Delafruita: so because the retardeen wants to display false humility,our constitution which expressly proscribes the title "commander-in-chief of the armed forces" should be impugned on.are you people alright at all?

wyvilleinc: He is lilly livered

solomon111: shut up,you morøn.
Jonathan did not removed that title from national nomenclature.
He only ask that you use it at the right place,which is during military engagements.
I don't see how the constitution is affected.

Delafruita: [s]you displayed your ignorance by trying to imply obama was responsible for the near-default or as you put it "his drastic actions".you ignorance was even more visible with the silly reference to the antichrist insanity.you then went ahead to imply that the senate intervenes which to me is gross ignorance on your part.how i wish jonathan will take the kind of "drastic actions" obama takes.rather the retardeen eats 1billion naira food and impugnes our constitution in a bid for false humility[/s]

eetching uk:

something elusive or visionary

of the nature of, suggesting, or being a phantom : illusory

I will advice you to consult your Dictionary as well, get down to Adjective. my statement wasn't decisive so i choose to use an Adjective

Delafruita: the constitution did not indicate a place or time for the title to be used.not using the title irrespective of the occasion is a breach of the constitution.

StarBoard:
You are a phool.
You can see something that is not real.
You can see something that is an illusion
Compare that to fathom, meaning measurable, comprehendable or understandable.
Use it and see which makes more sense.
It ia half-baked clowns who follow Barney Jonathan blindly even to the point if not knowing wht they are saying

eddiebruk:

You lack comprehension sir, if you read the article very well, you will understand that he made that decision because of how he is being addressed in a democratic stands as a Military Personnel, take for example the presidents Photograph in every Organization addressed him as the Chief of Arm force, even though such organization doesn't have anything to do with the Military, he is only trying to separate how he is being addressed democratically as well as Militarily, depending on the Occasion/Situation

solomon111: So because he's trying to be a true democrat,he's lily livered?
Very well then;
I hope you get the iron-livered tyrant you deserve.
Hopefully,i would be out of the country by then.

Delafruita: the constitution did not indicate a place or time for the title to be used.not using the title irrespective of the occasion is a breach of the constitution.

eddiebruk:

It did mention the occasions when he should be addressed with the Chief of Arm force title, JEZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ man did you even read this article at all..?

Delafruita: you have big problems.is president jonathan the commander in chief of the armed forces or not?whether president jonathan is in his bedroom,toilet,kitchen or on the road taking a walk,he remains the commander in chief of the armed forces.it doesnt matter where he is or who he is with,his duty doesnt change.he is the CinC and dt doesnt change.selectively repudiating the title is akin to selectiely performing his duties

Delafruita: you have big problems.is president jonathan the commander in chief of the armed forces or not?whether president jonathan is in his bedroom,toilet,kitchen or on the road taking a walk,he remains the commander in chief of the armed forces.it doesnt matter where he is or who he is with,his duty doesnt change.he is the CinC and dt doesnt change.selectively repudiating the title is akin to selectiely performing his duties

solomon111: Let the HOR and senate deal with him if they feel there is a breach of constitution.
You're a nobody.

Delafruita: you have big problems.is president jonathan the commander in chief of the armed forces or not?whether president jonathan is in his bedroom,toilet,kitchen or on the road taking a walk,he remains the commander in chief of the armed forces.it doesnt matter where he is or who he is with,his duty doesnt change.he is the CinC and dt doesnt change.selectively repudiating the title is akin to selectiely performing his duties

eddiebruk:

Now let me tell you something sir, It will be difficult explaining to primary school children that the President is actually the Chief of Arm force, so instead of bringing in such title in such situations, the title is now actually being excluded when he would be addressed in such occasions. even as it is right now, not everyone knows the head of the Military in Nigeria, he only wants to be addressed as the Chief of Arm force only in Military Functions. and i think that is a good idea

solomon111: Gej did not stop being commander-in-chief,you morøn.
Obama is the commander in chief of the american forces even without attaching the military title at every democratic event.
That's the difference between a democratic GEJ and the military Buhari.

Delafruita: i am a nigerian and an interested party in whatever president jonathan does.he is elected to be commander in chief of MY country at all times.he cant choose where and when to perform his duties or be addressed by the title the constitution of MY country bestows on him.if he doesnt want it,he should resign

solomon111: There are people who jobs are either to set laws or interpret them.
And the last time i checked,none of those people have held the presidence guilty for breach of constitution.
The law does not give you DELAFRUITA the right to interpret the law.

sweet_gala:

There is no humility in that. It has no economical or moral impact on the Nigerian nation. We need him to fight corruption and declare his assets in full backward of his years of service.
What has come of the oil subsidy probe. What would he do about ASUU; what would he do about the aviation minister?

ballabriggs:

The Senate sent to the Senate a budget of N1 billion for food?

Cool story bro, you care to tell it again?

Delafruita: this country is governed by a constitution and the first sentence in that book is "We the people of the federal republic of nigeria...".that constitution gives me the right to question anyone no matter how highly placed.it gives me the right to interprete the laws and also gives me the right to seek further clarification from the judiciary when i desire to do so.i dont need the national assembly to interprete the law for me,the national assembly makes the law and then its my duty to interprete or seek further clarification

thithi: The man no fit fight poo so he is right

solomon111: It's not your duty to interpret the law,sorry.
The judiciary is trained and empowered to interpret the law.
You are just a citizen whose view of the law is biased and tainted with sentiments.

thithi: The man no fit fight poo so he is right

Delafruita: ent jonathan cannot selectively choose when to be addressed as CinC because he is the CinC at all times and at all places