taurus25:

i have one question.....does any of those evidence provided make any sense to you?.......if they dont please point it out and tell your reasons why it makes no sense........thanks

Tellemall:




I never bothered reading them once I was told I wasn't educated. I simply am not bothered.

Our views are too different. If I'm expected to read all that, then I deserve some sort of politeness in return. Not autistic rambles and self proclaimed intelligence that is lacking.

You may read or watch them. I refuse to.

Thanks. Bye.

**Also, I shouldn't have commented on a thread meant to please atheists. I do not wish to be mentioned or stalked by irate female atheists who are looking for who to look down on.

taurus25:

okay now i understand.....bye tho

winner01:
Leaving the concept of an Eternal Being out of this for a minute (I know its hard for the human mind to grasp), I want you to realize something.

Whether you have the ability to probe the existence of your Creator depends solely on how your Creator created you. Somehow in your (created) mind, you think you possess the ability to root out the "source" of your Creator. Its amazing how you limit and liken a Creator to his creations.

Complexity connotes design, and that is all we have ever observed even in our planet. The only difference is, you agree with all other observed occurrences but give an exception to man and the universe.

You didn't create yourself and for that you need to recognize you limits, for if you didn't have any limits, this discussion of a Creators existence would have been settled a long time ago.

I should sound like the atheist Richard Dawkins and then say: "What matters is whether God's existence is probe-able".

Your limits is why you haven't successfully probed your existence. How on earth do you think you could probe your Creator's existence.

KingEbukasBlog:

The BOP game is for the mentally indolent ... your responses agree with me .
End of Story !

johnydon22:


Must be a Christian or muslim mod to have wiped out all my recent posts

sukkot should take note cus he might be next to chop ban for bolded texts

naijapips02:


Ebuka, you have no argument. Really.

KingEbukasBlog:
2. Man emulates nature but fails to admit nature was indeed designed .

1. RoboScorpion vs Scorpion

2. Robodog vs Dog

3. Artificial neuron vs human neuron

4. Man's arm vs Robot's arm

The former is described as intelligently designed but not the latter Do you see why atheism is irrational and the atheists need to understand the Logic of God and EVERYTHING ?

Tellemall:




I never bothered reading them once I was told I wasn't educated. I never was interested in the argument but it was drawn out.

Our views are too different. If I'm expected to read all that, then I deserve some sort of politeness in return. Not autistic rambles and self proclaimed intelligence that is lacking.

You may read or watch them. I refuse to.

Thanks. Bye.

**Also, I shouldn't have commented on a thread meant to please atheists. I do not wish to be mentioned or stalked by irate female atheists who are looking for who to look down on.

Everyone should believe what they want to. But if you don't want to hear about religion, especially Christianity, since atheists forget there are other religions, then don't try and ram atheism down everybody else's throat with some science to wash it down.

KingEbukasBlog:


Cloudgoddess is an irate bigot . Even though I mock the atheists and ridicule them , we still joke anytime and talk about other stuff like football . I wonder why she is taking everything personal . Her puerile insults and self acclaimed intelligence - which is conspicuously lacking - show she is immature , maybe a teen . Who knows

KingEbukasBlog:


I have no argument ? Whho is this one ? Respond profoundly to this :



Why does man emulate nature , describes the emulation as intelligently designed but not what is being emulated ?

*** Like I told you on the other thread , if you wont give me cogent reasons , dont bother replying

naijapips02:


what item in nature is my infinix joypad modelled after?

KingEbukasBlog:
The banana - a sure evidence of design

Like I told JackBizzle , man was presciently designed to dexterously invent , innovate - Phones , laptops , security systems , cars , houses , games , video games etc . Works of his hand and design of his body - look around and be rest assured there is an eternal creator .

## The Logic of God and EVERYTHING

Kay17:
What worries me about this lovely thread is the disorganized ramble going on.
So I will act as an umpire.

cloudgoddess:
What was the point of this thread exactly? Why are you bashing atheists for not giving you the science education you should already have, and that is very difficult to present thoroughly with just a few online exchanges. Yet when we ATTEMPT to give at least a small, easily digestible amount of 100% verified information that all children in developed countries are already learning in their science classes. And what do you do with the information? You ignore it and call it a scam. WITHOUT EVEN ONE ATTEMPT TO UNDERSTAND. Where can any of us go from there? What are we supposed to do for you at that point?

It is clear that any argument here is pointless. These people have shown they are not willing to be reasonable, no amount of evidence can sway them. Instead they will do whatever they can to deflect any evidence provided, and then turn the argument into personal attacks and pretend victimization. All the while still providing no valid evidence for their side, yet pretending they are still somehow correct. (And by the way, even if all the science I posted was completely unsupported bullsh*t, the "God" or specifically the God of Abraham would still not be proven. That claim would still require legitimate evidence of its own merit, for which, no surprise, has not been presented. All I've seen so far are arguments from ignorance. "I don't know how it works so therefore GOD. And specifically my God, not Krishna or any of the thousands of others, for more reasons I haven't proven." )

Arguing with an ignorant person who is determined to stay that way is like attempting to play chess with a pigeon. Play all your pieces right and they will get on top of the board, knock all the pieces off, then strut around proudly as if they won.

Tellemall:


So I'm not the only one who noticed.

She looks down too much, and so she's bound to hit her head.

Age doesn't equate stup.idity. As a teen she needs to check herselfherself because education isn't intelligence and even the people that she thinks are less than she is actually have higher IQs than she does. I keep emphasizing that because education cannot be brightness. There's a difference between a science student spouting science and a science student trying to spout art and design.

My experience with the shallow bigot is that she's got a lot of baggage. And lacks intelligence. And will come crying in here very soon. And will try to waste your time on her.

timonski:
@op. May God bless you for this analogy.
But I have been thinking... What if the banana was created for anal penetration. I mean the inward curvature gives it a strong grip on the anus giving more pleasure than would a penis. The smooth skin makes it easy to penetrate without causing any discomfort whatever. Also, the banana while green has a 'handle' making it possible to pullout in a situation were the banana slides all the way through.
Surely, Yahweh in His infinite wisdom designed the BANANA........................For Anal Sex.

johnydon22:


The mods happened ooo

naijapips02:


Bro, the theists are not happy with you at all. I'm Sure your posts are being reported in droves each minute. To them you are the anti-christ.

Seun needs to do something should this. Seun when has bold writings and italics become a crime on here?

fearlesschicken:


Hian! They chop craze ni?! seems so weird reading your post without bold and italic fonts....

maybe you can change font style?

oh well....I pray I get used to it

KingEbukasBlog:


This is quite naive coming from you . There are theistic evolutionists because they felt the creation story is allegorical and God did it through evolution . They had to succumb to the pressure of being delineated as "backward" - embracing a modern scientific theory .

I'm an old-earth creationist because there is no evidence for evolution - God did not do it through evolution .

KingEbukasBlog:


Ok .. Ive heard you ... so where is your evidence that the universe needs no creator ?

KingEbukasBlog:


Ugghh ... so how did strings derive that propensity to give rise to atoms and chaotic reactions thereafter ?

Its like you lack the understanding of the words "derive " and "propensity" .

Are you being disingenuous - in this case , a circumlocutory way of answering my questions

johnydon22:


Like i said it all falls down again to your comprehensive ability or am i just seeing case of willful cognitive dissonance ?

If after explaining the most fundamental part of nature (strings) you still couldn't grab how nature entertained reactions then sorry i cannot help you, only you can help yourself by reading it over and over again...

Sorry to say if you are looking for anywhere "god" is invoked then you'd be disappointed forever, this is science not fairy tales.

There are thousands of gods humanity has conceived, any of them may well exist but none is needed to explain the cosmos.

Nature is the totality of all, the oneness of the bits..

import java.io.*;
import javax.servlet.*;
import javax.servlet.http.*;
import java.sql.*;

johnydon22:


Hahahahahahaha first they understand the creation myth to be allegorical, well that's a very clear picture because if you are ever looking for answers regarding nature and go to religious books, you've got the wrong answer.

-there can never be day/night before the sun

-there can never be vegetation before the sun

-and the Bleep man is not earth's sand/dust cus if so man would have been predominantly made of silica.


-There was never a time any animal let alone a snake could talk (Only in folklores even Igbo Folklores carry such tales too)

They bowed to pressure? Noo i think rather they knew that every ancient myth regarding nature is just the ancient way of explaining the little about the cosmos they know of.

We have a thousand and one other creation myths from other cultures, nothing makes the one you believe special.

they are all naive but noble poetry... Enuma Elis is far more impressive..

You have always said Biology in fact natural sciences is never a strong point of yours.

I'm not gonna stretch it..

johnydon22:


Chai are you still playing this burden of proof reversal fallacy? Oh meeeeeehn

I bet you have proof that i do not have a pink flying diamond horse tied to my bed now..

The Onus is on the claimant to prove his claim not place that on the person who doubt it ... Chai

KingEbukasBlog:


Ok ... so where is your evidence that the universe needs no creator ?

winner01 ... this is like 6th page and this young man still haven't provided proof the universe needs no creator . I'm relishing the ludicrousness of your responses , johnydon22

winner01:
I see how hes been all over the place without any reasonable answer. Ive not been chanced to refute his unintelligent submissions even if they are worth refuting.
I should have some time to myself this evening.
How are things bro.

naijapips02:


Bro, the theists are not happy with you at all. I'm Sure your posts are being reported in droves each minute. To them you are the anti-christ.

Seun needs to do something should this. Seun when has bold writings and italics become a crime on here?