Logicboy03:
Davidylan and Anony showing that they can never understand the simple burden of proof. They have to use religious loigc;

Logicboy03:

Parameters of proof? Pulled that one out of your azz.

The fact still remains that the burden of proof remains on the claimant.

You claim that there is a god, prove it.

seyibrown: How would you prove to a blind man that the shirt you are wearing is purple?
How would the first boy prove to the other boy in the cartoon that he has an 'atom' rather than a 'baseball'? EDIT -- (To clarify question number two: I meant if the first boy had an atom instead of a baseball, how would he prove it when the second boy asks him to prove he indeed has an Atom.)
How do you expect me to prove to you that I had a dream in which I saw a dog with two heads?

Hi Atheists in the house, please kindly try to answer the above three questions. Thanks in advance.

Your questions are dumb because

1. I dont have to prove to a blind man about a color because HE IS BLIND, HE CAN'T CONFIRM IT, EVEN IF I OFFER PROOF.

2. The boy with the brain would have to show the brainwashed one asking the silly question images of an atom using scanning tunneling microscope (STM) or atomic force microscope (AFM)

3. I wont ask you to proof your dream because your dreams are your own illusion, created by your brain when your reflexes have control of your nerves. your dreams your problem, why should i ask you to prove an illusion.

Pls, pls, Black christians, you are disappointing me, white christians at other forums do not ask such questions as this, rather they will ask me to proof that E=mc squared does not prove God.

below is a micrograph of your atom

@seyibrown

Even if its an atom, the burden of proof always starts from the claimant.

As for the 3rd question:
Your dream, whatever it is, is in your head. It has no reality outside of your head. You can believe it all you want, but it is still a non-reality fabricated in your head.
Same goes for the idea of god. God is a fabulous dream. But is only a dream.

More atheists, please! I was expecting better answers than what you have proferred so far!
I am trying to show you that God exists and you are not helping me know how you 'atheistically' expect me to show you!


Logicboy03, darling! Omo Jesu last last! How now?

seyibrown: More atheists, please! I was expecting better answers than what you have proferred so far!
I am trying to show you that God exists and you are not helping me know how you 'atheistically' expect me to show you!


Logicboy03, darling! Omo Jesu last last! How now?

you have a weird method.

seyibrown: More atheists, please! I was expecting better answers than what you have proferred so far!
I am trying to show you that God exists and you are not helping me know how you 'atheistically' expect me to show you!


Logicboy03, darling! Omo Jesu last last! How now?

what if god exists? what then?

alfaman2:

what if god exists? what then?

then am f4cked

8 comments, yet no one, beside plaetton, has attempted the questions asked.
I'd like to know the answers to these questions my inhouse atheists.

MacDaddy01:


I have told you, stop supporting nonsense in order to defend your theist brethren!

If you cant see the obvious flaws in the questions, then you have no brains

o' knight! O' wise one! O' defender of the faith! Please I am mentally blind, make me peep into your mental resolution. Tell me why it's an invalid question.

Stop whinning. Here are your answers:

How would you prove to a blind man that the shirt you are wearing is purple?
There is no way you can prove that to a blind man. What exactly is the point of proving that to a blind man if I may ask?


How would the first boy prove to the other boy in the cartoon that he has an 'atom' rather than a 'baseball'? (To clarify question number two: I meant if the first boy had an atom instead of a baseball, how would he prove it when the second boy asks him to prove he indeed has an Atom.)
He doesn't have to prove he has an atom because he never claimed he has an atom. The day he says, he has an atom, he would need to prove it. Until that day, sir, your question is moot.


How do you expect me to prove to you that I had a dream in which I saw a dog with two heads?
I don't expect you to prove anything. You are freaking free in this world to live your life as you want regardless of my "expectations".

seyibrown: More atheists, please! I was expecting better answers than what you have proferred so far!
I am trying to show you that God exists and you are not helping me know how you 'atheistically' expect me to show you!


Logicboy03, darling! Omo Jesu last last! How now?

[size=14pt]JESUS CHRIST.[/size] SOMEONE IS BLIND

@ seyibrown: But God is generally understood as a being that is non-physical. Yet in your analogy you posit a physical thing (i.e the atom)

alfaman2: Stop whinning. Here are your answers:

How would you prove to a blind man that the shirt you are wearing is purple?
There is no way you can prove that to a blind man. What exactly is the point of proving that to a blind man if I may ask?


How would the first boy prove to the other boy in the cartoon that he has an 'atom' rather than a 'baseball'? (To clarify question number two: I meant if the first boy had an atom instead of a baseball, how would he prove it when the second boy asks him to prove he indeed has an Atom.)
He doesn't have to prove he has an atom because he never claimed he has an atom. The day he says, he has an atom, he would need to prove it. Until that day, sir, your question is moot.


How do you expect me to prove to you that I had a dream in which I saw a dog with two heads?
I don't expect you to prove anything. You are freaking free in this world to live your life as you want regardless of my "expectations".

To the first question. You did well. But, let's assume their was a nuclear explosion leading to spread of wavelengths that attack every colour except purple. The blind man just bought a purple suit and needed clarification that what he has is the real thing. How do you prove it to him?
Secondly, this one is hilarious. Read the question again.
Number 3. She's not talking about freedom or right to live here, please. The question really is, is there any way to proof particular dreams?

plaetton: As for the 3rd question:
Your dream, whatever it is, is in your head. It has no reality outside of your head. You can believe it all you want, but it is still a non-reality fabricated in your head.
Same goes for the idea of god. God is a fabulous dream. But is only a dream.

This is a good point. Though I don't think it answered the question. That the dream only existed in my head, doesn't mean that the non-real activities that happened never did. The question is, how do I/you proof to you/me I/you saw a dog with two heads in this phase of non-reality.

alfaman2:

what if god exists? what then?

Exists where?

seyibrown: am trying to show you that God exists

Exists in your house or church? Where so we can go see him, and which God by the way?

Reyginus: This is a good point. Though I don't think it answered the question. That the dream only existed in my head, doesn't mean that the non-real activities that happened never did. The question is, how do I/you proof to you/me I/you saw a dog with two heads in this phase of non-reality.

I think the problem here is the question, to me it has no r/ship with proving the existence of God. Pls christians, if u can't prove the existence of God, don't try, instead of ending up making a fool of urselves.

Now proving a dream? First of all almost everybody dreams? We all know that dreams exists. Telling someone about my dream is like gisting to another an event that happens in his absence. Both narrations are always flawed with what we feel because we cant narrate such events exactly as we saw or dreamt.

The fact is that there is really no need for a prove because Everybody know dreams exists and what u tell me is either what u tink u saw or what u saw. What do I need the proof for? Again we all know that dream is almost equivalent to thinking or imagining.

Atheists need prove for existence of God because religous folks tell them of how God has done wonders in their lives without explaining how they knew it was God.

All this question proves is that, God is just like a dream or imagination. Pls stop comparing the proof of God to our dreams, u just make his existence worse that what people already feel.

I believe God exists bt I don't believe he interfares in our lives, I think there is so much we don't know about life. I don't argue what I don't know.

Uyi Iredia: @ seyibrown: But God is generally understood as a being that is non-physical. Yet in your analogy you posit a physical thing (i.e the atom)

Why then do Atheists want us to show them this non-physical God like he was a baseball?

I use the atom because you can see an atom with the right 'instrument'......

seyibrown:

Why then do Atheists want us to show them this non-physical God like he was a baseball?

I use the atom because you can see an atom with the right 'instrument'......

Well this non physical God did appear in the flesh or shall I say spirit flesh back in the days to Moses when he got the 10 commandments but nowadays in the age of Information Technology mobile phones, internet etc. As for the atom forget it God has to start speaking for himself & prove his own existence. The mindset of the atheist is completely different from the theist.

manmustwac: Well this non physical God did appear in the flesh or shall I say spirit flesh back in the days to Moses when he got the 10 commandments but nowadays in the age of Information Technology mobile phones, internet etc. As for the atom forget it God has to start speaking for himself & prove his own existence. The mindset of the atheist is completely different from the theist.

gbam