Let's get this started!

It was Darius

olafirstt:
It was Darius

if it was Darius then 6 statements are true, not 4

@ abumeinben
very simple... BRENDA did it, and all statements (4) that says otherwise are wrong

its brenda

Na my grand ma steal am,,iranu.

It was BRENDA!!!

Brenda did.

It was Dairus.

Since Darius claims that it wasn't Alfred and It wasn't Charles, then only Darius and Brenda are left to be suspected... then foolish Brenda shot herself in the leg by claiming that it wasn't Darius, which leaves me with no other option but to conclude that it was Brenda!!...

Brenda nah d thief, #further utterances from you will be used against u in the court of law #


Alfred: It wasn't Charles(True), it was Darius(False)
Brenda: It wasn't Darius (True), it was Alfred(false)
Charles: It wasn't Brenda(false), it was Darius(false)
Darius: It wasn't Alfred(True), it wasn't Charles(True)

True=4 and False=4

.

If 4 of the 8 statements are true, then it is 100% Brenda

Answer = Brenda - If "It wasn't Brenda" is taken to be a false statement, it means she did do it so every other statement that says someone else did it is false too, that's 4 altogether, leaving the remaining 4 to be true.

Fun stuff.

[Modified] Arrest Brenda at once!

Lemme confess, it was me, I sent Brenda to steal it and blame it on Alfred, I don't know why she exonorated Darius, who would ve taken the fall.. It's just cake though, not our National cake, so don't tell Buhari.

i will go for dariu, because he was mentioned twice.

i will go for darius, because he was mentioned twice.

Toyolad:
Since Darius claims that it wasn't Alfred and It wasn't Charles, then only Darius and Brenda are left to be suspected... then foolish Brenda shot herself in the leg by claiming that it wasn't Darius, which leaves me with no other option but to conclude that it was Brenda!!...

Brenda nah d thief, #further utterances from you will be used against u in the court of law #


Alfred: It wasn't Charles(True), it was Darius(False)
Brenda: It wasn't Darius (True), it was Alfred(false)
Charles: It wasn't Brenda(false), it was Darius(false)
Darius: It wasn't Alfred(True), it wasn't Charles(True)

True=4 and False=4

***forgive me, allow me troll a little***


will you shut d4ku up! lol.

darius did it.. i saw him... lol

on a serious note odas had someone dey suspected but darius had no suspect. he said it wasnt alfred nd it wasnt charles but he didnt say who it was which can imply dat he cant indict someone else for his deed abd neither can he indict himself. so therefore darius is my suspect.

cant we just send all of dem to d lab for test?

Toyolad:
Since Darius claims that it wasn't Alfred and It wasn't Charles, then only Darius and Brenda are left to be suspected... then foolish Brenda shot herself in the leg by claiming that it wasn't Darius, which leaves me with no other option but to conclude that it was Brenda!!...

Brenda nah d thief, #further utterances from you will be used against u in the court of law #


Alfred: It wasn't Charles(True), it was Darius(False)
Brenda: It wasn't Darius (True), it was Alfred(false)
Charles: It wasn't Brenda(false), it was Darius(false)
Darius: It wasn't Alfred(True), it wasn't Charles(True)

True=4 and False=4

Rightly deduced! Darius name appeared 3 times! Brenda went ahead to refute the claim saying it wasn't Darius! Meaning it could be either Darius or Brenda.

I think Brenda is the culprit!

abumeinben:
Let's get this started!

Alfred na badt thief..... c pple calculating math for inside logic. Hehehehe

If I just hear that its not Brenda! That girl is a barawo!

I prefer using naija police style in solving this riddle. Throw all of them inside cell with better treatment, both the 'I follow' and 'I no follow'. Dem go confess by force...

abumeinben:
Let's get this started!

OP where's my gift?

MRBrownJ:


if it was Darius then 6 statements are true, not 4

@ abumeinben
very simple... BRENDA did it, and all statements (4) that says otherwise are wrong

ericoyewo3742:

OP where's my gift?

Allwility:
It was Dairus.

Well well well....
So we're looking at Darius and Brenda ehn?

Oya Charles and Alfred you people can go...

abumeinben:







Well well well....
So we're looking at Darius and Brenda ehn?

Oya Charles and Alfred you people can go...

OP I mentioned you earlier the answer is Alfred

[color=#006600][/color]. Four of the Eighth statement are exactly true that it was DARIUS

crotonite:


***forgive me, allow me troll a little***


will you shut d4ku up! lol.

You shouldnt av asked for my forgiveness as I would av forgiven u...but now that you've asked for it..I don vex!!!!

EverestdeBliu:

On a closer look:
Charles was not accused,but was vindicated 2wice.
Darius was the only person accused 2wice.
...Darius is the pilferer.

I think it's not about the number of times they were accused..it's all about deductive reasoning.

Everybody pointing finger @ brenda. Leave dat poor geh alone, even Dasuki was nt accused like dis.

Who stole the meat from the cooking pot...

Brenda stole the meat from the cooking pot

Why's my name being mentioned... @Darius Please leave my name alone o

this shuldnt be in d education section..ts shuld be in confusion section...