Roman Catholics the world over consider Emperor Constantine as a Saint for "supposedly" being the first Pagan Emperor to convert to christianity and spread this faith.

Let us now unravel the mysteries on the event of the News of the SOlar Eclipse, to do honour to the Sun God, Sol Invictus.



The role of Constantine in the history and development of Christianity has been falsified, misrepresented and misunderstood.

Constantine is often credited with the decisive victory of the “adherents of the message’ and not wholly without justification.

According to later Church tradition. Constantine had inherited from his father a sympathetic predisposition towards Christianity. In fact this predisposition seems to have been primarily a matter of expediency, for Christians by then were numerous and Constantine needed all the help he
could get against Maxentius, his rival for the imperial throne. In A.D. 213 Maxentius was routed at the Battle of Milvian Bridge, thus leaving Constantine’s claim unchallenged. Immediately before this crucial engagement Constantine is said to have had a vision later reinforced by a prophetic dream of a luminous cross hanging in the sky. A sentence was supposedly inscribed across it In Hoc Signo Vinces (“By this sign you will conquer’). Tradition recounts that Constantine, deferring to this celestial portent, ordered the shields of his troops hastily emblazoned with the Christian monogram the Greek letter Chi Rho, the first two letters of the word “Christos’. As a result Constantine’s victory over Maxentius at Milvian Bridge came to represent a miraculous triumph of christianity over Paganism. This, then, is the popular Church tradition, on the basis of which Constantine is often thought to have “converted the Roman Empire to - 386 -Christianity’. In actual fact, however, Constantine did no such thing. But in order to decide precisely what he did do, we must examine the evidence more closely. In the first place Constantine’s “conversion’ if that is the appropriate word does not seem to have been Christian at all but unabashedly Pagan. He appears to have had some sort of vision, or numinous experience, in the precincts of a Pagan temple to the Gallic Apollo, either in the Vosges or near Autun. According to a witness accompanying Constantine’s army at the time, the vision was of the Sun God the deity worshipped by certain cults under the name of “Sol Invictus’, “the Invincible Sun’. There is evidence that Constantine, just before his
vision, had been initiated into a Sol Invictus cult. In any case the Roman Senate, after the Battle of Milvian Bridge, erected a triumphal arch in the Colosseum. According to the inscription on this arch, Constantine’s victory was won “through the prompting of the Deity’. But the Deity in question was not Jesus.

It was Sol Invictus, the Pagan Sun God.

Contrary to tradition, Constantine did not make Christianity the official state religion of Rome. The state religion of Rome under Constantine was, in fact, Pagan Sun worship; and Constantine, all his life, acted as its chief priest. Indeed his reign was called a “sun emperor ship and Sol
Invictus figured everywhere including the imperial banners and the coinage of the realm. The image of Constantine as a fervent convert to
Christianity is clearly wrong. He himself was not even baptised until 337 when he lay on his deathbed and was apparently too weakened or too
apathetic to protest. Nor can he be credited with the Chi Rho monogram. An inscription bearing this monogram was found on a tomb at
Pompeii, dating from two and a half centuries before. The cult of Sol Invictus was Syrian in origin and imposed by Roman emperors on their subjects a century before Constantine. Although it contained elements of Baal and Astarte worship, it was essentially monotheistic. In effect, it posited the sun god as the sum of all attributes of all other gods, and thus peacefully subsumed its potential rivals. Moreover, it conveniently harmonised with the cult of Mithras which was also prevalent in Rome and the empire at the time, - 387 -and which also involved solar worship. For Constantine the cult of Sol Invictus was, quite simply, expedient. His primary, indeed obsessive, objective was unity. Unity in politics, in religion and in territory. A cult, or state religion, that included all other cults within it obviously abetted this objective. And it was under the auspices of the Sol Invictus cult that Christianity consolidated its position. Christian orthodoxy had much in common with the cult of Sol Invictus; and thus the former was able to flourish unmolested under the taller’s umbrella of tolerance. The cult of Sol Invictus, being essentially monotheistic, paved the way for the monotheism of Christianity. And the cult of Sol Invictus was convenient in other respects as well -respects which both modified and facilitated the spread of Christianity. By an edict promulgated in A.D. 321, for example, Constantine ordered the law courts closed on ‘the venerable day of the sun’, and decreed that this day be a day of rest. Christianity had hitherto held the Jewish Sabbath Saturday as sacred. Now, in accordance with Constantine’s edict, it transferred its sacred day to Sunday. This not only brought it into harmony with the existing regime, but also permitted it to further dissociate itself from its Judaic origins. Until the fourth century, moreover,
Jesus’s birthday had been celebrated on January 6th. For the cult of Sol Invictus, however, the crucial day of the year was December 25th the festival of Natalis Invictus, the birth (or rebirth) of the sun, when the days began to grow longer. In this respect, too, Christianity brought itself into alignment with the regime and the established state religion. The cult of Sol Invictus meshed happily with that of Mithras so much
so, indeed, that the two are often confused.4 Both emphasised the status of the sun. Both held Sunday as sacred. Both celebrated a
major birth festival on December 25th. As a result Christianity could also find points of convergence with Mithraism the more so as Mithraism stressed the immortality of the soul, a future judgment and the resurrection of the dead. In the interests of unity Constantine deliberately chose to blur the distinctions between Christianity, Mithraism and Sol Invictus deliberately chose not to see any contradiction between them. Thus he tolerated the deified Jesus as the earthly manifestation of Sol Invictus. Thus he would build a Christian church and, at the same time, statues of the Mother Goddess Cybele and of Sol Invictus, the Sun God the latter being an image of himself, bearing his features. In such eclectic and
ecumenical gestures, the emphasis on unity can be seen again. Faith, in short, was for Constantine a political matter; and any faith that was conducive to unity was treated with forbearance. While Constantine was not, therefore, the “good Christian’ that later tradition depicts, he
consolidated, in the name of unity and uniformity, the status of Christian orthodoxy. In A.D. 325, for example, he convened the Council of Nicea. At this council the dating of Easter was established. Rules were framed which defined the, authority of bishops, thereby paving the way for a
concentration of power in ecclesiastical hands. Most important of all, the Council of Nicea decided, by vote,5 that Jesus was a god, not a mortal prophet. Again, however, it must be emphasised that Constantine’s paramount consideration was not piety but unity and expediency. As a god Jesus could be associated conveniently with Sol Invictus. As a mortal prophet he would have been more difficult to accommodate. In short, Christian orthodoxy lent itself to a politically desirable fusion with the official state religion; and in so far as it did so Constantine conferred his support upon Christian orthodoxy. Thus, a year after the Council of Nicea, he sanctioned the confiscation and destruction of all works that challenged orthodox teachings works by pagan authors that referred to Jesus, as well as works by “heretical’ Christians. He also arranged for a fixed income to be allocated to the Church and installed the bishop of Rome in the Lateran Palaces Then, in A.D. 331, he commissioned and financed new copies of the Bible. This constituted one of the single most decisive factors in the entire history of Christianity, and provided Christian orthodoxy the “adherents of the message’ with an unparalleled opportunity.

In A.D. 303, a quarter of a century before, the Pagan Emperor Diocletian had undertaken to destroy all Christian writings that could be found.

As a result Christian documents especially in Rome all but
vanished. When Constantine, commissioned new versions of these documents, it enabled the custodians of orthodoxy to revise, edit and re-write their material as they saw fit, in accordance with their tenets.

It was at this point that most of the crucial alterations in the New Testament were probably made, and Jesus assumed the unique status he has enjoyed ever since.

The importance of Constantine’s commission must not be underestimated. Of the five thousand extant early manuscript versions of the
New Testament, not one pre-dates the fourth century.”

The New Testament, as it exists
today, is essentially a product of fourth-century editors and writers custodians of
orthodoxy, “adherents of the message’, with vested interests to protect.




[img]http://bluejayblog.files./2012/12/solinvictus03.jpg[/img]

[img]http://chesterfieldpagans.files./2010/12/sol-radiate.jpg[/img]

[img]http://www.ucg.ca/booklets/holidays-or-holy-days-does-it-matter-which-days-we-observe/images/p_mattertogod.jpg[/img]

Christianity is a reformed pagan religion.

And those dumb christian have the gut to insult pagan.

It doesnt take a genius to know the truth.


"ROman" catholic.


seat of office: Vatican, ROme.

Official language of text: Latin (Language of a Roman Italic Tribe)

who nails jesus? The ROmans.

who is accused of his death:

Not the ROmans, but the Jews.


who diverted the blame as a result?

The Romans.

PAGAN 9JA:
It doesnt take a genius to know the truth.


"ROman" catholic.


seat of office: Vatican, ROme.

Official language of text: Latin (Language of a Roman Italic Tribe)

who nails jesus? The ROmans.

who is accused of his death:

Not the ROmans, but the Jews.


who diverted the blame as a result?

The Romans.

I never knew you read the bible.

FOLYKAZE: Christianity is a reformed pagan religion.

And [b]those dumb christian [/b]have the gut to insult pagan.

If it was a christain that said the bolded now, you will accuse him of so many things, meanwhile you are not innocent of the offense....weldone

joel lala:


If it was a christain that said the bolded now, you will accuse him of so many things, meanwhile you are not innocent of the offense....weldone

Replica..... If you had never insult pagan, it doesnt involve you.

FOLYKAZE:

Replica..... If you had never insult pagan, it doesnt involve you.

Anyways, since you have given some people justifications to be abusive, dnt complain when other religious sects rain abusive words on you..just remember that..#amoutofhere#