If they had enough evidence, why not charge him to court instead of torturing him to confess what efcc already know.
I thought the procedure is;
1) Get evidence.
2) Invite or arrest as the case may be.
3) Question to conclude investigation.
4) Then charge to court for prosecution.
Now what we have is;
1) Think evidence.
2) Arrest or burgle.
3) Torture for evidence.
4) Charge to court.
5) Deny bail when the evidence could not be substantiated.
6) Repeatedly go back to step 3 until convicted.
And we say we operate a democratic governance.