The French president, Francoise Hollande said he would table a bill in the coming week to extend France's state of emergency to three months to enable a safe environment for citizens. He called for changes to be made in the French constitution to allow French nationals be stripped of their citizenship if convicted of terror offenses.

In his address, he also pledged additional forces and resources to fight militancy and vowed to intensify air strikes against ISIS. He called the attacks an act of war and promised to destroy ISIS.

We have also discovered that the man brain behind the France bombing has been identified as Belgian Abdelhamid Abaaoud, they are yet to name a second key suspect. Stay tuned.
For more news click http://www.blackberrybabes.com/2015/11/france-to-extend-state-of-emergency.html#more

Perhaps the conspiracy theorists are wrong in their assertions of the terrorist attack on France. But one cannot deny the fact that their are lots of logical questions which demands answers.

I kept asking myself, what does ISIS stand to gain from attacking France who actually plays no major military role in the fight against ISIS in Syria, and who is by the way one of the most vocal critic of Russia's war efforts against ISIS and "moderate Islamist" in Syria?

One would think Russia which has been bombing ISIS non stop in Syria should be a much easier target for ISIS terrorists attack. Considering ISIS declaration of war on Russia and Russia's close proximity to syria and the large number of ISIS recruits from Russia. ISIS didnt deem Russia a worthy target, but France, why?

The media are saying some of the ISIS terrorist entered France as SYRIAN REFUGEES. And the world knows, europe and US are battling for solutions to the Syrian refugee crisis. It was announced today that 24 governors in the US have refused to take Syrian refugees. Theres an ongoing negotion btw Eu countries and Turkey. Syrian refugees would be returned to Turkey and Turkey would stop the flood of Syrian refugees and in return, Turkey would be compensated with $Billions and a " ticket" to become an EU member.

Last month the British parliament voted to cut back military spendings of British war mission against ISIS in Syria. That vote was said to be a humiliating defeat for David Cameron, US and war hawks. The world has barely started mourning the attack on on France, when the British Parliament swung into action by even doubling the military funding they voted against just last month.

I also kept asking myself this, which country or countries stand to benefit most from this tragedy and the military and political repercussions that is sure to follow? . Nato has promised stern military retribution in Syria. With many Nato planes on Syrian skies bombarding ISIS, what are the chances that there won't be direct confrontation withd Russian fighter jets who are in control of Syrian airspace?

How did ISIS came into existence in the first place, and who is financing them?
Why is Turkey, a Nato country bombing the Syrian Kurds who are fighting ISIS, rather than ISIS?
Why is turkey the major gateway of ISIS recruits into Syria?
why has Nato countries been paying lip service in their war against ISIS?
Why does Nato keeps training "moderate jihadist" in Jordan and Turkey, despite admitting that about 80% of this trained fighters end up joining ISIS?
The number of bombs Russia dropped on ISIS in their first 3 weeks of bombardment is more than what Nato countries dropped on ISIS in 1yr. Why? Why? Why?

Abeg, make sombodi helep me answer these questions. And may God bless the soul of all the innocent lives that were lost in France, Nigeria, Syria et al.

Nigerians in France should display their safty skills" Isis no be kid militants Ooohh