Welcome, Guest: Register On Nairaland / LOGIN! / Trending / Recent / NewStats: 3,208,207 members, 8,001,903 topics. Date: Wednesday, 13 November 2024 at 06:29 PM |
Nairaland Forum / Science/Technology / The Sciences Discussion Thread. (71714 Views)
Universe Or Multiverse. (A Discussion) / Who Has Seen Smartbird? Discussion Thread For Novel ways to fly. / Possibility Of Alien Life (discussion Thread) (2) (3) (4)
(1) (2) (3) ... (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) (13) ... (34) (Reply) (Go Down)
Re: The Sciences Discussion Thread. by kandiikane(m): 5:59pm On Jun 21, 2015 |
Teempakguy: What makes up the superstrings? |
Re: The Sciences Discussion Thread. by johnydon22(m): 6:03pm On Jun 21, 2015 |
Queed:Lol. . . Belief/Unbelief in deity concepts makes no difference in scientific discussions or studies. . Belief impairs no one to study or discuss science except for some who for the so reason of finding some scientific facts contradictory to their belief chose to forgo/dismiss these facts to uphold their belief or superstition 1 Like |
Re: The Sciences Discussion Thread. by koife(m): 6:06pm On Jun 21, 2015 |
Pls does any one in the house in have alternative way of calculating adsorption equilibrium constant (Kad) apart from using the square correlation coefficient (Rsquare) from the linear plot of of isotherm equation? I used El-awady etal isotherm but because of variant error in linear equation parameters of the isotherm assumptions I ignored using the slope and intercept as log (Kads), rather I used the quasi chemical approximation and assumptions based on law of mass action. Kads =tita/(1-tita)xC...pls am I correct? |
Re: The Sciences Discussion Thread. by KennyLenz(m): 6:09pm On Jun 21, 2015 |
Fascinating, I'm in |
Re: The Sciences Discussion Thread. by rockiedink(m): 6:10pm On Jun 21, 2015 |
Freemanan: Technically you're wrong amigo... The mausoleum can be explained...as can the temple at Halicarnassus...or the statue of Diana...by science. So postulating that because it's called a 'wonder' means it can't be explained is balderdash. Because our forebears in the 1600s couldn't explain gunpowder and ammunition didn't mean that guns were magic did they? 1 Like |
Re: The Sciences Discussion Thread. by Nobody: 6:15pm On Jun 21, 2015 |
rockiedink:Waiting for the Hanging garden explanation then Mate |
Re: The Sciences Discussion Thread. by Nobody: 6:15pm On Jun 21, 2015 |
Teempakguy:While I was growing, I use to queried myself for the significance of mathematics because one is rarely thought importance of mathematics other than 1×1 to simultaneous to quadratic then jump to binomial and polynomial .... etc ..... Through soul searching , I was able to discovered that Everything in this life even the entire universe is built on MATHEMATICS . The fact that some branches of knowledge are devoid of equations doesn't imply mathematics ain't present .... any element containing measurements is mathmatics. |
Re: The Sciences Discussion Thread. by erico2k2(m): 6:21pm On Jun 21, 2015 |
menesheh:Does me user name look like that which you had an earlier argument with |
Re: The Sciences Discussion Thread. by Lawconfessor(f): 6:24pm On Jun 21, 2015 |
Cindino20: Indeed, an industrial chemist! |
Re: The Sciences Discussion Thread. by johnydon22(m): 6:25pm On Jun 21, 2015 |
Freemanan: I am of the opinion that the hanging gardens can be explained . . (mind you it is not literally plants floating on mid air) . . its a matter good functioning irrigation system to keep the plants alive to which am sure even you and i can tender a hypothesis without having to study the gardens personally |
Re: The Sciences Discussion Thread. by rockiedink(m): 6:28pm On Jun 21, 2015 |
johnydon22: You don dey use your brain...like a scuentitist!!! Hehehe Chop knuckle!!! |
Re: The Sciences Discussion Thread. by johnydon22(m): 6:34pm On Jun 21, 2015 |
rockiedink:Lol... |
Re: The Sciences Discussion Thread. by rockiedink(m): 6:36pm On Jun 21, 2015 |
Freemanan: The key to understanding the 'hanging gardens' is to remember that Babylon was in the desert...and vegetation was sparse... It's also known that the gardens had multiple terraces... Since we know the water wheel had been invented at this time, who's to say there wasn't a duct through which a water wheel (or something similar...you get the drift) pushed water all the way to the top of this formation... Then by a series of carefully planned, cut and channeled grooves and well laid soil within these terraces, allow gravity to do the rest of his work of 'watering' the 'garden' and then all you need is a knowledgeable husbandman and voila! You can have whatever plants you wanted and all would work as it should.... That's one way of looking at it mate... If they could build the pyramids and the sphinx... 2 Likes |
Re: The Sciences Discussion Thread. by Moffyman(m): 6:36pm On Jun 21, 2015 |
Nice one |
Re: The Sciences Discussion Thread. by 1miccza: 6:49pm On Jun 21, 2015 |
Teempakguy: Ehn and if you calculate all this force and velocity how e wan take add sugar to my gari. Please what goes up must remain up oo i love my position,after all John Newton said so or is that not that ibo boy's name? |
Re: The Sciences Discussion Thread. by Nobody: 6:51pm On Jun 21, 2015 |
rockiedink:Potent argument Mate... |
Re: The Sciences Discussion Thread. by Nobody: 6:52pm On Jun 21, 2015 |
johnydon22:Noted 1 Like 1 Share |
Re: The Sciences Discussion Thread. by 1miccza: 6:59pm On Jun 21, 2015 |
TYPING FROM THE TOP OF MY PALM TREE Please can someone link electronegativity with Ionic bonding or at least compare electronegativity with Ionic bonding?? |
Re: The Sciences Discussion Thread. by 1miccza: 7:05pm On Jun 21, 2015 |
rockiedink: Talking about carefully channelled grooves , that would be one hell of a task and do the water wheels shoot sprays of water upwards?? |
Re: The Sciences Discussion Thread. by Nobody: 7:16pm On Jun 21, 2015 |
dainty:Hello. Unfortunately, I am not an expert on advanced genetics. But, I can offer something. It would seem that genetic diversity is highly useful in determining the survival of a certain class of organisms. The more diverse a species is, the higher its chances of being able to adapt to its environment and hence, the higher its chances of survival. As we know, cancer is a situation in which a neoplasm spontaneously arises. Endangering the host organism. In this case, a new system has formed which acts as a parasite to the host. If we are to refer to this as a separate organism, sort of, it follows from the above that the higher the genetic diversity of the parent cells, the higher the chances of the neoplasm, e.g, tumor surviving. Simply because it can adapt. Another way of looking at it is that genetic diversity makes the behaviour of tumors or cancer cells unpredictable. It is uncertain, what will affect the cell, positively, negatively, or not at all. Another way, yet, of looking at this is that cancer cells, due to genetic diversity, cannot be classified because each clone has a different genetic make up. It is not like malaria, in which, all the plasmodium have the same Genetic make up and can be finished off with a single drug. A cancer cell is essentially brand new and varies across each individual. These are my humble submissions. I trust the biologists here will add and subtract. Cheers! |
Re: The Sciences Discussion Thread. by Queed: 7:17pm On Jun 21, 2015 |
johnydon22: This is 'purely' correct, and its the fact too. I always try to have an open mind about everything, and when scientific facts contradict believe or the other way round, I always put to use the the law postulated by some QUALIFIED African Teacher/Lecturers know as 'Gba bee's ' (youruba language meaning take it like that ) theory. like u asked in your other post; 'why does rain fall' , I would accept the scientific facts and also accept the 'Belief' hope you don't start seeing me as a nuisance because I believe 1 Like 2 Shares |
Re: The Sciences Discussion Thread. by Nobody: 7:18pm On Jun 21, 2015 |
Lushcream:you are very correct. Mathematics is the study of quantities, patterns, and the relationship between them. My definition, of course. 2 Likes 1 Share |
Re: The Sciences Discussion Thread. by Nobody: 7:19pm On Jun 21, 2015 |
kandiikane:WE DON'T KNOW. 1 Like |
Re: The Sciences Discussion Thread. by rockiedink(m): 7:22pm On Jun 21, 2015 |
1miccza: Trust me...or ask any engineer...channelling those grooves are nowhere near as hard as building the pyramids themselves...piece of cake. The water wheel is basically a contraption to harness hydropower...let's say a very basic for of a hydro turbine...but with the right add-ons, you can channel that water anywhere you want. The water wheel doesn't spray the water...it can direct the flow of water... ...and with a bit of pressure properly applied...anywhere could be 'upwards' |
Re: The Sciences Discussion Thread. by johnydon22(m): 7:23pm On Jun 21, 2015 |
Queed: No bro you pose no nuisance because you have a belief. . It actually still will make it more interesting. . anyway be good bro |
Re: The Sciences Discussion Thread. by samwayne154(m): 7:24pm On Jun 21, 2015 |
ELYMAXiimus:I want 2 also join how can I? Or is it d normal science $ technology forum? |
Re: The Sciences Discussion Thread. by johnydon22(m): 7:26pm On Jun 21, 2015 |
1miccza: Nope the water wheels just need to take the water into a channelling system that will have a fairly well distributed channel through out the garden. . so it is a huge architectural task but do not forget who we are dealing with here, not just any king but the mighty, rich and powerful. . Nebuchadenezeer he has the resources to achieve that as many times as he wants |
Re: The Sciences Discussion Thread. by Nobody: 7:28pm On Jun 21, 2015 |
I have a theory of the concept behind the hanging gardens. Well, after studying the pictures of the gardens, I find nothing impossible about them. What if instead of the elaborate engineering you guys are suggesting, what if they simply employed human labour? As in, lots of servants to water the gardens? That seems like a simple solution. |
Re: The Sciences Discussion Thread. by Nobody: 7:30pm On Jun 21, 2015 |
samwayne154:just post your ideas and/or questions here. People will reply you. |
Re: The Sciences Discussion Thread. by Nobody: 7:35pm On Jun 21, 2015 |
AreaFada2:of course. Science is tasking. Which is why one can easily know how intelligent a society is by checking their involvement in science. |
Re: The Sciences Discussion Thread. by 1miccza: 7:35pm On Jun 21, 2015 |
johnydon22: Yeah that sure shows that civilization and science is as old as time itself... |
Re: The Sciences Discussion Thread. by johnydon22(m): 7:38pm On Jun 21, 2015 |
1miccza: I agree those two concepts are very ancient, they are just improving now |
(1) (2) (3) ... (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) (13) ... (34) (Reply)
Rain Falls In Form Of Ice In Enugu Today(photos) / For Atm Users, See The 20 Most Guessed Atm Pin Numbers / Fear As Goat Allegedly Gives Birth To Half-human In Kwara
(Go Up)
Sections: politics (1) business autos (1) jobs (1) career education (1) romance computers phones travel sports fashion health religion celebs tv-movies music-radio literature webmasters programming techmarket Links: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) Nairaland - Copyright © 2005 - 2024 Oluwaseun Osewa. All rights reserved. See How To Advertise. 62 |