Comparing Longspan aluminium with Stone Coated Roofing

(1)Cost- Longspan aluminium are less expensive to stone coated.

(2)Beauty- Obviously stone coated looks more pleasing aesthetically but longspan also comes in varying colour shades which adds to its beauty.

(3)Weight- The weight of longspan is lighter as it is paint oven baked, while stone chips are coated on the stone coater tiles.

(4)Coverage- Longspan as the name suggests comes in longspan and is easily cover large areas of roof, therefore it reduces  number of wooden /carpentary materials needed to support the roof unlike the stone coated that needs a closer framework to install on.

(5) Maintenance- They are easier to maintain , repairing stone chips can be complicated.

(6)Leakages-These are rare and easily curtailed with longspan aluminium , you may run into problems  with stone chips if not properly installed or handled.

(7)Expertise-longspan aluminium can be done by most roofers in town , stone chips requires special technique, most often the company you bought the stone chips from will always advise they install.

(Time-longspan aluminium time of assembling and dismantling is very short compares to stone coated.

(9)Durability- They are both durable, but probability of leakages is higher with stone coated.

For further enlightenment and insight,
Call
08099990222 09093333901 for further advice.
Send drawings/sketches to cowrriefalls@yahoo.com for estimates