The jewish god is not very clever.....

He should have made Adam and Eve Chinese...They would have eaten the snake instead of the apple.

Hm! Chinese without medial epicanthal folds... God save us all

Agreed he is not clever, what stops you from fabricating your own creation story like the Big Bang Theory.

McWhillion: Agreed he is not clever, what stops you from fabricating your own creation story like the Big Bang Theory.

Fabricated#! What's d tested and proven one then?

Silkmoth33:

Fabricated#! What's d tested and proven one then?

The one you've not fabricated.

McWhillion:
The one you've not fabricated.

U mean the fabricated one that needs no further fabrication!

Silkmoth33: U mean the fabricated one that needs no further fabrication!

I meant whatever creation fable is in your head that you've not told us about.

McWhillion:
I meant whatever creation fable is in your head that you've not told us about.

ha! A fable!
Pls! Listen to urself read as u check d dictionary meaning for fable. And tell me if that defines a theory!

PAGAN9JA: The jewish god is not very clever.....

He should have made Adam and Eve Chinese...They would have eaten the snake instead of the apple.

....

Silkmoth33: ha! A fable!
Pls! Listen to urself read as u check d dictionary meaning for fable. And tell me if that defines a theory!

If you read in between the lines, you should know I am mocking whatever theory science is trying to put up to explain creation. It's obvious you can't detect sarcasm.

PAGAN9JA: The jewish god is not very clever.....

He should have made Adam and Eve Chinese...They would have eaten the snake instead of the apple.

bwhahahahahhahahahahhahahahahhahaha

McWhillion:
If you read in between the lines, you should know I am mocking whatever theory science is trying to put up to explain creation. It's obvious you can't detect sarcasm.

and ur sheer deep rooted ignorance just got really freaking obvious...u must be lost!

Fyi! Science isn't trying to explain creation, mate. It never did.
Ever heard of evolution? Now that's science.


PS! U also don't know how to apply sarcasm. I won't laugh at ur failed attempt, this time

nickz: bwhahahahahhahahahahhahahahahhahaha

girls with big eyeballs/exopthalmus are a turn on for u?

Silkmoth33: and ur sheer deep rooted ignorance just got really freaking obvious...u must be lost!

Fyi! Science isn't trying to explain creation, mate. It never did.
Ever heard of evolution? Now that's science.

So if I am to believe an organism evolved, does it mean its precursor was not created? or how did the organism that evolved come to be. You can confuse yourself if you wish.

.

[Quote author=McWhmcwhillion] if I am to believe an organism evolved, does it mean its precursor was not created? or how did the organism that evolved come to be. You can confuse yourself if you wish.[/quote]
U r indeed wise to say that a precursor must have being created.

Ofcourse! U r right. Now riddle me Dis.
What created DAT which created Dat which lead to a subsequent evolution?
Ur answer would be that d fable speaks of DAT evolving or created from nothing.
Now If something did create DAT which created something that lead to an evolution.
Then explain to me! Dear mcwhillion: "Just how u create or evolve from nothing?"

Silkmoth33: girls with big eyeballs/exopthalmus are a turn on for u?

size of the eyeball to an extent tho,but they look more attractive

Silkmoth33: [Quote author=McWhmcwhillion] if I am to believe an organism evolved, does it mean its precursor was not created? or how did the organism that evolved come to be. You can confuse yourself if you wish.
U r indeed wise to say that a precursor must have being created.

Ofcourse! U r right. Now riddle me Dis.
What created DAT which created Dat which lead to a subsequent evolution?
Ur answer would be that d fable speaks of DAT evolving or created from nothing.
Now If something did create DAT which created something that lead to an evolution.
Then explain to me! Dear mcwhillion: "Just how u create or evolve from nothing?"

The answer is what you won't/ refuse to understand 'cos you believe in no Supreme Being. If I answered and said God is He who can create from nothing, I dare you to prove otherwise.

McWhillion:
The answer is what you won't/ refuse to understand 'cos you believe in no Supreme Being. If I answered and said God is He who can create from nothing, I dare you to prove otherwise.

I would ignore ur dare until u answer my god-damned question.
I'm begging u and I'm dying on my ignorant sickbed here, for u to consult ur infinite wisdom on such matters...and explain to me in d best way u can just how u can evolve from nothing, whether it be fabricated or a tell-tale...as long as it makes sense Mac!

nickz: size of the eyeball to an extent tho,but they look more attractive

Silkmoth33:
I would ignore ur dare until u answer my god-damned question.
I'm begging u and I'm dying on my ignorant sickbed here, for u to consult ur infinite wisdom on such matters...and explain to me in d best way u can just how u can evolve from nothing, whether it be fabricated or a tell-tale...as long as it makes sense Mac!

That's where the distinction comes between science and God. I ve answered your question. You understand science and we believe God. It's not in my power and wisdom to explain how God created from nothing. If you're able to explain every thing, then there is no need to believe in a creator. Part of His prowess and wisdom lies in your own confusion of not been able to give a satisfactory "earthly" definition for every phenomenon.

Now can you honestly answer my question.

McWhillion:

That's where the distinction comes between science and God. I ve answered your question. You understand science and we believe God. It's not in my power and wisdom to explain how God created from nothing. If you're able to explain every thing, then there is no need to believe in a creator. Part of His prowess and wisdom lies in your own confusion of not been able to give a satisfactory "earthly" definition for every phenomenon.

Now can you honestly answer my question.

ha! The bold quote made me laugh. U don't want to say the obvious for no reason. Hence i will redirect it.
U r shying away from my question, why?

The answer to ur question also lies in ur quote. Simply put.
I do not believe it exists because there is nothing that points to d fact that it does

I've succeeded in feeding u with ur own poison now choke on it.

Silkmoth33: ha! The bold quote made me laugh. U don't want to say the obvious for no reason. Hence i will redirect it.
U r shying away from my question, why?

The answer to ur question also lies in ur quote. Simply put.
I do not believe it exists because there is nothing that points to d fact that it does

Are you deliberately trying to confuse me. You do not believe in what exactly, in case you forgot the question. We were talking about creation/ evolution. You do not believe in God, so your answer can never be found in what you bolded.
My question is this "I dare you to prove that there was no Being who created life". If you can give me an answer I would cease to believe in God.

Chai! I should have posted this in the Religious section.

Sorry about d mix up. When I said dis

Silkmoth33: ha! The bold quote made me laugh. U don't want to say the obvious for no reason. Hence i will redirect it.
U r shying away from my question, why?
The answer to ur question also lies in ur quote Simply put.
I do not believe it exists because there is nothing that points to d fact that it does

I was referring to dis

McWhillion:
That's where the distinction comes between science and God. I ve answered your question. You understand science and we believe God. It's not in my power and wisdom to explain how God created from nothing. If you're able to explain every thing, then there is no need to believe in a creator. Part of His prowess and wisdom lies in your own confusion of not been able to give a satisfactory "earthly" definition for every phenomenon.
Now can you honestly answer my question.

Yes science explains everything!
Hence i dont believe in d creation theory.

Now 4 dis ur question

McWhillion:
Are you deliberately trying to confuse me. You do not believe in what exactly, in case you forgot the question. We were talking about creation/ evolution. You do not believe in God, so your answer can never be found in what you bolded.
My question is this "I dare you to prove that there was no Being who created life". If you can give me an answer I would cease to believe in God.

PAGAN9JA: Chai! I should have posted this in the Religious section.

This really got me cracking, hence i need not to post at this weak thread but its a joke if you ask me anyways.

yes you should have

rolling on the floor ..lmao

PAGAN9JA: The jewish god is not very clever.....

He should have made Adam and Eve Chinese...They would have eaten the snake instead of the apple.

Joke of the year !OMG