Krak:


And why should we delete it? Could you kindly state very. good, convinving and reasonable grounds why we should do so?

juwoonn:
Dis pfp sweet sha..too much drama

oyeme1:
Puskin I am sorry if I mess with your reputation or integrity, but if you want to maintain your stand, then so be it. But even in real life football there is always room for appeal after a red card was awarded on the pitch. I just believe a good leader should do more of listening and should be able to reason with his followers Good night/bye

Punt for PRIDE Rule Amendment

20. Duplicate/Opposite BET
It is expressly forbidden to place duplicate BETS on the same market using multiple slots. This will be considered as UNFAIR advantage and the penalty is AUTOMATIC DISQUALIFICATION from the competition.
E.g. Using a slot to bet on OVER 2.5goals and using another slot to bet on UNDER 2.5goals on the same match.

This competition has rules. These rules came by as a result of past incidences of previous PfP competitions. These rules strive to capture every irregularity that might occur & also tries to set boundaries and guidelines during the competition but unfortunately not every scenario/irregularity/boundary is going to be captured and that is why there is always room for amendment of the rules during the competition.

The situation you (oyeme1) created is quite UNIQUE.
Though, it then wasn't captured in the rules/guidelines governing this tournament but we must all tell ourselves the truth, that this kind of scenario offers someone an UNFAIR advantage and sets a very bad precedent for this tournament and possibly future PfP tournaments.
A strong message had to be sent as a warning and serve as a deterrent.
Unfortunately, you were caught in the crosshairs.

akraym:
So nobody heard from troot, yesterday, na wa o.

considering oyeme1 scenario...... hmmm

much has been said, less has been done.

puskin since he has apologies for his comment, I suppose we pardon him.

Well I guess I will be taking over from troot here.

@oyeme1........people have pleaded on your behalf. I have decided to listen and bend myself a bit.

I hereby withdraw your disqualification and you are eligible to contest in the rerun.

I hope you make the best use of this opportunity.

Goodluck

Addme:
Username: Larrykool Slot: 2 1. 22.10.15 11:00 Vorskla-D Poltava - Zorya-D Lugansk (First Team to score in both halves) Customer type: No @ 1.40 Result: 2. 22.10.15 12:00 Banants Yerevan FC 2 - Pyunik Yerevan FC 2 (Under/Over 0,5 goals in 1st half) Customer type: Over @ 1.25

puskin:

@akraym........he used his two slots. Kindly update the results to reflect this.
Addme topped his group......and not Chelseafan1

akraym:
Apologies, that's because I don't have the record(s).

Chelseafan1:
akraym, I think I shud be paired with biogrammz and not bananaboi.


I am B2, Addme is B1

Chelseafan1:
akraym, I think I shud be paired with biogrammz and not bananaboi.


I am B2, Addme is B1

puskin:


It has been reflected.

Chelseafan1:


Yes boss, its been like 2 weeks since bananaboi came online, whoever has his contact should do the needful.

Enangson:
*Yawns* Good mrng punters,




Nice one from the Mod/Judges, for the mature way you handle the matter.


Issues like this will make pfp stronger and better.



Rule no. 20 should goes thus: it is forbidden to do an OYEME1 in the competition from now henceforth.



Lolzz, my thought were Puskin(Blatter); Akraym(PLatini). Just proven otherwise.

Addme:
Username: Larrykool Slot: 2 1. 22.10.15 11:00 Vorskla-D Poltava - Zorya-D Lugansk (First Team to score in both halves) Customer type: No @ 1.40 Result: 2. 22.10.15 12:00 Banants Yerevan FC 2 - Pyunik Yerevan FC 2 (Under/Over 0,5 goals in 1st half) Customer type: Over @ 1.25

We have entered the knockout stage where 10 contestants will receive a prize.

1) The 8 people who qualify from this knockout stage will earn the opportunity to be able to WIN one of the prizes, depending on how far you go in the competition.

2) The last two prize spots will be determined by BEST LOSER basis from this Group of 16 knockout stage.

This would be the order of priority.

- the two contestants with the highest points from amongst the KNOCKED-OUT. (Losers)
- if there is a TIE in points amongst them, the one who used the least amount of slots would be considered FIRST.
- if there is also a TIE in the amount of slots used........a run-off would be organised for them.

akraym:
[size=14pt]Dygeasy vs Moscyt

Hemor vs Ganjafama

Liam vs Playoff Winner

Omosisko vs Buddyy

Femcruz vs Krak

Sirchris4u vs Tsalmjohn

Boigrammz vs Chelseafan1

Addme vs Bananaboi[/size]

I want to believe at this juncture, no one will be tagged UNDERDOG

akraym:
2ND ROUND

Femcruz...[5 slots]...[1 point]
Krak...[5 slots]...[1 point]

Sirchris4u...[5 slots]...[1 point]
Tsalmjohn...[5 slots]...[1 point]

Boigrammz...[5 slots]...[1 point]
Chelseafan1...[5 slots]...[1 point]

Addme...[5 slots]...[1 point]
Bananaboi...[5 slots]...[1 point]

October 25th to October 31st 2015 11:59pm



PLAYOFF

Rhemite...[3 slots]...[1 point]
Oyeme1...[3 slots]...[1 point]
Riar...[3 slots]...[1 point]
October 23rd - 25th



As we all can see, we've made amendment to the rule, kindly adhere

Chelseafan1:


Boss, there's a mistake in my opponents name, he is not biogrammz, he's boigrammz, there's no way he will get this mention, kindly rectify.

Fair play always.

oyeme1:
Well, I am left with no choice than to accept the judgement, but I still maintain that justice was not served here, I put my self at risk for keeping my slots till that time what if my opponent won their games, if I did this when everyone had 5 slots, will the case be judged this way? what the mod played out here is simple, Increase the gravity of the offense such that the defendant has to plead for less. I have never for once thought that what I did will be tagged an offense that could lead to forfeiture of two slots, rather I see it as simple logic. The worst should have been to cancel my games and return my slots. Thanks to all who stood by me for justice, Juwon, Femcruz, Funkyjms, Evangson, Dan2j.