menix:
Missile wey no reach Sango thunder abii Amadioha slap...

Bollinger:


If a country has weapons of mass destruction, there is no way to hide it because of it's unique radioactive signature and that it can be easily detected with satellite imagery. This is why iran found it so hard to hide their uranium enrichment programme. Plus, it does not matter the amount you have, all you need is maybe 20 of the right megatons to destroy the whole world. And there are thousands spread all over the planet.

JonSnow:
I feel This Syrian crisis is a means of the 'big boys' to come and flex their 'biceps'

take cover guys, sh*t just got real

tundebaba234:


Only brainwashed people wanna go to america. When they get there they will realize that the grass is always greener on the other side until they get there and find out it is mirage. 62% of americans are one paycheck away from living on the street and cant raise a merely $500-$1000 in an emergency or a hospital visit. U are one of such dumb folk, u better wake up to reality....oh I forgot, waking up is not part of the american dream.

tundebaba234:
human rights and hunger? Very laughable. American imperialism which is the greatest enforcer of global capitalism is responsible for the hunger in any part of the world. You might have a black president in your country but he is useless, he doesnt control the economy. Wall steet is the number one enemy of africa, for every point it rises more communities in africa will be ravaged and destroyed. You know nothing about imperialism man. American imperialism and global capitalism must be destroyed for humanity to be saved!

Missy89:



Russia was not even in a position to colonize Africa even if it wanted to at that time since it wasn't industrialized enough to be able to. Besides, Russia colonized a whole lot of other places in the East.
Your other cold war examples might really sounds great on paper but keep in mind, every Soviet and American maneuver during the cold war was strictly power politics and not moral.
And as for slavery, Russia didn't need slaves because most Russians were serfs themselves until they were freed in 1861 and 1866.

If you are going to insist that those relics breached US airspace, I will have to believe that USAF presence in the UK is no agreement but a airspace breach and occupation as well

all4naija:

You listen here don't tell me trash. Where is Russia when these dictators are killing their citizens? It is only when America intervenes and envious piece of sh*t looking for attention to be recognized as super power would want to interfere. How much has Russia expended in fighting for human rights, hunger, world health, democracy, etc around the world than intimidating others? Oh, I can see the human rights in Russia are f**ked up and the Neo Nazis lynching your black brothers over there. You Putin-ass wipe!

Missy89:

Russia was not even in a position to colonize Africa even if it wanted to at that time since it wasn't industrialized enough to be able to. Besides, Russia colonized a whole lot of other places in the East.
Your other cold war examples might really sounds great on paper but keep in mind, every Soviet and American maneuver during the cold war was strictly power politics and not moral.
And as for slavery, Russia didn't need slaves because most Russians were serfs themselves until they were freed in 1861 and 1866.

If you are going to insist that those relics breached US airspace, I will have to believe that USAF presence in the UK is no agreement but a airspace breach and occupation as well

Missy89:



While I admire Putin, calling Russia the saviour of the weak is absolutely hilarious but ok.

I will be impressed if this was 10 years ago. Russia "mega weapon" equivalent has been deployed and used by NATO over the years. Russia always playing catch up. NATO has been deploying TLAM since the 90s

I like how Pro Putin cherry pick their criticism. DAILY BEAST is a propaganda and a CIA mouth piece when their article is anti Russia but a fair and balance news agency when they are pro Russia.

all4naija:
Go and get yourself educated before using some silly word you pick up from the internet. All security council members do the same thing including Russia you are praising here practices imperialism.

If you think America is responsible for you hunger in Africa you must be very lazy to see the truth. Your leaders fail to provide food and develop your infrastructure but here you are blaming it on another nation. Who stole the money in your treasury in the first place? Who is looting the resources of your country? Bwahaha... You don't expect to be fed by another nation all the time and wait on your poor a s s not to take actions. You have not argument there.

Russia is only being aggressive and trying to show it is still relevant as it used to do during and right after war world II. The Berlin wall constructed by the then USSR is a testament to that. History is there for you to draw some intelligence from.

princejayboss:


American game changer in weaponry skyrocketed after Roswell 1947..... Funny enough Russia just found out what Americans knew after 1957 in tebev.... Any one who know the secret has the power to mess the world up with one single nuke...


RUSSIA will put US out of the game any time ... Any day in the recent day.... USA have lost their way .... That dam country is going Down if they don't find their way back to the right track

princejayboss:



Bro ...when you know nothing .... Try to learn.... They actually ran away.... USA is overrated while Russia is underrated

tundebaba234:
the fundamental position of all revolutionary socialists is the total elimination of capitalism. Just wait till a socialists takes control of any african country then you will understand. The day a socialist state is declared in any africa country just tuned in to CNN and BBC. All the wealth of american and they west were stolen via global capitalism. All african leaders aside from mugabe are puppet of this destructive neoliberal world order.

Missy89:


I hear you. Russia indeed do have a better strategy in Syria

Point is, The US navy have moved far beyond hitting static targets with cruise missiles and have successfully tested synthetically guided Tomahawk missiles that can hit moving targets, alter its course toward the moving target after receiving position updates from surveillance aircraft/drones. They can even loiter over a target area. When Russia have the capability in 2056, Let me know .

The only area Russia can even dream to compete with the US navy is with submarines. Most Russian naval surface ships are old soviet legacy relics. They are modernizing however i will give them that.

S300 is a fascinating piece of technology but USAF wont even break a sweat penetrating it. There are advanced Miniature Air-Launched Decoys that can render it obsolete if it is integrated with Joint Standoff Weapons like AGM-154 and advanced Anti-Radiation missiles. A comprehensive USAF Iron Hand operation will amaze you.

Russia's military quality is impressive but very limited.

CSTR2:
The only advantage russia has over the US is the number of nukes.
Which is not really an advantage because the US has more nukes than she will ever need.
It wouldn't take the US a year to build atleast 100 of the most biggest nukes the world has ever seen.

Toktee:
When a messile fired by the russian landed in turkey,another one landed in iran,you are here talking about accuracy,any one who think American are behind or does not know about all the Russian millitary might,such person is a novice.
My advice,never you think the Russians have what the American have,what they are is initial gragra,read about an American warship called Gearge washington and its contents then your mentality will change.

jamst2:
Obama Refuses To Accept US
Soldiers Bodies Killed By Russian
Airstrikes In Syria

www.whatdoesitmean.com/index1923.htm

huh! isis is a group of zionist cia,mossad,mi1-6,unspecial forces & rag-tag fake muslims...

Any direct hit on russia forces will lead to ww 3...take it or leave it

Shymm3x:


But one thing you've to admire about the Russians is that they've never been on the wrong side of history. If not being industrialised when slavery/colonisation was the thing in vogue was what didn't put them on the wrong side of history - you still have to laud them for that. During the second world war, the Soviets again were on the right side of history by destroying over 95% of Nazi Germany's capabilities, while the yanks were benefiting from all sides of the war, thus saving Europe and the world from the Nazis. Suez Crisis was another - without the intervention of the Soviets, both the UK and France would've re-colonised Egypt. Then when you get into Africa proper - while the US fully supported apartheid, the Soviets were the ones who helped fight against it. With their help with the Cubans in Angola - there would still be apartheid in South Africa today and the whole of Southern Africa would look like Oceania. Etc.. And today in Syria, the Soviet offspring, Russia, is also on the right side of history - cleaning up the mess the US created there with tens of millions already dead in that axis.

Right side of history vs. wrong side of history. Interests might be involved, but one has always been morally right, while the other has always been morally wrong. WHY? (Jadakiss wanna know WHY lol).

Please, Tupolev almost crash landed in California (and I love Cali loool) with those ancient propellers. Why America? Why blow hot air when you can't even protect ya air space? I'll only admit it's an occupation if you can admit that the British Royal family still has control over the US, hence all the most important institutions in the US are located in the DMV axis - the axis King George built.

hajlat:

When will Nigeria belong to these group of World super power ?

JUHABACH:
so only gay people visit america. by that logic, there are millions of gay people in nigeria alone.
pls try to think before you type.
dont go full ret*rd.

ken4jj:

Whenever Russia and US are mentioned, some people start misbehaving. Let me summarize this issue once again. Every country in this syria mess are guilty of pursuing their selfish interest. What you are seeing in syria today is not about saving syrians, far from it. it is about some selfish interset by the powers that be.

1. US is in syria not really to fight ISIS but to remove Assad, checkmate Iran and to secure some economic deals among other selfish interests.
2. Russia is in syria to Prevent Assad from falling, safeguard their Naval base in syria, secure economic deals,protect other selfish interest and challenge the US and bring back the Russian power and not to fight ISIS
3. Iran is player in the conflict to further her own growing influence having captured Iraq, by ensuring the syrian govt stands and not necessarily fighting ISIS
4. Saudi, Turkey etc are in the region to ensure Iran does not have the upper hand and to ensure power is returned to the Sunnis in Syria.
5. ISIS is fighting to create its own Islamic state where they can rule with their own version of Sharia law and fortunately for them, the people who should fight them have their main interests
So in this war, fighting ISIS is secondary among all the players and an excuse to be in syria. Unfortunately, the losers are the civilians who have been used to play war games among competing interests. Anybody who thinks Putin is in syria to fight ISIS and save civilians is just plain naive. Like the US, wetin concern Putin with ISIS. Now, as i write, Yemen is on fire. The govt forces backed by the saudi's is bombing the houti rebels while Iran is sponsoring the rebels because they are shittes. Civilians are dying in droves, both Russia and the US are just watching and supporting form the sidelines because Yemen offers no benefit. The same Iran backing govt forces in Syria is backing rebels in Yemen while the Saudis and the Americans backing rebels in Syria are backing govt forces in Yemen. Where is Russia in Yemen? No where because there interest is not there despite civilians dying.
Gentlemen, this world powers are so selfish and wicked. It pans me to see how nairalanders take sides in this evils committed against humanity. people are dying in thousands and what some people are interested is in how Russia will defeat America or how America will defeat Russia insulting each other in the process. I warn you guys once again that this war you guys tactically wishing to happen between the US and Russia, when it happens, you might not live to know which cruise missile is superior to the other or who will win the war.
Thanks.

Oche211:
Whn will Nigeria use similar weapon/tech nd wipe boko haram out once nd 4 all instead of this hide nd seek games d idiots(boko haram) re playing.
I Want to see an end to global insurgency.
#SayNoToViolence
#SayNoToTerrorist
#SayNoToBokoharam
#SayNoToISIS
#SayNoToBloodshed
#WeAreNotTerrorists
#WeAreNigerians

Toktee:
When a messile fired by the russian landed in turkey,another one landed in iran,you are here talking about accuracy,any one who think American are behind or does not know about all the Russian millitary might,such person is a novice.
My advice,never you think the Russians have what the American have,what they are is initial gragra,read about an American warship called Gearge washington and its contents then your mentality will change.

tundebaba234:


Love ur post but u have to realize this is imperialism. How many people have died to feed the thirst of greedy imperialist in the past 100yrs? Imperialists dont save lives, they only save money, and American imperialism is the greatest threat to humanity

Underground:


One fell in Turkey as well? Lol! Where on earth do you people get your news from??!
Besides, Iran itself has said no missiles fell within its territory so I don't get what you are getting overly excited about?

Missy89:

Even thou, Russia's sacrifice was very important to wining the war, They collaborated with Hitler in the beginning took half of Poland, Killed all the polish officers in their captivity, created a fake polish army, refuse to give back the polish territory and insisted that Poland " get what she lost in the east from Germany in the west" Britain caved even thou she went to war to defend polish territorial integrity in the first place. Russia lied since the 40s about killing Polish officers till 1991. How is that the right side of history?

Stalin was on record saying that the England and France provoked the second world war and even said Russia will defend Germany's interest when the going was good in 39. Same Soviet Union shot down a Korean plane in 83 because they were paranoid "NATO is planning something" and did the same press conference with military powerpoint denying it and you people are wondering why people are skeptical when the MH17 issue started and wont buy Russia's explanation (Not saying Russia did it). Again how is that the right side of history?

At the same time Khrushchev was "defending" Egypt he was sending tanks into Hungary to crush and Uprising there. Every great power is the same. no nation in history can claim any moral high ground. In fact. Most political scientist that are realists thinks America is weighing herself down by ideology instead of strict power concepts when it come to formulating a foreign policy.



I will leave you with a memo from George Kennan a cold war strategist

We must be very careful when we speak of exercising "leadership" in Asia. We are deceiving ourselves and others when we pretend to have answers to the problems, which agitate many of these Asiatic peoples. Furthermore, we have about 50% of the world's wealth but only 6.3 of its population. This disparity is particularly great as between ourselves and the peoples of Asia. In this situation, we cannot fail to be the object of envy and resentment. Our real task in the coming period is to devise a pattern of relationships, which will permit us to maintain this position of disparity without positive detriment to our national security. To do so we will have to dispense with all sentimentality and daydreaming; and our attention will have to be concentrated everywhere on our immediate national objectives. We need not deceive ourselves that we can afford today the luxury of altruism and world benefaction...
]