it is with deep remorse and a heavy heart, that i post this topic. but i feel it my obligation to do this. for i too, remained silent while a 1001 accusation we'r slandered against this man,
goodbye Mike,
this thread is for you,
NOw, this topic is dedicated to revealing the truth about the allegations, levied against micheal; also the truth of his skin condition,
please all contribute construtivly without bias, web links, video links and all will be welcome, hwvr ensure they r valid links
thanx,

read this please:
quote from 'allMichealjackson.com'
and be shocked at how low some people could stoop for some change,

'This is an old page I had set up educating vistors to the site as to why Michael was innocent of all accusations against him. Michael was later found innoncent of all charges.

I, like many totally beilieve Michael Jackson is innocent of all charges. I will use this page to illustrate examples of why myself and so many others beilieve him to be innocent.
What you need to know about the accusers The family have a history of extortion. In 1998 gavin and Star were caught shoplifting some clothes. Caught red handed the mother insisited the boys were planning to model the clothes for the store, even though there was no contract or evidence to support this.

Outside the store Janet Arvizo the boys mother became involved in a scuffle with 3 of the stores security officers. Rather than spend the money on prosecuting the store dropped the charges.

Soon after Janet filed a lawsuit against the department store for the equivilent of £1.6 million. She claimed she and the boys had been viciously beaten by the 3 store detectives one of whom was a woman.

During the litigation a psychiatrist was hired and found Janet to be "schizophrenic" an delusional.

2 years later Janet added a new sensational charge claiming the 2 male security guards had "sexually fondled her breasts and pelvic area for up to 7 minutes.

In subsequent depositions Janet, Gavin and Star also claimed they suffered broken bones in addition to there mothers sexual assualt. Although they were never treated at a hospital.

Ulimately rather than face the damaging publicity from a lawsuit the store reached a settlement for the equivilent of £73,000 days before the scheduled trial in 2001.

The abuse they claim committed by Michael Jackson did not start until after the airing of the documentry "Living with Michael Jackson" in which Michael Jackson innocently admitted he did sometimes allow children to sleep in his room. Around this time its possible that the mother Janet saw the opportunity and download files readily available on the internet from the Smoking Gun website detailing the abuse alleged by Jordy Chandler. She then read these statement allowed to her 2 sons thereby prpgramming them and soon they came up with there own stories. Janet then went to fond a lawyer, not any lawyer but Larry Feldman the same attorny who represented Jordy Chandler and who recieved £500,000 for the settlement of that case. Feldman arranged for the boy to be interviwed by Dr Stan Katz who treated also treated Jordy Chandler in 1993.

Now for those of you who dont know anything about the first case, that to had a huge argument in the favour of Michael Jackson in from which I highlight this comments from the author of the article It is, of course, impossible to prove a negative -- that is, prove that something didn't happen. But it is possible to take an in-depth look at the people who made the allegations against Jackson and thus gain insight into their character and motives. What emerges from such an examination, based on court documents, business records and scores of interviews, is a persuasive argument that Jackson molested no one and that he himself may have been the victim of a well-conceived plan to extract money from him.
In summary on page 8 she states:And what became of the massive investigation of Jackson? After millions of dollars were spent by prosecutors and police departments in two jurisdictions, and after two grand juries questioned close to 200 witnesses, including 30 children who knew Jackson, not a single corroborating witness could be found. (In June 1994, still determined to find even one corroborating witness, three prosecutors and two police detectives flew to Australia to again question Wade Robson, the boy who had acknowledged that he'd slept in the same bed with Jackson. Once again, the boy said that nothing bad had happened.) The sole allegations leveled against Jackson, then, remain those made by one youth, and only after the boy had been give a potent hypnotic drug, leaving him susceptible to the power of suggestion.
To read the full article :Was Michael Jackson Framed?



For those of you who cant blieve people, including the use of children, go to EXTREME lengths to make false allegations heard and beilieved, you must watch this. A documented real example of a man using a boy to great effect falsely accusing Michael Jackson. I think this is from 1995.
Download confession -

xanders:

read this please:
quote from 'allMichealjackson.com'
and be shocked at how low some people could stoop for some change,

'This is an old page I had set up educating vistors to the site as to why Michael was innocent of all accusations against him. Michael was later found innoncent of all charges.

I, like many totally beilieve Michael Jackson is innocent of all charges. I will use this page to illustrate examples of why myself and so many others beilieve him to be innocent.
What you need to know about the accusers The family have a history of extortion. In 1998 gavin and Star were caught shoplifting some clothes. Caught red handed the mother insisited the boys were planning to model the clothes for the store, even though there was no contract or evidence to support this.

Outside the store Janet Arvizo the boys mother became involved in a scuffle with 3 of the stores security officers. Rather than spend the money on prosecuting the store dropped the charges.

Soon after Janet filed a lawsuit against the department store for the equivilent of £1.6 million. She claimed she and the boys had been viciously beaten by the 3 store detectives one of whom was a woman.

During the litigation a psychiatrist was hired and found Janet to be "schizophrenic" an delusional.

2 years later Janet added a new sensational charge claiming the 2 male security guards had "sexually fondled her breasts and pelvic area for up to 7 minutes.

In subsequent depositions Janet, Gavin and Star also claimed they suffered broken bones in addition to there mothers sexual assualt. Although they were never treated at a hospital.

Ulimately rather than face the damaging publicity from a lawsuit the store reached a settlement for the equivilent of £73,000 days before the scheduled trial in 2001.

The abuse they claim committed by Michael Jackson did not start until after the airing of the documentry "Living with Michael Jackson" in which Michael Jackson innocently admitted he did sometimes allow children to sleep in his room. Around this time its possible that the mother Janet saw the opportunity and download files readily available on the internet from the Smoking Gun website detailing the abuse alleged by Jordy Chandler. She then read these statement allowed to her 2 sons thereby prpgramming them and soon they came up with there own stories. Janet then went to fond a lawyer, not any lawyer but Larry Feldman the same attorny who represented Jordy Chandler and who recieved £500,000 for the settlement of that case. Feldman arranged for the boy to be interviwed by Dr Stan Katz who treated also treated Jordy Chandler in 1993.

Now for those of you who dont know anything about the first case, that to had a huge argument in the favour of Michael Jackson in from which I highlight this comments from the author of the article It is, of course, impossible to prove a negative -- that is, prove that something didn't happen. But it is possible to take an in-depth look at the people who made the allegations against Jackson and thus gain insight into their character and motives. What emerges from such an examination, based on court documents, business records and scores of interviews, is a persuasive argument that Jackson molested no one and that he himself may have been the victim of a well-conceived plan to extract money from him.
In summary on page 8 she states:And what became of the massive investigation of Jackson? After millions of dollars were spent by prosecutors and police departments in two jurisdictions, and after two grand juries questioned close to 200 witnesses, including 30 children who knew Jackson, not a single corroborating witness could be found. (In June 1994, still determined to find even one corroborating witness, three prosecutors and two police detectives flew to Australia to again question Wade Robson, the boy who had acknowledged that he'd slept in the same bed with Jackson. Once again, the boy said that nothing bad had happened.) The sole allegations leveled against Jackson, then, remain those made by one youth, and only after the boy had been give a potent hypnotic drug, leaving him susceptible to the power of suggestion.
To read the full article :Was Michael Jackson Framed?



For those of you who cant blieve people, including the use of children, go to EXTREME lengths to make false allegations heard and beilieved, you must watch this. A documented real example of a man using a boy to great effect falsely accusing Michael Jackson. I think this is from 1995.
Download confession -

expect evil any where there is money