Looking at these pictures keenly, consider these facts:

1. Beach is like a road side, certain meters from the water belong to government. It is a public space.


2. The coastal road would have affected only the structure of land mark beach which only belongs to him. But because of his noise the road was brought in front of the structure making government to lay claim to the coast that legally belongs to it, sand filling the water to create more space for the road.

3.Since land mark beach ⛱️ structure is not affected, no more compensation

4. Does land mark beach owner even have approval for the structure in the first place?

5.

.

The landmark building was never going to be affected.

Only the temporary structures he erected on Government land and the beach will be affected.

And where the temporary structures are located belongs to the FG not to landmark.

The beach also belong to the FG not landmark..the beach is a public property

Paraman:
The landmark building was never going to be affected.

Only the temporary structures he erected on Government land and the beach will be affected.

And where the tents are located belongs to the FG not to landmark.

The beach also belong to the FG not landmark..the beach is a public property

And the the buildings he erected in front of the beach would be useless because the beach is gone

Biodun556:


And the the buildings he erected in front of the beach would be useless because the beach is gone

I don't think the business in the buildings can become useless without access to the beach.

You can still have lots of fun in Landmark without going close to the beach

Paraman:
I don't think the business in the buildings can become useless without access to the beach.

You can still have lots of fun in Landmark without going close to the beach

Good to know

No compensation since the building is not going to be affected...I think the owner is just shouting because he won't have direct access to the beach again which is his selling point..Now to access the beach from landmark, you have to cross the road to the other side.

Biodun556:


Good to know

I'm not a fan of any of the beach within that axis sef.

I prefer going to Lacampagne Tropicana though is far, but I love the beach there.

All these buzz and noise is simply because the said property belong to an Igbo man

Igbos don't want to learn their lessons shaaa.

Jogs1900:
No compensation since the building is not going to be affected...I think the owner is just shouting because he won't have direct access to the beach again which is his selling point..Now to access the beach from landmark, you have to cross the road to the other side.

The beach is gone forever

Oga Umahi ...is that not a road beside the building can't the people going to calabar use it ...the same way you built a yeye airport no one is using . I don't know what is in the yeye calabar sef .... instead of sand filling areas that need sand filling to push the ocean back you want to construct road which I know you haven't checked the long term environmental impact ...By the time the city submerge don't say we didn't warn you....As if it was the President asset you would not reconsider your decision, most importantly there are high level security implications of building a coastal road close to shore ...I expect the National Security Adviser to know better. You forgot so quickly that Lagos was invaded from the Sea ...Now future invasion would be very easy..

Biodun556:
Looking at these pictures kinly, consider these facts:

It's "keenly" sir

Biodun556:


The beach is gone forever

Yeah..

Babangidapikin:
Oga Umahi ...is that not a road beside the building can't the people going to calabar use it ...the same way you built a yeye airport no one is using . I don't know what is in the yeye calabar sef .... instead of sand filling areas that need sand filling to push the ocean back you want to construct road which I know you haven't checked the long term environmental impact ...By the time the city submerge don't say we didn't warn you....As if it was the President asset you would not reconsider your decision, most importantly there are high level security implications of building a coastal road close to shore ...I expect the National Security Adviser to know better. You forgot so quickly that Lagos was invaded from the Sea ...

how many professionals do you find in government? a lot of things that technically non-professionals will through their lame man's mind advise you rightly, you meet professionals doing it wrongly.

Paraman:
The landmark building was never going to be affected.

Only the temporary structures he erected on Government land and the beach will be affected.

And where the temporary structures are located belongs to the FG not to landmark.

The beach also belong to the FG not landmark..the beach is a public property

The whole building will have to go because he should leave some metres from the ten lane road as well.

drlateef:




The whole building will have to go because he should leave some metres from the ten lane road as well.

And that would be effected in future

You people just want to create Eko Atlantic extension and your are stealing this mans sweat to do it ...There is no calabar road being built

SalamRushdie:
You people just want to create Eko Atlantic extension and your are stealing this mans sweat to do it ...There is no calabar road being built

What is his sweat doing on government land in the first place ?

Biodun556:


What is his sweat doing on government land in the first place ?

Well the man is always on lions den telling people to do due diligence before investing so I wonder why he didn't do that

Jogs1900:
No compensation since the building is not going to be affected...I think the owner is just shouting because he won't have direct access to the beach again which is his selling point..Now to access the beach from landmark, you have to cross the road to the other side.

This is will kill the business there sincerely

Biodun556:


What is his sweat doing on government land in the first place ?

See the way you guys talk and you want foreign investment. Lmao.

Someone used his hard earned Dollars to invest in your country, but see the way you're trash talking the person.

Do you know what $100m is? Do you think someone will invest such kind of money without due diligence? Smh for this Yoruba Ronu.

If Govt can wake up and blow someone's $100m investment away, what makes you think that foreigners will come and invest in your country?

Nonny95:


See the way you guys talk and you want foreign investment. Lmao.

Someone used his hard earned Dollars to invest in your country, but see the way you're trash talking the person.

Do you know what $100m is? Do you think someone will invest such kind of money without due diligence? Smh for this Yoruba Ronu.

If Govt can wake up and blow someone's $100m investment away, what makes you think that foreigners will come and invest in your country?

Have you been to landmark before?

Nonny95:


See the way you guys talk and you want foreign investment. Lmao.

Someone used his hard earned Dollars to invest in your country, but see the way you're trash talking the person.

Do you know what $100m is? Do you think someone will invest such kind of money without due diligence? Smh for this Yoruba Ronu.

If Govt can wake up and blow someone's $100m investment away, what makes you think that foreigners will come and invest in your country?

His so called $100 million investment is not affected

The beach ⛱️ legally belongs to government. Government only claims what belongs to it.

So because someone have a business close to the beach, automatically he owns the beach? While the shout is much is because he won’t have direct access to the beach and that is the main selling point

Biodun556:
Looking at these pictures keenly, consider these facts:

1. Beach is like a road side, certain meters from the water belong to government. It is a public space.


2. The coastal road would have affected only the structure of land mark beach which only belongs to him. But because of his noise the road was brought in front of the structure making government to lay claim to the coast that legally belongs to it, sand filling the water to create more space for the road.

3.Since land mark beach ⛱️ structure is not affected, no more compensation

4. Does land mark beach owner even have approval for the structure in the first place?

5.

[color=#006600][/color]

This looks like propaganda. Hope you guys are not expecting others not to take their compensation?

Babangidapikin:
Oga Umahi ...is that not a road beside the building can't the people going to calabar use it ...the same way you built a yeye airport no one is using . I don't know what is in the yeye calabar sef .... instead of sand filling areas that need sand filling to push the ocean back you want to construct road which I know you haven't checked the long term environmental impact ...By the time the city submerge don't say we didn't warn you....As if it was the President asset you would not reconsider your decision, most importantly there are high level security implications of building a coastal road close to shore ...I expect the National Security Adviser to know better. You forgot so quickly that Lagos was invaded from the Sea ...Now future invasion would be very easy..

That road can't contain ten lanes plus rail

That was the initial plan but it will affect landmark building

I would like to visit landmark Beach after the costal road is constructed. I'm certain he'll make do with what's left.

Biodun556:


His so called $100 million investment is not affected

The beach ⛱️ legally belongs to government. Government only claims what belongs to it.

His so called $100m😂.

Kai. Poor people and bitterness.

So what's now the purpose of the Landmark Beach? If there's no beach?

Honestly, Tinubu Supporters are the most heartless people in this country.

Jogs1900:

Have you been to landmark before?

For what exactly?

Not everyone is interested in going to that slum called Lagos.

Biodun556:
Looking at these pictures keenly, consider these facts:

1. Beach is like a road side, certain meters from the water belong to government. It is a public space.


2. The coastal road would have affected only the structure of land mark beach which only belongs to him. But because of his noise the road was brought in front of the structure making government to lay claim to the coast that legally belongs to it, sand filling the water to create more space for the road.

3.Since land mark beach ⛱️ structure is not affected, no more compensation

4. Does land mark beach owner even have approval for the structure in the first place?

5.

the beach could have been save by bypassing it with frigh over bridge 🌉 I was thinking umahi is an engineer

This picture clearly captures it
.

Paraman:
I don't think the business in the buildings can become useless without access to the beach.

You can still have lots of fun in Landmark without going close to the beach

Oga, the beach and the waterfront are the main drivers of traffic to Landmark.

If you remove those two, then Landmark isn't different from many of those recreation facilities scattered everywhere in Lekki, VI & Ikoyi

I wonder why govt refused to use that Water Corporation road shown clearly on the second picture
.