cococandy:

Ask coogar for example of he will be willing to go back to live permanently in Nigeria
With free ticket o.

See what he says.

coogar:


look at you - i stay in nigeria.

lolaredvelvet:




Listen to your gossip buddy's (cococandy) advice and talk about the topic at hand.. why are y'all still discussing me .. na so I annoy you reach?

shaybebaby:

Chick, there isn't that much about you that is worthy of discussion-zilch. I believe the answer to the topic is each to their own. People change their names for less significant reasons than marriage and on a whim. Maybe they don't like the names they were given at birth, maybe they changed religions and wanted their names to reflect their belief or maybe they just like the sound of the new name they are adopting. Hence a man taking his spouse's name ain't a biggie, he could just plain like the name Saldana. Don't make him less of a man and if it did, he never really was a real one to begin with if all it takes is a name to emasculate him. Capito?

cococandy:

I know.
The same way I stay in London.
Via nairaland

shaybebaby:

Chick, there isn't that much about you that is worthy of discussion-zilch. I believe the answer to the topic is each to their own. People change their names for less significant reasons than marriage and on a whim. Maybe they don't like the names they were given at birth, maybe they changed religions and wanted their names to reflect their belief or maybe they just like the sound of the new name they are adopting. Hence a man taking his spouse's name ain't a biggie, he could just plain like the name Saldana. Don't make him less of a man and if it did, he never really was a real one to begin with if all it takes is a name to emasculate him. Capito?

Moana:
so you think its very logical to blame a decision made by a man on an ideology that promotes equal rights for women. only on NL

Shollypopzz:
Yay for feminism! Though matriarchy isn't a new concept, I am going to attribute the man's decision to feminism.

I wonder why men are so threatened by male feminists. (That is a lie! I know why )

SMH @ the women condemning this man's decision...... I want you females to take a minute to see how fvcked up that is.

crackhaus:
I was answering the OP's question about if I (the reader) would adopt a wife's surname.

crackhaus:
Feminism hasn't triumphed yet, not when there are still guys like me living on earth...I can assure you of this

crackhaus:
However I don't think feminism made him (them) adopt a woman's surname, they just pvssy-whipped... and the thing about being pvssy-whipped is that it doesn't last forever, they'll come back to their senses soon enough.

FrancisTony:
Even bible opined that submission should be reciprocated before saying women should submit to their husband.

Stillfire:
Buhahahaha. I hope the bats in the cave kick you out of their natural habitat.

TV01:

FrancisTony, please don't willfully misunderstand the bible. Or reinterprete it to garner likes !

TV01:

If submission is in al instances reciprocal, why is it actually needed? And why would there be any need for a qualifier of "wives submittring to husbands" immediately afterwards?

TV01:

I think we should add workouts to your rehab - drop, and give me 50 press-ups. We need to work on your concave chest and weedy arms - as well as your bible knowledge. Building a "whole man"


TV

TV01:

Love it Stilly .

But you realise that when "feminism" finally screws everything up, you'll join us in the cave - and resume your natural role as we rebuild. Although I was talking tongue-in-cheek, as I don;t think it wil get that far before[b] womens natural instinct to police other women and protect patriarchy will re-assert itself [/b] .


TV

babygirlfl:


My madam on point. The problem with our people is always when it has to do with a woman. I know Nigerian men who have changed their name because they just don't like the sound of it. If the same man were to adopt the wife's name, it will be seen as an abomination. Some family adopt their fathers name as last name which means that after another generation, the name is lost anyway.

TV01:
If submission is in al instances reciprocal, why is it actually needed? And why would there be any need for a qualifier of "wives submittring to husbands" immediately afterwards?

FrancisTony:

I don't know; My bible opined so.

Ephesians 5:20
20. giving thanks always for all things to God the Father in the name of our Lord Jesus Christ.
21 submitting to one another in the fear of God.

FrancisTony:
I have an incomparable avalanche of bible knowledge - it's not a man thing but human.

TV01:
FrancisTony, please don't willfully misunderstand the bible. Or reinterprete it to garner likes !

lolaredvelvet:



Slow down there stranger. I am not confused. Just letting you know that the statement you made stinks of ignorance and fallacy that's all. Accept it and move on. You can't say one should accept all of the bad that comes with westernization just because 2catwoman has an inferiority complex! believing the western world and civilization is superior to traditional and moral values. Try and be a lil more objective.

TV01:

I think we should add workouts to your rehab - drop, and give me 50 press-ups. We need to work on your concave chest and weedy arms - as well as your bible knowledge. Building a "whole man"


TV

TV01:
I asked you this;

You responded thus;

The bible nowhere - and certainly not the verse you quoted - states that submission is in all instances reciprocal. Indeed, it can't. It is where "submission is demanded", such as for husband and wife.

If it did, elders would submit to deacons, or parents to children, or christian masters to servants. Do you see how absurd your reading is now?

TV01:
Romans 13:1 Let every soul be subject to the governing authorities. For there is no authority except from God, and the authorities that exist are appointed by God.

Do the rulers/governemnt now submit to the citizens?

TV01:
No, as the verse following clearly shows;
Romans 13:2 Therefore whoever resists the authority resists the ordinance of God, and those who resist will bring judgment on themselves.

The thrust behind Ephesians 5:21 is more about the attitude of submission - in the fear of God - demanded by those you are to obey/submit to. So in as much as a wife submits to her husband, there is a way to do it, not grudgingly or with an attitude.

TV01:
So no, the bible opined nada, and it seems like the "avalanche is on top of you and not within - someone dig this person out

TV01:
So I repeat,

For you edification - https://www.nairaland.com/2351801/feminism-joke-nigeriafor-now/6#34377924


TV

FrancisTony:

You are wrong!
There's nowhere bible opined that children should submit to their parents.

Exodus 20:12
Honour your father and your mother, that your days may be long upon the land which the Lord your God is giving you.

FrancisTony:
Bibe simply wrote that Children should honour their mother and father.
Keyword - honour , that's some kind of adulation not how Wife was commanded to submit to her husband.
The only thing I adhere is that, Man is the head of family .
Submission should be reciprocated afterall, even bible said;

FrancisTony:
Ephesians 15:31
"For this reason a man shall leave his father and mother and be joined to his wife, and the two shall become one flesh.
How can their be unequality between a flesh? huh? That's akin to saying God the father, God the son and God the holyspirit aren't equal just because they are different.

FrancisTony:
Yes they do!
In the sense that a good/righteous ruler contacts his subjects before taking a decision.

FrancisTony:

What of, "submitting to one another" in that verse.
Pray tell, what "one another" means.

TV01:

You are confused FT; Ephesians 6:1 Children, obey your parents in the Lord, for this is right - does one not submit as an act of obedience

TV01:
I've shown your first assertion to be wrong
Your second is illogical - how can a wife submit to her husband if they are both at once submitting to each other
Your third begs the question "what does it mean to be head" - |I've heard some funny ones for that interpretation

TV01:
You are totally lost here - the fact that men and women are equal has nothing to do with this - divine order demands men lead homes and women & children submit. Simples.

Even The Lord humbled himself to submit to the Father - although they are equal
Philippians 2:5 Let this mind be in you which was also in Christ Jesus, 6 who, being in the form of God, did not consider it robbery to be equal with God, 7 but made Himself of no reputation, taking the form of a bondservant, and coming in the likeness of men.

TV01:
And if he does not? Do they cease to be the ruler? You are straining - that's why I suggested an exercise regime for you

TV01:
Does submitting to one another mean everyone submits to everyone else in every instance in all relationships. Can't you see how absurd you sound and how obtuse you are being?


TV

FrancisTony:

I know you are married.
Okay, are you saying that whenever you obey your wife, then it automatically mean submission? This submission ish is overhyped, aswear.
Sometimes, when my uncles, aunts or elder/junior cousins come around and send me to get something for them, I obey - does it mean i'm submitting to them


Head means the "pillar" who gives an assertion for something to be done.
As the head, husband brings out an/a opinion/matter and seeks the wife advice, before proceeding not rushing to do it because she's an inconsequential subordinate.
- To me, a woman becomes a slave or dormant dumbkopf when she swallows whatever her husband says hook-line and sinker because he's a man even though they are all senile.

Have you forgotten the dual nature of Christ?
He was both God and Man on earth.
His flesh ate, praye
d, slept etc

Divinity of Christ
John 20:28
And Thomas answered and said to Him. "My Lord and my God!".

His flesh wasn't equal to God because God never die(s).


That's why I wrote, "righteous/good leaders


I refuse to insult you Tv01

Like they say, charity begins at home.
Husband and Wife should respect each other equally as bible commanded.

By the way, do you care to explain what submission means in your own context apart from respect?

snakebeat:

My friend what is ur problem? Did u offend a woman in d past & perhaps u think defending their cause may serve as an atonement for ur wrong? Honestly the way u argue & defend women with passion & enthusiasm even when the issue is clear is quite suspicious, I don't really know how to explain this, ur comments reeks off hatred for men.

Did a man offend u? U don't even mind going to the extent of misinterpreting the bible, all in a bid to buttress ur point. if u're really a man, pls visit google, find out how men act. It's an aberration for a man to constantly exhibit female traits, i'm afraid ur comments doesn't reflects manly traits at all, & if u're a woman, pls be brave & proud enough to disclose ur gender....

snakebeat:

My friend what is ur problem? Did u offend a woman in d past & perhaps u think defending their cause may serve as an atonement for ur wrong? Honestly the way u argue & defend women with passion & enthusiasm even when the issue is clear is quite suspicious, I don't really know how to explain this, ur comments reeks off hatred for men.

Did a man offend u? U don't even mind going to the extent of misinterpreting the bible, all in a bid to buttress ur point. if u're really a man, pls visit google, find out how men act. It's an aberration for a man to constantly exhibit female traits, i'm afraid ur comments doesn't reflects manly traits at all, & if u're a woman, pls be brave & proud enough to disclose ur gender....

Ngokafor:

....shatappp!!!

TV01:

I'm afraid it has/is



No, it's Ben Martin (nee Coghill) - husband of Rowan - one of a new breed of men, who are taking their wife's surname.

The last of his name, forsaker of the bloodline, the kinship, ties, the culture and heritage of his fathers. A sign of the feminised, limp-wristed, males that these days pass as progressive and open-minded men - presumably a genital swap will be forthcoming

I's all over Cracky - feminism has triumphed. Lets find a cave somewhere, gather the troops and live out our time reminiscing about the good old days - when men were men and women made sure dinner was on the table !


TV

FrancisTony:

Hypocrisy is when they hail a female(dude? lesbian?) supporting them and attack a male not supporting them.

FrancisTony:

Did I offend a woman? No
Do I hate men? No, for what reason?
Do I exhibit women trait? No
Do I really care about how men act? No
What trait do I exhibit? Mine

All I care about is, how I act.

Ngokafor:






....shatappp!!!

snakebeat:

My friend what is ur problem? Did u offend a woman in d past & perhaps u think defending their cause may serve as an atonement for ur wrong? Honestly the way u argue & defend women with passion & enthusiasm even when the issue is clear is quite suspicious, I don't really know how to explain this, ur comments reeks off hatred for men.

Did a man offend u? U don't even mind going to the extent of misinterpreting the bible, all in a bid to buttress ur point. if u're really a man, pls visit google, find out how men act. It's an aberration for a man to constantly exhibit female traits, i'm afraid ur comments doesn't reflects manly traits at all, & if u're a woman, pls be brave & proud enough to disclose ur gender....