carefreewannabe:


You have never heard of kids being se*xually abused by teachers or pastors? Really?
Is se*xual abuse better?

Here you go:

https://www.nairaland.com/2011772/parents-warned#28285675

And if you want to know what Catholics priests have been doing for decades, just google the words Catholic + child abuse.

Woman, we're discussing physical abuse not sexual abuse - I've said this before.

Now, I'll give you some reasons that "can" make a housemaid physically abuse a child that way.

I also want you to give reasons that "can" make a teacher, pastor or priest physically abuse a child that way.

A housemaid that gets beaten unnecessarily by her employer, in revenge, might start beating up the kids of her employer.

A housemaid that gets starved by her employer, also in revenge, might beat up her employer's kid that way.

A housemaid that works like an elephant and doesn't benefit tangibly from her employer, might vent her frustrations on the kids - by beating them up unnecessarily.

Saying benefits - I mean education or vocation.

iconize:



Woman, we're discussing physical abuse not sexual abuse - I've said this before.

Now, I'll give you some reasons that "can" make a housemaid physically abuse a child that way.

I also want you to give reasons that "can" make a teacher, pastor or priest physically abuse a child that way.

A housemaid that gets beaten unnecessarily by her employer, in revenge, might start beating up the kids of her employer.

A housemaid that gets starved by her employer, also in revenge, might beat up her employer's kid that way.

A housemaid that works like an elephant and doesn't benefit tangibly from her employer, might vent her frustrations on the kids - by beating them up unnecessarily.

Saying benefits - I mean education or vocation.

Physical or se*xual abuse, whatever a child suffers from, it is devastating so no need to exclude any of them from the discussion.

You don't need to give me any reasons. I already know. And there are even more reasons.

carefreewannabe:


Physical or se*xual abuse, whatever a child suffers from, it is devastating so no need to exclude any of them from the discussion.

You don't need to give me any reasons. I already know. And there are even more reasons.

Why would you include sexual abuse when the discourse is centered on physical abuse?

I made it clear in my initial comment - "physical assault".

iconize:



Why would you include sexual abuse when the discourse is centered on physical abuse?

I made it clear in my initial comment - "physical assault".

Why not?

Abuse is abuse. Both forms of abuse may have devastating effects.

carefreewannabe:


Why not?

Abuse is abuse. Both forms of abuse may have devastating effects.

Abuse is abuse, yes. But the discussion is physical abuse not sexual abuse.

Was the Ugandan kid sexually abused?

Yes!

Especially, if they are older and can TALK!

iconize:


Abuse is abuse, yes. But the discussion is physical abuse not sexual abuse.

Was the Ugandan kid sexually abused?

The question of the thread is whether someone would leave their kids with a housemaid and I joined the discussion saying that if you answer the question in the negative then you must consider not leaving your kid with anyone.

Anyway, forget it. I am out.

There are still many good housemaid, maybe it depend on how you treat your house: they maybe doing that for revenge you know