According to Vanguard, the Abuja Division of the Federal High
Court, yesterday, fixed March 19 to commence hearing on seven
separate suits.
However, both Buhari and his party, who are respondents in the
matter together with the Independent National Electoral Commission
(INEC) maintained that they would not agree to take the service of
the court procedures which they said were not authentically served
on them.
READ ALSO: Jega Gives Reasons Behind Elections Postponement
They dared the propriety of orders of Justice Adeniyi which had
allowable the accusers to serve the originating summons on them
through replaced incomes.
Justice Adeniyi had on February 2, directed that the court processes
be served on the defendants by publishing same in three national
dailies.
The court also granted an order of synopsis of time within which the
defendants must respond to the suits.
Though, both Buhari and his party contended that there was no
urgency in the matter to permit the court to hear the suits in
urgency.
Thus, in separate preliminary objections filed by counsel to Buhari,
Chief Wole Olanipekun, SAN, and that of the APC, Prince Lateef
Fagbemi, SAN, they called on the court to set-aside all the
instructions it has made in the matter so far.
They further opposed that the subject matter of the suit bothers on
pre-election issues which they said is not time bound, adding that
it can be determined even after the March 28 presidential poll.
But, Chief Mike Ozehkome, SAN, who represented the accusers
yesterday, advised the court to advance hearing on the matter so as
to determine Buhari’s fate before the presidential election.
His proposal enraged Buhari’s lawyer, Olanipekun, SAN, who
contended that the suit challenging the certificate his client
submitted to the INEC, has nothing to do with the election itself.
READ ALSO: Appeal Court Reserves Judgment on Jonathan
“ My lord what he is saying is that this case must end before this
election. It is a wrong impression. This case has nothing to do with
the conduct of the election. What if the presidential election was
held on February 14?”, Olanipekun queried.
Similarly, INEC through its lawyer Mr. Hassan Liman, SAN,
yesterday, said it would file a initial objection to challenge both the
capability of the suits which were filed by the two plaintiffs, Mr.
Chukwunweike Okafor and Mr. Max Ozoaka, as well as the
jurisdiction of the court to entertain them.
It should be noted that the Abuja Division of the Court of Appeal
reserved its judgment concerning the President Goodluck
Jonathan’s eligibility to contest presidential election in March.
President Jonathan is key opponent of the opposition candidate
General Buhari in coming poll.

GEJ till 2019!!!

Facts are coming out,because of the hearing they postponed the elections(1)

This is very good! All the Shekaus, straight, crippled, blind, multiplorosis etc would have been arrested and dealt with by the Nigerian Military on or before then. May The God Of Nigeria Continue to Guide and Guard Nigeria and GEJ FOR EVER!!!!

read thread *runs to afganistan embassy to get visa* who wan follow me,les,temigrace?

APC should install a parallel government immediately.

There it goes again! Another Jonathan and Clueless Crews Plan to raise tensions again..
Jonathan will return back to Otuoke comes May 29th. by the Grace and power of The Almighty who created Heaven and Earth..

Please Nobody should Quote me with insult.. Warning!

Please Vote the Man that will try all his very best to reshape the Lives of poor Nigerians.
Sai GMB
Sai Professor

GenBuhari:
APC should install a parallel government immediately.

Do not advocate for what can degenerate into violence.

The outcome of this case whichever way it goes will be a defining moment in this country.

Buhari is a terrorist
Apc Is bokoharam
Tinubu is a bastard

Gej till 2019

Good, cant wait for that grandpa to get out of the way, GEJ TILL 2019!!! [color=#000000][/color]

What about the violence of poverty, electoral disenfranchisement, insecurity , crime under the current PDP government?

In fact a parallel government is likely to dampen the chances of violence, if the current government does not respond with violence.

dealslip:


Do not advocate for what can degenerate into violence.