chukwudi44: The bible by definition is a collection of canonised scriptures.it implies that the bible never existed until the fourth century by the catholic church.the term bible and scriptures do not mean the same

truthislight:

other books that were in circulation were not written by the apostles.

Were not taken as the words of the apostle by the christians then.

Since they were not the writing by the apostle they were not among the ones that the christians considered as The word of God, 2thessolonian 2:13

canonization can not add other books that are not guarded as the words of the apostle cause it will be rejected by the christians cause they already Have the words of the apostle in there churches that they have been studying and learning from befor 4CE all over the churches that apostle paul preach to and even the Jewish christian.

This books were guarded as treasures, they were ready to die for them.

frosbel:

Of all the traits you mentioned, I hope you know that Christ Embassy tops the list especially with regard to scamming and worldliness.

chukwudi44: @enigma

I never said apostles practised baptism of the dead,Paul did and I was merely quoting him.

There is nothing in that passage that suggests paul was referring to a pagan practise.It has no precedent in the bible for an apostle to resort to pagan practises to justify christian beleifs

truthislight:

error.

The bible means little books.
Couse its a collection of little books that made up the bible.

chukwudi44:

Which christians are you talking about? Are referring to the montanists,docetists,nicolaitans,marcionists e.t.c
You obviously have no knowlege about the history of christianity.FYI multiple christian sects arose each with their own unique beleifs and scriptures.There was nothing like a common canon.All sorts of writings were flying about including about 18 gospels each purpoetedly written by the apostles.

mkmyers45:

Huh? care to explain? Chukwudi's definition was right

truthislight:

you have then taken in too many lies that you have been fed, with that it has destroyed you faith in the bible.

Does it make sens to you that a group or a church produce a set of books that they considered original and refuse to follow it and end up sticking with the fake or the ones having questions of originality called traditions?


They even left the book in a dead language latin for centuries as to prevent people from being able to read it.

They even killed those who attempt to translate it.

They also killed those who own it.

They also killed those who reads it.

Is all this not an irony?

I have so much on this histories that i dont wish to bring it here cause it may have the opposite effect, and not on this thread.

Though this are already very obvious facts.

It will be honesty if they should stick to their usual antics against the bible instead of trying to tell us that they own/produce/protect the bible.

Do you do or think it was God's will by locking off a book that God said should go to all the nations? Nath 24:14 and 28:18-20

It was after so many people have lost their life translating/read the bible and you know it cant be stop that you have this your new stand as not to loose face.
Peace

christemmbassey: These RCC ppl wetin them de argue sef, them no de shame? With all their gay priests rampaging and destroying boys? Worshiping stones and dead ppl with their knights (night) cults. My prayer is that the light of the gospel of our Lord Jesus will shine into rcc and set the sincere ignorant ppl free who tro accident of birth or location found themselves in this prison.

mkmyers45:

Shut your mouth joooor

Are protestants any better? SMH at your following of pastors that self-service over tithes....

mtswwwww

[/quote]
you have then taken in too many lies that you have been fed, with that it has destroyed you faith in the bible.

Does it make sens to you that a group or a church produce a set of books that they considered original and refuse to follow it and end up sticking with the fake or the ones having questions of originality called traditions?


They even left the book in a dead language latin for centuries as to prevent people from being able to read it.

They even killed those who attempt to translate it.

They also killed those who own it.

They also killed those who reads it.

Is all this not an irony?

I have so much on this histories that i dont wish to bring it here cause it may have the opposite effect, and not on this thread.

Though this are already very obvious facts.

It will be honesty if they should stick to their usual antics against the bible instead of trying to tell us that they own/produce/protect the bible.

Do you do or think it was God's will by locking off a book that God said should go to all the nations? Nath 24:14 and 28:18-20

It was after so many people have lost their life translating/read the bible and you know it cant be stop that you have this your new stand as not to loose face.
Peace[quote]

christemmbassey: U ppl shnuld rtop this wickedness allow d priests 2 so that they stop this satanic practice, u ppl make them gaypriest and lesbian sisters, ask anyone ever attendf rcc boarding schools etc. Don't insult ppl because the truth must b told. The atrocities of the rcc is common knowledge to anyone who has attended sec school history class. And the exploits of d gay priests is currently rocking the vetican, u should b ashamed instead of looking 4 partners in the rascal gang called pentiticostals/protestants 2 rationalize ur pervertions. MAY GOD HELP u.

chukwudi44: The bible by definition is a collection of canonised scriptures.it implies that the bible never existed until the fourth century by the catholic church.the term bible and scriptures do not mean the same

chukwudi44:
you have then taken in too many lies that you have been fed, with that it has destroyed you faith in the bible.

Does it make sens to you that a group or a church produce a set of books that they considered original and refuse to follow it and end up sticking with the fake or the ones having questions of originality called traditions?


They even left the book in a dead language latin for centuries as to prevent people from being able to read it.

They even killed those who attempt to translate it.

They also killed those who own it.

They also killed those who reads it.

Is all this not an irony?

I have so much on this histories that i dont wish to bring it here cause it may have the opposite effect, and not on this thread.

Though this are already very obvious facts.

It will be honesty if they should stick to their usual antics against the bible instead of trying to tell us that they own/produce/protect the bible.

Do you do or think it was God's will by locking off a book that God said should go to all the nations? Nath 24:14 and 28:18-20

It was after so many people have lost their life translating/read the bible and you know it cant be stop that you have this your new stand as not to loose face.
Peace

You just confirmed yourself as an olodo.Multiple christian sects existed with their separate scriptures eventually the RCC came up with their own sect of scriptures which they called bible.You do not believe the RCC yet you cling tenaciously to the set of scriptures they compiled. You are here quoting Nathan for me because it was canonized.Why don't you quote other books like Enoch which was not canonized

frosbel:


Depends on what you mean by the bible.

The bible is simply scripture.

Scripture in both the old and new testament formats always existed. The catholic church only got involved in the collection of these already existing scripture into one compact version.

The catholic church did not write the bible , they did not inspire it, they were only involved at certain stages in the recommendation on which scripture to add or remove from the final version.

It is obvious that they removed quite a few key biblical statements and added a long list of heretical gnostic books called the apocrypha .

Anyway , it is the Holy Spirit who controls the hearts of Kings, he turns their hearts in any direction that pleases him.

frosbel:


Depends on what you mean by the bible.

The bible is simply scripture.

Scripture in both the old and new testament formats always existed. The catholic church only got involved in the collection of these already existing scripture into one compact version.

The catholic church did not write the bible , they did not inspire it, they were only involved at certain stages in the recommendation on which scripture to add or remove from the final version.

It is obvious that they removed quite a few key biblical statements and added a long list of heretical gnostic books called the apocrypha .

Anyway , it is the Holy Spirit who controls the hearts of Kings, he turns their hearts in any direction that pleases him.

mkmyers45:

Now am sure that you've completely run mad..who forces anyone to be a priest? Is it by force or by choice? Mr Man I am not a catholican but stop embarrassing yourself by talking rubbish...the remaining sins of the church is committed by who abi na RCC dey do all?

mkmyers45:

Now am sure that you've completely run mad..who forces anyone to be a priest? Is it by force or by choice? Mr Man I am not a catholican but stop embarrassing yourself by talking rubbish...the remaining sins of the church is committed by who abi na RCC dey do all?

christemmbassey: GO TO ISLAM SECTION, THIS SECTION IS FOR XTIANS N NOT 4 ISLAMISTS OR BOKO HARAM. Mallam pls vamouse.

mkmyers45:

Mr Man

I am not a muslim so whats itching you?

christemmbassey: U R NOT A catholican, not a protestan n not a moslem what r u? Animist? Cultist' secret societist? Etc. Pls u can ask Seun 2 open another sub-section for u. But to me u sound like a boko haramist by d insults u r dishing out.

truthislight:

other books that were in circulation were not written by the apostles.

Were not taken as the words of the apostle by the christians then.

Since they were not the writing by the apostle they were not among the ones that the christians considered as The word of God, 2thessolonian 2:13

canonization can not add other books that are not guarded as the words of the apostle cause it will be rejected by the christians cause they already Have the words of the apostle in there churches that they have been studying and learning from befor 4CE all over the churches that apostle paul preach to and even the Jewish christian.

This books were guarded as treasures, they were ready to die for them.

christemmbassey: U ppl shnuld stop this wickedness allow d priests 2 marry so that they can stop this satanic practice, u ppl make them gaypriests and lesbian sisters, ask anyone who's ever attended rcc boarding schools etc. Don't insult ppl because the truth must b told. The atrocities of the rcc is common knowledge to anyone who has attended sec school history class. And the exploits of d gay priests is currently rocking the vetican, u should b ashamed instead of looking 4 partners in the rascal gang called pentiticostals/protestants 2 rationalize ur pervertions. MAY GOD HELP u.

frosbel:


Depends on what you mean by the bible.

The bible is simply scripture.

Scripture in both the old and new testament formats always existed. The catholic church only got involved in the collection of these already existing scripture into one compact version.

The catholic church did not write the bible , they did not inspire it, they were only involved at certain stages in the recommendation on which scripture to add or remove from the final version.

It is obvious that they removed quite a few key biblical statements and added a long list of heretical gnostic books called the apocrypha .

Anyway , it is the Holy Spirit who controls the hearts of Kings, he turns their hearts in any direction that pleases him.

souldust: i attended a catholic school and it was not reported what you are saying.

christemmbassey: Did u attend an rcc all-male boarding school where the principal was an rcc priest? N u tell me that homosexuality was not a problem? Where did the senior students learned the sexual abuse of d junior boys from? Don't u know that it was from the priest/principal?

christemmbassey: Did u attend an rcc all-male boarding school where the principal was an rcc priest? N u tell me that homosexuality was not a problem? Where did the senior students learned the sexual abuse of d junior boys from? Don't u know that it was from the priest/principal?

mkmyers45:

Haha...and who told you i'm not a protestant? Mr Man stop making assumption because you're not up to it.....You definitely don't know your onions so i ask again...what exactly do you have against the roman catholic church?

christemmbassey: Now that u claim 2 b a xtian will u b civil in ur posts otherwise i'd sugest u go 2 another section.. Now i don' v anything against d rcc, i only want them 2 accept their mistakes which is replet in history n 4 which d pope had apologised openly, stop worshiping stones n d dead ppl they call saint/ancestors and make efforts to stop gay priests from intimate abuse of boys instead of arguing a shamful legacy.

chukwudi44: @christemmbassy

Who will apologise for the intimate abuse carried out pentecostal churches.Because as you know even the pentecostals are not left out of this scandal

mkmyers45:

and who told you i'm a christian? and when will pentecostals accept their mistake of peddling false doctrines and miracles?