who was blessed by GOD, and blessed by you, "Keep your wife and reverence GOD," and YOU HID inside yourself what GOD wished to proclaim.([url=http://submission.org/QI#33%3A37]33:37[/url])

So you see, he equally was required to "Obey the messenger" by obeying the message(Quran) inspired to him by GOD. It all sounds crazy, but you just have go through many verses where Muhammad himself was warned in the strongest of terms not to ever deviate one bit from the message of the Quran; doing so would earn him retribution. This is all in the Quran.

tbaba1234: May Allah make it easy for all of us to truly accept what has been revealed to us and make it easy for us to obey Him and hold on to the sunnah of the Messenger who has come as an example and role-model to be followed. "Certainly, there is an excellent example for you in the Messenger of Allah, for him who looks forward to Allah and the Last Day, and remembers Allah much." (Surah Al-Ahzab: 21)

God has truly made it easy and simple for us to be guided by the Qruan([url=http://submission.org/QI#20%3A2]20:2[/url]). It is you and others who burden yourselves with several innovations that have nothing to do with GOD and the messenger. I will cite briefly to you how your so-called hadiths/sunnah have really taken you guys far far far away from the Messengers message(Quran).

1)Killing Apostates:
According to your sharee'a law of Irtida'ah(Apostacy) derived from your hadith/sunnah, a person who leaves Islam(Murtaad) should be KILLED. And you at one point, without shame, was defending this cruel, inhumane and barbaric practice to the Non-muslims on the main religion section of this forum.

If you were "Obeying the Messenger" as you claim, you would realize that the Messenger said to us in the message(quran) that he preached:

a)that there's absolute and total freedom of belief. No one should compel anyone to follow his own faith; that no person should be hurt on the account of leaving ,defecting or subscribing to a different belief. But are you "Obeying" the messenger by subscribing to the Irtida'ah(Apostacy) law?

[2:256] There shall be no compulsion in religion: the right way is now distinct from the wrong way. Anyone who denounces the devil and believes in GOD has grasped the strongest bond; one that never breaks. GOD is Hearer, Omniscient.

[4:137] Surely, those who believe, then disbelieve, then believe, then disbelieve, then plunge DEEPER INTO DISBELIEF, GOD will not forgive them, nor will He guide them in any way.

According to verse 4:137, a person is totally free to jump in and out of belief as he chooses. God says the judgement belongs Him. But according to your sharee'ah, the judgement belongs to you. At least, a person needs to be constantly "alive" to be able to jump in and out of belief as he chooses.

b)that there is total freedom of speech and expression. And no person should be hurt on the account of insulting/mocking GOD or his revelations let alone the prophet([url=http://submission.org/QI#6%3A68]6:68[/url]).


2)ADULTERY:

According to your man-made shareeah, married adulterers should be buried and stoned to death, according to the hadith, Muhammad did same. But according to the Teachings of the messenger in the Quran, adultery of any form is only punishable by giving hundred lashes to parties involved([url=http://submission.org/QI#24%3A2]24:2[/url]). Are you truly "Obeying" the Messenger? And according to the Hadiths, a goat ate the verse of stonning. What an Evil Lie!!

3)DIETARY PROHIBITIONS:

According to your sunnah/hadith, there are some really long list of dietary prohibitions. But according to the teachings of the messenger in the quran, GOD has specifically forbade only four categories of meat([url=http://submission.org/QI#5%3A3]5:3[/url], [url=http://submission.org/QI#6%3A145]6:145[/url], [url=http://submission.org/QI#16%3A115]16:115[/url]). Anything outside these is lawful; be it dog, horse, frog, Gorilla etcetra. Even Dragon grin . God rebukes those who fabricate lies and forbid anything in His name([url=http://submission.org/QI#10%3A59]10:59[/url]). Are you really "obeying" the messenger?


4)Ablution:

The messenger tells us to observe only four steps of ablution(wudu)([url=http://submission.org/QI#5%3A6]5:6[/url]), but according to your sunna/hadith there are many more steps than that. Are you saying the messenger disobeyed God by practicing something different from what he was instructed in the quran?. Remember God warned that if he ever deviated one bit from the message in the Quran, his destiny will be hell:

[13:37] We revealed these laws in Arabic, and if you(Muhammad) ever acquiesce to their wishes, after this knowledge has come to you, you will have no ally, nor a protector, against GOD.

So tell me this: who are the ones disobeying the Message(Quran) of the Messenger? So you obey the messenger by following what you see in the hadiths, while it is alright to IGNORE what God says in the Quran? I get it, the messengers supposed hadith carries greater weight than God's word in the Quran, huh?

This is getting too lengthy, i will stop at these few examples. However, i will appreciate it if you can please point to me just one thing the messenger said in the Quran, that you observe exactly as it is dictated. JUST ONE!!


tbaba1234: About the sahih hadiths

Now you have often made the claim that bukhari collected 600,000 hadiths..It is so sad that you know nothing about the hadiths and you just make claims out of Ignorance...


You seem to be living under the delusion that the 600,000 ahadith of al-Bukhari's collection somehow means 600,000 separate narrations or bodies of text.

Your sloppy study of this issue becomes clear when one learns that a hadith is comprised of both a text (matn) and a chain of transmission (isnad).

In the science of hadith, the same text with ten chains of transmission is regarded not as one hadith but rather as ten hadiths, despite the fact that the text attached to each chain is the same in every case.

Let us see what bukhari said about the hadiths in his book

"I have not included in my book al-Jami` but what is authentic, and I left out among the authentic for fear of [excessive] length.

You really are one hilarious fella. You wrongly posit/assume that i am ignorant regarding the HADITHs. There's nothing new you can tell me about hadiths. I have dealt with them long ago, and now i have thrown them into the bin where they belong. I did not claim bukhary collected over 600,000 ahadiths, this is what is documented in muslim texts. Whether some were duplicates or not, it still is impossible for any human being to have achieved that feat. To sift over these staggering number of hadiths(some times he even went on long journeys to collect a hadith) and finally get it to just about 6000 within the number of years Mr. bukhary lived was impossible. And if there's one hadith that's should be dubbed authentic, it should be the prophets "LAST SERMON". This is supposedly the most witnessed event in the life time of the prophet, yet you find three different versions(SUNNI vesion, SHIA version and a third one unknown to many muslims) of this in the hadith books. Why...which is it? Your sunni one, the Shi'i one or the other one?

As for the underlined part in the quote above: Isn't this calamitous? so bukhary left out many "authentic hadiths" for fear of being too lengthy?. In other words bukhaary threw away part of Your religion?. He threw away part of what is supposed to "complement/explain" the quran? This is a disaster....I think it's better for me to stick with the Qruan.

Believe me, i am only responding to an empty post. You never even attempted to answer the questions i asked on the other thread. All these are nothing but straw-men you erected. Little wonder 'you diverted the discussion to this thread. I will end it here. We must conclude it there. You initiated a thread for people to come ask about your "Religion"; i have asked questions there, you should answer there as well. And i know i am in no violation of the forum rules. So i hope the MOD don't take sides.

tbaba1234: Alright, maybe you are the arabic expert... Do you know more arabic than people who have studied the language all of their life?? Your deception is deep..

I don't have to be an arabic expert to understand the straightforward message in the qruan. I mean... is difficult to understand that you should only do four step ablution([url=http://submission.org/QI#5%3A6]5:6[/url])? Is it difficult to understand that all your salaat should be said in a moderate tone([url=http://submission.org/QI#17%3A110]17:110[/url])? Is it difficult to understand that you should not mention any other name except God's when you are at the prayer house([url=http://submission.org/QI#72%3A18]72:18[/url])?

The Jews understood their language well, yet they did not understand the torah. The same Jews invented Mishnah(sayings) and Gemarrah(Deeds) attributed it to Moses, their own version of Hadith and sunnah. Exactly what the Muslims have invented. yet when you read the quran, all you find is Torah and Quran. No mention of Talmud(Mishnah and gemarrah of Mosses) nor Hadith/sunnah of Muhammad. In fact, the Jews invented the Hadith/sunna. Remember abu hurraira: the Jew who narrated 80% of the hadiths? yet the fella only reverted to ISLAM two years before the prophets death!!

What you follow as hadith/sunnah of prophet Muhammad are simply Jewish fabrications. I ask again, please SHOW me one commandment in the Quran that You are certain you obey as dictated(marriage, divorce, Inheritance, Salat, Hajj, Saywm, Zakat, Shahadaah...anything). JUST ONE!!

[7:89]"We would be blaspheming against GOD if we reverted to your religion after GOD has saved us from it. How could we revert back to it against the will of GOD our Lord? Our Lord's knowledge encompasses all things. We have put our trust in GOD. Our Lord, grant us a decisive victory over our people. You are the best supporter."

PEACE!!

Islam for Muslims / Re: Questions For Muslims: For Those Who Want To Know by usisky(m): 6:44pm On Dec 09, 2012



tbaba1234: Thanks for your Question, Islam is based on two sources, i. The Quran ii. The way of the prophet.

Peace Brother. I disagree with your conclusion above. Can you by any means prove why you are inclined to such belief?
I ask this because when you study the Quran carefully, consistently God tells the reader about the Quran, Torah, Gospel, Psalms and other scriptures been inspired to other prophets. Now my questions are as thus:

1)Why did the Quran mention all these other scriptures including the Quran by name, yet fail to mention the other source you hint at as been inspired concurrently to Muhammad- not even once by name considering its significance(that without it the Quran cannot be understood)?

2)How come of all the prophets, Muhammad was the only prophet who had two sources for the religion- given the fact that the Quran only mentions a single source for all other prophets and messengers? If i am wrong, then correct me.

3)Is there any way one can confirm your allusion....maybe by giving just one verse from the Quran that directly(unambiguously) mentions this other source? For instance when the Quran says the follow:"......while you have no power over them. Therefore, remind with this Quran, those who reverence My warnings."[50:45]

We can safely and unequivocally conclude that this verse references the Quran as been the source Muhammad should preach...any similar verse pointing at this other source?


Tbaba: We send peace upon the prophets because

i. We are directed to do so in the Quran

“Allah and his angels send blessings on the prophet, o you who believe, send blessings on him and salute him with all respect.” [Qur’an, 33:56]

First, the above is blatant mistranslation and an invitation to idolatry. No where in the Quran do we find God inviting people to the idolization of His servants(Angels, prophets and messengers). No where in the Quran do you find God asking anybody to commemorate or praise any of His servants; rather, consistently you find the quran exhorting the believers to commemorate/praise God at all times. Here are the problems with this dangerous teaching:

1)The prophets and messengers are dead. They cannot hear us, they have no idea what we are up to here on earth. When you consistently praise/commemorate them, this gives the idea that they can hear you and thereby bestowing upon them "omnipresence" attribute. But we know God alone is omnipresent. This is why we find the Quran tells us to put our trust in the living GOD who never dies:

[25:58]You shall put your trust in the One who is Alive - the One who never dies - and praise Him and glorify Him. He is fully Cognizant of His creatures' sins.


2)The Quran tells us all the messengers and prophets are assured of eternal bliss. If this is the case, then sending salutations on them is pointless since they can neither hear you nor does it add or devalue their position at God, and definitely it adds nothing to You except God's anger.

3)Today, you find that at any "Muslim" gathering, the opening prayer most often begins with showering of praises(distorted meaning of sending blessings) on Muhammad, then God comes second. This is SHIRK(IDOLATRY) of the highest degree. Again, whenever Muhammad's name is mentioned in the Masjids(mosques), you often hear the entire congregation raise their voices in unison to supposedly send blessings on Muahammad, but when GOD is mentioned, you rarely hear a single voice commemorating GOD's name. This is how this dangerous and idolatrous teaching have messed up the true meaning of the verse. Please verify my claims next time you visist the Mosque.


Tbaba: ii. The prophet told us to do so:

And the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said: “whoever sends blessings upon me, Allaah will send blessings upon him tenfold.” Narrated by Muslim (384).

Obviously, this can only be found in the hadith books. In truth, the prophet of GOD would never have said anything even of semblance to what the above hadith claims. These are fabrications and transgressions against the teachings of that great prophet- Muhammad. Every prophet of God exhorted the people to devote themselves absolutely to God alone and to never ever idolize them. Unfortunately, soon after their death, the people revert to idolatry with the prophets being their idols.

[3:79]Never would a human being whom GOD blessed with the scripture and prophethood say to the people, "Idolize me beside GOD." Instead, (he would say), "Devote yourselves absolutely to your Lord alone," according to the scripture you preach and the teachings you learn.

I initially wanted to expound much on the true meaning of the verse 33:56, but i will just give a link to an article on our site. I will only give the correct translation here, and if You(Tbaba) have any reason(s) why the translation isn't correct- then we go on and discuss it further.

CORRECT INTERPRETATION:
[33:56] GOD and His angels help and support the prophet. O you who believe, you shall help and support him, and regard him as he should be regarded.

You must read the sura from the beginning up until this point to understand what the verse means. This verse is addressing the believers during the time of the prophet, where some of them hesitated when a call to fight was made and deserted the prophet. The verse is asking them to support him at all times. This same sentence is used almost word for word thirteen verses before(33:43), it has nothing to do with "blessings". The misunderstanding comes from the words "SALLOO" or "YUSALLEE" or "YUSALOON". Please Read the following: "SALAWAT ON THE PROPHET"

PEACE!!..


Islam for Muslims / Re: Questions For Muslims: For Those Who Want To Know by usisky(m): 1:30pm On Dec 09, 2012
DanielNoble: dont they have peace already in heaven? Peace be upon them meaning what?



You Sir is an intelligent person. This is how God loves to see us use our BRAINS. Let see what the learned MULLAH(s) have to say about this. Also, i personally would want to know why this is:

1)For Muhammad(S.A.W)

2)For other prophets(A.S)

I want to understand why the distinction?

Islam for Muslims / Re: Quran Contradiction: Truth Or Fallacy? by usisky(m): 11:48am On Dec 09, 2012

[size=13pt]

Claim45:
In which direction should Muslims pray? Any direction 2:115, since Allah is everywhere. Only facing Mecca 2:144!

Refutation45
The subject of 2:115 is NOT prayer

"To God belongs the east and the west, so wherever you go you will always be facing God. God is Omnipresent, Omniscient" 2:115

"We assign a Qiblah (direction for prayer) that is pleasing to you. Henceforth, you shall turn your face towards the Sacred Masjid. Wherever you may, all of you shall turn your faces towards it." 2:144

The claim is that as per 2:115 God made it lawful for the believers to face anywhere in Salat (Contact Prayers), yet in 2:144 they are commanded to pray only in the direction of Mecca !

The obvious misunderstanding here is that while verse 144 is speaking about Qiblah (direction) for the Prayer, verse 115 is not speaking about prayer at all. Verse 115 is speaking about the fact that God is Omnipresent. God is everywhere at the same time, and thus wherever we may look or wherever we may go, we will always be facing God. The presence of the word "Omnipresent" at the end of the verse confirms that the subject of the verse is God's Presence and not the Prayer.

Therefore there is no contradiction between the two verses.


Claim46:
Is the Quran clear or incomprehensible? The Qur'an is "clear Arabic speech." [16:103] Yet "NONE knows its interpretation, save only Allah." [3:7] !!!

Refutation46
Author ignored key words in 3:7

"We are fully aware that they say, "A human being is teaching him!" The tongue of the source they hint at is non-Arabic, and this is a perfect Arabic tongue." 16:103

Now let us read the complete verse 3:7, with the words the author ommitted:

"He sent down to you this scripture, containing straightforward verses which constitute the essence of the scripture-as well as multiple-meaning or allegorical verses. Those who harbor doubts in their hearts will pursue the multiple-meaning verses to create confusion, and to extricate a certain meaning. None knows the true meaning thereof except GOD and those well founded in knowledge. They say, "We believe in this-all of it comes from our Lord." Only those who possess intelligence will take heed."

The author falsely claims that 3:7 states that no one knows the interpretation of the Quran save God. However, when we read 3:7 we note that the wisdom and the understanding of the Quran is also given to those well founded in knowledge. This verse is traditionally mistranslated to mean only God knows the meaning of certain verses. This is false translation. If we could only think for a moment why God would put a verse in the quran that is to serve as a guidance for man and yet we cannot know its meaning. Why put it there in the first place?

We are also told in the Quran that the truth and wisdom of the Quran are only given to the pure in heart, to those who worship God alone.

The words those well founded in knowledge are not related to any scientific or intellectual knowledge, they simply mean the knowledge and understanding of the Quranic message. The knowledge that God should be worshiped alone and that all idolatry should be rejected.

Thus the claim that only God understands certain verses in the Quran, as implied by the author and traditional Muslims, is false.

[/size]
Islam for Muslims / Re: Why Qur'an Alone? by usisky(m): 10:50am On Dec 09, 2012


ghazzal:

im wondering if tomorrow has not come o!


It will only be a repeat of what we had -HERE.

I started that thread exclusive for Mr. sweetnecta. Ask your questions there! Like the title of this thread suggests, it is an argument is support of Quran alone views, if you have any reason to advance a counter argument with regards to the thread's title.....then go on.

Islam for Muslims / Re: Divorce And Remarriage, Weird Laws by usisky(m): 10:33am On Dec 09, 2012



ghazzal: I appreciate your contribution above and its clarity. Also your chouce of words is exemplary.

Peace to you Bro', and Masha'allah(Glory be to GOD)!!

ghazzal: May God reward us for our Good deeds, Forgive our errors and make us better Muslims.

Masha'allah!! May God make us true Mu'meens(Believers).

ghazzal: My Concern is your claim of disbelief in the Hadith.

You don't have to be. Every soul is responsible for what its hands put forth. I am prepared to face the consequences of disbelieving in them if any. Besides, i have ample proof from the Quran as well as the HADITHs why my position is vindicatory.

ghazzal: I understand that almost all groups refer to the Hadith to back their claims and the Hadith is not free of false information.

This is precisely the point. Without the HADITH, the SUNNI or the SHI'I and their derivatives can never prove their doctrines from the QURAN. Their various HADITH is the reason for schism between all of these groups. If they only had one source of religious authority and guidance, then they will all be united under the guidance of this source. This wisdom is prophetically mentioned as parable in the following verse:

[39:29] GOD cites the example of a man who deals with disputing partners (Hadith), compared to a man who deals with only one consistent source (Quran). Are they the same? Praise be to GOD; most of them do not know.

So you see, while they refer to their individual Hadiths to prove their religion, i refer to the Quran which Muhammad preached as my proof. Ironically, the Quran will be the only reason Muhammad will be upset on the day of judgment that those who claim to be following it had abandoned it(25:30).

[25:30]The messenger will say, "My Lord, my people have deserted this Quran."

Maybe he would've forgotten then about his hadiths/sunnah?!!!!

ghazzal: But Dont you think there are some true information in it as well?

Of course there are some true information in the HADITH, the point is: of what religious value are they?
The hadith may contain HISTORICAL accounts that may be useful in understanding the customs and traditions of the people of that era- but giving the hadith any religious value is tantamount to setting up partners besides God. The quran tells us all we need for our salvation is detailed in it. And i am ready to debated this with whoever is ready to take up such a challenge.


ghazzal: Edit: Also, according to the link,

1: How do you guys know that it was the last 2 verses in Surah 9 that was added?
2: Who said your calculation of 19 could not have been a fluke that you use it to detect an addition to the Quran-(what if your thoughts are wrong as humans)?
3: Are yu saying that Allah Could not keep his promise to protect the Quran for 1400 years?
4: When Ali was a khalf, why did he not restore your acclaimed original Quran?

The history you refer to about Ali being in his house and not wanting to go out cos of addition to the Quran was from what Source...... hope its not the Hadith since you do not believe in the Hadith.
and i suppose you dont pray 5 times (2-4-4-3-4) daily cos that is according to the Hadith you dont believe in.

We shouldn't derail this thread further. I advice you open a fresh thread, address all your queries there- i will attend to them, God willing. But also be prepared to answer a few fundamental theological questions i will be asking too. Please do not fail to.

ghazzal: May God guide us to the right Path, the path of those who have earned his favour and not those who have gone astray.

He has already. He has given us a perfect scripture as a guidance, what remains is for us to adopt it as our true path to HIM.

Quran: Fully Detailed

[7:52]We have given them a scripture that is fully detailed, with knowledge, guidance, and mercy for the people who believe.


Please don't think i avoided your questions. Like i mentioned, open a fresh thread for that.

PEACE!!


Islam for Muslims / Re: Divorce And Remarriage, Weird Laws by usisky(m): 10:14am On Dec 09, 2012



Saint paris: Thanks Usisky for all your explanations, i think we all know where the root of the problem comes from.

Thank you too for taking the time to read through.

Saint paris: Thanks for the gift as well

Don't mention. It's the best Quran translation available. Very clear modern English, easy to read and free of most of the traditional errors and distortions found in others. The appendices will clarify most things for you, God willing.

Whenever you need clarification on anything, please do feel free to ask- i will by God's grace attend to you.

Au revoir!!


Islam for Muslims / Re: Quran Contradiction: Truth Or Fallacy? by usisky(m): 7:10pm On Dec 04, 2012
Will Be Updated Soon- God willing!!
Islam for Muslims / Re: Divorce And Remarriage, Weird Laws by usisky(m): 10:44pm On Dec 02, 2012



Sweetnecta: @Usisky: is there anything called "Sunni religion"?

Peace Mr. Sweetnecta.

Sir, you are a married man with kids. I am not married neither do i have kids, but i do know that the responsibilities you shoulder as a father and a husband is not easy. Sir, i would only ask you do the following, if not for anything- at least for the sake of your children. Visit the following website: www.submission.org, Peruse as much of the contents as you can for the next two weeks. Pen down down anything that you feel is odd, please alert me to it. I shall clarify God willing. Peace.


Islam for Muslims / Re: Divorce And Remarriage, Weird Laws by usisky(m): 9:00pm On Dec 02, 2012



Saint Paris: Peace unto you too

Thanks. Peace to you once again and everybody else.

Saint Paris: thanks for your input it was very educating

Praise be to GOD. It's refreshing to know you read through and found it edifying.

Saint Paris: Thanks also for accepting that Muslim divorce their women by uttering divorce thrice.

I was only stating the obvious.

Saint Paris: This is very problematic and very degrading for the women,....

Not only that, it is a misogynistic ideology that needs to be obviated; a total disregard for God's laws. Fortunately, such is unsupported in the Quran.

Saint Paris: ...but nah you choose to berate me for pointing it out.

My apologies...

Saint Paris: But before you condemn those that do it, know that they have their backing from both Quran and Hadiths which is the sunnnah of the Prophet.

God forbid that i shall condemn anybody- rather, i condemn UN-Godly and illogical practices. If i ever do unknowingly, may God forgive me. Yes, such practices can only be found in human-authored books called HADITHS. As far as the Quran is concerned, such backward and illogical ideologies are unsupported. And the most appropriate book to call the HADITH(saying, Narration, News) of the prophet is the Quran. Also, the prophet followed no other SUNNA(system, way of conduct) other than that detailed in the Quran.

Saint Paris: Most of the sources i've used here as you erroneously thought is not from anti islamic site, it's from sites from Islamic scholars imagine that.

Quite unfortunate but not surprising.

Saint Paris: So It's really something you and fellow enlightened ones like you need to educate the others not wait till an 'islamoqhobia' points it out to you.

We do. We have many websites dedicated to spreading the truth about God and "religions". By God's grace, many sincere muslims, christians, jews, Hindus, Bhudists and people of various religious orientation who visit our websites are not only convinced by our "perspective" , but are certain they have arrived at the last stop.

Saint Paris: I agree with most of what you've said...

Praise be to GOD!!

Saint Paris: And one more thing am not the making caricature of your Quran, it is muslims and scholars that support them that do.

Point noted.

Saint Paris: All i just did was point them out,n how's that a crime?

There's absolutely no crime in speaking against injustices- i am equally with you on that.

Saint Paris: Lol, whatever Shia's are doing am sure it has backing from the Quran and Sunnah of the Prophet no?

From their man-made books...YES! From the Quran...NEVER!!

Saint Paris: Was Muhammad engaging in prostitution when he engaged in Muta marriage?

God forbid that a Prophet of God ever indulged in such obscene practice. The prophet was commanded to tell the true believers to maintain their morality and chastity if they are unable to marry([url=http://submission.org/QI#4%3A25]4:25[/url]). It is very unlikely that the prophet would go against God's laws as the followers of these man-mad books would have us believe.

Saint Paris: I wonder what lagoshia and co would say about this.


It doesn't what anybody thinks. What is sacrosanct are God laws as dictated in the scriptures. Religion is not about its adherents- rather, it's about strict subservience to God and His laws, regardless of what anybody thinks.

Saint Paris: You see what am saying, you know of all this laws that supposedly protect women and you decide to keep quite and wait till someday? Till when? You know all this things but keep mute but when a non muslim points it out you start lecturing or are you lying to save face for Islam? If not what are you waiting for?

Believe me....I do try. The moderator isn't particular friendly(maybe he is to others), some of my post barely survive a few minutes before they are blasted into oblivion. So you see why i rarely participate here. Truth hurts, but what God has prepared for those who oppose truth hurts the most.


Saint Paris: Now you talk of fatherly figure how's that even possible when adoption is banned in islam?

In the "ARAB RELIGION", YES! In the ISLAM(Total submission to GOD) as practiced by Muhammad, certainly not.
The condition for adoption as stated in the Quran is that the names of the adopted child(ren) is not changed so as to preserve the lineage([url=http://submission.org/QI#33%3A4-5]33:4-5[/url]). Also, that you treat them as you treat your own family([url=http://submission.org/QI#33%3A4-5]33:5[/url]). The prophet Muhammad had an adopted son called "Zeid"([url=http://submission.org/QI#33%3A37]33:37[/url]).

Saint Paris: Yea well learned muslim here like Sweetnecta have told it's banned in Islam.

Like i have said: It doesn't matter what anybody thinks, what is important is that God's commandments are upheld.

Saint Paris: Now what of the Sunnah of the Prophet? Did he marry any mother of orphaned? Why did he marry Aisha when he already had a wife sauda? Didn't he break this rule too when he married Zaynab and others like her?

The prophet Muhammad is our perfect model. He was married to one woman(Khadija) from the age of 25 to 50, until she died. He had all his children with her except one. For the next 13 years of his life, he married aged widows of his friends who left many children. They needed a home and a fatherly figure. Apart from these, three other marriages where political. His close friends Abu Bakr and Omar insisted he married their daughters, Aisha and Hafsah, to establish traditional family ties between them. The other was an Egyptian(Maria), given to him as political gesture by the ruler of Egypt. The fact that he had only one child after the death of his first wife for the remaining 13 years o his life, tells us he never married his subsequent wives for sexual pleasure. This explains why he had only one child within the 13 years.

Saint Paris: Good luck to whenever you feel like coming to the aid of muslim women.


I am a human being like everyone else. I can not guide anybody. Those who desire guidance will be led to it by the merciful GOD. Our websites are there as reference materials.

Saint Paris: Good, let's hear what Islamic scholars say about this. 'The above is clear in pointing out that a innovated divorce (in all its various forms) is unlawful (and sinful) and contrary to the teachings of the Shariah. One must avoid Talaqal-Bid`a at all times.
However, this does not mean in any way that, a unlawful divorce will not be effected... Therefore, if a man pronounced three divorcesat once by stating to the wife: “I divorce you three times” or by saying: “I divorce you”, three times, then three divorces will be effected and the divorce will be irrevocable. The woman will be free to re-marry another man after the termination of her Iddah. She can not return to her former husband’s marriage unless she is divorced once again from her second husband.
This is the position held by all the Sunni schools of Islamic law, i.e, Hanafi, Shafi’i, Malikiand the Hanbali. This was also the view of the overwhelming majority of Sahaba (Allah be pleased with them) and Tabi’in (followers). Only the Ja’fariyya sect amongst the Shi’a and those who followed the literal meaning of the texts, like Imam Ibn Taymiyya and his student Ibn al-Qayyim differed with this view. There view, however, was not accepted by the majority of the Ummah (See Ibn Qudama in al-Mugni , V:7, P:104).
Some of the evidences declaring the three divorces to be in effect:
1) Allah Almighty says in the Qur’an:
“Divorce is (only permissible) twice, thereafter either retaining her honorably or releasing her kindly...If he divorces her (the third time), she will not be lawful for him unless she marries another husband (and he also divorces her)” (Surah al-Baqarah, V:229/230).
2) Sayyidatuna Aisha (Allah be pleased with her) reports that: A man pronounced three divorces to his wife. She (after her Iddah) married another man. The Messenger of Allah was asked if it was lawful for her to return to the first husband. He said: “ Not until they havesexual intercourse” (Recorded by Imam al-Bukhari in his Sahih)
It is clear from the above Hadith that three divorces at once will be effected. The woman was allowed to marry another man. The Prophet of Allah (Allah bless him and give him peace) would have surely pointed out, had three divorces did not come into effect at once.
http://qa.sunnipath.com/issue_view.asp?HD=1&ID=170&CATE=11

So you see, it's something you guys have to sort within yourselves.

Like i have emphasized, it does not matter what people say or think. What's important for any believer in God is that His laws are followed verbatim in the right context. The prophet could not have been ordered one thing in the Quran, then he goes on and does something different....it's impossible.

Saint Paris: No you're wrong, and even contradictory. Verses [2:226-227]Those who intend to divorce their wives shall wait four months; this one is saying four months while 65:4-5]As for the women who have reached menopause, if you have any doubts, their interim shall be three months. Which is it? Four months or three months? Now back at what you accuse 'islamophobes' of, this idea is supported by many scholars. It's even obvious in the quran.....

It's okay. I know it isn't easy to assimilate everything i put up there all at once. However, if you look closely at what i wrote, there is not a contradiction. You have just mixed everything up. 2:226-227 is talking about a waiting period before divorce. I even put it in bold in my post(check out point #2). 2:228 and 64:4 are talking about post divorce interim. Two different things. Re-read my post carefully.


Saint Paris: And that is the one whose menstruation has stopped due to her older age. Her `Iddah is three months instead of the three monthly cycles for those who menstruate, which is based upon the Ayah in (Surat) Al-Baqarah. ﴿see 2:228﴾ The same for the young, who have not reached the years of menstruation. Their `Iddah is three months like those in menopause. This is the meaning of His saying;

﴿وَاللَّـتِي لَمْ يَحِضْنَ﴾

(and for those who have no courses...) as for His saying;

﴿إِنِ ارْتَبْتُمْ﴾

http://www.islamicstudies.info/ibnkathir/ibnkathir.php?sid=65&tid=54196

Here another by Sayyid Abul Ala Maududi - Tafhim al-Qur'an - The Meaning of the Qur'an

13 They may not have menstruated as yet either because of young age, or delayed menstrual discharge as it happens in the case of some women, or because of no discharge atall throughout life which, though rare, may alsobe the case. In any case, the waiting-period of such a woman is the same as of the woman, who has stopped menstruation, that is three months from the time divorce was pronounced.

Here, one should bear in mind the fact that according to the explanations given in the Qur'an the question of the waiting period arisesin respect of the women with whom marriage may have been consummated, for there is no waiting-period in case divorce is pronounced before the consummation of marriage. (Al-Ahzab: 49). Therefore, making mention of the waiting-period for the girls who have not yet menstruated, clearly proves that it is not only permissible to give away the girl in marriage at this age but it is also permissible for the husband to consummate marriage with her. Now, obviously no Muslim has the right to forbid a thing which the Qur'an has held as permissible.

http://www.englishtafsir.com/Quran/65/index.html
Again know where to point your accusing fingers.


This is not from the quran. The translation and the tafsirs(quranic exegeses) you have used are obviously satanic. No where in the quran is it allowed to marry under-aged girls. Contrast my translation of 65:4 and that of other translations. Such translations and Tafsirs are gross and demonstrates how perverted these people are. Unfortunately, these are the kinds of translations and Tafsir(Quranic explanation) most muslims follow. As a result, they are been deprived of the truth embedded in the Quran. Equally unfortunate is that the non-muslims use these satanic sources as a standard for judging the Quran.

Here is the verse again:

[65:4-5]As for the women who have reached menopause, if you have any doubts, their interim shall be three months. As for those who do not menstruate, and discover that they are pregnant, their interim ends upon giving birth. Anyone who reverences GOD, He makes everything easy for him.

What the first half of the verse is saying is that the interim for a woman who has reached menopause is three months with effect from the time of divorce if one is uncertain such a woman could still conceive or not. The second half of the verse is with regards to women who have not reached menopause, and their menstrual cycles stops- then if such cessation of menstrual flow was due to pregnancy, their interim expires when they give birth. Otherwise, if the cessation was due to some abnormalities, then their interim is still three menstruation as mentioned in 2:228. This is what the verse means and not as the perverts will have us believe.

You being a neutral person wouldn't know which translation is correct. But here is the wisdom behind God ensuring that the Arabic was preserved. Let me show you how these perverts deliberately mistranslated the Quran. They broke down the verse into four parts instead of three, giving the idea that three different categories where mentioned.



[size=14pt]

Correct Way to break down the verse:

وَالّٰـٔى يَئِسنَ مِنَ المَحيضِ مِن نِسائِكُم إِنِ ارتَبتُم فَعِدَّتُهُنَّ ثَلٰثَةُ أَشهُرٍ

وَالّٰـٔى لَم يَحِضنَ وَأُولٰتُ الأَحمالِ أَجَلُهُنَّ أَن يَضَعنَ حَملَهُنَّ

وَمَن يَتَّقِ اللَّهَ يَجعَل لَهُ مِن أَمرِهِ يُسرًا
[/size]

[size=14pt]
Wrong Way:

وَالّٰـٔى يَئِسنَ مِنَ المَحيضِ مِن نِسائِكُم إِنِ ارتَبتُم فَعِدَّتُهُنَّ ثَلٰثَةُ أَشهُرٍ

وَالّٰـٔى لَم يَحِضنَ

وَأُولٰتُ الأَحمالِ أَجَلُهُنَّ أَن يَضَعنَ حَملَهُنَّ

وَمَن يَتَّقِ اللَّهَ يَجعَل لَهُ مِن أَمرِهِ يُسرًا
[/size]




There are many more deliberately mistranslated verses like that. The worst i have come across so far is 4:157 translation by Halali & Khan. And such translation was endorsed by the Saudi government. I urge any sincere muslim to go check it out. This perversion is from their HADITHS which they derive their so-called Tafsir(Quranic exegeses) from. They love under-age girls, why won't they promote such. That is why you find in HADITH books pornography, pros.titution and the likes being promoted in a subtle manner(breast feeding a man, Temporary marriage etcetera).

Saint Paris: 2:237 couldn't possibly be referring to both man and woman or do women pay dowry? But take a careful look at what the verse says again.
[2:237]If you divorce them before touching them, but after you had set the dowry for them, the compensation shall be half the dowry, unless they voluntarily forfeit their rights, or the party responsible for causing the divorce chooses to forfeit the dowry. To forfeit is closer to righteousness. You shall maintain the amicable relations among you. GOD is Seer of everything you do.
Isn't this khole? Khole is when women agree to forgo alimony and to repay their husbands any dowry in exchange of having the right to divorce. It is supported by this hadith: abudawud12.2220 . Is that fair?

This is a great tool in the hand of a man who wants to get rid of his wife and not pay her alimony and get back the dowry. All he has to do is to make her life miserable until she takes her freedom and forgoes her rights. This happens everyday where Sharia is practiced.

Please re-read the verse carefully. I despise verbosity, but sometimes it can't be helped. The keyword to note in the verse is: "or the party responsible". Dowry is paid by a man. However, if a woman is the cause for the divorce, the quran is saying she should forfeit the dowry- as this is more righteous. In other words, a woman can divorce the man. I don't want to have to explain everything. If you are still not convinced, then i shall elaborate.

Saint Paris: I do not see any justice in this. Again we still have the case of a man uttering divorce thrice which is even Permissible by sharia as i earlier pointed out This is the position held by all the Sunni schools of Islamic law, i.e, Hanafi, Shafi’i, Maliki and the Hanbali.

Like i have said all along, it does not matter what the Hanbali, Maliki, Hanafi or the Shafi'i SUNNI followers think. The fact remains it is un-quranic and unacceptable. All reasonable persons should speak against it.


Saint Paris: Now this is quite something. You don't believe in hadiths at all? All of them?

This is why: HADITH

Saint Paris: So what do you know about your Prophet's life or that he even existed?

Religion is not about the prophets or messengers and how they led their lives. Religion is about God and strict conformity with His laws. The messengers and Prophets were simply conduits for conveying a message from God to MAN. What is important is how these prophets taught us to submit to God and not the life style they led. The quran details all we need to know about GOD, SATAN, The Angels, Muhammad, Jesus and all other prophets and messengers. More importantly, the Quran details the complete pathway to GOD.

Saint Paris: do you choose and pick which to believe?

God forbid. I am trying hard to avoid HELL. Anything that comes from SATAN....I reject([url=http://submission.org/QI#6%3A112-113]6:112-113[/url]).

Saint Paris: Majority of Muslims do live by both tradition (hadiths) and ofcourse the Quran.

That's their decision. Every decision we make in this life have consequences, provided we are prepared for what comes out of it....No wahala! Anyway, the majority most often are led astray.([url=http://submission.org/QI#6%3A116]6:116[/url])

Saint Paris: The ball is in your court.

O, i didn't realize that!. ok, i have the ball now......dashing towards the opponents court....got passed the defenses......about to make a slam dunk....you better duck cos the rim may shatter.....DUuuNkkkk!!! Oh my shocked....Rim in pieces now cheesy.


I have a gift for you: *[url=https://1cabb384-a-62cb3a1a-s-sites.googlegroups.com/site/evidenceofgod/Quran.pdf?attachauth=ANoY7cqxefBGCU-DajQuUDmVVyKC1wSWXbaaLYj4Uls6pV5Uvjn2g7AoNmIUmCwJUFkmAYFfbGA4Datu1TQslXzJBTFKvS69XgQuFf2DwkYubPDfGyLU6_qvnxSTNVmCCFEfb_dTzQvNoNOjRyVw_HKKnuy6C0gqso8Zcb1g1d_QSEHvj6egCx_aSrMGZ36T7aDTaJ8JQhMOz3bueGL2mJ5TCd-4mi2h4A%3D%3D&attredirects=0]GIFT[/url]*

Peace to you Ma'am/Sir.


www.submission.org

www.miracleof19.org

www.masjidtucson.org

Islam for Muslims / Re: Divorce And Remarriage, Weird Laws by usisky(m): 7:50pm On Nov 29, 2012



PEACE to all.

pardon me Mr. Saint_paris, but i think you have made caricature of the Quranic law concerning divorce. If you really did study the quran yourself(not copy-paste from anti-Islam sites) you would realize the law as stated in the quran is actually to serve as a deterrent to those who are considering divorce. Unfortunately, what you have said concerning a man uttering "divorce" thrice to terminate his union with the spouse is what the reality is for the followers of the "SUNNI RELIGION". They objectify their women, treat them like piece of garbage and have no regard whatsoever for them. The "SHI'A RELIGION" also have their share of absurd teachings- like temporary marriage(which they deceptively
twist the meaning of the quranic word) which is nothing short of prost.itution.

Suffice it to say, none of what they advocate in their religion have any basis in the quran. example:

1)Polygamy- The quran never says marry four wives; it says marry the[b]mothers of orphaned[/b] children(up to 4 mothers of orphans- with strong conditions that even renders it impossible to take in another wife); it didn't say go and marry young women to satisfy your carnal needs.The intent is clear; to provide fatherly figure to the child. Neither did the quran say marry off juvenile female children. The essence is to alleviate sorrow and not to create it as we see with our dear "muslims" today. Someday, i will deal with this decisively- God willing.

2)Divorce- a man cannot divorce his wife by merely saying "talak"(divorce) thrice, this is satanic and un-quranic. The divorce described in the quran serves to protect the woman's interest and not vice versa.

Let me elucidate to you the beautiful quranic laws concerning divorce which you fail to appreciate the wisdom therein.

First off, God never shies from telling us the reality as is; divorces do happen, and more often than not- this is caused by irreconcilable differences between the couple. So you see, we submitters(Muslims) are grateful to God for giving us a complete and perfect scripture detailing(guidelines to) all we need to manage our affairs.....Masha'allah(Glory be to God)!!

Like i have mentioned earlier, reading the qruan, we see that God does not support divorce; in fact, encourages the continuation of marriage. Divorce must be resorted only in exceptional circumstances.

DIVORCE FROM QUR'AN

1)APPOINT AN ARBITRATOR :

[4:35]If a couple fears separation, you shall appoint an arbitrator from his family and an arbitrator from her family; if they decide to reconcile, GOD will help them get together. GOD is Omniscient, Cognizant.

This is the very first step that must be undertaken by a couple considering divorce. A couple may likely make decisions out of impulsive rage or naivete in which they most times regret their actions when they become sober. The idea of appointing arbitrators is to provide counseling to the feuding couple and if possible reconcile them. But if the two still insist on going ahead with their decision, the arbitrators ensure that the parties separate amicably in the manner designed by GOD. This also relegates the idea that a man can divorce a wife by simply uttering "talak" thrice.


2)Wait 4 months cooling off before divorce:

[2:226-227]Those who intend to divorce their wives shall wait four months (cooling off); if they change their minds and reconcile, then GOD is Forgiver, Merciful. If they go through with the divorce, then GOD is Hearer, Knower.

The idea is to give the couple sufficient time to reconsider their decisions; if such a decision was due to anger from either of the couple- this phase provides sufficient time to manage such anger.

However, if the estranged couple chooses separation they must go through with it equitably. There must be two equitable witnesses witness the divorce before GOD.

[65:2]Once the interim is fulfilled, you may reconcile with them equitably, or go through with the separation equitably. You shall have two equitable witnesses witness the divorce before GOD. This is to enlighten those who believe in GOD and the Last Day. Anyone who reverences GOD, He will create an exit for him.


3)Divorced women to observe an interim period:

[2:228]The divorced women shall wait three menstruation (before marrying another man). It is not lawful for them to conceal what GOD creates in their wombs, if they believe in GOD and the Last Day. (In case of pregnancy,) the husband's wishes shall supersede the wife's wishes, if he wants to remarry her. The women have rights, as well as obligations, equitably. Thus, the man's wishes prevail (in case of pregnancy). GOD is Almighty, Most Wise.

[65:4-5]As for the women who have reached menopause, if you have any doubts, their interim shall be three months. As for those who do not menstruate, and discover that they are pregnant, their interim ends upon giving birth. Anyone who reverences GOD, He makes everything easy for him. This is GOD's command that He sends down to you. Anyone who reverences GOD, He remits his sins, and rewards him generously.


From 2:228, we see that a divorced woman observes an interim of three menstruation before she thinks of marrying another man. This ensures that she is not pregnant at the time of divorce; therefore, the identity of the child a woman is carrying is preserved(in case she is pregnant). Also, the verse tells the woman to take back the man if he wishes to reconcile with her; if not for anything else, at least for the sake of her unborn child.

Same message is repeated in 65:4-5, this time it also addresses women who no longer menstruate. The verse also finalizes the case of a woman who is pregnant at the time of divorce mentioned in 2:228. It tells us their interim expires when they have given birth, in case the husband does not opt for reconciliation. Put succinctly, a divorced woman must observe three menstruation interim, if found pregnant- interim expires upon birth of the child. However, if she has reached menopausal age, her interim is still three months just to be sure. This shows how the quran explain itself when read from cover to cover(73:4).

NOTE: the sentence "as for those who do not menstruate" mentioned in 65:4 have been traditionally misconstrued by islamophobes to mean under-aged girls just to ridicule Islam; however, this is blatantly wrong, it refers to pregnant women as already stated in 2:228.


4)Exception for observing interim period:

[33:49]O you who believe, if you married believing women, then divorced them before having intercourse with them, they do not owe you any waiting interim (before marrying another man). You shall compensate them equitably, and let them go amicably.


After the fulfillment of the interim the divorced woman is free to do whatever she wants. Although the following verse is in context of widows, it appears to be applicable to divorcees too.

5)You Shall Observe the Pre-Marriage Interims

[2:234]Those who die and leave wives, their widows shall wait four months and ten days (before they remarry). Once they fulfill their interim, you commit no error by letting them do whatever righteous matters they wish to do. GOD is fully Cognizant of everything you do.

[2:235]You commit no sin by announcing your engagement to the women, or keeping it secret. GOD knows that you will think about them. Do not meet them secretly, unless you have something righteous to discuss. Do not consummate the marriage until their interim is fulfilled. You should know that GOD knows your innermost thoughts, and observe Him. You should know that GOD is Forgiver, Clement.


6)Divorced women have to be provided for:

This is probably one of the abused laws in the Quran. But God holds us responsible for our innermost thoughts. If one observes God’s laws then God makes it easy for him / her.


[65:7]The rich husband shall provide support in accordance with his means, and the poor shall provide according to the means that GOD bestowed upon him. GOD does not impose on any soul more than He has given it. GOD will provide ease after difficulty.


Alimony For Widows and Divorcees

[2:240]Those who die and leave wives, a will shall provide their wives with support for a year, provided they stay within the same household. If they leave, you commit no sin by letting them do whatever they wish, so long as righteousness is maintained. GOD is Almighty, Most Wise.

[2:241]The divorcees also shall be provided for, equitably. This is a duty upon the righteous.


7)Compensation when marriage is not consummated:

Breaking the Engagement

[2:236]You commit no error by divorcing the women before touching them, or before setting the dowry for them. In this case, you shall compensate them - the rich as he can afford and the poor as he can afford - an equitable compensation. This is a duty upon the righteous.

[2:237]If you divorce them before touching them, but after you had set the dowry for them, the compensation shall be half the dowry, unless they voluntarily forfeit their rights, or the party responsible for causing the divorce chooses to forfeit the dowry. To forfeit is closer to righteousness. You shall maintain the amicable relations among you. GOD is Seer of everything you do.


.8.)Divorced women entitled to stay in the same house she stayed before divorce:

Do Not Throw the Divorcees Out Onto the Streets

[2:231]If you divorce the women, once they fulfill their interim (three menstruations), you shall allow them to live in the same home amicably, or let them leave amicably. Do not force them to stay against their will, as a revenge. Anyone who does this wrongs his own soul. Do not take GOD's revelations in vain. Remember GOD's blessings upon you, and that He sent down to you the scripture and wisdom to enlighten you. You shall observe GOD, and know that GOD is aware of all things.

[65:6]You shall allow them to live in the same home in which they lived with you, and do not make life so miserable for them that they leave on their own. If they are pregnant, you shall spend on them until they give birth. If they nurse the infant, you shall pay them for this service. You shall maintain the amicable relations among you. If you disagree, you may hire another woman to nurse the child.


9)Divorce can be retracted twice:

In other words, if the couple reconciles after the first divorce and wish to be husband and wife again, they can re-marry. This is allowed for two divorce only. If the couple divorces third time they have to observe God's commandment in 2:230 (quoted below.) God makes it not-so-easy for the couple to divorce. This law serves as a deterrent for those who want a divorce for the third time and they would be very careful to take this step; a man who truly loves his wife will have to think deeply before divorcing her the third time knowing fully well the condition he is encumbered by(her marrying another man who may never divorce her; also consider the interim she must go through).

[2:229]Divorce may be retracted twice. The divorced woman shall be allowed to live in the same home amicably, or leave it amicably. It is not lawful for the husband to take back anything he had given her. However, the couple may fear that they may transgress GOD's law. If there is fear that they may transgress GOD's law, they commit no error if the wife willingly gives back whatever she chooses. These are GOD's laws; do not transgress them. Those who transgress GOD's laws are the unjust.

[2:232]If you divorce the women, once they fulfill their interim, do not prevent them from remarrying their husbands, if they reconcile amicably. This shall be heeded by those among you who believe in GOD and the Last Day. This is purer for you, and more righteous. GOD knows, while you do not know.

[2:230]If he divorces her (for the third time), it is unlawful for him to remarry her, unless she marries another man, then he divorces her. The first husband can then remarry her, so long as they observe GOD's laws. These are GOD's laws; He explains them for people who know.

Also note the words "It is not lawful for the husband to take back anything he had given her." in 2:229.


10)In case there is a baby during the interim:

If during the observation of the interim period it is discovered that the divorced women is pregnant then as stated in 65:4 the interim ends upon giving birth. God has decreed the following law dealing with the infant:

[2:233]Divorced mothers shall nurse their infants two full years, if the father so wishes. The father shall provide the mother's food and clothing equitably. No one shall be burdened beyond his ability. No mother shall be harmed on account of her infant, nor shall the father be harmed because of his infant. (If the father dies), his inheritor shall assume these responsibilities. If the infant's parents mutually agree to part, after due consultation, they commit no error by doing so. You commit no error by hiring nursing mothers, so long as you pay them equitably. You shall observe GOD, and know that GOD is Seer of everything you do.


11)Under what conditions can a woman divorce her husband?

Whichever party chooses for divorce must obey the laws as aforesaid. Normally divorce is mutually decided by the couple. If the aforesaid laws are observed, there could be a situation where either of the spouse may not give their consent but if the arbitrators from both the families decide that divorce is the best solution for the estranged couple then they would, nevertheless go through divorce. The divorce laws are applicable to both man and woman (4:35 and 2:237 indicate this) except that there are certain additional laws which a divorced woman has to observe.

The following seem to be the only conditions where a believing woman leaves her husband without observing the above laws. In fact, I think in this case even a formal divorce is not required under Quran. However if the law of the land requires a formal divorce then one must follow suit.

In Case of War

[60:10]O you who believe, when believing women (abandon the enemy and) ask for asylum with you, you shall test them. GOD is fully aware of their belief. Once you establish that they are believers, you shall not return them to the disbelievers. They are not lawful to remain married to them, nor shall the disbelievers be allowed to marry them. Give back the dowries that the disbelievers have paid. You commit no error by marrying them, so long as you pay them their due dowries. Do not keep disbelieving wives (if they wish to join the enemy). You may ask them for the dowry you had paid, and they may ask for what they paid. This is GOD's rule; He rules among you. GOD is Omniscient, Most Wise.



END REMARK: Mr. Sain_Paris, as you can clearly see, the laws regarding divorce in the quran aren't weird at all- the laws serves to discourage divorce as well as cater to the woman in the event that divorce ensues. The problem stems from your interpretation of the quran. I did not address your case of HADITH simply because i do not believe in them. Please endeavor to be a little patient when you are researching anything; otherwise, you may unwittingly be causing damage to another person's faith due misinformation. The Quran is truly easy to understand, the explanation of the quran is by the quran itself- because God is the teacher of the Quran([url=http://submission.org/QI#55%3A1-2]55:1-2[/url]). Those who do not allow themselves to be brainwashed; who do not give up their leeway to personal sovereignty and have pure hearts will grasp the message(56:79).


PEACE , and may God guide us all!!


1 Like

Islam for Muslims / Re: What is the Islamic View on Court Weddings? by usisky(m): 10:18pm On Nov 28, 2012



Peace onto everybody!

I think there's absolutely nothing wrong in court marriages or marriages registered in courts as long as God is observed. The laws in the Qur'an are dynamic and accommodates all societies regardless of the era. And by observing God ,i meant to say none of the Qur'anic laws concerning marriage or otherwise are breached.

Apart from all of God's laws in the Qur'an that all true believers must follow, they have to also be law abiding citizens and do whatever is legally required by their country of citizenship/residence, so it's important to know this beforehand. If the country/state of residence requires that newly weds register in a court, they may do so- as long as doing such does not contravene the injunctions in the Qur'an. In fact,state registered marriage is recognized all over the world and has several advantages in terms of citizenship, passport documentation, progeny identity, inheritance claims etc. These are neutral state laws and do not have any religious bearing that one need to worry about. I think part of Tbaba's post covers what i am trying to say:

tbaba1234:
....if what is meant is documenting the marriage and recording it, then this is something that is required, so as to protect people’s rights and prevent tampering with marriage. But if the conditions of marriage are not met or it involves anything that is contrary to sharee’ah stipulated in the Qur'an with regard to divorce and so on, then it is not permissible to do it, unless documentation of the marriage cannot be done otherwise, or if the person has no choice but to do it.
Sorry for editing your post a little. wink

Here are the important things to observe regarding marriage as dictated in the Quran:

(a) The person/partner is not an idolater/idolatress (2:221).

Since idolatry is the only unforgivable offense if maintained till death, so an idolatrous partner may never advocate the worship of God alone in the home or among the children (24:36). Although, there those who are the first to brand everyone as idolaters without realizing that they are the biggest hypocrites and idolaters themselves.

(b) Mutual Attraction and consent (4:24).

The couple should know each other and are old/mature enough to give their own consent (not be forced) to the marriage. In essence, their union should be brought about by love for each other; the couple must know each other well enough.

(c) Dowry, paid by the man beforehand (4:24, 33:50, 60:10).

There are no preset rules for the value or exchange medium for the dowry, which can be arrived at mutually.

Marriage according to the Quran is essentially a solemn pledge or 'contract' of commitment between a man and woman to love, support and be faithful to each to each other as man and wife for the rest of their lives. When a couple pledges their commitment to each other before God, they are considered married as per Quran - God is the witness.

In Islam, no one has the "religious authority" to permit two people to be married. That permission is granted by God, the ultimate witness and knower of the couple's innermost intentions. Several people are not aware that in Islam there is actually no clergy system where matters of your soul/religion need to be authorized or mentored by a religious cleric. This is because Islam is based on an individual's direct relationship and accountability with God where no one can decide or take responsibility for another's soul.

May God guide us all!!!

Islam for Muslims / Re: Only One God In Islam.am Confused by usisky(m): 7:24pm On Nov 21, 2012



Salaam Sweetnecta.

Mr. sweetnecta, you see, if your mind is too rigid, and if you harbor preconceived beliefs- no matter the explanations i give- you'll never see the truth in them. All i ask is you take the time to analyze my posts.

Sweetnecta: @Usisky: God, Alone is able to do all things, with or without anyone, period.

You are spot on sweetnectar; God is certainly able to do all things all by Himself without help from any entity. But just because He can doesn't mean He does or should. May i then ask why God delegates certain duties to the angels even though He could do it all by Himself? Take a look:

[77:1] (Angels) dispatched in succession.
[77:2] To drive the wind.
[77:3] Stir up clouds.
[77:4] Distribute the provisions.
[77:5] Deliver messages.
[77:6] Good news, as well as warnings.

I am certain God is able to do all these by Himself, yet He assigns the angels to such tasks.

Another:
[70:4] The angels, with their reports, climb to Him in a day that equals fifty thousand years.

Could God not take reports by Himself? I am sure He could, yet he assigns such task to the angels.

You see my friend, God is not the same as the tyrannical and selfish leaders we have who love taking credit for everything without acknowledging their subordinates or servants. On the contrary, God is the MOST GRACIOUS. For this reason alone, God acknowledges the involvement of others when due.

I have already expounded much in my earlier posts. If you want to debunk my position on this, all you gotta do is point out to me one verse where God uses the plurality to address Himself when speaking about His attributes; at least, i would assume if there are instances God should use such "royal address" it should be in those verses that shows the attributes He alone possesses.


Sweetnecta: For example, when Gabriel was interacting with Mary as he is delivering the news of the impending birth of her son, Jesus [as], Mary after securing the safety of Allah against the person before her, upon her realizing that this man was a messenger from God, she addressed God directly, while Gabriel delivered the responses of God to her.

You find that in the action of Zakariah [as], just as well.


This shows you are not really following my arguments. We are not talking about someone addressing God with plurality. Instead, the way God uses it in the Quran.


Sweetnecta: It is common in yoruba nobility and even family that a powerful like parent addresses himself before the child in the we, us, our, talking about himself alone. even husband to his wife in a way of honoring himself. a wife can say we are enough as a wife and you dont need another.

You may be correct on this, but as far as its use in the quran- it may not exactly tally with your idea.

Sweetnecta: Allah is complete and there is no reason to add anyone with Him to make US, WE, or OUR of the Quran.

Nor did i ever say God(ALLAH) is incomplete. Acknowledging the involvement/efforts of your servants/subordinates takes nothing away from your persona.

Sweetnecta: Using your logic, we all agreed that Allah is the ONLY Creator of Adam [as]. Allah uses "WE" in the creation of "man from nothing" in verse 67 of Surah Maryam when He says

Does man not remember that We created him before, while he was nothing?

obviously in this We, you have agreed that Gabriel was not part of creation of Adam and definitely, the prophet is bani Adam [sa]. Allah is consistent.

Firstly, God did not creating the human being from nothingness. God created MAN from "Aged Mud"(15:26).

[15:26] We created the human being from AGED MUD, like the potter's clay.

[15:28] Your Lord said to the angels, "I am creating a human being from AGED MUD, like the potter's clay.


And who says the angels could not have participated in the creation process? In fact, the above verses will seal this discussion we are having. Look closely at the two verses above; In 15:28, prior to creation of man, God declares His intentions about creating the human being to the angels using the first person singular: "I am creating"; in this case, man is yet to be created, so no point using "we" to denote any participation. On the other hand, in 15:26, God uses "We created", denoting possible participation of the angels in such process"(e.g. bringing the clay to Him or even shaping man into form etcetera). I hope this helps.

I could be wrong anyway. it is possible certain cases may be as you guys have said. Personally, i haven't analyzed all the cases so i can't rule out the possibility of me being wrong. My views so far are what i can fathom from studying the Quran.

PEACE!!


Islam for Muslims / Re: Only One God In Islam.am Confused by usisky(m): 12:07pm On Nov 21, 2012


Peace Tbaba!

tbaba1234: ^what a load of rubbish?

I will assume that your response was impulsive.....So, you're forgiven! What may be bullsh.it to you may not necessarily be for another. My posts are meant for all those who read them, and not for any individual in particular. Whenever you fill nauseous from going through my posts....KINDLY IGNORE!!!

tbaba1234: Even today the average Arab still uses the plural tense to address elders n respected people. you can not divorce the quran from the qualities of Arabic.

I don't doubt what you're saying. However, what i am saying is that in the case of the Quran this isn't exactly the case. All you gotta do is disprove me. I have given concrete examples, you need to do the same. You need to explain to us why God does not use such first person plural consistently in addressing His majesty if the case is as you have stated. The examples i gave earlier are solid enough for those who reflect deeply. I will further disprove your notion with more examples. Why is it that we find that whenever God expresses His majestic qualities in the Quran the first person singular is consistently used if indeed your claim was correct? Let me illustrate.

1)

[2:30]............" They said, "Will You place therein one who will spread evil therein and shed blood, while we sing Your praises, glorify You, and uphold Your absolute authority?" He said, "I know what you do not know."

IF you recollect the context of the above verse; here, God speaks about His omniscience with respect to that of the angels. This was during the creation of Adam when God tells the angels only He is all knowing, even though they posses great knowledge too. You can clearly see the first person singular "I" used by God to describe such majestic quality- OMNISCIENCE.


2)

[2:160] As for those who repent, reform, and proclaim, I redeem them. I am the Redeemer, Most Merciful.

Here again, we see God using the first person singular in addressing His qualities. Why? Well, because ONLY God can grant absolution.


3)

[2:186] When My servants ask you about Me, I am always near. I answer their prayers when they pray to Me. The people shall respond to Me and believe in Me, in order to be guided.

Again, singular tenses used. Here, God expresses His omnipresence as well as the ability to answer prayers. We only pray to a god, and only a god can answer prayers.


I have only drawn examples from sura 2(chapter 2), there are more cases like these from other suras too. You may take the time to research if you care. But quite clearly, the use of plural forms by God in some verses only occur where there is possibility of an audience to, or participation of other entities given a particular situation. I have already illustrated this in the prior post.


tbaba1234: Allah revealed the quran in clear Arabic, the more you know of classical arabic, the better your understanding.

This is one subject I'd like to have a debate/discussion with you on. You have been spreading this pernicious idea on this forum and i must say- this only shows your lack of understanding of the Quran or at worst, the concept of what GOD represents.

tbaba1234: Again clear does not mean simple, I can clearly explain a matter in a language you do not understand. I can clearly solve a calculus problem but someone without an understanding will not have a clue.

You can keep ridiculing the Quran without realizing what you're doing. Here, i will let the readers pit your words against that of the Quran itself.

QUR'AN
[2:99] We have sent down to you such clear revelations, and only the wicked will reject them.

[2:185] Ramadan is the month during which the Quran was revealed, providing guidance for the people, clear teachings, and the statute book......

[2:209] If you backslide, after the clear proofs have come to you, then know that GOD is Almighty, Most Wise.

[22:16] We have thus revealed[b] clear revelations herein[/b], then GOD guides whoever wills (to be guided).

[54:17] We MADE THE QURAN EASY to understand(remember). Does any of you wish to learn?

[54:22] We MADE THE QURAN EASY to understand(remember). Does any of you wish to learn?

[54:32] We MADE THE QURAN EASY to understand(remember). Does any of you wish to learn?

[54:40] We MADE THE QURAN EASY to understand(remember). Does any of you wish to learn?


tbaba1234: STOP spreading misinformation and commit yourself to truely learning this book. Do so with an intellectual humility n you may find guidance.

I had invited you to a discussion prior, but you declined. When you are ready to have such a discourse, just Hola at me wink. Till then, keep your opinions to yourself.


PEACE!!!


Islam for Muslims / Re: Only One God In Islam.am Confused by usisky(m): 6:55pm On Nov 20, 2012


Peace nzechu and other readers.

First, no blame to you for asking such a crucial question. you see, in the world we live today, where there are many belief systems as well as doctrines, with many people espousing the idea of multiple deities(gods); many people tend to be intrigued when they read the quran and find the usage of plural tenses in reference to God. They then question(just like you have) "what explanation there's to that?". Most muslims explain this by saying it is a "royal address". In other words, it simply indicates God's majesty- as it's been used in the English language. However, i beg to differ in that. The quran tells us it(quran) is a book with no ambiguity(39:28), clear(2:99) and detailed(6:114, 7:52). Therefore, if one is to follow the "correct methodology"(73:4) in analyzing the quran, we will inevitably come to the understanding as to why such first person plural tense is used. Before i acquaint you with the explanation, i would like you to know that the overwhelming message of the Quran, where there is absolutely no compromise is that "GOD is ONE"-(2:133, 163; 4:171; 5:73; 6:19; 9:31; 12:39; 13:16; 14:48, 52; 16:22, 51; 18:110; 21:108; 22:34; 37:4; 38:65; 39:4; 40:16; 41:6; 112:1).

HERE:

I will illustrate the accuracy and consistency of language of the Quran with few examples. I believe this will give you better insight on the question you raised.

Whenever the first person plural form is used by the Almighty, it invariably indicates participation of other entities, such as the angels. For example, the revelation of this Quran involved participation of the angel Gabriel and the prophet Muhammad. Hence the use of the plural form in 15:9: "We revealed this scripture, and we will preserve it." The plural form here simply reflects the fact that the angel Gabriel and the prophet Muhammad participated in the process of delivering the Quran.

Another example has to do with blowing the breath of life into Adam and Jesus. The creation of Adam took place in heaven and God directly blew into him the breath of life. Thus, the first person singular form is consistently used: "I blew into Adam from My spirit" (15:29, 38:72). The creation of Jesus, on the other hand, took place on earth, and Gabriel carried God's "word" to Mary. The plural form is consistently used when referring to the creation of Jesus (21:91,66:12).

When God spoke to Moses directly, without the mediation of angels, we see that God is speaking exclusively in the singular tense: "I am God. There is no other god besides Me. You shall worship Me alone, and observe the regular contact prayers (Salat) to commemorate Me." (20:12-14).Consequently, whenever the worship of God is mentioned, the singular tense is used(51:56).

Therefore, the usage of such plural tenses in reference to GOD simply denotes the participation of other entities in carrying out God's commands. The word choices in the quran are not accidental; rather, a deliberate design. There are many examples i could give, but i hope you are able to get the idea from my post.

QUR'AN
[2:163] Your god is one god; there is no god but He, Most Gracious, Most Merciful.

[14:52] This is a proclamation for the people, to be warned herewith, and to let them know that He is ONLY ONE GOD, and for those who possess intelligence to take heed.

[16:51] GOD has proclaimed: "Do not worship two gods; there is ONLY ONE GOD. You shall reverence Me alone."


PEACE!!



Islam for Muslims / Re: The Most Peculiar And Awesome Things About Studying The Quran.. by usisky(m): 8:10am On Nov 12, 2012
smileyprin: i came across this thread pretty late but lemme clarify sum fins. 1.The quran is easy to understand in d aspect of reciting and memorzing but surely nt in d aspect of translatio nd inference ,to do that u need to know a lotta things.




Here's the big problem: People who say they believe in God do so because they are convinced God is almighty. Now, if that were the case, why do the same people have difficulty in accepting God's words? God is cognizant of and controls everything in the universe down to sub-atomic matter(4:85, 7:54, 31:16). if God says He has rendered the Quran easy to comprehend, why then should one who claims to be a believer in such a God doubt His words?

PEACE to You Brother. By your opinion; the quran is only good for recitation and memorization. One then wonders if the message is of any relevance. The quran calls itself a statute book(Furqaan) i.e a book of law. Of what import is a book of law if it is only to be revered, recited and memorized but without heeding its laws?

Yes, the quran does contain certain phenomenon that aren't easy to translate, especially by people of earlier times. But certainly that shouldn't be the case today. However, i must make this point clear to you: the bulk of the quran contains verses that are straight forward; in fact, those verse are the essence of the message itself. Let me cite two examples for you dear friend:

1)In chapter five verse six of the quran, God commands:

Ablution

[5:6] O you who believe, when you observe the Contact Prayers (Salat), you shall: (1) wash your faces, (2) wash your arms to the elbows, (3) wipe your heads, and (4) wash your feet to the ankles. If you were unclean due to sexual orgasm, you shall bathe. If you are ill, or traveling, or had any digestive excretion (urinary, fecal, or gas), or had (sexual) contact with the women, and you cannot find water, you shall observe the dry ablution (Tayammum) by touching clean dry soil, then rubbing your faces and hands. GOD does not wish to make the religion difficult for you; He wishes to cleanse you and to perfect His blessing upon you, that you may be appreciative.


Here brother, is this verse difficult to understand? This is supposed to be the words of the "Almighty God" to muslims... yet, He gives such straight forward command and they fail to observe it as is. Why? Do they not understand what the above verse means? Well,for me, it is easy to see why the muslims can't observe this simple 4-step ablution. this is because the verse is addressed to those who truly believe in God; hence why the verse starts with "O you who believe".


2)Here is another:

[72:18] The places of worship(masjid) belong to GOD; do not call on anyone else beside GOD.


Is this also hard to grasp? Do you or do you not call prophet Muhammad's name, the names of Imams and the saints in the places of worship? Do you think you know better than Muhammad who wrote down this commandments? Please enlighten me dear friend. You see, i can list hundreds of things the quran says while the muslims do the opposite. The muslims waste their entire lives reciting and memorizing the quran in a foreign tongue that they fail to see the real message of the scripture. By the very meaning of Islam(submission) and Muslim(One who submits), when you fail to do exactly as commanded by God, you cannot claim to be in Islam or a Muslim at all. You must submit your will to God to qualify as such. That's what all the prophets, messengers and all patriarchs of the past did....you should emulate them.

PEACE!!!

Islam for Muslims / Re: The Most Peculiar And Awesome Things About Studying The Quran.. by usisky(m): 3:00pm On Nov 04, 2012
^^^Alright then. Let me ask just one question. I think it is wise to start this way.

A while ago, you were defending the shariah law of apostacy(irtidah) in "ISLAM" to a "non-muslim" audience. Please re-state your position on that. I want to know the justification for killing people who leave ISLAM?
Islam for Muslims / Re: The Most Peculiar And Awesome Things About Studying The Quran.. by usisky(m): 2:54pm On Nov 04, 2012
^^^Can we just have a fresh discussion?. Don't just give up on me yet....i need guidance o!

Frankly tbaba, i would want us to have a sensible discussion and i want us to start somewhere. If you don't feel like addressing my questions, then feel free to ask yours.
Islam for Muslims / Re: The Most Peculiar And Awesome Things About Studying The Quran.. by usisky(m): 2:17pm On Nov 04, 2012
^^^
Tbaba, Tbaba, Tbaba. Why art thou avoiding discussions with me enh?

Please garner all the energy you can, i want us to have this discussion. You have a habit of avoiding my questions, why?

Even from the thread link you gave, i asked several questions but somehow they were cleverly avoided. I despice having empty discussions; i would expect as i ask questions you at least attempt to answer. I would do similar. Please!
Islam for Muslims / Re: The Most Peculiar And Awesome Things About Studying The Quran.. by usisky(m): 1:56pm On Nov 04, 2012

tbaba1234: I have had many discussions with you and i have shown you why the Quran can not be understood without understanding the seerah.

Can you please refer me to the thread where we had such discussions? Further, i wanna know if this idea is just your own personal opinion or it is something evident from the quran itself?. The quran that i have in my possession speaks nothing as you have concluded above. Instead, the quran says it is a guidance for all the people(all of humanity); as such, the quran has got to be easy to understand-otherwise , the majority of the people may not derive any benefit from an incomprehensible scripture from God almighty. In any case, the quran readily affirms that it's easy to understand if only we make a conscious effort to understand it and not seeking its meaning from misguided scholars.

[2:185] Ramadan is the month during which the Quran was revealed, providing guidance for the people, clear teachings, and the statute book........

[54:17,22,32,40] We made the Quran easy to learn(remember). Does any of you wish to learn?


Here are some of the claims you have made from before:

1)The quran cannot be understood unless one is well knowledgeable in classical arabic.
2)The quran cannot be understood without the Ahadiths.
3)The seerah is a requirement for understanding the Quran.

Please prove this assertions to me while providing quranic basis for such reasoning.



tbaba1234:
What is the purpose of your questions? Are you interested in discovering truth or you just want a debate? It is as clear as night and day

My reason for asking is to get your perspective on those. I just want us to have a discussion tthat's all. Please address the questions.

tbaba1234:
"If anyone disobeys Allah and His Messenger he is indeed on a clearly wrong path." [Al-Ahzab, 33:36]

"He that obeys Allah and His Messenger has already attained the great victory." [Al-Ahzab, 33:71].

Yes indeed! who ever disobeys the messenger is clearly in error. But how do one obey the messenger now that he is dead?
well quite simple; by following the words(message) that came out directly from the mouth of the messenger inspired by God. Every messenger has a message, in the case of Muhammad- it was the Quran(the messenger dies, but the message never dies). Withoout the message(risala) there cannot be a messenger(rasool). If the people were obeying the messenger, they would realize the quran was the only message he ever preached(6:19, 10:15, 50:45). It is not enough to admire the beauty of the quran and sing songs of it in arabic; the real deal is in heeding its message(the content is what matters).

Please address my questions form earlier post and if possible also(1,2,3)of this post. We will go further afterwards.
you may choose to ask questions too. I think we should start a fresh thread, what do think?? just discussions for a better understanding- nothing to it.

PEACE!!

Islam for Muslims / Re: The Most Peculiar And Awesome Things About Studying The Quran.. by usisky(m): 11:18pm On Nov 03, 2012
^^^Mr. Tbaba! Would've really appreciate if you at least attempt to answer my questions,please.
We would still discourse further after the above.
Islam for Muslims / Re: The Most Peculiar And Awesome Things About Studying The Quran.. by usisky(m): 8:22pm On Nov 03, 2012


tbaba1234: .......The Quran gives you an inside view of the seerah of the prophet( peace and blessings be upon him), People who say they are Quran only do not even understand the Quran. The Quran and the seerah are inseparable.

PEACE Tbaba! May i ask what exactly you mean by the bold part above? Well, i am a quran only advocate, and from what you have alluded above, i do not understand the quran. Right? I am guessing you do understand the quran hence your reason for making such remark.I would like to ask a few questions so i can get some enlightenment from you.

1) Was the prophet muhammad unlettered(illiterate)? if yes, then explain how come. I will appreciate some quranic verses to back that up.

2)Are there verses in the quran that cannot be understood? if yes, please state why.

3)What is the significance of the Eid you just concluded and what does the animal slaughter symbolize?

just a few questions dear learned one. Let us start with these

PEACE!!

Programming / Re: Abeg O,help Me With Dis VB.NET Code by usisky(m): 8:17am On Oct 14, 2012

^^^^Your code should work, but....
Lakulos: I trying to write a program on a simple calculator using visual studio 2008,i want the user to be able to enter values in 2 textboxes and submit the result to a third textbox,the problem am encountering is that the program is not bringing out error and it is not also it is not calculating anything. This is my code.

0-Dim num1 as integer
1-Dim num2 as integer
2-Dim ans as integer
3-num1=val(textbox1.text)
4-num2=val(textbox2.text)
5-ans=val(textbox3.text)
6-ans=num1+num2.
Thanks.


@line5: what's this supposed to be doing? assigning unknown value of Textbox to Your result! code can't work!
@line6: correct! but where are you displaying this result? certainly not Textbox3.

anyway, change line5 to: ans = num1+num2, then line6 to: Textbox3.Text = ans. should work .

also,

Dim num1 As Integer = Integer.Parse(TxtNum1.Text)
Dim num2 As Integer = Integer.Parse(TxtNum2.Text)
TxtResult.Text = num1 + num2


Advice: If you're a newbie, or even a seasoned programmer for that matter; always get the logic of your intended program done on a paper before rushing to your editor....It reduces Your brain processing time.


Gaming / Re: Fifa13 Is Out(and Breaking Records) by usisky(m): 3:52pm On Sep 28, 2012
^^^well, until they truly play FIFA....they won't understand! Being a PES fan all my life since ISS on SEGA. But my word! When i decided to give the FIFA advocates the benefit of doubt....i played FIFA 11 And then 12. Only then did i realize EA has finally edged over KONAMI...significantly!. FIFA 13 must be awesom-est....no doubt. Just my 2-cents...notn' much.
Computers / Re: Let's Discuss Embedded System by usisky(m): 3:37pm On Sep 28, 2012
^^^Hello there mate! 80K? That's way too much man! Try googling the following: FTB2000 series flow sensor. It's $80 or there about. Although,there are complete flow rate modules that takes care of the gritties for you; but these are kinda expensive. I think the sensor above is quite ok....at least from the datasheet.
Gaming / Re: Official NL FIFA 13 Thread by usisky(m): 7:52pm On Sep 27, 2012
EA's FIFA is really the king of the footie game so far. Had being a die hard KONAMI's PES fan For so long until FIFA11, 12 and now 13. The game paly in FIFA is simply mind blowing. The addition of tactical defending as well as impact engine on FIFA12 was out of this world. And now...with newer features on 13, one can expect FIFA to continue its dominance amongst those who know how soccer should be played. Can't wait to get my hands on that beast......KONAMI lovers.....u better try FIFA even for once

1 Like

Computers / Re: Let's Discuss Embedded System by usisky(m): 4:24pm On Sep 27, 2012
PS: what your friend needs is a flow rate sensor. There are some ultrasonic flow rate sensors too. Google is ur best friend; use it.
Computers / Re: Let's Discuss Embedded System by usisky(m): 4:17pm On Sep 27, 2012
^^^Well because with ultrasonics, u can measure d exact water level in d tank; i mean down to a few centimeters and with as low as 3% deviation. On d other hand, liquid sensor will only provide u with d relative water level in d tank. It all depends on what ur application demands anyway. If all u need is to detect if tank is filled; then a simple liquid sensor suffices. But if d actual level of fluid in d tank is indeed wat needs to be known, then, i am afraid u cannot escape d use of specialized schemes as ultrasonics ranging.
Programming / Re: Embedded Systems by usisky(m): 7:20am On Sep 27, 2012
^^^^hi there! I think u should've at least given it a try b4 u make conclusions. Every C compiler in the world must support such.....it's part of the specs.

proteus VSM(virtual simulation machine)? Yeah sure! I do use proteus, and i think many professionals around the globe use it too. It's a great tool for debugging/simulation. Well, i'd say i'm fairly proficient at it. Also, i think it is d best there is for now. Peace!

(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (of 15 pages)

(Go Up)

Sections: politics (1) business autos (1) jobs (1) career education (1) romance computers phones travel sports fashion health
religion celebs tv-movies music-radio literature webmasters programming techmarket

Links: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10)

Nairaland - Copyright © 2005 - 2024 Oluwaseun Osewa. All rights reserved. See How To Advertise. 314
Disclaimer: Every Nairaland member is solely responsible for anything that he/she posts or uploads on Nairaland.