FOR the family of Mr. Emmanuel Uwagbaokwu of Ohobo Afara in Umuahia North Council Area of Abia State, happiness and peace of mind have eluded them for now following the gruesome murder of their 21 year old son, Ikechukwu Uwagbaokwu, allegedly by the operatives of the Abia State Police Command. Until his tragic death, Ikechukwu Vincent Uwagbaokwu was a student of Imo State Polytechnic, Umuagwo, in Ohaji- Egbema Local Government Area.

The Uwagbaokwu family is strongly linking the tragic killing of their son to a land dispute it has with the Ndukwe and Uwaga families. Specifically, the family is alleging that the said families framed their son and connived with the police to kill Ikechukwu because of the land dispute.

The land dispute was said to have lingered and was getting messier when the community’s traditional peace makers, Ibeku Okonko Arbitration Panel waded into it and had indeed fixed a date to hear from the families involved before one the parties lost one of the witnesses, prompting the rescheduling of the matter by the traditional panel.

However, five days to the rescheduled date, Ikechukwu was gruesomely murdered and the Uwagbaokwu family is pointing accusing fingers at the rival families in the land dispute. According to their petition to the Abia State Commissioner of Police, Uwagbaokwu family hinged their suspicion on an allegation from one of the rival families which had earlier accused them of being responsible for the death of their family member.

The Uwagbaokwu family, in the petition, written by their lawyer, Godwin Oriaku of Overcome’s Chambers, claimed that days before the burial of the deceased from the rival family, they [rival family] sent a warning message to them not to attend the burial ceremony, accusing them of having a hand in the death of their brother. The petition also alleged that prior to the killing of Ikechukwu, “there have been threats issued at various occasions” by the rival family that lost a member that they were “going to avenge the death from the family of Uwagbaokwu”.

In the petition addressed to Abia Police Commissioner, Joshak Habila, the family of the slain undergraduate accused the police of killing their son. “On the 10th of September, 2015, Mr. Ikechukwu Vincent Uwagbaokwu, a Marketing Student of Imo Polytechnic went to bed at about 9.00pm but at about 10.50pm there was persistent banging on the door of the family house of the Uwagbaokwu.

“When Mr. Anthony Uwagbaokwe (elder brother of deceased) came out to see who was banging on their door, lo and behold, there were about ten fierce men in Police uniform who had taken strategic positions in the surroundings of the house. “One of the men in uniform, who came with Hilux pick up van and black Camry Saloon Car, hit the door of one of the occupants of the house and forced it open. When the occupant came out, the men in police uniform, who refused to identify themselves, said that he was not the person that they were looking for.

“The Police went to the direction pointed to by those who allegedly brought them. The armed policemen forced the next wooden door open and on sighting Ikechukwu Vincent Uwagbaokwu, one of the policemen allegedly shot him and he died immediately. “Our clients raised alarm but nobody came to their rescue. The matter was reported to Ehimiri Police Station in whose jurisdiction this area falls, where the Divisional Police Officer (DPO) gave them order to deposit the deceased at Madonna Mortuary in Umuahia,” the family stated

The 54 year old father of slain Ikechukwu, Mr. Emmanuel Uwagbaokwu, has therefore appealed to the Inspector General of police, Solomon Arase to order a comprehensive investigation to properly unravel who are the killers of his son. In a telephone chat, the Commissioner of Police, Joshak Habila could neither confirm nor deny the incident or the receipt of the petition but urged the lawyer and members of the family to see him in the office if they have such allegation, saying that they would not cover or protect any police man involved in extra-judicial killing or any illegal act.

But the family lawyer, Godwin Oriaku, insisted that the Police Commissioner has the petitions which he forwarded to the CID department to investigate. In fact, Oriaku claimed that four suspects have been arrested but alleged that the Ehimiri DPO was still shielding the alleged killer cop even as he said that his clients would demand for a thorough autopsy to determine the type of bullet that killed their son.

From a Forensic point of view, autopsy will not determine the "kind of bullet" that killed the victim. Autopsy will determine the possible manner of death and cause of death.
Manner of death in this case is, was it homicide? If so, how? Was it gunshot from pointblank range, accidental etc. Manner of death in this case is what really killed him? Was it from blood loss, brain damage, punctured artery in the heart from the bullet or bullets wound? Etc.
These facts are needed to be established if justice is to be served. Forensic evidence is crucial to this case.
ADVICE
Get forensic experts or crime investigators to do the following:
1. Visit the crime scene.
2. Seek for possible bullet shells
3. Get a warrant from the court to examine the firearms used by the team of police that were present at the crime scene.
4. Analyse the firearms with comparison with the bullet shells possibly gotten from the crime scene and the actual bullets shot if stuck and found on the victim's body during autopsy.
5. Perform forensic ballistic analysis on each of the firearms and compare the striations and patterns of the controlled shots with that of the shells and bullet(s) recovered from the crime scene.
6. A possible match will be obtained if a firearm's bullet patterns is consistent with the recovered shell or bullet.
7. The owner of that firearm is responsible for the murder of the victim.
8. Except the police authorities will want to cover this up or frustrate this forensic investigation, IT IS POSSIBLE TO APPREHEND, CHARGE AND SUCCESSFULLY PROSECUT THE PEPERTRATOR OF THIS MURDER.
NB.
This is just a rough, brief and overview of what is expected to be done from a forensic point of view given the description of the case as stated by the media.