the INEC did investigation when they were reports of cheating in Rivers state and Prof Jega concluded that the election was free and fair.

I trust Jega more than I trust Tribunal (especially after APC moved it to Abuja, changed the Judges and used DSS to intimidate officials)

if Jega is right that APC won the Presidential election then he is right that PDP won the Rivers state and Akwa Ibom Election... simples!

Buhari and APC should keep fooling and disgracing their party.
Jega has spoken the truth, while they power mongers are busy trying to manipulate it.

Wike is a Goner.... Even INEC IcT and Monitoring Directors testified against itsself and the document was tendered as exhibits,they tactically avoided using card reader and at the same time Tendered incident forms(manual voting) that wasn't up to the 1M votes alloted to Wike

NON-USE OF CARD READER WAS NOT A GROUND IN THE APC ELECTION PETITION. APC major ground was "SUBSTANTIAL NON- COMPLIANCE WITH THE ELECTORAL ACT AND GUIDELINES". Non-use of Card Reader was merely one of the "PARTICULARS OF NON COMPLIANCE WITH ELECTORAL ACT AND GUIDELINES". I overheard someone argue that the facts in Delta, Lagos and Rivers State were the same, but the outcome was different. The facts were never and can never be the same. The fact maybe similar but the evidence in prove of the facts and the method of presentation of the evidence cannot be the same. FOR INSTANCE APC PLEADED AND PROVED IRREGULARITIES. Eg. 1. APC showed that Prince John BAZIA signed as Ward Collation Agent for 10 wards of TAI LGA 2. APC showed that Princewill Claudous Signed as Ward Collation Agent for 13 wards of ASARI TORU LGA. 3. APC showed that Dr. Chituru Orluwene who was INEC Collation Officer for DEGEMA LGA is a known PDP member and was also a Member of the PDP Campaign Organization (the Medical Team) and so many others. APC equally established that known members of the PDP were used as INEC ADHOC STAFF FOR THE ELECTIONS. 4. APC proved that In all the LGAs, total number of accreditation for GOVERNORSHIP was DIFFERENT FROM HOUSE OF ASSEMBLY, yet the elections took place the day with one single process. 5. APC proved that in OMUMA LGA, Election was allegedly held for House of Assembly and did not hold for Governorship, yet the elections were on the same day and time. 6. APC showed that In wards 12 and 13 OBIO/AKPOR LGA the purported election did not hold for Governorship but held for House of Assembly, yet the elections were for same day and time. 7. APC established that In Wards 15 and 16 OBIO/ AKPOR the purported election did not hold on the 11th April for Governorship and rescheduled to 12th April, but held on 11th April for House of Assembly, yet it was the same process. 8. APC showed that From documents filed by PDP and Wike, Former Governor Amaechi was shown on photographs casting his vote at Ubima Ward 8, unit 14, BUT INEC could not produce results for his unit; establishing APC's allegation of snatching of material. 9. APC proved, On the face of Results from INEC, it was clearly written that some results were snatched. 10. APC showed over voting on the face of some unit results. 11. APC showed disparity on number of accreditation on the results sheets, different from tick of accreditation on voter register, different from card reader report. 12. APC established disparity on number of total vote cast on results sheets different from tick of vote on voter register. 13. APC established disparity between accreditation figures for Governorship and House Assembly Election in the same unit, yet you same process. 14. APC Showed disparity and inconsistent entries on Results Sheets (Form EC8A). 15. APC established that the RAC centre at ASARI TORU LGA, with electoral materials for 10 out of the 13 wards of LGA were burnt. 16 APC established incontrovertibly that there was LARGE SCALE VIOLENCE ACROSS THE STATE ON THAT DAY, etc. DESPITE THESE MANIFEST IRREGULARITIES ESTABLISHED BY APC, Nyesom Wike and PDP did not call any witness(es) to EXPLAIN THE DISCREPANCIES AND IRREGULARITIES. They simply maintained that they won. How did they expect the Election Tribunal to resolve the disparity and discrepancies, except in line with the established evidence? Card Reader reported was just one of the documents MUCH ADO about the so called INCIDENT FORMS, MANUAL ACCREDITATION AND 1,187,295 VOTES DECLARED BY INEC. For the APC, it is a mere subterfuge to create an impression that all was well in that election. Unfortunately, Even from the so called INCIDENT FORMS tendered during the hearing of APC's petition at the Election Petition Tribunal, INEC, WIKE and PDP could still not account for the over 1 million votes purportedly cast and allotted to WIKE. After the Sham Election, PDP spent several months with some compromised INEC staff preparing incident forms at INEC Office in Port Harcourt, which they planned to tender at the Tribunal in order to hoodwink the Judge, yet the GOD of Justice put confusion in their midst and they could not not even account for half the votes. Foremost, the Respondents didn't remember that the 3rd Respondent (PDP) did not plead or front-load the Incident Forms which they suddenly decided to bring to Court seeing the progress the Petitioners had made in discharge of the onus on them. The Incident Form tendered by PDP could only account for about 299,885 votes contrary to total vote cast of 1,187,295 declared and 1,029,102 allotted to Wike by INEC It would interest you to NOTE THAT EACH INCIDENT FORM CONTAINS A MAXIMUM OF 10 NAMES/ INCIDENCES. The Petitioners had to do a physical count of the names of voters that allegedly had incidence as shown from the EXHIBITS TENDERED BY PDP and it shows only 299,885 voters/incidences. Now, you may wish to do some calculations yourself, and in doing so just ASSUME THAT EACH FORM CONTAINS THE MAXIMUM OF 10 NAMES/ INCIDENCES. FOR EASE OF REFERENCE; Below is the lists of the INCIDENT FORMS AND QUANTITIES TENDERED AS EXHIBITS BY PDP at the ELECTION PETITION TRIBUNAL. The figure preceded by the alphabet "B" is the tittle of the exhibits; and the figures following are the quantities of the incident forms. LGA EXHIBIT; NO COPY OBIO/AKR LGA B47-57; 1,341 DEGEMA LGA. B58. 489 OGU/BOLO LGA. B59. 1,052 OKRIKA LGA. B60. 587 AHOADA EAST LGA. B61. 648 ONELGA. B62. 1,081 ABUA/ODUAL. B63. 503 OYIGBO LGA. B64. 660 ELEME LGA, B65. 136 KHANA LGA, B66. 1,072 ANDONI LGA, B67. 527 OPOBO/NK LGA, B68. 683 AHOADA WST LGA, B69. 368 BONNY LGA, B70. 515 ETCHE LGA, B71. 596 IKWERRE LGA, B72. 1,804 TAI LGA, B73. 560 GOKANA LGA, B74. 948 OBIO/AKR LGA, B75. 2,652 PHALGA, B76. 5,155 TAI LGA. B77-B79. 82 OYIGBO LGA. B80-B91. 105 ABUA/ODUAL B92-B95. 525 OKIRIKA LGA B96-B100. 260 IKWERRE LGA B101. 254 ANDONI LGA B102-B106. 888 AHOADA EAST B107-B108. 334 DEGEMA LGA B109-B110. 124 OBIO/AKR LGA, B111-B112. 1,983 PHALGA B128-B134. 875 ONELGA. B135-B140. 735 OGU/BOLO LGA B141-B143. 424 GOKANA LGA B144-B147. 582 AKULGA B148-B151. 528 ETCHE LGA B152-B156. 919 TAI LGA B157-B162. 564 ASALGA B163-B164. 281 NOW you know the quantity and figures of the MUCH TALKED ABOUT INCIDENT FORMS AND MANUAL ACCREDITATION from the Sham Election in Rivers State. SO, THE QUESTION TO INEC, WIKE AND PDP is WHERE DID THE 1,187,295 votes come from

Ahmadie:
This is nonsense so appeal court will upturn supreme court judgement abi?
Na which kind weed these people dey smoke?

Please get your facts straight. The judgment that reached supreme court is that of jurisdiction and location of the tribunal at Abuja.
The Tribunal judgment was just recently appealed. the appeal court has not given judgment yet. when appeal court gives her judgment, if it is not favorable Wike can still go to supreme court.

simply put: There are two separate cases here.
1. which Wike filed challanging the jurisdiction of an Abuja base tribunal. This one has been concluded because Supreme court has given verdict on it. and
2. filed by APC/Dakuku which tribunal recently gave their verdict. the verdict of the tribunal is what is being appealed now, which simply mean Wike did not accept the tribunal judgement. as soon as appeal rules on the case, if the ruling does not favour Wike, he will leave the office even if he will still have the option of taking the case to supreme court.

I hope this is simple enough?