Welcome, Guest: Register On Nairaland / LOGIN! / Trending / Recent / NewStats: 3,209,030 members, 8,004,653 topics. Date: Saturday, 16 November 2024 at 10:04 PM |
Nairaland Forum / Nairaland / General / Politics / Foreign Affairs / US Angry That China Does Not Want To Allow Unrestrained Access To The Internet (956 Views)
Rwanda Votes Yes To Allow Extra Terms For President Kagame To Rule Until 2034! / OBAMA REFUSES TO ALLOW YAZIDI AND ASSYRIAN CHRISTIANS FLEEING ISIS TO ENTER U.S. / The D.R Congo CNN Does Not Want You To See (pics) (2) (3) (4)
US Angry That China Does Not Want To Allow Unrestrained Access To The Internet by JustGood(m): 10:55am On Jun 25, 2009 |
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/8118055.stm US objects to China's net filter The US has called on China to scrap its plan to put net-filtering software on all its computers. It said that China's proposals would violate its free trade obligations, weaken computer security and raise serious censorship concerns. China has demanded that all computers come supplied with software called Green Dam from 1 July, which it says would filter out pornographic content. The proposals have been criticised even within China. The US's objections also came a day after it filed an unfair trade complaint to the World Trade Organization (WTO) over raw material exports. The latest comment raises the concern about a broader trade war between the US and China over everything from computer security to chicken poultry imports. 'Unjustified' "Mandating technically flawed Green Dam software and denying manufacturers and consumers freedom to select filtering software is an unnecessary and unjustified means to achieve that objective, and poses a serious barrier to trade," said US Trade Representative Ron Kirk. The US is now complaining that putting such pressure on manufacturers to pre-install or supply the software would violate China's WTO free trade obligations. "China is putting companies in an untenable position by requiring them, with virtually no public notice, to pre-install software that appears to have broad-based censorship implications and network security issues," said US Commerce Secretary Gary Locke. The Green Dam Youth Escort software was created to stop people looking at "offensive" content such as pornographic or violent websites, China has said. But China's Ministry of Industry and Information Technology later said that use of the software was not compulsory and that it was possible to uninstall the program. Tests carried out on Green Dam outside China also showed that it left PCs open to many different security risks, including being hijacked. Petitions calling for Green Dam to be scrapped have circulated widely within China, which has the world's largest net-using population. Meanwhile, it appeared that China had blocked users of Google in China from using the search engine. Users in Beijing and Shanghai said they could not access Google's main site, its Chinese-language version nor its mail services. "We have found that Google has spread a lot of pornographic content, which is a serious violation of Chinese laws and regulations," Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Qin Gang said. He urged the company to abide by local rules, but said he had no specific details on the outage. The disruption comes a week after China accused Google of deliberately linking to "pornographic and vulgar" content and ordered it to stop. Google said it was looking to why there was an outage. |
Re: US Angry That China Does Not Want To Allow Unrestrained Access To The Internet by JustGood(m): 10:58am On Jun 25, 2009 |
JustGood: |
Re: US Angry That China Does Not Want To Allow Unrestrained Access To The Internet by ElRazur: 11:04am On Jun 25, 2009 |
This is not about porn, this is about China wanting to control everything its citizens are doing. |
Re: US Angry That China Does Not Want To Allow Unrestrained Access To The Internet by JustGood(m): 11:10am On Jun 25, 2009 |
ElRazur: Tell me exactly what is wrong with that? The UK does exactly the same. |
Re: US Angry That China Does Not Want To Allow Unrestrained Access To The Internet by ElRazur: 12:10pm On Jun 25, 2009 |
It represses, gags and encrouch on freedom. Fundamental human freedom. The Uk have proper courts and laws where things can be challenged. When it comes to controlling citizens, comparing china with Uk is not a fair comparison. No? |
Re: US Angry That China Does Not Want To Allow Unrestrained Access To The Internet by JustGood(m): 12:44pm On Jun 25, 2009 |
ElRazur: And you and I are the appointed universal custodians of all knowledge who are able to determine good and bad? We also have the right to determine what is good for other nations? |
Re: US Angry That China Does Not Want To Allow Unrestrained Access To The Internet by ElRazur: 12:50pm On Jun 25, 2009 |
JustGood: Say what? You asked a question you got an answer. Can we stick to the points at hand instead of bringing in another "Biina style" of questioning "authority". Where have I determine what is good for other nations specifically? Gosh. |
Re: US Angry That China Does Not Want To Allow Unrestrained Access To The Internet by JustGood(m): 1:03pm On Jun 25, 2009 |
ElRazur: Perhaps you did not get my drift. The questions were meant to make you think about your statement. You have concluded that is is alright for the UK to do the same thing that you seem to want to condemn China for. So you need to ask yourself who determines the right way to do anything in this world? Why cant the Chinese government decide how it wants to rule its Nation? Why must the Chinese government do things exactly the same way that the UK and US governments are doing things? Does it not also amount to encroachment to try and tell the Chinese government the way to govern its country? |
Re: US Angry That China Does Not Want To Allow Unrestrained Access To The Internet by JJYOU: 1:10pm On Jun 25, 2009 |
JustGood:na who upset my brother today? you just dey fight every where. |
Re: US Angry That China Does Not Want To Allow Unrestrained Access To The Internet by JustGood(m): 1:12pm On Jun 25, 2009 |
JJYOU: I never vex bro. I just dont like Nigerian becoming apologists for anyone. |
Re: US Angry That China Does Not Want To Allow Unrestrained Access To The Internet by ElRazur: 1:18pm On Jun 25, 2009 |
JustGood: It is hard to think about a question that is not clear cut. Sorry, I dont have super powers. I never concluded it is alright for the UK to the same thing. Instead, I am agreeing that UK makes attempts to control her citizens too. However, unlike china, things can be readily challenged in the UK. For example, protesters have for years camped in front of the Government building here as a result of the court over-ruling the action to remove them. On contrast, the Tienanmen square memorial gathering is actively nipped and disrupted by China - even though this year's one was a peaceful one. The point is UK and China do control their citizens, however the level at which they do are totally different. The internet is a super highway, it should be free from government control in my opinion. |
Re: US Angry That China Does Not Want To Allow Unrestrained Access To The Internet by JustGood(m): 1:48pm On Jun 25, 2009 |
Ok. fine. . . I'm glad we are agreed that both the UK and China are in this business. If you want to talk about democracy and rights, that's another point. The same thing that China does, the UK does. The government in this country controls everything we do in a very structured and systematic way so the Chinese government is also trying to find ways to structure what the citizens do and hear. It is their prerogative to determine what is good for thei country. |
Re: US Angry That China Does Not Want To Allow Unrestrained Access To The Internet by ElRazur: 2:16pm On Jun 25, 2009 |
Not entirely true to say they do the SAME THING. Finally, I am referring you back to my orginal point which I made about china. Note that my comment was focused on what this debate was about - China ElRazur: A point which you initially disagree with, but then indirectly agree with later. |
Re: US Angry That China Does Not Want To Allow Unrestrained Access To The Internet by JustGood(m): 3:12pm On Jun 25, 2009 |
ElRazur: Actually, the thread is not about democracy in China but about America wanting to tell the Chinese government to accept its pornographic nation into her mainstream. In terms of controlling its citizens, anyone can say what they want but for you to expect the Chinese government to govern the way the UK government does is suspect. Are Chinese people the same as British people? Why would they be ruled the same way? Why dont we just tell America and UK to make laws for the rest of the world - they seem to be doing a lot of that now anyway. |
Re: US Angry That China Does Not Want To Allow Unrestrained Access To The Internet by ElRazur: 3:15pm On Jun 25, 2009 |
I think the actual focus is about how China actively control and have massive grip on the information highway. A breach in free trades agreements. Do people not make porn movies in china? Or you think there isn't already a pornographic or sex trade industry there? |
Re: US Angry That China Does Not Want To Allow Unrestrained Access To The Internet by JustGood(m): 4:20pm On Jun 25, 2009 |
ElRazur: They still have the right to decide what they allow into their country. Google has a right to sue over it, doesn't it? |
Re: US Angry That China Does Not Want To Allow Unrestrained Access To The Internet by JJYOU: 4:25pm On Jun 25, 2009 |
JustGood:ok if you say so. if u need some medications dont forget china town do all sorts ok. |
Re: US Angry That China Does Not Want To Allow Unrestrained Access To The Internet by Kobojunkie: 5:19pm On Jun 25, 2009 |
Since when did GOOGLE become US? China's Porn issue is with GOOGLE not with the US. |
Re: US Angry That China Does Not Want To Allow Unrestrained Access To The Internet by ElRazur: 5:23pm On Jun 25, 2009 |
JustGood: I think we may be moving round in circles. But to paraphrase, a nation can do what it wants with her citizen, however it should be expected that other nations may voice concern from time to time. Over this matter, I think it appears china is in breach of trade agreements. The question is which one matter more the trade agreements, or the need to control china's citizen. |
Re: US Angry That China Does Not Want To Allow Unrestrained Access To The Internet by scottN(m): 5:33pm On Jun 25, 2009 |
Any crime in controlling and monitoring ur territory? Everybody does it but via different means and modes; even the so called freedom advocates . Some freedom advocates even 1 2 control theirs and others as well. This is just another form of Information Technology War Technique. |
Re: US Angry That China Does Not Want To Allow Unrestrained Access To The Internet by biina: 5:33pm On Jun 25, 2009 |
ElRazur:'Biina style' of questioning 'authority' Shouldn't you be more concerned as to why you seem to be the primary victim of this. Is it possible that it is because you dabble into issues you are less grounded in? You made a declarative statement about an issue, and I asked that you substantiate your claims. You have subsequently failed to do, and have only confirmed my initial suspicion that your statement was from a position of ignorance of the issue in question. I would rather you not drag my handle into all the other quicksand you get yourself into. As to the topic, I feel the chinese government have a reason to police what comes in or out of their country, and its up to the populace to protest against the government, and not a foreign body to tell them what they should allow into their country. Free trade should not be taken to mean 'open trade', as no country allows the importation of contraband under the guise of free trade. |
Re: US Angry That China Does Not Want To Allow Unrestrained Access To The Internet by tpiah: 6:02pm On Jun 25, 2009 |
China probably has enough porn of its own. American porn will only make the Chinese lust after Americans and undermine the govt. That's not patriotic. |
Re: US Angry That China Does Not Want To Allow Unrestrained Access To The Internet by ElRazur: 6:05pm On Jun 25, 2009 |
Binna please give me a break. Or should it be who makes you an authority on what I should be concerned with or not? [Two can play that game] My concern is to how a few people seem to have such approach to a debate. I do not see myself as a victim. If in a debate you set out to "not see" what your other person is talking about, I guess you would not see it. Something you have successfully shown time and time. As far as the debate goes, you wanted evidence, it was produced. Only that you dismissed each and everyone of them on the pretext of being "incorrect" "irrelevant" etc. Then when struck in a corner, you moved the goal post with a parting note of "oh I didn't it is only in your figment of imagination" To come into a debate with such approach sucks. To claim ignorance and refusal to debate points that support my view sucks harder than a dyson to be honest. The whole thing is a joke. Please explain to me what here you see as a quick sand? I suppose associating your name with something that you obviously do is too much to bear. Never mind. . . It is only a debate and nothing more. @Topic. Sorry for the diversion. Point had to be made. |
Re: US Angry That China Does Not Want To Allow Unrestrained Access To The Internet by biina: 7:18pm On Jun 25, 2009 |
@Elrazur Quicksand is you grasping at the state of democracy in China, when the original issue was simply about China's right to control what comes into its borders (a right exercised by several other countries). From your first post you sought to broaden the issue by stating that ElRazur:and yet after several posts, you are yet to address the fundamental question of if China has the right to bar external porn on its network. Anyways, feel free to tell yourself anything that makes you sleep at night, but be rest assured that whenever you do make another unsubstantiated claim on an issue you know little to nothing about, if I am aware, I will not hesitate to take you up on it. It is nothing personal, and is not about if I agree with the position or not, but that people refrain from making unqualified statements with much prejudice and little information, stating them like if they were the gospel truth. |
Re: US Angry That China Does Not Want To Allow Unrestrained Access To The Internet by TayoD1(m): 7:29pm On Jun 25, 2009 |
tpiah:I just love the various perspectives people bring to debate here on nairaland. Now who can top this?!! |
Re: US Angry That China Does Not Want To Allow Unrestrained Access To The Internet by ElRazur: 7:48pm On Jun 25, 2009 |
biina: Here we go again. It must suck being you to be honest. You see it is easy to see that you have questionable views and approach to actually understanding my post since your recent head clash with me. You claim I haven't tackle the issue at hand. I mean, using your logic. . . Who makes you an authority on what is tackled and what aint? It is sometimes necessary to see the bigger picture here. This is world politics and sometimes, things may not be simple as you would like to think, or as one would like to approach. No one have said Chinese do not have the right to control or do what it wants over her borders/citizens. In fact, I have stated otherwise in my post so as to make things clearer, however I am guessing for the sake and purpose of trying to escape from the original reference I made as per your style, understanding and general short-sightedness is making you to completely ignore what ever it is I have painted. For crying out loud. I have stated exactly what my views are etc. In fact, contrary to your altered views on my first, I made clear from the onset that this issue is bigger than porn and not about porn like some would think. Yet you opt to nit pick and come out with insignificant issues with the bigger picture at hand. If you really feel this is about porn and porn alone. Then good for you. I am sticking with my point - This is not about porn, this is about China wanting to control everything its citizens are doing. . . . It represses, gags and encroach on freedom. Fundamental human freedom. " If people want to watch porn in the privates of their homes, why should some government throw filter at them? Jeez, some people are awesome. You need to look at the bigger picture, before focusing on the insignificant stuff next time. I suppose it makes you feel better then keep it up. PS This is politics and as such, people would have different view from you. People would have different ideas from you. You do not have to agree, etc. However trying to claim "oh you are ignorant" when in the grand schemes of all things it isn't so just sucks to be brutally honest and makes you come across as weak. |
Re: US Angry That China Does Not Want To Allow Unrestrained Access To The Internet by spikedcylinder: 7:49pm On Jun 25, 2009 |
If they can control the amount of children its citizens can birth, what is mere porn? |
Re: US Angry That China Does Not Want To Allow Unrestrained Access To The Internet by ElRazur: 6:18pm On Jun 30, 2009 |
Finally common sense have prevailed! Yay!! China have backed down at the last minute.
How people can defend china on this one is beyond me. http://technology.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/tech_and_web/article6611274.ece |
Re: US Angry That China Does Not Want To Allow Unrestrained Access To The Internet by Nobody: 10:25pm On Jul 04, 2009 |
JustGood: Yes this is true, they blocked Google for a whole day. I couldn't access Google until the next day. Up till date, YOUTUBE has been be blocked and some other websites. All this complains are just strategics, the Chinese government don't want their citizens to be exposed to the outside world which is quite sensitive because of some security reasons and human right activity. e.g. All the Chinese TV Stations don't broadcast any news about what is happening around the world in terms of politics. The Chinese government are so wicked and strict to their citizens. The Chinese do not dare to protest against the government, they will all be KILLED INSTANTLY on spot and nothing is going to happen. IMAGINE!!! A Chinese man will tell you: "OUR GOVERNMENT SAY" The Government is just like their GOD. |
(1) (Reply)
A Rocket Was About To Cause The Worst Terror Attack In Israel’s History, But / Why Do Politicians Celebrate Thanksgiving Services In Church After Elections? / After Trump Calls Obama Worst US President, Obama Rating Rises High After DNC
(Go Up)
Sections: politics (1) business autos (1) jobs (1) career education (1) romance computers phones travel sports fashion health religion celebs tv-movies music-radio literature webmasters programming techmarket Links: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) Nairaland - Copyright © 2005 - 2024 Oluwaseun Osewa. All rights reserved. See How To Advertise. 91 |