Stats: 3,185,761 members, 7,927,124 topics. Date: Wednesday, 21 August 2024 at 10:02 AM |
Nairaland Forum / Nairaland / General / Religion / King James Bible Is NOT The Best Translation & Catholic Influence ( Edited ) (1332 Views)
Real Image Of King James Of KJV1611 / Reasons Why I Dont Read King James Bible. / Shakesphear's Name In The King James Bible Spelled Backwards (2) (3) (4)
King James Bible Is NOT The Best Translation & Catholic Influence ( Edited ) by tidytim: 2:27pm On Sep 11, 2012 |
First, I want to affirm with all evangelical Christians that the Bible is the Word of God, inerrant, inspired, and our final authority for faith and life. However, nowhere in the Bible am I told that only one translation of it is the correct one. Nowhere am I told that the King James Bible is the best or only ‘holy’ Bible. There is no verse that tells me how God will preserve his word, so I can have no scriptural warrant for arguing that the King James has exclusive rights to the throne. The arguments must proceed on other bases. Second, the Greek text which stands behind the King James Bible is demonstrably inferior in certain places. The man who edited the text was a Roman Catholic priest and humanist named Erasmus. He was under pressure to get it to the press as soon as possible since (a) no edition of the Greek New Testament had yet been published, and (b) he had heard that Cardinal Ximenes and his associates were just about to publish an edition of the Greek New Testament and he was in a race to beat them. Consequently, his edition has been called the most poorly edited volume in all of literature! It is filled with hundreds of typographical errors which even Erasmus would acknowledge. Two places deserve special mention. In the last six verses of Revelation, Erasmus had no Greek manuscript (he only used half a dozen, very late MSS for the whole New Testament any way). He was therefore forced to ‘back-translate’ the Latin into Greek and by so doing he created seventeen variants which have never been found in any other Greek MS of Revelation!He merely guessed at what the Greek might have been Secondly, for 1 John 5:7-8, Erasmus followed the majority of MSS in reading “there are three witnesses in heaven, the Spirit and the water and the blood.” However, there was an uproar in some Roman Catholic circles because his text did not read “there are three witnesses in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Spirit.”Erasmus said that he did not put that in the text because he found no Greek MSS which had that reading. This implicit challenge—viz., that if he found such a reading in any Greek MS, he would put it in his text—did not go unnoticed. That is a very important point. It illustrates something quite significant with regard to the textual tradition which stands behind the King James. Probably most textual critics today fully embrace the doctrine of the Trinity (and, of course, all evangelical textual critics do). And most would like to see the Trinity explicitly taught in 1 John 5:7-8. But most reject this reading as an invention of some overly zealous scribe. |
Re: King James Bible Is NOT The Best Translation & Catholic Influence ( Edited ) by tidytim: 2:28pm On Sep 11, 2012 |
Third, the King James Bible has undergone three revisions since its inception in 1611, incorporating more than 100,000 changes. Which King James Bible is inspired, therefore? Fourth, 300 words found in the KJV no longer bear the same meaning—e.g., “Suffer little children…to come unto me” (Matt 19:14). “Study to shew thyself approved unto God” (2 Tim 2:15). Should we really embrace a Bible as the best translation when it uses language that not only is not clearly understood any more, but in fact has been at times perverted and twisted? Sixth, when the KJV was first published, it was heavily resisted for being too easy to understand! Some people revere it today because it is difficult to understand. I fear that part of their response is due to pride: they feel as though they are able to discern something that other, less spiritual folks cannot. Often 1 Corinthians 2:13-16 is quoted with reference to the KJV (to the effect that ‘you would understand it if you were spiritual’). Such a use of that text, however, is a gross distortion of the Scriptures. The words in the New Testament, the grammar, the style, etc.—in short, the language—comprised the common language of the first century. We do God a great disservice when we make the gospel more difficult to understand than he intended it. The reason unspiritual people do not understand the scriptures is because they have a volitional problem, not an intellectual problem (cf. 1 Cor. 2:14 where ‘receive,’ ‘welcome’ shows clearly that the thing which blocks understanding is the sinful will of man). Seventh, those who advocate that the KJV has exclusive rights to being called the Holy Bible are always, curiously, English-speaking people (normally isolated Americans). Yet, Martin Luther’s fine translation of the Bible into German predated the KJV by almost 100 years. Are we so arrogant to say that God has spoken only in English? And where there are substantial discrepancies between Luther’s Bible and the KJV (such as in 1 John 5:7-8 ), are we going to say that God has inspired both? Is he the author of lies? Our faith does not rest in a singular tradition, nor is it provincial. Vibrant, biblical Christianity must never unite itself with provincialism. Otherwise, missionary endeavor, among other things, would die. Source |
Re: King James Bible Is NOT The Best Translation & Catholic Influence ( Edited ) by tobechi20(m): 2:59pm On Sep 11, 2012 |
Op, which one is d corect bible? |
Re: King James Bible Is NOT The Best Translation & Catholic Influence ( Edited ) by tidytim: 3:11pm On Sep 11, 2012 |
I have the Kings James , NIV , NLT and Good News. Online I use over 10 versions. KJV is not bad, but the problem is people who call you out as a rebel because you decide to use the NIV or NLT or NASB. Actually these other ones used more accurate manuscripts. So use your KJV bible , I will use my NIV , but let us not condemn each other for our choice. Also using the NIV along side your KJV for reference is good. Blessings. |
Re: King James Bible Is NOT The Best Translation & Catholic Influence ( Edited ) by Nobody: 5:12pm On Sep 11, 2012 |
Re: King James Bible Is NOT The Best Translation & Catholic Influence ( Edited ) by Nobody: 8:07pm On Sep 11, 2012 |
obadiah777: http://www.jesus-is-savior.com/Bible/NIV/why.htm All those sites you quoted are a bit dangerous to your health, they are cults , be careful. |
(1) (Reply)
Beware Of PRIEST LORD RAHAJAM (facebook Scammer/419/thief) / 'Send An Ambulance': Father Beats Gay Caught Molesting 11 Year Old Son / Jesus Died For Our Sin
(Go Up)
Sections: politics (1) business autos (1) jobs (1) career education (1) romance computers phones travel sports fashion health religion celebs tv-movies music-radio literature webmasters programming techmarket Links: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) Nairaland - Copyright © 2005 - 2024 Oluwaseun Osewa. All rights reserved. See How To Advertise. 18 |